This is what they think of you:
His X posts are protected. His IMDb profile is not
Prepare appropriately.
This is what they think of you:
His X posts are protected. His IMDb profile is not
Prepare appropriately.
This is not a general income tax. From my perspective, it’s more of a sin tax.
Gavin Newsom
Governor of California
December 29, 2023
Newsom signs ‘sin tax’ on guns and ammo
Constitutionally protected rights are sins? Wow! That tells you all you need to know about him.
It would amuse me a great deal if this ends up being used as evidence at his trial.
Since its inception, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s monetary policies have led to a decline of over 95% in the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar. As a result, there have been several attempts to curtail or eliminate the Federal Reserve’s powers (e.g., the efforts of Rep. Louis T. McFadden in the 1930s; the efforts of Rep. Wright Patman in the 1970s; the efforts of Rep. Henry Gonzalez in the 1990s; and the efforts of Rep. Ron Paul since the 1990s).
However, none have proven successful to date, due mainly to the constraints of strong political opposition at the national level. In contrast to these “top-down” attempts at the national level, this paper proposes an alternative approach to ending the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on money: the “Constitutional Tender Act,” a bill template that can be introduced in every state legislature in the nation, returning each of them to adherence to the U.S. Constitution’s “legal tender” provisions of Article I, Section 10.
This approach would have a greater likelihood of success for a number of reasons. First, it is decentralized: rather than facing concerted political opposition at a single Federal level, it attacks the issue at the State level, where strategies and tactics can be adapted to the types and amount of political opposition they encounter.
Second, it is diffused: it can be attempted in any number of States, which can cause the opposition to spread its resources much more thinly than would be necessary at the Federal level. Finally, it is legally sound: it relies on the U.S. Constitution’s negative mandate in Article I, Section 10, that “No State shall… make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.” Therefore, in contrast to “top-down” attempts to “end the Fed,” a “bottom-up” approach using “constitutional tender” laws will find greater success.
…
Under this Act, the State would be required to only use gold and silver coins (or their equivalents, such as checks or electronic transfers) for payments of any debt owed by or to the State (e.g., taxes, fees, contract payments, etc.). All contracts, tax bills, etc. would be required to be denominated in legal tender gold and silver U.S. coins, including Gold Eagles, Silver Eagles, and pre-1965 90% silver coins. All State-chartered banks, as well as any other bank that is a depository for State funds, would be required to offer accounts denominated in those types of gold and silver coins, and to keep such accounts segregated from other types of accounts such as Federal Reserve Notes.
Bill Green
April 4, 2017
Ending the Federal Reserve from the Bottom Up
It is an interesting thought.experiment. But will it work? It’s been almost seven years now and how much progress has it made?
Perhaps after the big crash people will give it more serious consideration.
Gold is currently tickling the $2,100/oz price as I type this… Prepare appropriately.
Scientists have discovered a new way to destroy cancer cells. Stimulating aminocyanine molecules with near-infrared light caused them to vibrate in sync, enough to break apart the membranes of cancer cells.
Aminocyanine molecules are already used in bioimaging as synthetic dyes. Commonly used in low doses to detect cancer, they stay stable in water and are very good at attaching themselves to the outside of cells.
…
In tests on cultured, lab-grown cancer cells, the molecular jackhammer method scored a 99 percent hit rate at destroying the cells. The approach was also tested on mice with melanoma tumors, and half the animals became cancer-free.
David Nield
December 27, 2023
Scientists Destroy 99% of Cancer Cells in The Lab Using Vibrating Molecules
I like living in the future.
How much power does the government claim on private land?
“Unfettered,” according to a Commonwealth Court decision in a case pitting the Pennsylvania Game Commission against two private gun clubs.
On Sept. 29, a court ruled against two hunting clubs in their lawsuit accusing the Game Commission of private property rights violations.
…
In its ruling, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania noted the government’s absolute power to “roam private land without consent, warrants or probable cause.”
…
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said “possessions” do not include private land.
Chris Bennett
January 25, 2023
Pennsylvania court rules against gun clubs in private property case
Interesting. Perhaps I should see if I can find those old bear traps, abandoned wells, and explosives testing grounds so as to make sure no government agents get hurt when they venture beyond the no trespassing signs.
Prepare appropriately.
It’s about time we go door to door and personally take away everyone’s firearms, if they don’t comply then they will be sent to prison.
Johnathan (@theprism89)
Posted on X April 7, 2023
No.
Your move.
Don’t every let anyone get away with telling you no one wants to take your guns.
72% of AR-15 owners didn’t serve. That says it all. With 81% being men, I suspect they feel there is something they’re missing. Such as a ballsack. And they feel they’re filling that ball-less void with a gun.
altNOAA @altNOAA
Posted on X March 27, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
You know they are desperate when they resort to childish insults. But, with the court ruling in our favor a few days ago, I’m in a playful mood. I can play this game too.
I suspect altNOAA feels inadequate because they have no legal, philosophical, or factual basis to support their opposition to firearms. So, they strike out with a childish insult in a futile attempt to bring their opponents down to their level by projecting their own feelings of inadequacy.
I hate it too dear heart… I’m there. I am so sorry your generation, and all of us are dealing with a preventable issue… the guns must go!!!
Kristin Hill (@khill0771)
Tweeted on January 31, 2022
Don’t every let anyone tell you no one wants to take your guns.
In an ironic twist Kristin’s account is gone and I still have all my guns.
But the Constitution, by design, recognizes that some rights are so important and sacrosanct that nothing short of a constitutional amendment may take them away. No one—not a federal judge, not a state governor or legislator, not even the President of the United States—is above the Constitution.
Nevertheless, California recently passed a law, Senate Bill 2, that limits the public places where people with concealed carry permits may carry their handguns to defend themselves and their families. To obtain such a permit in California, a person must go through a rigorous screening process. The process includes a lengthy application, a thorough background check involving interviews, fingerprinting, and reviewing multiple government databases, and a full-day, hands-on training course in which the person must demonstrate they can safely and proficiently use the handgun they seek to carry in public. Even with those stringent requirements, California will not allow concealed carry permitholders to effectively practice what the Second Amendment promises. SB2’s coverage is sweeping, repugnant to the Second Amendment, and openly defiant of the Supreme Court.
Cormac J. Carney
United States District Judge
December 20, 2023
Reno May, et al. v. Robert Bonta
And
Marco Antonio Carralero, et al. v. Robert Bonta
Case Nos.: SACV 23-01696-CJC (ADSx) SACV 23-01798-CJC (ADSx)
There are lots of strong words in this opinion. I hope they stand up to the almost certain attack of the appeals court.
My request to Bing Chat for an image was:
Please create an image of a federal judge telling the attorney general California law is repugnant to the Second Amendment, and openly defiant of the Supreme Court.
I suspect there is some bias in the AI:
In CCP’s China, one can find a Party Branch (党支部) in any workplace.
According to the CCP, its function is to propagate & implement the Party’s principles, policies, & resolutions.
In America today, we have a DEI office in every institution.
Xi Van Fleet @XVanFleet
Posted on X December 21, 2023
I read and really like her book.
Well, “like” in the sense of interesting and enlightening. She grew up in China during the cultural revolution and then moved to the U.S. where she now sees frightening similarities to her native country. Daughter Jaime refuses to read it because it sounds too dark.
Some of the terrible stuff in China would not fly in the U.S. because of the widespread ownership of firearms and a substantial number of the population tend to distrust the government and highly regard individualism. But other stuff can be seen closing in all around us.
Quote of the Day
So there it is, straight from the cops’ mouths, the reason you should have and carry a gun. Not that such a thing will happen up here, but still.
Never give an inch…
Mike
December 12, 2023
Latest nonsense from Toronto
Via email.
Good advice for all times. And this doesn’t even take into consideration the scenarios where the police are the ones implementing the genocide.
If anybody has enough money to insulate himself from the damage created for society, it would be Zuck. That’s sort of what it is. He’s destroyed the government and society, and now he can go to Hawaii and build a fort.
Douglass Rushkoff
2023
Inside Mark Zuckerberg’s Top-Secret Hawaii Compound
From the same article:
The cost rivals that of the largest private, personal construction projects in human history. Building permits put the price tag for the main construction at around $100 million, in addition to $170 million in land purchases, but this is likely an underestimate.
I wonder why he thinks he needs something like that?
From Zero Hedge’s article on Zuckerberg’s bunker:
Other billionaires, like PayPal and Palantir founder Peter Thiel, have built or been planning doomsday bunkers in remote places worldwide.
There are several reasons why billionaires feel worried about the future and are compelled to build doomsday bunkers, some of which include spillover risks of the Russia-Ukraine war, possible regional conflict in the Middle East, imploding Western cities into crime-ridden hellholes, the surge in illegal migrants across West, deteriorating financial conditions in the West, and the list goes on and on.
My bunker does not compare.
I don’t understand how one can look at Jewish history and think that leaving Jewish security unto others is a winning strategy.
Josh Hamme
December 12, 2023
Can you guess which demographic group is now taking advantage of the Second Amendment?
Self defense using the best available tools is a basic human right.
Aww the tiny penis brigade calling for backup
Because they’re afraid of everything
Ronald (@RB_Scott_80)
Tweeted on February 1, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
His account has been deleted. Perhaps he is afraid of a battle of wits because he knows he is unarmed.
I sleep fine at night because I know peaceable people are not responsible for the crimes of a few monsters, and they just want to preserve their rights guaranteed by the constitution.
I also sleep fine because I know that even though we’ve had guns in the US for our entire history, including repeating arms for well over 150 years, regular mass shootings are only a phenomenon of the last 20 years or so. They happened infrequently or even not at all before Columbine, even though gun laws were far looser and background checks weren’t even a thing for most of our history.
Kostas Moros @MorosKostas
Posted on X March 27, 2023
This was in response to David Hogg claiming to “wonder how the lawyers, employees and lobbyists of the gun lobby can sleep at night.”
There is a lot more to Moros’ response. It’s worth a read.
I sleep at night from knowing genocide is disabled by widespread gun ownership and that same widespread ownership saves far more innocent lives than are criminals enabled to commit murder.
What’s the efficacy of banning these magazine clips? I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those know they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these ‘high capacity’ magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available.
Diana DeGette
U.S. Representative to Congress from Colorado
2013
Is it a lie? Or is it profound ignorance? I could go either way on it. I’m certain many people would believe her. And that false belief will increase the likelihood of passing magazine bans.
Just keep in mind that people like her are making the laws you will be prosecuted with.
Prepare and respond appropriately.
The Jetson One is supposed to be available for sale next year at a price of just under $100K.
This craft avoids some of the roadblocks of other attempts to get into this (create is probably aa better term) market because it is classified as an ultralight.
The payload would have to at least 50% more and the cost reduced by a factor of four before I would give it serious consideration, but it would be very handy for a quick trip to and from town at my place in Idaho. Because of the long and winding road into the nearest town it takes 30 minute of driving time. It is less than eight miles as a VTOL would fly. That translates into eight to ten minutes instead of the 30 minutes driving time. And when the roads are hazardous because of snow and ice, this would save even more time and might even be safer.
The flight time without a recharge is 20 minutes so the trip into town would be at the edge of its range for a round trip. Still, that is very cool.
I’ve been causally looking at personal affordable VTOL craft for at least 35 years now. There have lots of promises and nothing of substance.
Only the right wing gun nut teachers carry guns,a lot of them so t and flat out refuse to.These undervalued/ underpaid teachers should be able to go into their schools knowing a shooter armed with an semi automatic weapon will not be able to enter because they weapons are illegal
josie @josie97
Posted on X January 25, 2023
Crap for brains. Frequently one can make a case for lying. But, in this case, I don’t think they are smart enough to create a plausible lie.
My blogging software sends me notifications of how many days in a row I have made a blog post. This is the one I received this morning.
February 3rd of next year will be the 20th anniversary of my first block post.
Via mothmoo @MothMoo:
Excellent point.
And, of course, there is that little thing about it being unconstitutional.