Sorry about your small dick Cletus.
MAGA Mocker @MAGAmocker
Tweeted on August 11, 2023
Via a tweet from In Chains @InChainsInJail·
The idiots always try to drag the more intelligent people down to their level in an attempt to win with childhood insults.
Whatever. We have SCOTUS decisions. They have crude insults.
Barb and I recently visited Central Europe. In Vienna we were walking from our Air B & B to some sort of public transportation to visit Schönbrunn Palace (the main summer residence of the Habsburg rulers set on what amounts to a 400-acre park) when I saw this and did a double take:
What? Oh, yeah, Freud was from Vienna!
In high school there was a psychology class, and I heard other students talking about the Id, Super Ego, Oedipus Complex, etc. I read a little about it and was not impressed. It wasn’t like so many other classes I took, like the math and science stuff which once the teacher introduced a topic it “just made sense”. Of course this was right, it fit in with everything else I knew. This psychology stuff was something different. Did the human mind really work like this? It just didn’t make sense to me and I didn’t take the class.
In college I had to take some “humanities” classes and in what I think was my second or third semester I took Psych 101. One of the first things the professor said was, paraphrasing:
Freud created the science of psychology. Other than the existence and importance of the unconscious mind, we have painstakingly proved everything he said about the human mind is not true.
Freud was such a powerful figure it had taken two generations after his death to finally reach the point where people called B.S. on his work. And to this day we still have remnants of his legacy with Markley’s Law.
I loved that psychology class. It wasn’t the “this makes sense” type of stuff to the extent of the of math and the hard sciences but it was based on decent research and did make a certain amount of sense. I took numerous other psych classes throughout my undergraduate years and probably was close to having a minor degree in psychology. It was really easy and I got A’s in all of them.
Now here I am, a two-minute walk from Frued’s office and residence. Whatever I think of Freud’s work, I have to see this museum. The next day, on September 1st, we visited the museum.
It was a little disappointing, but I’m glad I did it. Here are a few pictures:
Barb reading about the family tree:
This is an art exhibit at the museum, it is not his real couch:
Broooooooo y’all proving u have small dicks. I know how to stop gun violence. Pay for trumpnecks to get penile enlargement.
Inmate #P01135809 @iryterong
Tweeted on June 9, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
Interesting projection. In prison, peopled identifying as Democrat outnumber all others combined by a factor of 2:1. And a huge percentage of violence crime is committed by people using a gun is in deep blue cities.
One has to wonder if the small dick insult is also a projection.
In any case, as Dan recently wrote:
Expecting logic, facts and reason to be part of the “gun grabbing” agenda is a fools errand.
Most people’s don’t get hard over the thought of killing some
Sam 💕💜💙 @Oh_HiSam
Posted on X, October 25, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
In addition to the usual conflation of sex and the exercise of a specific enumerated right, I think Sam has grammar, writing, and/or cognition issues.
Wow can you even see your own penis?
Johnny Memphis @johnnymemphis
Tweeted on June 4, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
The joke is so very old now. It’s nice to have even a little bit of a new twist.
I am gun owner with many hours of range and tactical practice and a concealed carry license. You do not need an automatic weapon to hunt. Or to “protect” yourself. Stfu, you impotent crybaby losers. I’m sorry about your small weiners.
Makingthebestofshit (@Zoey_Lifts)
Tweetted on May 15, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
They are sorry about something that doesn’t exist? There is something quite fitting about that. I’m sorry their account doesn’t exist either. It makes further mocking difficult and less effective.
It always cracks me up when I come back from the farm to see that a whole bunch of twidiots who substitute guns for their penises have spent the whole day tweeting at me, thinking their comments upset me because they know that people like me will take their precious guns away. 😆
Savi (@SavionWinter)
Tweeted on April 7, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
Yes, 2022. I have a long queue of Markley’s Law examples.
Don’t ever let anyone get away with anyone telling you that no one wants to take your guns.
And… it cracks me up that his account no longer exists.
Muting this thread because you all are some of the stupidest MFers I’ve seen. You don’t need an assault rifle to protect yourself (and I’d bet you’ve never needed to protect yourself anyway) you’re just compensating for your small dicks.
The Queen Of Damn Near Everything @Queenofitall21
Posted on X, August 20 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
Yes, 2023. The queue is backed up that far.
Typical.
I wonder if they know that believing they can read the minds of other people is a sign of a personality disorder.
The biggest cause of death of children in the USA is by guns. You morons are happy to sacrifice young lives for your phallic symbols. Grow up.
Chaeyoung 채영 Park @Susan16Park
Posted on X, July 31, 2024
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
The only way you can conclude guns are the biggest cause of death of children is if you include all teenagers as “children”. This lets you include 17 through 19 year-old gang members as “children”. Hence she is, being generous, distorting the truth in her attempt to achieve her evil goals.
She describes herself as
I
Kpop & horizontal folk dancing.Queen of the Sooky La la’s & a hypersexualised atheistic bisexual commie satanic childless cat lady
She then uses a childish insult and tells us to “grow up”? Wow!
open carry also signifies that you are likely afflicted with micropenis
Konayuki @chillindrdude
Tweeted on April 6, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
I have never heard of the affliction ‘”micropenis”. I’m wondering if Konayuki is speaking from personal experience.
So your dick is small. Just say that. You loud as hell about it
BardyC @BardyCee
Tweeted on April 5, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
With the stupid this thick it is not surprising the account has been deleted.
Aren’t you just a full cup of stupid?! Tiny micro peen feels the need to show of his big bad gun. Dude, even with laser sights I doubt you could hit the broad side of a barn.
Jana B Warrior Angel @Janabw81
Posted on X, August 3, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
As is typical with people with some mental disorders, she imagines she knows things about other people which she has now way of knowing. In other words, she is delusional.
These emotional dorks are such predictable cliches. Bitchface dirty deleted but the internet is forever.
Larry Correia @monsterhunter45
Posted on X on June 21, 2024
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
Yup. It’s totally predictable. That is why we call it Markley’s Law.
Some dudes with small penises found my opinions on guns and they’re feeling reaaaaallll insecure about it.
Joshua Lander @lander
Posted on X, July 6, 2024
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
Via a post by In Chains @InChainsInJail:
The funny thing is that you’re wrong on all counts. That said, @JoeHuffman to the red courtesy phone, please.
Which elicited this response from the same person:
Does he have a small penis too?
It’s a twofer!
That, and the fact you have a micropenis.
Bruce Normal @BrianMalcolm20
Posted on Twitter June 30, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
No originality. No cleverness. No humor. Boring.
Holy shit lol the entire Micropenis Rapid Response Force came out to reply to you here
‘Cope! Seethe! 3 inches is big enough!!’
Of the 20 replies you got, there’s gotta be a total of 80 domestic violence charges & *zero* satisfied women between them all
Spaghetti Policy? @alt_DoooooM
Posted on Twitter March 4, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (see also here)!
I have to give him a bonus point for the phrase “Micropenis Rapid Response Force”. I have not heard that one before.
And he gets another bonus point for the prejudice of expecting gun owners to be perpetrators of domestic violence.
Via a tweet from In Chains @InChainsInJail.
I see you have a tiny penis and want to murder people…
Lord Boofhead (@Lord_Boofhead)
Posted on X June 29, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier (and here)!
And, is frequently the case, the account is suspended.
Delusions are a sign of mental issues. This candidate for the cuckoo’s nest thinks they can see your penis as well as read your mind. Therefore, it is no surprise they are a science denier.
Size Matters? Penis Dissatisfaction and Gun Ownership in America – PubMed (nih.gov)
In this study, we formally examine the association between penis size dissatisfaction and gun ownership in America. The primary hypothesis, derived from the psychosexual theory of gun ownership, asserts that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises will be more likely to personally own guns. To test this hypothesis, we used data collected from the 2023 Masculinity, Sexual Health, and Politics (MSHAP) survey, a national probability sample of 1,840 men, and regression analyses to model personal gun ownership as a function of penis size dissatisfaction, experiences with penis enlargement, social desirability, masculinity, body mass, mental health, and a range of sociodemographic characteristics. We find that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises are less likely to personally own guns across outcomes, including any gun ownership, military-style rifle ownership, and total number of guns owned. The inverse association between penis size dissatisfaction and gun ownership is linear; however, the association is weakest among men ages 60 and older. With these findings in mind, we failed to observe any differences in personal gun ownership between men who have and have not attempted penis enlargement. To our knowledge, this is the first study to formally examine the association between penis size and personal gun ownership in America. Our findings fail to support the psychosexual theory of gun ownership. Alternative theories are posited for the apparent inverse association between penis size dissatisfaction and personal gun ownership, including higher levels of testosterone and constructionist explanations.
Also, from the paper, this additional bit of irony:
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The data collection for this study was supported by funding from Change The Ref, an organization that “uses urban art and nonviolent creative confrontation to expose the disastrous effects of the mass shooting pandemic.” Although Change The Ref holds a clear political stance with respect to the role of guns in society, this organization played no part in the planning or implementation of the study.
Yes, an anti-gun organization paid for this study.
And a final bit of irony is that there is more than one way to interpret the results of this study which I have not found mentioned anywhere. It could be that the gun owning men satisfied with their penis size are happy because they have successfully compensated for their small penis with gun ownership.
I was referred to this study by numerous people. Here are the ones I can recall. If someone else also brought it to my attention and I failed to give them credit, I apologize.
I’m sorry you feel you need an AR-15 to compensate for your tiny tadger. That’s rough.
Christina Zheng @Christilynw
Posted on X, May 30, 2024
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
I was referred to this by In Chains @InChainsInJail. Zheng then told me not to procreate. I suspect what she really meant was that she wants me dead, but even if she was just passing judgement on my fitness for parenthood, that she thinks she should be able to make a decision like that for others is very telling. Anti-gun people are tyrants with, at most, a thin veneer of respectability.
It’s not fear, it’s cock swinging when you don’t have the junk to swing.
SloneK. @king_sandirella
Posted on X on Jjune 21, 2023
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
They must have an exceptionally small imagination and narrow mind to believe those are the only two options to own and carry a gun. Especially, since one of the people in the picture is a woman.
