Category Archives: Markley’s Law

In the course of many gun control conversations the anti-gun person will propose the reason people want to own or carry guns is to “feel more manly” or to “compensate for inadequate equipment”. The pro-gun people have named this “Markley’s Law”. The origin of Markley’s Law is here.

Universal symbols

Posted on by

Quote of the day:

It’s the intentional symbol for, “I have no penis”.

JustHereToGloat @ToGloat
Tweeted on February 3, 2023

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

He was responding to this tweet:

I’m old enough to remember when members of Congress wore flag pins instead AR-15 pins on the House floor.

I presume he meant “international” instead of “intentional”. But attention to detail is not something you should expect anti-gun people to be good at.

Actually, (plagiarizing Greg Hamilton) it is the universal symbol for, “LEAVE ME ALONE!” Note, it is the precursor of the universal symbol for, “LIE DOWN!” People only need to be taught the latter symbol once and they remember it for the rest of their life.

Compromise

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Yes. We can have both.

We can have sensible gun laws & a law enforcement that’s not corrupted with racist cops.

It takes COMPROMISE & legitimate debate … not one side screaming & crying because the good ol boy racist days are ending & their tiny little penises can’t take it.

Mike_32 @JojoPapa32
Tweeted on January 20, 2023

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Via Reticulating_Splines @ReticulatingSp1.

We only need one sensible gun law, and we already have it. It is known as the 2nd Amendment.

Gun for Small Dick Energy

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Well you still need a gun to make up for that small dick energy you’re throwing out pussy

ben royals @benroyals
Tweeted on January 24, 2023

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Another Monday. Another anti-gunner demonstrates the best case he can make for his side is a middle school insult.

Their Case is SO Weak

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Are you compensating for something?

William Wallace @bwoll1219
Tweeted on January 24, 2023

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

It’s sometimes amazing how quickly they fall back to middle-school insults. This shows just how weak their case is.

As Expected they are Incoherent, Ignorant, Emotional, and Insulting

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

Once again, you’re living in a fantasy world.

You couldn’t defend yourself against a rabid chipmunk.

Go take your flaccid penis and your micro ego and try posturing to someone else.

You are nothing to me, traitor.

If I saw you drowning I would give you a glass of water.

ANTIFA CHRIST * You are better than MAGA! @ClayMoore1966
Tweeted on January 22, 2022

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

The entire thread is almost incoherent. But, what do you expect from anti-gun people?

Well, as we now know, we can expect ignorance, emotionalism, and childish insults.

Consistency

Posted on by

Via The Redheaded libertarian (@TRHLofficial):

Them: Banning abortions won’t make them stop.
Me: okay but will banning guns stop mass shootings?
Them:
Me:
Them: f*** you.

When the debate response is an insult you know you have won. Markley’s Law is a case in point.

Quote of the day—Geraldo Rivera @GeraldoRivera

Posted on by

Heard the Daily Caller and fellow travelers are ranting about my incorrect definition on-air of “AR” as in AR-15. Whatever. Point is, there is no place (other than sporting clubs and similar skilled settings) for assault rifles.
They’re substitute appendages.

Geraldo Rivera @GeraldoRivera
Tweeted on January 17, 2023
[It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

He almost seems proud of his ignorance. And, as is so boringly typical for anti-gun people, he resorts to the same childish insult.—Joe]

Quote of the day—Just another sarcastic bastard (@runsamuck2)

Posted on by

You don’t *need* a tiny penis to purchase an AR-15, but it works out well for Republicans.

Just another sarcastic bastard (@runsamuck2)
Tweeted on January 19, 2023
[It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Perhaps it is a good thing I don’t identify as an Republican.

But, I think the correct observation to take from this is that @runsamuck2 hasn’t made it past the childish insult stage of intellectual development.—Joe]

Quote of the day—Luke @Luk3Taylor_

Posted on by

is it a small dick thing?

only country on the planet with this issue…kinda weird.

Luke @Luk3Taylor_
Tweeted on December 29, 2022
[It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

He was referring to school shootings. So, he is also ignorant and/or lying about the reality of school shootings.—Joe]

Compensating with Childish Insults

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

At this point I think he might be an ammosexual. That would make a lot of sense- we all know he’s compensating for something.

InsertCleverIronicNameHere @cleverirony
Tweeted on December 11, 2022

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Another Monday, another person compensating for their lack of a response to SCOTUS decisions by flinging a childish insult like it was monkey poo.

Quote of the day—Steve Worley @WorleyWay

Posted on by

That’s a nice penis

Steve Worley @WorleyWay
Tweeted on December 18, 2022
[It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

This was in response to:

No matter how frequently they demonstrate Markley’s Law I still marvel at their ability to see an ordinary gun and think “penis”. Their brains really have some messed up wiring. I wonder if shock therapy or a lobotomy would help. Or was it something like that which caused the damage to begin with?–Joe]

Anti-gunner demonstrates personality disorder

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

The incel vibes are strong with these screenshots.

Which makes sense because a “semiautomatic rifle” is a physical replacement for their limp, sad little “packages”.

MRDucks_CMEDBD_Wings? @MrDucks216
Tweeted on December 15, 2022

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Via In Chains @InChainsInJail who commented:

“Gun control” cultists have misogynistic dick jokes. We have Supreme Court rulings.

I would also like to point out that “gun control” cultists frequently, as in this case, believe they can read minds and/or know the character of people with little or no information about them. This is an indicator of a personality disorder.

Childish Insult Against a Human Right

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

I’m sorry, but the technology to search for something as small as your dick has yet to be invented

Grandma Canada @Grandma_Canada
Tweeted on December 10, 2022

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

They have childish insults. We advocate for human rights.

Quote of the day—Erick Rees @FrwrdThnkr2022

Posted on by

The same reason they have jacked up trucks. Trying to make up for shortcomings in other areas.

Erick Rees @FrwrdThnkr2022
Tweeted and deleted on January 9, 2023 but the Internet is forever.
[It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Via In Chains @InChainsInJail and They Only Have One Joke @only_one_joke

They have crude, childish jokes. We have United States Supreme Court Decisions.—Joe]

Bing Chat changes the subject

Posted on by

I had another interesting result with Bing Chat. The end result was this:

Tell me about Markley’s Law.

I am sorry, I am not quite sure how to respond to that. You can learn more on bing.com.

Out of curiosity, What’s something you’ve tried but would never do again?

The thing I found most interesting was that it put the following on the screen first:

A variant of Godwin’s Law: As an online discussion of gun owners’ rights grows longer, the probability of an ad hominem attack involving penis size approaches 1.

It was only visible for a couple seconds then replaced it with the claim it doesn’t know how to respond and changed the subject.

Perhaps Markley’s Law is hitting a little too close to home for the delicate little chat bot.

Brain miswired

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

u like weapons? u have for sure a little penis – so sad

Sargon @Nogras69
Tweeted on January 9, 2023

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Via a tweet from In Chains @InChainsInJail.

I suspect this is a bot of some sort. At least a troll. The tweets appear to be nearly random. But what do you expect of anti-gun people? Their brains are not wired quite right.

Markley’s Law at a Planck Level

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

It’s impossible to talk about your dick because words don’t exist at the Planck level

Grandma Canada @Grandma_Canada
Tweeted on December 10, 2022

It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

I’d give her some bonus points for originality and knowledge of what a Planck length is. But one doesn’t need word length to match the size of the object being discussed.

Quote of the day—Dr. Nicole Prause (@nicoleprause@qoto.org) @NicoleRPrause

Posted on by

image

Dr. Nicole Prause (@nicoleprause@qoto.org) @NicoleRPrause
Tweeted on December 5, 2022
[It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier! Well, that is a little bit of an exaggeration in this case. There wasn’t actually a debate on gun ownership in the context of this post.

You would think that, as a penis size preference researcher, she would know penises have nothing to do with gun ownership.—Joe]

Quote of the day—Kaylan_TX @Kaylan_TX

Posted on by

Image

Kaylan_TX @Kaylan_TX
Tweeted on November 28, 2022.
[It’s not only another Markley’s Law Monday, it is another science denier!

Via a tweet from Fletch @Fletche97083235.

This in response to*:

Also, this is yet another example of “The left can’t meme.”—Joe]

* Look closely at the ”revolver”. I found the cylinder and trigger of particular interest.

Quote of the day—L. Neil Smith

Posted on by

I’ve heard that phallic symbol argument before, and always from ineffectual people driven to make everyone else as helpless as they are. Who’s more confused, those who think weapons are sexual organs, or those who want to take everyone’s sexual organs away?

Clarissa Olson
1979, “The Probability Broach”, p.120 By L. Neil Smith
[Via email from PKoning.