It would be useful if state violence extended to killing gun freaks
rumtytum @rumtytum
Tweeted on June 4, 2022
This is what they think of you. They want you dead.
And, of course, they want someone else to do their dirty work for them. They want the state to kill the people they don’t like. Also, note that it is an entire class of people they want dead. Considering people as individuals on a case-by-case basis would take too long.
Communism is a crime against humanity.
We’re going to have to stop treating health care access, affordable housing, and taxing the rich as mere theory or political talking points and start rolling out plans district by district, state by state, until they become federal policy. We’re going to have to confront our elitist tendencies and recognize the intrinsic value of all professions and the rich experiences of those without formal degrees. And we’re going to have to show what we’re made of as the strong, reliable, and authentic leaders voters crave.
I believe we can still rebuild trust with Americans. I believe we can still reinforce our commitment to representing the needs and values of all citizens. We just have to get out of our emotional, hypersensitive, politically correct way and focus on the labor of changing our public image. Unless we’re too afraid, too good, or just too damn late.
Tera Johnson-Swartz
November 12, 2024
Democrats Need To Drop the Elitism if We Want To Win Again | Opinion – Newsweek
What I find most interesting is she has a clue but still doesn’t get the big picture. She understands they have been condescending and out of touch with people in the “fly over” states. But she thinks the products they have to sell are still the right products. They just need be better salespeople. It apparently is beyond her comprehension that people exist who just want to be left alone. Less government is not an item in her sales catalog.
Related:
The people voting different from the “coastal elites” are a nothing but a problem. It is not possible they have some valid points.
There were two attempts on Trump with a Secret Service detail protecting him. Individual are going to be much easier targets.
Prepare and respond appropriately.
We can line all those guys up and shoot ’em. And they clearly don’t understand the way the world works.
Phillip Lowcock
October 9, 2024
Via a post on X from Chuck Petras @Chuck_Petras.
Violence. It is their language. It is what they think they can do. It is what they do.
See also:
I find it “interesting” that in the video he clearly says, “… we can…”. But in the msn.com, Newsweek, cjonline.com, and ksnt.com articles they “quote” him as saying, “…we could…”. Other articles don’t provide any quotes at all. They just say “Lowcock made some remarks about some men.”
What bias in the mainstream media?
Perhaps you really can’t hate the media enough.
I completely disagree with the premise of the question.
The question that you’re are asking; it is also incredibly dangerous in the way that you are asking it, because American people are watching.
Karine Jean-Pierre
White House Press Secretary
September 18, 2024
Jean-Pierre scorched for ‘utterly heinous response’ defending Biden-Harris rhetoric calling Trump a ‘threat’ | Fox News
The question, you ask?
It’s been, only two days since someone, allegedly, tried to kill Donald Trump again. And you are here at the podium in the White House Briefing Room, calling him a threat. How many more assignation attempts on Donald Trump until the president, and the vice president, and you pick a different word, to describe Trump, other than threat?
If you question their violence inspiring rhetoric, they declare your speech is dangerous. Then, if you listen to the rest of her response, she doubles down on Trump being a threat.
This is what they think of you.
Doesn’t that tell you everything you need to know about their attitude toward the First Amendment?
Prepare appropriately.
It is hardly far-fetched to argue that America’s toxic cult of individualism might on some occasions lead folks to believe that the only way to accomplish anything is by taking matters – and guns – into their own hands.
Following Trump’s own brush with death, one wonders whether he’ll think back on his advice to Iowa residents devastated by a January school shooting: “Get over it”.
As they say, you reap what you sow. And if there is one thing the US needs to get over, it is the “right to bear arms”.
Belén Fernández
July 15, 2024
Is America’s gun fixation backfiring on its pushers? (msn.com)
This is what they think of you as an individualist gun owner.
Don’t ever let anyone get away with telling you that no one wants to take your guns.
If individualism is a “toxic cult” you have to wonder what socialism and communism are. I’ve always thought of them as death cult. But with this new calibration of individualism as a “toxic cult” I’m thinking socialism and communism must be something like an existential threat to the solar system.
Holy shit lol the entire Micropenis Rapid Response Force came out to reply to you here
‘Cope! Seethe! 3 inches is big enough!!’
Of the 20 replies you got, there’s gotta be a total of 80 domestic violence charges & *zero* satisfied women between them all
Spaghetti Policy? @alt_DoooooM
Posted on Twitter March 4, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
I have to give him a bonus point for the phrase “Micropenis Rapid Response Force”. I have not heard that one before.
And he gets another bonus point for the prejudice of expecting gun owners to be perpetrators of domestic violence.
Via a tweet from In Chains @InChainsInJail.
I’m sorry you feel you need an AR-15 to compensate for your tiny tadger. That’s rough.
Christina Zheng @Christilynw
Posted on X, May 30, 2024
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
I was referred to this by In Chains @InChainsInJail. Zheng then told me not to procreate. I suspect what she really meant was that she wants me dead, but even if she was just passing judgement on my fitness for parenthood, that she thinks she should be able to make a decision like that for others is very telling. Anti-gun people are tyrants with, at most, a thin veneer of respectability.
It’s not fear, it’s cock swinging when you don’t have the junk to swing.
SloneK. @king_sandirella
Posted on X on Jjune 21, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
They must have an exceptionally small imagination and narrow mind to believe those are the only two options to own and carry a gun. Especially, since one of the people in the picture is a woman.
Yep, this
pretty much says it all!
AcornKtn @AcornKtn
Posted on X May 29, 2024
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
How boring, when they have no argument they resort to the classic insult.
Economic Marxism wants to destroy your property.
Cultural Marxism wants to destroy your civilisation.
Environmental Marxism wants to destroy your species.
Progress!
Alice Smith (@TheAliceSmith)
Posted on X April 6, 2024
Alice Smith claims to be the great-great-great-granddaughter of Adam Smith.
It would be trivial to get multiple quotes of high quality each and every day from her X feed.
From: ron <ron@svnpy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2024 5:03 AM
To: joe
Subject: You are still a redneck Idaho farm boyI hope you have not reproduced. The USA already has plenty of stupid and ignorant people like you.
When you shoot yourself, please take out all your family members first–this would raise the average IQ in Trumpland.
—
M. Ronald G. KIRCHEM8 rue Campagne Première
Bâtiment C (Staël)
Apt. 343 (4ème étage)
75014 Paris, Île-de-France
La République françaiseKIRCHEM: +33 (0)7 72 42 44 34
I suspect the email address has been compromised (the content is for a doctor in California). The name is likely fake or deliberate misdirection.
One of the most fascinating and telling things about people like this is they believe they can read the minds of others. You can search this blog all you want but you won’t find any support for Trump.* Yet this guy believes I am a Trump supporter. The belief that you can read other people’s minds is a strong sign of mental health issues.
Also interesting is how they claim to believe they know my IQ and that of my family members and are confident it is below average in “Trumpland”. My three children and I have IQs that range from 125 to 155. The three grandchildren also appear to be in the same range. Mr. KIRCHEM’s estimation of the IQ of people in “Trumpland” is much higher I would have guessed.
I could make other observations but all you really need to know is that they want me and my children, and probably you and yours, dead.
Prepare appropriately.
* I did make predictions about his actions which I approved of. Months before she died, I predicted he would successfully replace Ginsberg on the Supreme Court with a pro-constitutional judge.
Bullshit. It’s better trigger discipline if he leaves his penile substitute at home rather than walk down the street toward a bus stop, fondling it as he goes along.
Youngkin and Miyares Must Go (@CarlieWeddingt1)
Posted on May 19, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
ASSAULT WEAPONS ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR SELF DEFENSE AND ARE NOT WELL-SUITED FOR HUNTING, SPORTING, OR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN MASS KILLING.
Hernandez and Epps, Garcia, Amabile, Bacon, Brown, deGruy Kennedy, English, Joseph, Lindsay, Mabrey, Ortiz, Rutinel, Velasco, Willford, Woodrow
Colorado House of Representatives
HOUSE BILL 24-1292
Considering that most of my rifles, all my shotguns, and two of my .22 caliber pistols* are considered “assault weapons” and that I have fired 10s of thousands of rounds in practice and competition with them without once being involved in a mass killing I can say with great certainty that they are deliberately lying.
This is pure evil. I look forward to their trials.
* Oddly enough my Limited Division USPSA pistol, a STI DVC chambered in .40 S&W, with 18 rounds magazines does not appear to be considered an assault weapon.
You want to talk about a single person to avoid the reality that no one has taken away your 2nd amendment rights. No one has taken away your guns. No one is trying to take away your guns. You’re just a big baby gun whacko with a small dick.
Secret Lair Arcade (@LairArcade)
Posted on X, May 19, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
I don’t know what color the sky is in their universe but we can be certain our political reality does not match their delusions and/or lies of the political landscape.
Check out No one wants to take your guns for a quick and easy refutation of their primary assertion.
This is what they think of you:
His X posts are protected. His IMDb profile is not
Prepare appropriately.
This is not a general income tax. From my perspective, it’s more of a sin tax.
Gavin Newsom
Governor of California
December 29, 2023
Newsom signs ‘sin tax’ on guns and ammo
Constitutionally protected rights are sins? Wow! That tells you all you need to know about him.
It would amuse me a great deal if this ends up being used as evidence at his trial.
If Americans where brave enough they could give up all their guns and use their bodies as weapons, they could learn martial arts, self defense, knives attacks and even fight with swords to “defend” themselves but they are too fat and lazy to do something brave. A bunch of fearful cowards. If you rely in a gun to be “secure” you have a big, big problem and try to use a stupid logic to justify guns is not going to solve it.
idly-raven17
January 19, 2021
Gun Control NOW
As I read things like this I wonder if when they get the words out and then read their own delusions, do they realize it is crazy talk and publish it anyway? Or do they actually think it is something profound and is enlightenment for the dimwitted masses?
Another hypothesis I have about this sort of thing, and it is particularly obvious here, is the phrase “stupid logic”. This could be interpreted at least two different ways. One is that they believe gun rights advocates use faulty logic. And the other is that logic as a means of determining proper courses of action is stupid. There are many people who abhor reason. I suspect the great mass of gun control advocates are of this opinion and idly-raven17 is one of those.
All criminals start off as non-criminals. But if they do break the law in respect to gun use they THEN become criminals. So even non-criminals can be a problem. You should know this!
Paige Kristinson (@SquirlyGirll)
Tweeted on December 11, 2022
This is what they think of you. You are a pre-criminal and “can be a problem”.
The real problem is people like her who have no respect for civil rights. Perhaps she should consider the consequence of people like her being treated as civil rights infringers before they have actually infringed upon the civil rights of others.
There’s no noncriminal use for civilians, really, in the way they’re promoting them. If you ask somebody to make a list of ‘missions’ that could be carried out with an AR-15 – by a civilian – you could give them till the end of time, and then they wouldn’t be able to think of something that would be lawful.
Josh Koskoff
November 11, 2023
Mass Murder Is a Choice. The Gun Industry Made It
This is what they think of you. If you own an AR-15 you own have criminal uses for it.
I find it very telling that no one from the gun industry or gun consumer was quoted in this article.
These people have nothing but their delusions to draw upon to generate their propaganda in their war upon the specific enumerate right to keep and bear arms.
As for the private citizen AR-15 “missions”, here are a few:
All are lawful and it took me considerable less than “the end of time” to enumerate those.
These people are liars with an evil goal. The violation of a constitutional protected right creating a disarmed society susceptible to genocide.
Prepare and respond appropriately.
