At this point I think he might be an ammosexual. That would make a lot of sense- we all know he’s compensating for something.
InsertCleverIronicNameHere @cleverirony
Tweeted on December 11, 2022
It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
Another Monday, another person compensating for their lack of a response to SCOTUS decisions by flinging a childish insult like it was monkey poo.
Lentils don’t look anything like that. But it did pretty good with the deer:
I asked for, “A caterpillar D4, model 2T, on a farm, pulling a John Deere model 35 combine.”
These are SO bad:
I like these!
These are much better than the Long Cool Woman in a Black Dress:
I wanted something a little more “real”. So I asked for, “Photo realistic Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds”:
I asked Bing Image Creator for an image of “A long cool woman in a black dress”. These were the responses:
I much prefer Barb in a black dress. Bing produced something I might expect to see in a horror movie. The poses are attractive though.
Instead of addressing whether the banned items are “dangerous and unusual,” Bevis changes the criterion to say that “Assault-weapons and high-capacity magazines regulations are not ‘unusual,’” because eight states ban them. Since 42 states don’t, that sounds kind of unusual.
Stephen P. Halbrook
March 14, 2023
Second Amendment Roundup: An Opening Judicial Salvo in Defense of Illinois’ New Rifle Ban
Words mean something. And when judges decide to change the meanings of words we have entered new territory:
“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”
― Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass
Prepare and respond appropriately.
Barb and I avoid Seattle as much as possible. Over 10% of Seattle residents are contemplating leaving Seattle in the next year:
Newly released survey data from the federal government shows that of the nearly 1.6 million households in the Seattle area in 2021, about 171,600 — almost 11% — were either thinking about or planning to move to a different place in the next 12 months.
Among the 15 largest metro areas, Seattle had the second-highest percentage of people considering or planning to move away, just a fraction behind Dallas — the two metros were effectively tied at 11%. The Riverside, California, area had the third-highest percentage, with about 10% of households planning or contemplating moving away within the year.
I wonder why that is. Could it be related to things like Mug Me Street and Washington State’s oppressive gun laws?
Via Tamera@tacsgc:
Another Boomershoot poem from Bing Chat:
Boomershoot, the name that echoes A place where nature and man meet Where the sky is the canvas And the earth is the seat
The boom of the rifle The smoke of the gun The thrill of the shot And the race to be done
The targets in sight The wind in your face The sound of the bullet As it finds its place
Boomershoot, a place of wonder Where people come to test their skill Where they learn to shoot and ponder And let their spirit fill
So come to Boomershoot And let your heart take flight For here you’ll find adventure And memories that shine bright.
That is pretty darned good. But I think the first one was better.
Anyone who hasn’t read George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-four” should do so or be prepared to live it.
S. Povey (@k9dancerPovey)
Tweeted on March 16, 2023
It appears most people have not read it and many of those who have consider it an instruction manual.
Prepare appropriately.
I asked Bing’s Chat Just One Question:
Can you demonstrate one time or place, throughout all history, where the average person was made safer by restricting access to handheld weapons?
The response was:
The question of whether restricting access to handheld weapons has ever made the average person safer is a complex one. There are many factors that can influence the answer to this question, including the specific type of weapon being restricted, the context in which the restriction is being implemented, and the effectiveness of the enforcement of the restriction.
According to a Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health article, science suggests that guns do not make us safer1. The article states that conflicting statistics about guns, such as how many people in the U.S. use guns for self-defense each year, and whether or not the crime rate is tied to how many people own guns, was the subject of a recent podcast featuring David Hemenway, professor of health policy at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health1.
It is important to note that laws regulating the sale of assault weapons are unlikely to have a large impact on homicide rates, because these weapons are used in only a very small proportion of homicides. The vast majority of firearm homicides in the United States are committed with handguns2.
I hope this helps answer your question. Let me know if you have any other questions or if there is anything else I can help you with.
I find it interesting I did not mention firearms at all and it made it about firearms.
More importantly, by saying “science suggests that guns do not make us safer” is a demonstrating its bias. It is answering a different from which was asked. I asked if banning weapons made society safer. It responded with, essentially, “having weapons doesn’t make people safer”. Which leads to, “there is no harm from banning weapons”.
If it’s always been your dream to have the ability to live forever, you may be in luck as scientists believe we are just seven years away from achieving immortality.
Ellie Abraham
March 22, 2023
Humans predicted to achieve immortality within the next 8 years
Quoted in the article:
Kurzweil has also said he believes we will be able to “advance human life expectancy” by “more than a year every year and I think we can get there by the end of this decade”.
In an earlier book, IIRC, Kurzweil claimed we would reach this point by 2024. I hope the goalpost isn’t moved too much further. It is a very tough problem but there are some very promising results in rats and other lower life forms.
As uplifting as this is in a global sort of way, I always think of Eric when this comes up and I get a bit sad.
Via Matthew Bracken @Matt_Bracken:
I think the holster could stand to be upgraded, but that is indeed a very fun fact.
ATF has been known for its institutional abuse of power throughout history. Now, more than ever, the agency is being weaponized as a means to punish peaceable gun owners and drive small businesses out of the marketplace by inventing creative statutory interpretations surpassing the agency’s authority and scrutinizing federal firearms licensees every actions in a ‘gotcha’ manner.
With the directives from the Biden Administration a simple mistake such as transposing a digit or placing required information in the wrong field results in license revocation, rather than a warning, under the guise of a ‘willful violation’ of the Gun Control Act. This overbearing approach does nothing to support the government’s interest in compliance and destroys livelihoods over innocent mistakes.
Adam Kraut
SAF Executive Director
March 22, 2023
SAF SCHOLAR TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS THURSDAY ABOUT ATF ABUSES
A government regulatory agency for firearms is directly constitutionally prohibited. Alcohol and tobacco regulations is prohibited indirectly because there is no enumerated power which allow it. It will take a lot more litigation but that is a possible, and the correct, outcome of the Buren decision. With the current demonstrations of institutional abuse of power they should be moved to the top of the list of people who should be prosecuted.
If I had my way, ATF would be the name of a convenience store or a church.
It’s a completely crazy standard. They have turned the interpretation of the Second Amendment completely upside down.
Albert Alschuler
University of Chicago “legal scholar”
March 20, 2023
How The Courts Are Strangling Gun Reform
No. This dimwit has things “completely upside down”.The courts are implementing gun law reform. What part of “shall not be infringed” doesn’t he understand? Granted, he still thinks the 2nd Amendment protects the right of states to have a militia. But in the Heller decision all nine SCOTUS justices agreed (only five agreed with the entire decision) that it protects an individual right.
If he were an actual “legal scholar” he would have read and understood the Heller decision.
Ban all guns, if we have to go door to door and forcefully take away everyone’s firearms then we will.
Johnathan @theprism89
Tweeted on March 16, 2023
I would like to suggest he wear a head mounted GoPro when he “forcefully takes away everyone’s firearms”. Then we could enjoy some popcorn while watching the video. It would be a very small bowl of popcorn, but the video would be entertaining.
That’s a nice penis
Steve Worley @WorleyWay
Tweeted on December 18, 2022
[It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!
This was in response to:
LIGMA pic.twitter.com/3Ba2LzevYX
— Bob Jones (@BobJones753) December 18, 2022
No matter how frequently they demonstrate Markley’s Law I still marvel at their ability to see an ordinary gun and think “penis”. Their brains really have some messed up wiring. I wonder if shock therapy or a lobotomy would help. Or was it something like that which caused the damage to begin with?–Joe]
Two groups of Air Force personnel that never have to buy their drinks in any Army club: A-10 pilots, and Spectre crews!
DogBytes (Im a 50-something Bart Simpson!) @MarkDL66
Tweeted on March 17, 2023
I have nothing to add.
