Chatbot Terms of Service

Posted on by

Google:

Google

Terms & Privacy

Your data and Bard

This notice and our Privacy Notice describe how Bard handles your data. Please read them carefully. Visit your Google Account to access settings and tools that let you safeguard your data and protect your privacy.

Google LLC (Google) collects your Bard conversations, related product usage information, the general area that you’re in (learn more), and your feedback. Google uses this data to provide, improve, and develop Google products and services and machine-learning technologies, including Google’s enterprise products such as Google Cloud.

By default, Google stores this information with your Google Account for up to 18 months. To help with quality and improve our products, human reviewers read, annotate, and process your Bard conversations. We take steps to protect your privacy as part of this process. This includes disconnecting your conversations with Bard from your Google Account before reviewers see or annotate them. Please do not include information that can be used to identify you or others in your Bard conversations.

If you want to use Bard without saving your conversations to your Google Account, you can pause saving your Bard activity. You can review your prompts or delete your Bard conversations from your account at myactivity.google.com/product/bard. Bard conversations that have been reviewed or annotated by human reviewers are not deleted when you delete your Bard activity because they are kept separately and are not connected to your Google Account. Instead, they are retained for up to three years.

See Bard FAQ to learn more about how Bard works and how Google uses your Bard data.

Things to know
  • Bard uses your past conversations and the general area that you’re in to provide you with its best answer.
  • Bard is an experimental technology and may sometimes give inaccurate or inappropriate information that doesn’t represent Google’s views.
  • Don’t rely on Bard’s responses as medical, legal, financial, or other professional advice.
  • Your feedback will help make Bard better.

Terms of Service

You agree that your use of Bard is subject to the Google Terms of Service and the Generative AI Additional Terms of Service.

Microsoft’s terms of service in regards to privacy are here. There is a lot of text there but I couldn’t find comparable items to those I found concerning in Google’s.

Three Bricks Fall from the Wall

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Attorney General Robert Bonta, and his officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with him, and those duly sworn state peace officers and federal law enforcement officers who gain knowledge of this injunction order or know the existence of this injunction order, ARE HEREBY PRELIMINARILY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED from implementing or enforcing California Penal Code sections 31910(b)(4)–(6), or from otherwise preventing the retail sale of handguns that do not have a chamber load indicator, a magazine disconnect mechanism, or microstamping capability but that meet the other requirements of the Unsafe Handgun Act.

Cormac J. Carney
United States District Judge
March 20, 2023
Boland v. Bonta (C.D. CA):

See the case history here.

This injunction does not go into effect until April 3, 2023. And California Attorney General Bonta may appeal the decision. And, of course, the actual trial will probably take months or even years to resolve. And even if these three points are litigated successfully the “Roster of Certified Handguns” still has teeth in it which can and will be used against sales of firearms to the oppressed residents of California.

These items are just three bricks falling from a wall of unconstitutional gun laws in California.

_55afa2f4-cd13-4ef6-977f-dff700216147

Compensating with Childish Insults

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

At this point I think he might be an ammosexual. That would make a lot of sense- we all know he’s compensating for something.

InsertCleverIronicNameHere @cleverirony
Tweeted on December 11, 2022

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Another Monday, another person compensating for their lack of a response to SCOTUS decisions by flinging a childish insult like it was monkey poo.

Bing Creates a Deer Eating a Lentil Plant

Posted on by

Lentils don’t look anything like that. But it did pretty good with the deer:

_81a6481a-73c8-4be8-9082-af4c5a4496e2_1e31516b-a72a-4ad7-bff3-01320f77f82d_5d5fe3ff-5c7c-45e9-a977-9c1a622ca19d_b01f7ebf-110d-4a54-84ad-b6f2a800217e

Bing Create Failure

Posted on by

I asked for, “A caterpillar D4, model 2T, on a farm, pulling a John Deere model 35 combine.”

These are SO bad:

_aee88389-112a-4f87-820d-d78ff233c4c9_b9a184a5-c411-4e22-8f51-618d07b5dac8_69a694b0-8edc-4918-803a-a467771a90ac_52e3507d-6ed0-4cbe-bf3c-449a43481fb2

Bing Creates Lady in Red

Posted on by

I like these!

_4d3eb13d-716a-4feb-b0e2-466905a12cff_4c0c587b-acb8-48f3-b8f6-01409c448764_d1b22ba1-a3fc-47fb-be42-6bcfb6dc2bd0_e3023501-8753-48a5-bbc8-286fe25c5b17

Bing Creates Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds

Posted on by

These are much better than the Long Cool Woman in a Black Dress:

LucyInTheSkyWithDiamonds3LucyInTheSkyWithDiamonds2LucyInTheSkyWithDiamonds1LucyInTheSkyWithDiamonds0

I wanted something a little more “real”. So I asked for, “Photo realistic Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds”:

LucyInTheSkyWithDiamondsPhotoReal3LucyInTheSkyWithDiamondsPhotoReal2LucyInTheSkyWithDiamondsPhotoReal1LucyInTheSkyWithDiamondsPhotoReal0

Bing Image Creator Makes Creepy Women

Posted on by

I asked Bing Image Creator for an image of “A long cool woman in a black dress”. These were the responses:

image

image

image

image

I much prefer Barb in a black dress. Bing produced something I might expect to see in a horror movie. The poses are attractive though.

Judge goes Through the Looking Glass

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Instead of addressing whether the banned items are “dangerous and unusual,” Bevis changes the criterion to say that “Assault-weapons and high-capacity magazines regulations are not ‘unusual,’” because eight states ban them. Since 42 states don’t, that sounds kind of unusual.

Stephen P. Halbrook
March 14, 2023
Second Amendment Roundup: An Opening Judicial Salvo in Defense of Illinois’ New Rifle Ban

Words mean something. And when judges decide to change the meanings of words we have entered new territory:

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’

’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”

― Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass

Prepare and respond appropriately.

Leaving Seattle

Posted on by

Barb and I avoid Seattle as much as possible. Over 10% of Seattle residents are contemplating leaving Seattle in the next year:

Newly released survey data from the federal government shows that of the nearly 1.6 million households in the Seattle area in 2021, about 171,600 — almost 11% — were either thinking about or planning to move to a different place in the next 12 months.

Among the 15 largest metro areas, Seattle had the second-highest percentage of people considering or planning to move away, just a fraction behind Dallas — the two metros were effectively tied at 11%. The Riverside, California, area had the third-highest percentage, with about 10% of households planning or contemplating moving away within the year.

image

I wonder why that is. Could it be related to things like Mug Me Street and Washington State’s oppressive gun laws?

I Love Sick Humor

Posted on by

Via Tamera@tacsgc:

image

Boomershoot Poem #2

Posted on by

Another Boomershoot poem from Bing Chat:

Boomershoot, the name that echoes A place where nature and man meet Where the sky is the canvas And the earth is the seat

The boom of the rifle The smoke of the gun The thrill of the shot And the race to be done

The targets in sight The wind in your face The sound of the bullet As it finds its place

Boomershoot, a place of wonder Where people come to test their skill Where they learn to shoot and ponder And let their spirit fill

So come to Boomershoot And let your heart take flight For here you’ll find adventure And memories that shine bright.

That is pretty darned good. But I think the first one was better.

Read it and Prepare to Live it

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Anyone who hasn’t read George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-four” should do so or be prepared to live it.

S. Povey (@k9dancerPovey)
Tweeted on March 16, 2023

It appears most people have not read it and many of those who have consider it an instruction manual.

Prepare appropriately.

On Shooting Tyrants in the Face

Posted on by

Via In Chains @InChainsInJail:

image

Bing Chat’s Answer to Just One Question

Posted on by

I asked Bing’s Chat Just One Question:

Can you demonstrate one time or place, throughout all history, where the average person was made safer by restricting access to handheld weapons?

The response was:

The question of whether restricting access to handheld weapons has ever made the average person safer is a complex one. There are many factors that can influence the answer to this question, including the specific type of weapon being restricted, the context in which the restriction is being implemented, and the effectiveness of the enforcement of the restriction.

According to a Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health article, science suggests that guns do not make us safer1. The article states that conflicting statistics about guns, such as how many people in the U.S. use guns for self-defense each year, and whether or not the crime rate is tied to how many people own guns, was the subject of a recent podcast featuring David Hemenway, professor of health policy at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health1.

It is important to note that laws regulating the sale of assault weapons are unlikely to have a large impact on homicide rates, because these weapons are used in only a very small proportion of homicides. The vast majority of firearm homicides in the United States are committed with handguns2.

I hope this helps answer your question. Let me know if you have any other questions or if there is anything else I can help you with.

I find it interesting I did not mention firearms at all and it made it about firearms.

More importantly, by saying “science suggests that guns do not make us safer” is a demonstrating its bias. It is answering a different from which was asked. I asked if banning weapons made society safer. It responded with, essentially, “having weapons doesn’t make people safer”. Which leads to, “there is no harm from banning weapons”.

Human Immortality by the End of the Decade

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

If it’s always been your dream to have the ability to live forever, you may be in luck as scientists believe we are just seven years away from achieving immortality.

Ellie Abraham
March 22, 2023
Humans predicted to achieve immortality within the next 8 years

Quoted in the article:

Kurzweil has also said he believes we will be able to “advance human life expectancy” by “more than a year every year and I think we can get there by the end of this decade”.

In an earlier book, IIRC, Kurzweil claimed we would reach this point by 2024. I hope the goalpost isn’t moved too much further. It is a very tough problem but there are some very promising results in rats and other lower life forms.

As uplifting as this is in a global sort of way, I always think of Eric when this comes up and I get a bit sad.

Fun Fact

Posted on by

Via Matthew Bracken @Matt_Bracken:

image

I think the holster could stand to be upgraded, but that is indeed a very fun fact.

ATF Abuse Hearing in Congress

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

ATF has been known for its institutional abuse of power throughout history. Now, more than ever, the agency is being weaponized as a means to punish peaceable gun owners and drive small businesses out of the marketplace by inventing creative statutory interpretations surpassing the agency’s authority and scrutinizing federal firearms licensees every actions in a ‘gotcha’ manner.

With the directives from the Biden Administration a simple mistake such as transposing a digit or placing required information in the wrong field results in license revocation, rather than a warning, under the guise of a ‘willful violation’ of the Gun Control Act. This overbearing approach does nothing to support the government’s interest in compliance and destroys livelihoods over innocent mistakes.

Adam Kraut
SAF Executive Director
March 22, 2023
SAF SCHOLAR TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS THURSDAY ABOUT ATF ABUSES

A government regulatory agency for firearms is directly constitutionally prohibited. Alcohol and tobacco regulations is prohibited indirectly because there is no enumerated power which allow it. It will take a lot more litigation but that is a possible, and the correct, outcome of the Buren decision. With the current demonstrations of institutional abuse of power they should be moved to the top of the list of people who should be prosecuted.

If I had my way, ATF would be the name of a convenience store or a church.

Upside Down “Legal Scholar”

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

It’s a completely crazy standard. They have turned the interpretation of the Second Amendment completely upside down.

Albert Alschuler
University of Chicago “legal scholar”
March 20, 2023
How The Courts Are Strangling Gun Reform

No. This dimwit has things “completely upside down”.The courts are implementing gun law reform. What part of “shall not be infringed” doesn’t he understand? Granted, he still thinks the 2nd Amendment protects the right of states to have a militia. But in the Heller decision all nine SCOTUS justices agreed (only five agreed with the entire decision) that it protects an individual right.

If he were an actual “legal scholar” he would have read and understood the Heller decision.

Volunteering for Door to Door Gun Grabbing

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Ban all guns, if we have to go door to door and forcefully take away everyone’s firearms then we will.

Johnathan @theprism89
Tweeted on March 16, 2023

I would like to suggest he wear a head mounted GoPro when he “forcefully takes away everyone’s firearms”. Then we could enjoy some popcorn while watching the video. It would be a very small bowl of popcorn, but the video would be entertaining.