I have a couple of cubic yards of ammo, but I’d feel more comfortable with four.
Jim Harris
November 8, 2020
Comment to How’s everybody doing for ammunition? And what’s the full loadout for Pak36? Asking for a friend…
[Unless your stockpiling for your neighborhood, I think the money and time would be better spent on training and practice.
But, still, I rather like what he said.—Joe]
There has been a massive and coordinated effort to steal this election from We The People of the United States of America to delegitimize and destroy votes for Donald Trump. To manufacture votes for Joe Biden. They’ve done it in every way imaginable, from having dead people vote in record numbers, to absolutely fraudulently creating ballots that exist only for voting for Biden. We’ve identified over 450,000 ballots that miraculously only have a vote for Joe Biden on them and no other candidate.
Sidney Powell
November 8, 2020
We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden” – Sidney Powell Drops a BOMB on Sunday Morning Futures (Video)
[We live in interesting times.—Joe]
I have to wonder what happened to the active FBI investigation over Biden money laundering.
One would think that at least Kamala Harris would be interesting in seeing that case brought to fruition.
Benford’s Law seems sort of magical but it was first observed in 1881 and is frequently used by statisticians/accountants to detect anomalies.
As it applies to our current situation is explained here and reposted here.
Via James O’Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII:
BREAKING: Here is the signed affidavit from Erie, Pennsylvania
Whistleblower Richard Hopkins that is now in the hands of Sen. Lindsey Graham and the Senate Judiciary Committee. #ExposeUSPS
I find it very odd that this supposedly happened in Pennsylvania but the affidavit was signed in Texas. I was notarized online via audio-video communication, but still.
From Scott Adams @ScottAdamsSays:
To believe Biden will be sworn in as president in January, one must believe at least one unlikely thing:
1. Despite being brainwashed to believe Trump is Hitler, Democrats in key cities did NOT attempt a large-scale voter fraud to save the country.
or. . .
2. Democrats did commit major voting fraud to remove “Hitler” but for some strange reason all the geniuses looking for indications of it can’t find any confirmed evidence and there are no whistleblowers.
or. . .
3. Democrats WANTED to commit major fraud to get rid of “Hitler” but there is no practical way to do such a thing and hope to get away with it.
or. . .
4. Democrats didn’t REALLY think Trump was so bad that it was worth cheating to remove him.
Remember, it’s still #2020.
I see one more unlikely possibility:
5. Fraud did occur and was discovered but no one with standing is interested in and/or willing to pursue it in court.
Via Matthew Bracken @Matt_Bracken:
[Deleted]
I’ve deleted this meme. It was overstating things more than what I think is acceptable.
Yes, it is an acknowledged fact that Kamala Harris was dating Willy Brown in 1994 and 1995 and that he gave her political appointments at or about that time. This probably should have been investigated as nepotism.
But the meme strongly implies her selection as a U.S. V.P. candidate was because of her sleeping with “powerfully connected men”. This is a big stretch with the currently available evidence. Where there relationships with other men which also contributed to her success? I’ve not heard of any. And I’m nearly certain there have been a lot of people looking for that sort of dirt and would have reported it if they had found it.
Certainly the case can be made that her appointments 25 years put her on a path to her current position. But the path is far too long to reasonably say the Willy Brown relationship was a dominate factor in her successful traversal of that path.
The two sides in American politics today lack almost all middle ground. There can be no “meeting of the minds” if the minds are so diametrically opposed to each other. This election has not solved that problem, and no election will. Nevertheless, we’d better try to find a solution . . . because if we don’t, the next Battle of Fort Sumter may be all too ready to erupt. We may be seeing its first skirmishes on our streets as I write these words.
Peter Grant
November 5, 2020
No matter who wins this year’s election, we can’t go on living together like this
[I have nothing to add.—Joe]
Bill Whittle is more passionate than I have ever seen him before. As Matthew Bracken said:
Start watching at 3 minutes 50 seconds. Don’t miss it. You can explain this easily to even your dimmest democrat relative or neighbor.
The first step in any recovery problem is admit you have a problem. If they don’t think the corruption is a problem and people are not going to jail, they’ll find endless excuses to not fix it.
So a plan was hatched. They watched the 2017, 2018, and 2019 off-season elections closely to determine who was involved and what methods were used.
Rolf
November 5, 2020
Election Trap
[I want to believe there was such a plan.
If it is true then I remind myself that it’s a government operation so I’m skeptical it was or will be successful.—Joe]
I noted that this revolution’s logic leads to no logical end. That is because “the logic that drives each turn of our revolutionary spiral is Progressive Americans’ inherently insatiable desire to exercise their superiority over those they deem inferior.” Its force, I observed, “comes not from the substance of the Progressives’ demands,” but rather “from that which moves, changes, and multiplies their demands without end. That is the Progressives’ affirmation of superior worth, to be pursued by exercising dominance: superior identity affirmed via the inferior’s humiliation.” Affirmation of one’s own superiority by punishing inferiors is an addictive pleasure. It requires ever stronger, purer doses of infliction, and is inherently beyond satisfaction.
Angelo Codevilla
September 23, 2020
Revolution 2020
[Via Kevin.
As Codevilla pointed out this is a Stalinist revolution because of the top down nature of it. And as he points out here, “Affirmation of one’s own superiority by punishing inferiors is an addictive pleasure.” There is a deadly psychology here which I have described before.—Joe]
Via daughter Jaime:
1,300 confirmed: https://pastebin.com/XEi5Uy6t
13k being checked https://pastebin.com/zjz6nm6QMichigan registration website: https://mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/Index
The confirmed list is people who have been supposedly confirmed to be voted and/or registered to vote in this election via the Michigan Voter Information Center website (the third link above).
The second link above is a list of 14,549 names of people who were born 100 or more years ago. Of possible interest is this warning by Paste Bin for this list:
Warning – Potentially offensive content ahead!
Pastebin’s SMART filters have detected potentially offensive or questionable content ahead.
The content you are about to view has been deemed potentially offensive or questionable by our filters, because of this, you’re receiving this warning.
You can continue ahead at your own risk or go back.
Yeah, it’s offensive to the criminals committing fraud.
I sorted the confirmed list by date of birth and selected the oldest people to confirm via the Michigan registration website. Here are my results:
| TERRY MATHIS | 1/1900 | 48207 Ballot Received: 11/2/2020 |
| JAMES BRADLEY | 1/1900 | 48234 Ballot Received: 11/2/2020 |
| THEODORE WILLIAMS | 1/1900 | 48219 Registered but no absentee ballot was requested. |
| ROBERT BROCK | 1/1900 | 48203 Ballot sent but not received. |
| JAMES JENTZ | 1/1900 | 48224 Registered but no absentee ballot was requested. |
I find it highly unlikely that people coming up on their 121st birthday actually voted. I claim fraud.
This must stop. The people committing this fraud must be sent to prison and never be allowed to vote again.
Some observations made by Jaime when she called me to discuss:
I’ve seen this a couple different places now:
According to Wisconsin Elections Commission:
The State of Wisconsin had 3,684,726 active registered voters on November 1, 2020.
I even used the Way Back Machine for the WI web page and found it had identical numbers of November 1, 2020.
There may be good reasons to suspect fraud but this isn’t one of them for Wisconsin.
for the first time in my life i voted for a republican for president, congress, and senate leftist identitarianism and critical theory was the catalyst for me the democrats have refused to put an end to it in fact they’ve embraced it
TimcastFeed @TimcastFeed
Tooted on October 25, 2020
[We live in interesting times.—Joe]
left twitter: VOTE BIDEN OR THE RUSSKI KLANSMEN WILL MAKE YOU A HANDMAID AND SHOOT YOU WITH ASSAULT COVID BULLETS
right twitter: VOTE TRUMP OR THE CHINESE ANTIFAS WILL BURN YOUR CHILDREN ALIVE IN DRAG QUEEN STORY HOUR CAMPS
me: oh boy I’m guaranteed 4 years of material
David Burge @iowahawkblog
Tweeted on October 28, 2020
[I have nothing to add.—Joe]
On dealing with firearms. It is irrational, with all due respect to the Governor of Texas, it is irrational what they are doing. On the very day you see a mass shooting… we are talking about loosening of access to have guns. To be able to take them into places of worship, store them in schools. I’m mean it’s absolutely irrational. It’s totally irrational.
And it’s all about special interests and it has to stop. It has to stop.
The idea that we don’t have elimination of assault type weapons, magazines that can hold multiple bullets bullets in them, is absolutely mindless. It is no violation of the Second Amendment. It’s just a bow to the special interests, the gun manufacturers, the NRA.
It’s gotta stop.
Joe Biden
September 2, 2019
[Eliminating magazines that have multiple bullets in them is not a violation of the Second Amendment? Guns for self-defense is irrational?
It’s Joe Biden that has to be stopped.
Take appropriate action.—Joe]
Money doesn’t vote – people vote.
Richard Feldman
May 14, 2016
Revered or reviled, NRA’s power is at the polls
[Note the date. The year Donald Trump surprised most of the country.
Make your intentions clear. Vote.—Joe]
From Becket Adams at the Washington Examiner, New York Times opinion section comes unhinged ahead of the 2020 election regarding What Have We Lost?:
Featuring all 15 New York Times opinion columnists, the collaboration asserts that its aim is to explain “what the past four years have cost America, and what’s at stake in this election.” However, rather than explore seriously and realistically the short- and long-term consequences of the Trump presidency, the project comes across more like a collective nervous breakdown, full of self-absorbed handwringing and wild-eyed proclamations about the future of the republic.
“Persuasion,” argues New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.
“The conundrum for those of us trying to change minds is that the more urgently we shout, the less we’re heard,” he writes. “The challenge for opponents of Trump like myself is that our denunciations of the president sometimes backfire and help him.”
My take from reading the same web page is that I have no clues what they are talking about when it is apparent they believe they are saying something very profound. For example, would someone please tell me what this is supposed to mean:
Hank Willis Thomas
Over the past four years, we have lost nearly everything and nothing at all. Nothing was lost but everything. Everything that is won can be lost, because winning and losing are nothing, after all.
I can sort of grasp what this guy is saying but I would have to reverse the direction of what he perceives as “forward” to believe he has a clue about what he is talking about:
Bobby C. Martin Jr.
America has lost all trust. Gone is any confidence in our institutions. Lost is our standing in the world. More divided than ever, we don’t even trust one another. Now is not the time to despair. We can’t get cynical. We can’t be afraid. Action is the only way forward. Vote. Vote. Vote.
In the end I’m inclined to agree with Adams. The New York Times people have no self awareness. This “project” of theirs, intended to be something profound, is merely an incoherent wailing:
The ahistorical lamentations featured in the New York Times’s “What have we lost?” project are neither insightful nor even particularly original. They are just the latest notes in a long, unbroken wail that began in November 2016.
If they could bottle that, like Liberal Tears, I’d used it to oil my guns.
