Another Progressive with a Clue?

Quote of the Day

Progressive-led cities like Seattle, Smith argues, are killing Democrats’ brand with fringe rhetoric and well-publicized failures on crime, drugs and homelessness.

And yet, Smith says, he’s seen “a fierce resistance on the left side of the political spectrum to even consider the possibility that they should adjust some of their approaches.”

Smith’s crusade — which has upset some local elected officials and activists — is attracting national attention as Democrats debate why they lost and their best route out of the political wilderness.

After Trump defeated Kamala Harris in November, Smith told The Wall Street Journal “the extreme left is leading us into a ditch.”

In a recent New Yorker profile, Smith blamed his party’s woes on the “new left,” whose policies “have utterly and completely failed.” He singled out King County for funding programs with a leftist bent, including one that describes its work as fighting “cis-hetero patriarchy” and a move toward “getting rid of the criminal justice system.”

Jim Brunner and Daniel Beekman
March 19, 2025
Rep. Smith’s crusade against Democrats’ left wing gets attention, flak | The Seattle Times

Smith is my representative in the U.S. House. It appears he has a clue on at least a few topics. However, I don’t expect him to make a meaningful difference in their political direction. I’m seeing him and his colleagues in a future “ditch” of their own making. They just can’t help themselves.

Daily Ice Baths

Quote of the Day

Rutgers Health researchers have made discoveries about brown fat that could pave the way for helping people stay physically fit as they age.

A team from Rutgers New Jersey Medical School found that mice lacking a specific gene developed an unusually potent form of brown fat tissue, which extended lifespan and increased exercise capacity by approximately 30%. The team is now working on a drug that could replicate these effects in humans.

In the meantime, techniques such as deliberate cold exposure can increase brown fat naturally. Studies have found such efforts to produce short-term benefits that range from enhanced immune system function to improved metabolic health, but Vatner said none of the studies have run long enough to find any effect on healthful aging.

He added that most people would prefer to increase brown fat levels by taking pills rather than ice baths and is optimistic about translating the newest finding into an effective medication.

Rutgers University
March 17, 2025
Exercise in a Pill? Brown Fat Discovery May Extend Lifespan and Boost Fitness

Hmmm… I don’t think taxpayers should be subsidizing healthcare. But there doesn’t seem to be a good way out of it at this point. But this gives me an idea.

In order to receive taxpayer subsidized healthcare, I think people should engage in a healthy lifestyle. This would help to minimize their burden on taxpayers. No recreation drugs (this includes tobacco and alcohol). Healthy foods. At least moderate exercise. Wearing seat belts when traveling. Fire extinguishers in your home. Maintaining a healthy weight. No high-risk recreational activities. Etc., etc.

And now, there is another item we can add to the list of requirements!

One of the qualifications for subsidizes should be wearing no more clothes than that needed to prevent frostbite. Of course, this would require repealing all laws against public nudity. I don’t have a problem with that.

The alternative would be verification of their daily ice baths. I don’t have a problem with that either.

Too Timid to Play with Kindergartners

Quote of the Day

U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) and Tim Sheehy (R-MT) introduced the Protecting Americans’ Right to Silence (PARTS) Act to cut government red tape and ensure gun owners and businesses are not unfairly targeted by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). The bill modernizes outdated federal regulations on firearm suppressors, providing much-needed clarity to manufacturers, retailers, and law-abiding gun owners.

he PARTS Act would clarify that a silencer refers to a complete device or a single principal component, rather than an assortment of parts that could be used in its construction.

Additionally, the bill would streamline the purchase of consumable silencer parts, such as wipes, without requiring additional ATF paperwork, ensuring gun owners can properly maintain their lawfully owned suppressors.

Bill Cassidy
U.S. Senator for Louisiana
Cassidy, Sheehy Introduce Bill to Protect Gun Owners from ATF Overreach | U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy

What the hell!!!

The courts could throw out the entire NFA by the beginning of Vance’s first term. And the elimination of the ATF seems to be a minor stretch goal shortly after that. I’m planning on my grandchildren having the option of participating in high school machine gun competitions.

And this guy is so timid that he wants to just clarify that silencer wipes don’t require any paperwork? Are there any modern-day suppressors that even use wipes?

Cassidy needs to get in touch with reality. As it is he is too timid to play in a kindergartner T-Ball league.

An Interesting Twist

Quote of the Day

Lets suppose for a minute that suppressors become available through vending machines and at WalMart. No tax stamp, just cash or credit card.

I can see municipalities across the country adding regulations requiring suppressors at outdoor public ranges where housing developments have popped up in the recent past.

How would you like to see a potential multiverse wherein suppressors go from prohibited to required? Is that not just as oppressive a dictate from government? Would we not have the NRA and FPC running campaigns against mandatory suppressor use? “It adds an unreasonable financial burden on our 2nd Amendment right to require suppressors…”

Or maybe this is how we pitch it to Liberals. “You know… I have this way to make all guns more expensive, and the RKBA crowd will simply love it! As a matter of fact, they’re proposing it now. Hear me out…

Mike Hines
Via email on March 14, 2025

I laughed out loud.

It would be an interesting change of perspective to be in court fights insisting requirements to possess are unconstitutional. We could always offer the compromise of government subsidies. Of course, such subsides must be funded by taxes on those who registered as being gun free. And those registries would, of course, be public records available to everyone.

Satire?

Quote of the Day

And don’t forget these weapons of mass murder help people with small penises feel like men

Woke Mind Virus (@mousepoop)
Posted on X, August 21, 2023

It is possible this is a satire account. I am just not quite sure. Still… it matches the pattern. Therefore, it’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday; it is another science denier (see also here)!

Improving the Speech of Mice

Quote of the Day

In a quest to understand complex speech, scientists inserted what’s been dubbed a human “language gene” into mice. Remarkably, the genetic tweak had a profound impact on the little rodents’ ability to squeak, revealing astonishing clues about the evolution of vocal communication.

Mouse pups that had the human version of the language gene showed different vocalization patterns from their buddies with the usual version mice have. When calling for their mother, their squeaks were higher pitched and featured a different selection of sounds than usual.

Tom Hale
May 13, 2025
Scientists Put A Human “Language Gene” Into Mice And Curious Things Unfolded

While I find this interesting and quite remarkable, I also find it a little creepy. It’s not that I worry about mice talking to me as I am setting trap for them or anything. I’m not even sure why it bothers me. But it does.

What if they put this gene in chimps and/or other apes?

Thoughts?

A Rule with Broad Application

Quote of the Day

Most scientists are button counting bottle washers.

Almost all science reporting is complete dreck. If journalists could understand science, they probably wouldn’t be journalists.

McChuck
March 14, 2025
Comment to More Data Supporting Our Universe is a Black Hole

This quote is great for several reasons. The first paragraph originates from a character in the Robert Heinlein book, Time Enough for Love: The Lives of Lazarus Long.

Most “scientists” are bottle washers and button sorters.

Related:

H. L. Mencken’s Law:
Those who can — do.
Those who can’t — teach.

Martin’s Extension:
Those who cannot teach — administrate.

Also:

It doesn’t take much effort to realize the application of the second paragraph has extremely broad application. Substitute almost any profession for “science” and observe how well it works.

I did this substitution as I worked downward through the list occupations. I found it worked quite well for nearly everything down to and including “whoring”, “financial fraud”, and “serial killing”.

The Party of Hate

Quote of the Day

For today’s Democrats, nothing matters more than hating Trump. That, my friends, is a crucial point in all of this. Hatred of Trump has become their go-to position on just about everything; it is what energizes them, motivates them and dictates what they say and do.

Instead of coming up with fresh ideas to show why they’re a reasonable, more rational alternative to Trump, what they’re doing is showing anyone paying attention why he won.

Democrats think Trump is the enemy. But the truth is, they are their own worst enemy.

Bernard Goldberg
March 12, 2025
Opinion: Democrats’ hatred of Trump makes them their own worst enemies

My view of the Democrat party is that they define themselves by what they hate. It may have started earlier, but at least since the U.S. Civil war they hated Republicans because they were going to take their slaves away. Then they hated people with dark colored skin because, “Those uppity blacks think they are just as good as white folk.” Then LBJ convinced the party the votes of the blacks be bought*.

As Democrats warmed up to and passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Senator Dodd (D) introduced the precursors to the Gun Control Act of 1968. These were Senate Bill 1975 in 1963, “A Bill to Regulate the Interstate Shipment of Firearms”, and Senate Bill 1592 in 1965, “A Bill to Amend the Federal Firearms Act of 1938”.

Democrats, in general, have hated gun owners ever since they started pretending to be defenders of blacks.

I would like to believe that they have a limited amount of hate. If this were true, then as their hatred for Trump, Musk, and MAGAs increased the hatred of gun owners would decrease. But as the legislative record shows, the hatred has spread and increased in intensity rather than focused.

As I have said before, “Gun owners are the ni**ers of the 21st Century” and “the anti-gun bigots are the KKK of the 21st Century.” See also Bigotry is alive and well. And Quote of the day—Dinesh D’Souza.

Perhaps, all this hatred has finally caught up to them.


*

Emotion Driven Theatrics

Quote of the Day

Giffords’ pivot to actual theater matches their overall approach of using theatrics to push gun control laws that do little to hold criminals accountable for their crimes and instead only penalize law-abiding Americans seeking to exercise their rights to keep and bear arms and the lawful and highly-regulated industry that provides for the exercise of that Constitutional right.

It all makes more sense now.

The Giffords gun control group’s call from theater pitches is just that – theatrics. It won’t lead to safer neighborhoods. It won’t lead to more violent criminals being locked up for committing acts of violence. It won’t protect families, homes or businesses from those choosing to ignore existing laws and instead harm innocent lives.

The theme is similar to Everytown for Gun Safety’s recently launched high dollar ad campaign, which mocks the hard-working and law-abiding Americans who comprise the firearm industry. Everytown, of course personally funded by billionaire gun control stalwart Michael Bloomberg, spared no expense to create a glitzy caricature of the firearm industry, repeating tired and inaccurate tropes about who is buying firearms today and who safeguards the Second Amendment right to do so.

Needless to say, these ad campaigns and the theatre pitches haven’t yet and won’t put any meaningful dent in the occurrence of violent firearm crime or the criminals who commit heinous crimes.

Larry Keane
March 7, 2025
While Gun Control Plays Theatrics, Firearm Industry Pursues Real Solutions for Safer Communities • NSSF

Via JPFO.

The anti-gun side has emotion driven theatrics. We have data, philosophy, and SCOTUS.

The Rats are Leaving the Ship

Quote of the Day

ActBlue, the primary online fundraising platform for Democratic candidates, is experiencing significant internal upheaval as at least seven senior officials resigned late last month.

The departures coincide with an ongoing investigation by congressional Republicans, raising concerns about the organization’s future and its ability to continue as the party’s dominant fundraising tool.

Anthony Gonzalez
March 8, 2025
Democrat Fundraising Group ActBlue Faces Internal Chaos

This could be interesting.

I hope they enjoy their trials.

Abolish Firearms Background Checks

Quote of the Day

The idea of undergoing and passing background checks as a prerequisite to exercising the Second Amendment should have never been a thought even in the darkest corners of the most communist minds of the most radical left-wing ideologues, not only because it violates the rights of American citizens but also because it puts undeserving Americans in legal jeopardy and in physical danger.

According to the Government Accountability Office, in 2017, the NICS background check system denied 112,090 people the right to purchase a firearm. Of those 112,090 denials, only 12,710 were investigated. We have to ask ourselves: If over 112,000 people were denied but only 12,710 investigations took place, wouldn’t that be clear evidence that the system is failing and falsely denying good people their right to keep and bear arms?

It gets worse.

That same year, and from that group of 112,090 denials, there were only 12 prosecutions for the crime of attempting to purchase a firearm. Now the anti-gun crowd says, “See, we stopped 12 mass shootings!”

There are problems with that argument.

Dan Wos
March 6, 2025
Should firearms background check system be abolished? | Buckeye Firearms Association

I agree background checks should be abolished. But from a political capital perspective this should be prioritized near the elimination of restrictions on machine guns. It isn’t going to get much traction in the near future.

Nothing to Contribute

Quote of the Day

There you go again, denying your urgent need to prop up your squashed penis with a weapon.

JAY carreon (@JAYcarreon6)
Posted on X, July 8, 2023

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday; it is another science denier (see also here)!

Obviously, he has nothing of value to contribute to the conversation. It should come as no surprise his account has been suspended.

A Canadian’s View of The Second Amendment

Quote of the Day

When I was travelling through the South over the past month, I was told by several hosts that they all carry guns. They confirmed that they do not tolerate the nonsense that Jews face elsewhere. America: Never ever give up or water down your Second Amendment. It is the means by which you maintain your freedom from all enemies, domestic and foreign.

Gad Saad @GadSaad
Posted on X, March 7, 2025

Dr. Saad is the psychologist author of the bestselling book, The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense. I listened to it and liked it. I follow him on X and find his sarcasm quite entertaining. He taunts the Canadian censors with his criticism of woke ideologies.

His childhood history as a Jew in Beirut likely influences his views on the right to keep and bear arms.

Careful What You Wish For

Quote of the Day

To all progressives who say “gun control” as an alternative to policing: THOSE ARE THE SAME THING. Police are the people who control the guns!!

Another name for gun control is “stop and frisk”!!

Noah Smith 🐇 @Noahpinion
Posted on X, March 6, 2025

No respect for the fourth or the second amendment. No awareness of the consequences of living in a society where those rights are not respected.

He should be careful what his wishes for.

How could it be any clearer?

Quote of the Day

Mexico can’t show the court how a lawfully-made and lawfully-sold gun that is illegally straw purchased, illegally smuggled across an international border, illegally possessed in Mexico and criminally misused by narco-terrorist drug cartels is the responsibility of U.S. gun makers.

Larry Keane
March 6, 2025
What SCOTUS Got Wrong About Firearms and the Gun Business During Arguments in Mexico’s Lawsuit Against US Gun Makers – Shooting News Weekly

I think what happened is that they believed their logic was irrefutable. It went like this, “Guns are bad. Companies that make and sell bad things are bad. These bad things hurt our people. Companies must make us feel good by giving us lots of money.”

How could it be any clearer?

The SCOTUS decision will reflect the soundness of their arguments.

Light can be Made into a Supersolid

Quote of the Day

We actually made light into a solid. That’s pretty awesome.

Dimitris Trypogeorgos
March 5, 2025
Light has been transformed into a ‘supersolid’ for the first time

I took physics in high school. I took two semesters of conventional physics and one semester of “modern” (quantum, relativity, etc.) physics in college. I learned about superfluids. But this is the first I have heard of supersolids.

It turns out they were not actually proven to exist until 2017. So, it is understandable that they were not taught in my classes many years before that.

And making light into anything other than its native photons or electromagnetic waves is beyond my comprehension. Just photons interacting with single/double slits and EM waves which have zero mass yet have momentum is wild enough.

Light into a solid? That just doesn’t compute.

Skynet Smiles

Quote of the Day

The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has achieved a major milestone in maritime innovation by completing the development of a prototype unmanned surface vessel (USV) called the USX-1 Defiant.

This vessel, part of the No Manning Required Ship (NOMARS) program, is designed to operate autonomously on extended sea missions without onboard human presence.

A DARPA official confirmed with IE on March 4 that the prototype vessel has been completed and launched and will undergo at-sea trials soon.

The construction of the Defiant, measuring 180 feet and weighing 240 metric tons, was finalized in February 2025, according to DARPA.

The vessel will now undergo rigorous testing in dockside environments and on the open ocean, with plans for a multi-month demonstration in the spring of 2025.

Kapil Kajal
March 4, 2025
US launches first-ever 240-ton ship that needs zero crew to operate

See also, Air Force announces new unmanned fighter jets will be ‘ready to fly this summer’.

I’m Surprised. They Have a Clue

Quote of the Day

Takeaways on Why Democrats Have a Cultural Disconnect with the Working Class

  1. Overemphasis on Identity Politics
    Many working-class voters feel Democrats prioritize niche identity-based groups with overbroad, unifying messages, making them feel excluded rather than included.
  2. The “Faculty Lounge” Problem
    Democrats are often viewed as judgmental, out-of-touch, and dismissive of those without elite education or progressive views. This makes the party seem disconnected from everyday people.
  3. Failure to Prioritize Economic Concerns
    While voters struggle with jobs, wages, and inflation, Democrats are seen as more focused on cultural and social issues than on economic progress and opportunity.
  4. Weak Messaging & Communication
    The party’s language is often vague, politically correct, or overly intellectual, making it hard for working class voters to connect with Democratic policies.
  5. Fear of Dissent Within the Party
    Democrats are perceived as intolerant of internal debate, where questioning progressive orthodoxy results in backlash rather than open discussion. Candidates and operatives need to feel more comfortable just
    saying NO to activist groups and unpalatable far-left ideas.
  6. Attachment to Unpopular Institutions
    Democrats are seen as defending elite institutions (academia, media, government bureaucracy) while being critical of institutions working-class people value (churches, small businesses, police).
  7. Allowing the Far Left to Define the Party
    Activist groups and progressive staffers push unpopular cultural positions, making it seem like Democrats are more extreme than they actually are. Operatives and campaigns must remember that activist groups exist to promote their single issue and raise money around it, not to make Democrats electable.
  8. Reactionary Rather Than Proactive
    Democrats often let Republicans set the terms of cultural debates (e.g., crime, immigration) instead of clearly defining their own positions in a way that resonates with voters.
  9. Overreliance on Buzzwords & Political Correctness
    Terms like “pregnant people” and “Latinx” alienate working-class voters who see them as out of touch with real-world terms and vocabulary.
  10. Lack of a Positive National Identity Message
    Democrats focus too much on America’s flaws (racism, sexism, inequality) without acknowledging the country’s progress and potential, making them seem pessimistic and unpatriotic.

Takeaways on Why Democrats Are Not Trusted by the Working Class on the Economy

  1. Vilification of Wealth
    Democrats are seen as hostile to success, indifferent to people’s desire to attain wealth, while reflexively attacking wealthy business leaders instead of promoting economic mobility and aspiration.
  2. Disconnected Messaging
    Democrats focus on broad economic indicators instead of acknowledging real struggles like high prices and stagnant wages, making voters feel dismissed and unheard.
  3. No Clear Economic Vision
    Democrats lack a cohesive, inspiring economic agenda and often present a laundry list of policies rather than a unifying vision.
  4. Over-Prioritization of Social Issues
    Economic policy is often framed through the lens of identity politics rather than broad-based prosperity, making working-class voters feel overlooked.
  5. Perceived Government Overreach
    Voters see Democrats as favoring excessive regulations, inefficient spending, and programs that don’t directly benefit them.
  6. Failure to Own Mistakes
    Democrats defend flawed policies and institutions instead of acknowledging failures and committing to reforms that would improve economic trust.
  7. Republicans as the “Aspirational” Party
    GOP messaging suggests they want voters to be rich, while Democrats are seen as focusing on redistribution rather than wealth creation.
  8. Climate Policy Viewed as Anti-Growth
    The emphasis on climate change is seen as harming job opportunities and economic growth, especially in working-class communities.
  9. The Break Room vs. the Board Room
    Democratic economic messages often come from elites, celebrities, and politicians rather than working class voices that voters can relate to.
  10. Failure to Address Economic Anxiety
    Voters believe Democrats care more about the very poor than the struggling middle class and fail to provide a clear path to economic security. Voters often believe they are wealthier than the people Democrats talk about.

Takeaways on How Democrats Can Reconnect Culturally with the
Working Class

  1. Move Away from Identity Politics
    Stop addressing voters as identity blocs and instead focus on shared American values.
    Use plain language and avoid jargon or abbreviations that can alienate voters. Acknowledge that people have multiple identities (e.g., Black and a veteran) rather than reducing them to one label.
  2. Emphasize Shared Values and Cultural Alignment
    Frame rights as about “freedom and justice,” not just identity-based concerns.
    Highlight similarities between marginalized groups and mainstream American values.
    Embrace patriotism, community, and traditional American imagery (e.g., farms, main streets).
  3. Rebalance the Party’s Cultural Messaging
    Reject fringe positions that alienate the median voter.
    Avoid overly moralistic or condescending messaging; speak plainly and directly.
    Allow candidates to express personal faith and values without fear of backlash.
  4. Reduce Far-Left Influence and Infrastructure
    Build a moderate Democratic infrastructure, including media, talent pipelines, and communications networks.
    Push back against far-left staffers and groups that exert a disproportionate influence on policy and messaging.
    Ban far-left candidate questionnaires and refuse to participate in forums that create ideological purity tests.
  5. . Engage with the Working Class in Their Spaces
    Get out of elite circles and into real communities (e.g., tailgates, gun shows, local restaurants, churches).
    Own the failures of Democratic governance in large cities and commit to improving local government.
    Show up in unfriendly media spaces and engage with voters outside traditional Democratic strongholds.
  6. Improve Democratic Communication & Media Strategy
    Conduct a comprehensive study on media consumption to better understand how to reach voters.
    Develop a stronger, more relatable Democratic media presence (podcasts, social media, sports broadcasting).
    Encourage candidates to be bold, engaging, and authentic in their messaging rather than overly polished.
  7. Embrace Moderation, Individualism, and Masculinity
    Reconnect with values like hard work, rugged individualism, and entrepreneurialism.
    Be more accepting of masculinity and male voters who feel alienated from the party.
    Shift focus from progressive “mission creep” to core Democratic issues that resonate broadly.
  8. Revise Democratic Fundraising Priorities
    Move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate.
    Give candidates and campaigns more flexibility in how they spend funds without excessive donor constraints.

Takeaways on How Democrats Can Rebuild Economic Trust with
Working-Class Voters

  1. Acknowledge Struggles & Speak to Real Concerns
    Recognize that while the economy may be improving broadly, many families are still struggling.
    Avoid dismissing economic anxieties—speak directly to the concerns of working-class voters with tangible solutions. As progressives, we all discussed among our friends and family how expensive things were but politically only wanted to talk about how much better things are getting.
  2. Shift Messaging Away from ‘Handouts’
    Many working-class voters reject policies seen as giveaways (e.g., student loan forgiveness, universal basic income).
    Frame policies around opportunity, empowerment, and work rather than redistribution.
    Small language shifts matter—focus on “better wages” instead of “minimum wage.”
  3. Prioritize Simple, Tangible Policies
    Advocate for middle-class tax cuts, support public education, and propose spending cuts where needed.
    Ensure policies are easy to understand and feel relevant to daily life.
  4. Integrate & Engage with the Business Community
    Democrats need to stop demonizing wealth and corporations broadly.
    Engage with small businesses, business podcasts, podcasts like “Earn Your Leisure” that reach the aspiring class, and entrepreneurs to discuss economic policies.
  5. Be Pro-Aspiration & Pro-Capitalism in a Smart Way
    Recognize that working-class voters value upward mobility and economic success.
    Have a prosperity gospel aimed at the working class.
    Call out corporate abuses individually instead of attacking “corporations” as a whole.
  6. Reform Government & Address Inefficiencies
    Take government complaints seriously and commit to improving its efficiency.
    Push for systemic reforms rather than just defending the status quo.
  7. Center Every Conversation on the Economy
    Lead with economic messaging in speeches, ads, and policy proposals.
    Avoid leading with cultural issues—focus on jobs, wages, and cost-of-living concerns.
  8. Engage Rural & Non-College Voters
    Show up in rural communities and places where Democrats are unpopular.
    Listen to non-college voters without judgment, making their concerns central to policy conversations.
  9. Embrace Populism Thoughtfully
    Critique corporate excess and corruption but avoid an anti-capitalist stance.
    Be bold in challenging inefficient institutions while maintaining credibility as pragmatic reformers.
  10. Showcase Working-Class Voices & Candidates
    Recruit candidates who come from working-class backgrounds and have relatable life experiences.
    Use messengers that working-class voters trust—business leaders, skilled laborers, and community figures.

Third Way
February 2025
Comeback Retreat

Via Dems Unveil New Plan to Beat MAGA: More Gun Shows and Less AOC.

I’m surprised. They have a clue. I thought they were totally clueless and tone deaf.

Two things should now be crystal clear to everyone:

  1. They do not have economic or social principles.
  2. They do have a tribal identity and a desire for power.

Other things of note:

  • They still think of people in terms of class.
  • Their culture of deception is tacitly acknowledged and encouraged.
  • No mention of abortion policy.
  • No mention of gun policy.

Respond appropriately.

No Meat Brought to the Table

Quote of the Day

Sorry about your small dick Cletus. 🙄

MAGA Mocker (@MAGAmocker)
Posted on X, August 11, 2023

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday; it is another science denier (see also here)!

Also, the account has been suspended. Which tells you how little meat they brought to the table.

I Give Up

Quote of the Day

I can promise moving forward that we Democrats will fix our broken system of imaginary cheating. Otherwise, it might appear Republicans like Trump only say cheating occurred when they lose, and say everything went smoothly when they win.

That, of course, would be absurd.

Shame on us Democrats.

Rex Huppke
November 8, 2024
Opinion: I guess Trump won because Democrats forgot to cheat. Oops!

Prior to the election, everyone I talked to privately about the election expected “they will cheat, just like last time.” They said things like, “Nothing has changed. So how can there be a different outcome?”

Is Huppke correct? Have the elections have been essentially honest and the widespread belief the 2020 election was stolen is just another mass delusion?

I did not have an answer. While I knew some things had changed, my impression was the changes were not significant enough to make a difference.

So, was the vote just so overwhelming in Trump’s favor that the Democrats couldn’t cheat hard enough? If that were true, then at least some of the polls should have predicted a solid win for Trump.

Did Trump cheat enough to win? Maybe. But you would think the “cheating Democrats” would have been able to catch them and get the courts to intervene.

Did the Democrats believe the domestic and global political scene was so toxic they did not want to be at the helm when the Titanic hit the iceberg? Maybe. But weren’t they scared that if Trump got into power again, he would exact a heavy price on those he believed to have wronged him?

As I have essentially given up on legislative action to protect our RKBA, I have also given up on getting the truth on anything political from any news media. Video of speeches is frequently edited to eliminate context. Deep fakes are getting more and more common and nearly impossible to detect. So even those are not really trustworthy. Yes, if the person in the video doesn’t complain about it being fake via some other channel, then it probably is not a fake. But it is getting to be more and more effort to determine the truth with any confidence.

I just want to crawl into my underground bunker in Idaho and come out as needed for sunlight, exercise and producing and gathering food.