Category Archives: Politics

Socialist Mayor Recall Attempt

Posted on by
4

Seattle’s socialist mayor may be subject to a recall:

Two people in Seattle have filed a recall charge against Mayor Katie Wilson, alleging she has “neglected her legal duty to maintain public safety and peace.”

The recall comes amid a slew of city controversies, the latest being the continued fallout from the deadly Bite of Seattle shooting, and the forced resignation of Police Chief Shon Barnes.

Melinda Jacobson and Dale Osterud filed the paperwork with the King County Elections Office on Tuesday, Aug. 11, alleging that Wilson is “derelict in her duties for public safety” of the City of Seattle.

What’s in the recall charge?

The recall charge points to five specific events: the forced resignation of then-Police Chief Shon Barnes, shootings and sex trafficking in the North Aurora neighborhood, crime and drug use in the Chinatown International District, crime in Belltown and the deactivation of CCTV cameras for police use around the city.

Dig deeper

The filing outlines safety issues across several Seattle areas, including North Aurora, Chinatown International District, Belltown and Third Avenue.

Letting socialists gain power is a disaster. The sooner they kick her to the curb, the better. But with a spirit of full disclosure, I don’t have a lot of confidence Seattle will be able to rid themselves of her until the next normal election.

That last line mentions Third Avene. That is also known in our house and on this blob as Mug Me Street. Part of the time I worked in downtown Seattle my office building was bounded on two sides by Third and Fourth Avenues. The difference between the two streets was amazing. I do not recall ever not seeing at least one police officer near the office exit to Third Avenue. And frequently there would be a canine unit there as well. Your hair would stand on end as you walked out the door, and you knew something was not right there. The street was dirty with lots of people sitting or lying on the sidewalk. Many of the people were dirty and with tattered clothes. On the Fourth Avenue side there was a park, with normal people and shops everywhere you looked.

Apparently, Wilson was able to make an intolerable situation even worse.

I Can See the Appeal

Posted on by
1

Quote of the Day

@Emma_S_Brown @GabbyGiffords you need a new comms guy. We’ve broke this one and need a new plaything.

BadGunControlTakes @guncontroltakes
Posted on X August 20, 2026

It is entertaining to see them squirm and indirectly admit they don’t just want “common sense gun laws”, but total bans. All the while seeing their legal framework, their life’s work in some cases, collapsing like a house of cards.

I am thinking there are probably more productive things to do. Sure, entertainment and a high moral are important. But don’t get stuck on it. Certainly, a case can be made to take people to the range and to get friendly legislators and executive branch politicians into office.

Other areas of potential value include getting good media coverage of the shooting sports. Kid’s programs, Boy/Girl Scout shooting events, local shooter participating in regional, national and international events, etc.

Another Brick in the Wall

Posted on by
6

Quote of the Day

A federal appeals court threw out on Friday a lawsuit by California and the Giffords gun control advocacy group claiming that a Biden administration-era rule to curtail the production of illegal, largely untraceable “ghost guns” was not strict enough.

Reversing a lower court ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco voted 3-0 that California and Giffords did not show the rule’s treatment of partially completed receivers, or frames, for AR-15 type semi-automatic rifles caused them harm.

Jonathan Stempel
August 21, 2026
US appeals court throws out California, Giffords ‘ghost guns’ challenge

Interestingly, the decision was 3-0. Two of those judges were Biden appointees.

How many decisions went in our favor this week?

I don’t think I will ever get tired of winning. Prove me wrong.

Never Forget

Posted on by
5

Quote of the Day

Their uninterrupted, continual, and severe, abject failures absolutely must be a cloak of greatest weight from which they, and their fellow travelers, cannot escape the burden thereof; mere “casting out” from successful society must never be the sanctuary of relief they crave, the many examples of their failures must be the constant, painful reminders of placing any amount of trust in their beliefs, to them and especially and foremost, to us.

“Remember the Alamo” is still heard in Texas; “Never forget what Liberals did to us” must persist at least as long.

Francisco
August 17, 2026
Comment to Insightfully Horrifying and Hilarious

Q: Who says you should not carry a grudge?

A: Those who intend to injure you again.

Another Brick in the Wall

Posted on by
1

Quote of the Day

A federal court in Texas has ruled that the Biden-era Frame and Receiver Rule is unconstitutional for two separate reasons: it violates the Second Amendment, and it is too vague to satisfy the Fifth Amendment’s due process protections.

The court declared the rule unconstitutional as applied to all SAF members, and issued a permanent injunction protecting Defense Distributed and current and future Second Amendment Foundation members as it relates to the specific gun kits involved in the case.

In plain English: SAF members are now expressly protected from enforcement of this rule specifically involving these specific products under the court’s order.

The government may still appeal the decision or ask the court to put the injunction on hold while an appeal moves forward. We are also seeking additional guidance from the government about exactly how the injunction will work in practice.

For now, this is another significant legal victory for SAF and its members and another example of why SAF membership matters.

Read the full court opinion here: https://saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Defense-Distributed-opinion-8.19.26.pdf

SAF @2AFDN
Posted on X August 18, 2026

From the same post:

Notice the rate of legal victories we are having? These are indicative of Nearing Structure Collapse.

I don’t think I will ever get tired of winning. Prove me wrong. Give your favorite gun owner rights group money to broaden the front in this war.

Five-Gallon Pails of Zoloft, Prozac and Xanax

Posted on by
10

Quote of the Day

It’s hard not to smile or even giggle a little bit when you see how badly President Donald Trump is scaring the country’s paid anti-gun community, especially when you combine the President’s efforts with those of the United States Supreme Court.

No one is feeling this pro-gun heat more than the youngsters working at the Trace, the propaganda arm of former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg’s gun control empire, who want the public to believe it’s an actual newsroom comprised of actual journalists—a fiction they’ll go to great lengths to maintain.

The Trace kids are extremely busy trying to stop this Second Amendment tidal wave that’s washing across the entire country. They realize that they’re losing, so they’re rabidly coming up with new ideas to counter our coming freedom—and some of their ideas are absolutely crazy.

Two Tracers just released this tome: “New Jersey Just Lost Its Assault Weapons Ban. Here’s Why That Matters for the Rest of the Country.”

The story’s last line is bedeviling. It’s not a quote or taken from any report. It’s completely attributable to the story’s two anti-gun authors:

“If the Supreme Court strikes down assault weapons bans nationwide next year, states could try other strategies, including putting semiautomatic rifles behind a permitting process,” they actually wrote.

Can you actually imagine that?

The highest court in the country says you can legally possess ARs in every state and U.S. Territory, but then some blue state suddenly requires you to obtain a state permit—regardless of the Supreme Court decision?

Do they think that might actually work?

It’s a Second Amendment right, right?

It would be like requiring state permits before allowing someone to read a book or scour the internet, which are rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.

The Trace is redefining desperation.

I’m picturing five-gallon pails of Zoloft, Prozac and Xanax scattered throughout their newsroom, each with a “help yourself” label.

Lee Williams
July 24, 2026
‘And Do You Have a Permit for your AR, Sir?’

To be fair, yes, I do believe there will be states who try to use a permitting process for firearms. Some states are and have been for many years, requiring permits to purchase handguns and many require permits to purchase any firearm. Some examples which already have permit requirements for AR-15s: Minnesota, Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and D.C. (yes, I know, not a state).

Although it is far from a sure thing it could be that SCOTUS will address the permitting issue in the “assault weapon” ban cases next year, they might. However, I suspect it will be 2028 before we get rid of the permit to purchase requirements.

Insightfully Horrifying and Hilarious

Posted on by
6

Quote of the Day

Normally, we have thought outward based on the rules of reason: the law of noncontradiction, modus ponens, Occam’s razor, etc. Not so for the socialist. Based on Bloch, the socialist thinks from utopia backward. Reality is made to conform to the utopian ideal, not the ideal to reality. As the root of all things, all man needs to do is make the necessary changes to bring utopia about. 

Thus, the facts of failure do not matter because, as Kolakowski explains, “‘facts’ have no ontological meaning [to the Marxists] and may be ignored without hesitation: what matters are the premonitions of the anticipating fancy.” Simply put, the socialist puts feelings over facts. If there is sufficient belief, it can be so.

Connor Appelboom
August 6, 2026
Why are socialists unfazed by their abysmal historical record?

This QOTD was specifically to trigger Kathy Jackson (of Cornered Cat fame) “favorite feature” of my blog. She said, “My favorite feature is when you quote the anti-gun folks. Equal parts hilarious and horrifying.”

While this is broader that an anti-gun quote, it is certainly congruent with what appears to be their line of thinking. And while I think it is mostly horrifying, I can see more than a little humor in it.

There is more from the article that particularly resonated with me but needs some more background:

If man is the master of both reality and his own nature, then everything is subject to the collective conscience. If enough people believe and try hard enough, the socialist paradise can be achieved. Past failures merely indicate a lack of one or both.

Back in the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s I subscribed to a magazine called, Skeptical Inquirer. For a few years I even purchased a subscription for the local King County Library in Kirkland Washington a few hundred feet from where I lived.

The magazine still exists. but I expect most people just read it online. Probably the article which stuck with me the most was The Hundredth Monkey Phenomenon from the Summer 1985 issue. This phenomenon is also called the Hundredth monkey effect – Wikipedia. The gist of it (from Wikipedia):

The hundredth monkey effect is an esoteric idea claiming that a new behavior or idea is spread rapidly by unexplained means from one group to all related groups once a critical number of members of one group exhibit the new behavior or acknowledge the new idea. The behavior was said to propagate even to groups that are physically separated and have no apparent means of communicating with each other.

That describes the socialist (and to a certain extent the anti-gun people) mindset as explained by Appelboom above.

Grok elaborates:

Both involve the notion that sufficient collective belief or adoption can override ordinary constraints of evidence, transmission, or human limitation:

  • In the monkey story, once critical mass is reached, the idea/behavior “jumps” independently of normal learning or contact.
  • In the article’s diagnosis of socialist thinking, once enough people share the utopian conviction (and the will to remake human nature), reality itself is expected to conform; historical counter-evidence becomes secondary or dismissible.

In both cases the mechanism is quasi-mystical or consciousness-based rather than strictly empirical or institutional: belief/numbers generate a transformative threshold that ordinary causal processes cannot explain or resist. The article’s emphasis on “if there is sufficient belief, it can be so” and “if enough people believe and try hard enough, the socialist paradise can be achieved” maps closely onto the critical-mass logic of the hundredth-monkey claim.

Of course the domains differ (political ideology vs. a primatology anecdote turned meme), and the article is making a critical philosophical point while the monkey story was more New Age folklore. But the underlying intuition—that a tipping point of shared conviction can magically dissolve stubborn facts or barriers—is recognizably the same.

I find this both horrifying and hilarious.

Prepare appropriately.

As the Founders Intended

Posted on by
6

Posted on X by JD Heeler @MoonLitLynx87:

This is probably a little overstated. But I think we are still on track for my vision of seeing machine gun competitions in high schools by 2032 being realized.

A Thin Veneer Over the Emotional Kaleidoscope

Posted on by
5

Quote of the Day

As a liberal it’s galling that those on my side remain obsessed with disarming during the most dangerous powder keg of a political environment we’ve seen perhaps since the civil war. Masked government goons are kidnapping people, killing citizens in broad day with no consequences and running concentration camps. The military is on our streets but these idiots want us even more vulnerable and defenseless. 

stonkyvolatile_9010
August 15, 2026
Comment to The Guns Affected by the New Texas Firearm Ruling – Newsweek

I will let pass the collection of assertions I disagree with.

I agree there are a great number of people on his side who irrationally claim we have a Fascist government with Nazi’s everywhere and simultaneously demand private citizens owning guns should be at least register and be severely limited in their selection of arms if not completely disarmed by that same government.

There is no way I can make sense of this other than they are doing the prep work for when they regain power and want to implement their own version of the Final Solution. That is also consistent with the dehumanization of the political right. While one might be able to find kernels of half-truths in their claims, it totally blown out of proportion and almost unrecognizable in reality.

But, as I frequently say, it is irrational to expect people to be rational. Rationality is just a thin veneer over the emotional kaleidoscope of the human brain.

Prepare appropriately.

Mental Issues

Posted on by
15

Quote of the Day

You shouldn’t need a private briefing to notice what millions of Americans could see with their own eyes.

…

Pelosi says she wasn’t told about Biden’s decline. Apparently watching him in public wasn’t enough.

The Atlas Society
August 13, 2026

This says more about Pelosi than it does about Biden or anyone else. People, including me, were saying Biden had dementia during his 2020 campaign. Either she is lying and/or she has her own mental health problems.

DOJ Will Not Appeal Our NFA Win

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

🚨

BREAKING: I’ve received confirmation from the Trump Administration that the DOJ will NOT appeal our historic court victory against the NFA.

THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP and Attorney General Blanche, for delivering the most significant Second Amendment win in OVER 90 YEARS!

Rep. Andrew Clyde @Rep_Clyde
Posted on X August 12, 2026

This is really big. It really is something to celebrate.

I’m not sure I agree with 90 years claim though, though. Heller was only 18 years ago, and I think of it as a more significant decision. What win did we have about 1936?

On a lighter note:

No Registry in Order to Exercise Second Amendment Rights

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

There is no longer any reason for this government gun registry scheme to continue, and our victory will ideally lead to other successful court rulings across the country. American citizens should never have their names on a government registry in order to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Alan Gottlieb
CCRKBA Chairman
August 5, 2026
Fed. Judge Rules ATF Registration Requirements on SBRs, Suppressors Unconstitutional – TheGunMag

Agreed, just like our First Amendment rights, no one should ever have to register themselves, their books, their church, magazine subscription, ammo purchases, or their guns. What is a little misleading here is that this case was not won on Second Amendment grounds. And because of that (I am not a lawyer, so someone correct me if I’m wrong) this case cannot be leveraged to state and local registries.

And just on the core decision it is not a certainty that it will hold on appeal.

Copilot is of the option that even in the Fifth Circuit, the appeals court is likely to overrule the decision. Furthermore, it thinks the odds are low of SCOTUS buying the argument that no tax means no registration.

Grok is of the opinion the appeals court and SCOTUS will uphold the ruling.

Claude thinks it is a coin flip on appeal.

I just wonder what the odds are of Democrats, if they get control of all the house, senate and presidency, caring enough to reinstate the tax and registration in, say, 2029 -> 2032. If they had the votes to reinstate it, they probably would have the votes to include “assault weapons.” Hence, the silencers, SBR, and SBS are enough of a hook to get them to act and then they up-scale to include semi-automatic rifles. Sure, next June SCOTUS will say the guns cannot be banned. But they could place a tax of $20,000 per SBR, SBS, and “assault weapon” and require registration of all of them.

Celebrate our win but prepare appropriately as needed for the uncertain future.

Maximum Corporation

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Government is a corporation in the limit. It is the most corporate thing. It is maximum corporation. And it’s also a monopoly, and also is the only one that’s allowed legally to do violence.

Elon Musk
December 6, 2021
Posted on X by Dustin @r0ck3t23 on July 28, 2026

See also Elon Musk: Government Is ‘the Biggest Corporation, With a Monopoly on Violence, Where You Have No Recourse’ Musk: Government Is ‘The Biggest Corporation, With a Monopoly on Violence, Where You Have No Recourse’.

In a video interview a year earlier in 2020 you see a different version of the same concept: Watch Elon Musk on Regulators, Silicon Valley and Innovation.

I find it interesting listening to the two interviews back-to-back. They are similar with Musk cleaning up the phrasing a year later.

I think it is a valuable framing of government. The socialists/communists want to destroy the concept of a limited government and destroy corporation. They would replace those entities with some sort of “people’s government” that is nearly all powerful. But framing government as the ultimate corporation causes the communists to lose traction. Anything you can do to hinder socialism and communism is a net win for humanity.

That is an Interesting Way to Look at AI

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Dario Amodei just described a future where revolution becomes physically impossible.

Amodei: “You’re supposed to follow orders, but if something crazy enough happened, the soldiers would say, I’m not gonna do that.”

Every check on power in human history came down to one thing.

The people holding the weapons could refuse to use them.

That refusal is not a flaw in the system. It IS the system.

The entire architecture of human freedom is built on a single biological fact… that soldiers have a conscience.

Amodei: “What if you have an army of 10 million drones instead of 10 million human soldiers?”

Remove the conscience and every structure built on top of it collapses.

No refusal. No mutiny. No revolution. No ceiling on power.

Not temporarily. Permanently.

And every institution on earth understands this. Which is why the response hasn’t been to prevent autonomous weapons.

It’s been to control who gets to build the intelligence behind them.

That’s what model bans are. That’s what export controls are. Not safety policy. Power consolidation disguised as caution.

And the result is the opposite of what they intended.

Every restriction slows the people playing by the rules while adversaries who answer to nobody sprint ahead unchecked.

The harder Washington squeezes, the wider the gap grows between what America builds and what its competitors deploy without a single committee meeting.

Which creates an irony so brutal it’s almost poetic.

The more aggressively governments try to lock down frontier AI, the stronger the incentive for labs to simply stop asking permission and drop their most powerful models open source before the regulatory window closes forever.

And once those weights are open, no executive order on earth can pull them back.

Amodei: “I think if we handle this wrongly, you could have a situation where there’s a very small number of people, or one person, who has their hand on the button and controls those 10 million drones.”

The institutions telling you AI must be centralized “for your protection” are constructing the exact infrastructure he’s warning about.

Restricted access. Consolidated control. One hand on the button.

They’re not preventing the nightmare. They’re building it and writing their name on the door.

Amodei: “We don’t want to make companies more powerful than the government, but we also don’t want to make government so powerful that it can’t be stopped.”

Nobody in power ever quotes the second half of that sentence.

But here’s what every institution scrambling to lock this down keeps missing.

They’re running the nuclear playbook on a technology that breaks every rule nuclear followed.

Nuclear required nation-state resources. This fits on a hard drive.

Nuclear had a supply chain you could choke. This one multiplies the moment you squeeze.

Open weights are already out. The barrier to entry is collapsing.

And every attempt to centralize this technology accelerates the exact decentralization they’re trying to prevent.

The question was never whether this power would exist.

It was whether you’d need permission to use it.

For the first time in history, you don’t.

Dustin @r0ck3t23
Posted on X July 18, 2026

Interesting line of thought. I will have to think about this some more.

This is the Way

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

An Obama-appointed federal judge just decided the Supreme Court’s rulings are more like suggestions, and Republicans in Congress are done pretending she has the authority to make that call.

U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs issued an order on Friday blocking the Trump administration from ending Temporary Protected Status for Somali nationals. It was a brazen display of judicial activism, and it took Republicans about a weekend to respond.

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) announced he will file articles of impeachment against Burroughs on Monday, accusing her of trampling both the Constitution and a Supreme Court ruling that should have ended this fight already.

Matt Margolis
August 2, 2026
Obama-Appointed Judge Defies SCOTUS, Now Faces Impeachment – PJ Media

It’s not going to result in a criminal conviction, but it would be effective. If nothing else, with enough usage, and replacement with constitution affirming replacement judges, when the case was reheard the odds of getting a judge respecting SCOTUS decisions would be much higher.

I can see this process having application in other areas.

Parts of the NFA Ruled Unconstitutional

Posted on by

This is big news.

Judge takes sledgehammer to National Firearms Act

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the National Firearms Act (NFA) no longer applies to suppressors and other items whose taxes were reduced to $0 in July 2025.

United States District Judge James Wesley Hendrix of the Northern District of Texas, a Trump appointee, granted a motion for summary judgement from attorneys representing the Silencer Shop Foundation Wednesday.

A summary judgement!!!!

It was NOT a Second Amendment based decision:

Thank the GOP legislators and President Trump for enabling this win. The gun organizations had a relatively easy layup in court.

The Four Boxes Diner has the best legal take. Something you should know is that the decision only applies to the plaintiffs, their members, and their customers. It is not nation-wide. It only applies to people in the federal district court in the Northern District of Texas:

The plaintiffs include:

  • Gun Owners of America
  • The National Rifle Association
  • B&T USA, LLC
  • Palmetto State Armory, LLC
  • SilencerCo Weapons Research, LLC
  • The Virginia Citizens Defense League
  • The Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition
  • Fifteen states
  • Silencer Shop Foundation

That NRA membership is still good for something!

I don’t know for certain how the “fifteen states” plays out in this context. We will need some clarification from a lawyer on that. My guess is that the Feds can’t prosecute any of those state that makes, uses, or sells silencers, SBR, and SBS. But, I am not a lawyer.

JUDGE: SHORT-BARRELED RIFLE, SUPPRESSOR NFA REGISTRATION SCHEME UNCONSTITUTIONAL – Second Amendment Foundation

CCRKBA WIN: FED. JUDGE SAYS SUPPRESSOR, SBR NFA REGISTRATION UNCONSTITUTIONAL – CCRKBA

Giffords exposes themselves as liars again. Kostas Moros assists in making it obvious:

They cannot imagine it was about anything other than about money. They need to think of a new rationalization. This one is so boring. Can’t they come up with something just as nonsensical and not so boring? I’d like to suggest:

  • The NFA was needed to assist in alcohol prohibition, and we need it now for recreational drug prohibition!
  • Protecting the hearing of gun owners takes away another reason to ban guns!
  • Short barrels bad, long barrels good!

This Single Opinion Will Set the Anti-Gun Movement Back for Generations

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

The rubble shall be bouncing in June 2027 when the Supreme Court opinion on AR15 bans is released. This single opinion will set the anti-gun movement back for generations.

Mark W. Smith/#2A Scholar @fourboxesdiner
Posted on X July 31, 2026

This was in response to:

Just overheard the lawyers’ phone call. The Viramontes brief at SCOTUS is gonna make the gun grabbers’ heads explode.

We’ll share more when we know more.

Firearms Policy Coalition @gunpolicy
Posted on X July 31, 2026

I look forward to hearing more. What I expect is a lot of powerful legal stuff. I doubt we will hear, in so many words, what will be just as important. The proper ruling at SCOTUS, and enforced by the DOJ, will create a huge morale boost for us and the morale of the anti-gun people will crash. That change in attitude is what will make the heads explode and set the anti-gun movement back for generations.

Our side will have them on the run. They will have no defenses. We will, metaphorically, be chasing them with torches and pitchforks.

People love to be on the winning side. They will be happy to donate money and see their abusers crushed in the courts. People will go to the range and laugh and tell jokes about the tears of the anti-gun leaders and the bankruptcies of their organizations.

We will be tearing down their remaining infringements in months and years that took them a century to construct. They will constantly on the defense and unable to even find a defensible position.

Any time an anti-gun people timidly proposes anything they will be hammered by “the plain text of the 2nd Amendment” from their opposition and even their lawyers. Shall. Not. Be. Infringed. What part do you not understand?

Gun Control Proponents Aren’t Looking for New Answers

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

The state of Delaware has some of the strictest gun control laws in the country. But don’t make the mistake of believing that “distinction” means the state is safe from criminal gun misuse.

The national gun control activist group Giffords, named after former U.S. Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-Ariz.), awarded the state an A- grade on its recent gun control scorecard. Everytown for Gun Safety, the gun control organization funded by billionaire former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, ranks The First State as #10 on its national ranking of states with tough gun laws.

If there’s a gun control law that national anti-Second Amendment activists are looking for, it’s likely already law in Delaware. That might lead some to think Delaware has solved the “gun violence problem” and that its residents are safe.

That would be terribly mistaken.

Recent reporting by the Delaware News Journal revealed the number of minors who have been shot this year has nearly doubled when compared to the same time period last year. According to the report, the number of homicide victims has remained relatively unchanged, but shootings have ticked up year-over-year.

Gun control proponents aren’t looking for new answers. They’re just rehashing the old and ineffective ones.

Larry Keane
July 31. 2026ays
Delaware Gun Control Activists Demand Special Gun Control Session • NSSF

That they keep trying more of the same thing that does not make their citizens safer is very telling. This means they have some sort of mental health issues and/or citizen safety is not the goal. While mass delusions do happen with surprising frequency, they usually require more isolation from those who do not share the delusions. That means there is a good chance the alternate hypothesis is correct. Citizen safety is not the goal.

It probably will require the courts to give them the proper incentives to change their evil ways.

Expect a surplus of liberal tears and widespread whining.

Elect More Communists

Posted on by

Watch the whole video. It’s worth it.

As if people have not been saying the Democrat Party is socialists and/or communist for years now. Still, better late than never.

Prepare appropriately.

Imagine Doing Legislative Trials Like We Do Drug Trials

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

imagine if we treated adding a new law to the economy in the same way we treated adding a new medicine to the body. you’d have to demonstrate no harmful effects show up in controlled trials, people who pass laws with damaging side effects would be held liable, etc

Aella @Aella_Girl
Posted on X July 26, 2026

Imagining that is almost orgasmic.