What can I say. A classic. With animations.
Hope to see some of you at Boomershoot.
What can I say. A classic. With animations.
Hope to see some of you at Boomershoot.
Isn’t it interesting that what the artist believes and reality are so divergent?
Or is it the artist knows the truth and is attempting to misinform others?
Ignorance or ill-intent? That is the question.
We are better than this. We are well-informed and well-intentioned.
What if the president were to publically announce they were going to sign an executive order to “research” the detrimental effects of free speech or Christianity? Or how about the prohibiting the reading of material from international sources that had no “sporting or scientific purpose”?
Why can’t people see how disturbing it is that a single person has the power to place restrictions on a specific enumerated right? It’s a really bad precedent to allow.
Its not really a cartoon, but it’s close enough.
Logic isn’t the strong suit of the Anti-gunners.
To be accurate the ATF logo should be added to the U.S. flag on the side of the truck.
Read Fast and Furious: Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal and the Shameless Cover-Up. It’s a quick read and very good. One of the more interesting things I discovered from reading the book was that the Mexican government stopped making such a stink about the ATF running guns into Mexico because the U.S. threatened to cut off $500 million in aid if they didn’t shut up about it.
The artist is sharing their nightmare not reality. Reality is readily available should they have chosen to get the facts.
See the story that goes with this cartoon here. It contains things like:
Lost in the impassioned arguments about the Second Amendment and the right to defend oneself from government and each other is the question of what “open carry” might do to the already fragile fabric of society.
Lost on the writer is that most states have no laws prohibiting open carry and probably 100 million of us get along just fine living in those open carry states with millions carrying either openly or concealed.
Another example of the deficiencies of writers understanding and analysis:
Instead, let’s talk about what makes us civilized, and what makes America free. Guns don’t make us free.
Actually, I think a pretty good case can be made that the gun is civilization. And while guns in and of themselves do not make us free the restriction of firearm ownership and use is a sure sign that a civilization is not free.
I would claim the writer is just another ignorant bigot but the last paragraph makes me wonder if there isn’t something more than ignorance going on here:
Deep in its corporate-sponsored heart, you have to wonder if this is what the NRA really believes those learned gentlemen had in mind when they ratified the words, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…”
“Corporate-sponsored heart”? I hear whispers of animosity toward capitalism in that paragraph. Is this just another socialist who knows they must destroy the means to resist their master plan to rid society of free markets and free minds?
Via Whoopie at Waznmentobe who also points out rioters shot at the police during the recent riots:
An article about the shootings at the police is here.
This one, possibly from Daniel Nauenburg, together with this classic from the Half Hour News Hour, tell you just about everything you’ll ever need to know about the subject of gun restrictions. Add one more, illustrating what governments have done to their disarmed populations, and you’d have all the bases covered in just a few minutes.
The moral depravity and intellectual bankruptcy of the anti-rights movement would be laughable so long as it never gained any traction. As it is, there remains justice to be done, wrongs to be righted where possible, thousands of laws to be repealed, and government agencies to be disbanded. When can the healing begin?
This certainly seems to be the way it works:
I’m not sure if it is deliberate or they simply lack the mental facility to process information correctly.
Cartoon via email from Barron.

The more accurate answer to the question is, “Respect for fundamental rights.” But that’s a topic the liberals want to repress.

I don’t get this one. Is there some context that I don’t remember?
This is the last one I have for now. I think I can find some more but it may be a while before I get around to it.

When has someone said having a permit is a guarantee of perfect behavior? Having a “permit for a gun” is no more a guarantee of perfect behavior than a drivers license is a predictor of perfect driving.
But if you were to read the VPC or Brady Campaign publications with their lists of people with permits that committed crimes you would think concealed carry permit holders were billed as perfect angels and they are disappointed to find out we are mere mortals–with a lower rate of crime than the general population and police officers.

Yes. There have been some school shootings. And seeing a scene such as the one depicted would be adequate justification for concern. The guns should be properly cased for transport.
What is lost on most people is the school shooting incident data before and after schools were made “gun free zones”.

This, in essence, came up in the comments a few days ago. The artist twists facts to achieve their desired goal. A six year-old does not have the right to keep and bear arms, enter into legally binding contracts, marry, or associate with whoever they want. Even fundamental human rights about which there is essentially no controversy such as access to sexually explicit material is prohibited to children.
Misrepresentation of facts can be a sign of immaturity, laziness, stupidity, evil intent, or bigotry. I wonder which it is in this case (in the case of the comments to my previous post I attribute it to an attempt at humor which I dismiss as extremely unlikely in this case).

It seems to the people on the left believe everything boils down to money/greed. There apparently is no such thing as principles. There are no such thing as inalienable rights. There apparently are no solutions that do not involve more government control. It is apparently inconceivable that less government control could be the solution to the problems they claim to be concerned about.
Either they are either incredibly narrowed minded, incredibly stupid, or incredibly evil. Most are not all that stupid. Other than a few politicians I don’t think they they have that high a percentage of evil in their midst. That leaves narrowed minded.
With such narrow minded and evil people in positions of power our current economic situation should not be a surprise to anyone. The only thing that will surprise me is if the future does not hold a lot of government caused deaths.
The school massacres have been caused by excessive government and the economic collapse, political unrest, and starvation ahead of us will result in many, many more deaths. Will this be the final lesson that will ever need be taught that attempting a socialist/communist utopia is a really, really bad idea? Or is it true…


I’m not sure how to take this one.
It could be the kid is frowning because there are so many laws which are so complex that he has to start when very young in order to learn them all. Or it could be the artist intended to say the kid shouldn’t have to worry about the existence of guns and should be listening to fairy tales of a different type.