Quote of the day—Joshua Horwitz

Now that there is proven resolve to keep military-style weapons off of America’s streets, we hope Congress and the President will get behind a truly effective assault weapons ban – one that includes ‘copycat’ weapons just as deadly as those already banned.

Joshua Horwitz
March 2, 2004
Executive Director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
CSGV Claims Victory in Defeating Gun Immunity Bill
[As is typical with anti-gun people, their claims are usually worthless. The “Gun Immunity Bill” later passed and the “assault weapon” ban expired a few months later.

Also I would like to point out that the AWB was created and passed on the basis of “menacing looks”. Then they turned around and wanted to ban guns that matched the “assault weapons” in terms of “deadliness”.

So anything with a menacing look should be banned. And then 10 years later anything that is the functional equivalent of something that looks menacing should be banned as well.

Does that mean Michelle Obama should be banned because she is the functional equivalent of Hillary Clinton 15 years ago?—Joe]

Quote of the day—Barack Obama

Now, like the majority of Americans, I believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. And the courts have settled that as the law of the land. In this country, we have a strong tradition of gun ownership that’s handed from generation to generation. Hunting and shooting are part of our national heritage. And, in fact, my administration has not curtailed the rights of gun owners – it has expanded them, including allowing people to carry their guns in national parks and wildlife refuges.

The fact is, almost all gun owners in America are highly responsible. They’re our friends and neighbors. They buy their guns legally and use them safely, whether for hunting or target shooting, collection or protection. And that’s something that gun-safety advocates need to accept.

Barack Obama
March 13, 2011
We must seek agreement on gun reforms
[All the gun safety advocates that I know (most are NRA firearms safety instructors) do accept this. It’s the anti-gun activists that don’t accept it.

Other than that minor point I don’t have anything to disagree with in those two paragraphs. He could have suggested grief counseling for Brady Campaign and Violence Policy Center supporters but my read of the tone is that he wouldn’t have really meant it.—Joe]

Boomershoot chemicals

The Potassium Chlorate needed for Boomershoot 2011 Boomerite was delivered to my home in Idaho a few hours ago. Assuming the ground dries out enough to get it to the Taj Mahal by the end of April we just need some more target boxes, a few gallons of ethylene glycol, and the mystery ingredient (readily available from Costco in 50 pound bags) and we will have all the supplies we need for the next event.

Campus carry in Idaho up for a vote

Via the Idaho Sport Shooters Alliance:

Shooters:

H222 (the campus carry bill) will be on the House floor tomorrow for a final vote. Please contact your representatives ASAP and ask them to vote for the right of faculty, staff, students, and the public to have the means to defend themselves in the current gun-free university zones.

Find your representative here.

Contact info here.

Executive Director/General Counsel
Idaho Sport Shooters Alliance
www.idahossa.org

Thumpy

On our recent trip to the Boomershoot site I walked the 150 meters from the road to clean up some left over targets while Ry waited in my vehicle. My size 14 shoes were close enough to snowshoes that I didn’t break through the crust on the snow and it was like walking on a sidewalk for me while Ry broke through and went in half way to his knees.

The first target I detonated was composed of the spill from another 850 gram target, a complete 850 gram target and a 200 gram target. Assuming half of the spill detonated that was about 1500 grams or about 3.3 pounds of Boomerite. This is a little larger than usual but not all that much. I shot it from 25 yards away and when it went off blobs of mud landed all around me and I was impressed with the thump I received from the explosion. Previously we had been setting off 200 gram targets from 25 yards and I was concerned that it didn’t seem that there was as much thump as I had expected. The only previous 850 gram target detonation had been from 470 yards and Ry reported it had the biggest flash he had ever seen and the thump seemed to be typical.

When I got back to the vehicle Ry reported the first explosion was quite remarkable. It was very thumpy. He also felt it before he heard it and he counted at least six echoes from it. He felt it before he heard it? Hmm… the shock wave had to be transmitted through the ground for that to happen. I did have that target on the ground as opposed to on a stake so the spilled Boomerite would get the maximum shock from the target so the ground coupling would be greater than normal. But how much faster does the shock wave travel through the wet ground than through the air? Would the 150 meters be far enough for the difference between the air and ground waves to be discernible?

A quick Bing search didn’t pop up anything for the speed of sound in water soaked earth but the speed of sound in water is about 1.5 km/s. The speed of sound in hard rock is between 5 and 7 km/s and the speed of sound in the air is about 330 m/s. Assuming the speed of sound in the wet earth was no faster than the speed of sound in water then the time to Ry from the explosion would have been about 0.1 seconds through the earth and 0.45 seconds through the air for a difference of about 0.35 seconds. This is easily discernible by a human. If the speed of sound is greater than the 1.5 km/s the difference increases.

Years ago when I had time to shoot targets at Boomershoot events I would shoot from the ground and it always seemed I could feel the thump from the explosion in my chest through the ground but I wasn’t quite sure. The thump through the air was quite noticeable too. This new data point confirms my impression from years ago.

Quote of the day—Ayn Rand

Government “help” to business is just as disastrous as government persecution… the only way a government can be of service to national prosperity is by keeping its hands off.

Ayn Rand
[A friend of mine once compared government aid to candy that causes cancer. It tastes sweet and is almost irresistible but eventually it will kill you.

Some lessons are taught over and over with only a few ever really grasping it.—Joe]

New target containers

I have been sick for days but Ry came over to Idaho with me on Friday night and yesterday we went to the Boomershoot site to do some tests. Boomershoot is May 1st and time is getting short to make any last minute changes in the event. Ry has his own thoughts about the day on site and other ideas of potential here. I thought I would add a little more from my perspective.


At Ry’s suggestion, via conversations with http://www.ultimak.com/ (who blogs here), I found and purchased 100 each of some plastic containers to use for targets. These containers are actually made of a corn starch resin and are compostable. I was hoping that “compostable” would also mean “biodegradable”. Further research has revealed this is not the case:



PLA is not biodegradable in its “as-extruded” state. Instead, it must first be hydrolyzed before it becomes biodegradable. To achieve hydrolysis of PLA at significant levels, both a relative humidity at or above 98% and a temperature at or above 60°C are required.


I expected that UV light would break it down but again further research proves (from the previously linked document) that hypothesis is also incorrect:



PLA is also highly resistant to degradation by ultraviolet radiation, with no loss in elongation after 100 hours in Xenon arc testing, and minimal losses at longer exposure. Amazingly for a polymer that is readily consumed by microbes in composting, PLA does not support bacterial growth before composting.


This means that if we use these target containers we will have to pick up all the pieces of the targets that were broken but not detonated. As Ry pointed out in his post from yesterday the detonated targets are reduced to very fine shard less than 2 mm long and perhaps 1/10 that diameter. We were only able to find them because the paper labels we used to secure the lids retained a few of them throughout the explosion.


Another downside of the targets is that if you get an hit that does not detonate the target the back side of the target is blown completely open and the contents are dumped as shown in the picture below. But on the other hand it was easy for the shooter and spotter to see the target was dead.


WP_000136Web_2011


This was a hit from a 50 grain Hornady V-MAXTM traveling at about 1625 fps. Another target detonated from a similar hit (I had forgotten the satisfaction of seeing the view in the scope suddenly and silently completely fill with smoke followed by the ground shaking thump as the sound reached you 1.25 seconds later). And a third target received an edge hit without detonating. This is consistent with other tests on other target containers.


From the manufacturing and storage viewpoint these targets are awesome. They can be filled in probably 1/4 the time and with increased storage density.


We tested two different size targets.


One target size tested was the “32 oz Clear Rectangle Deli” which held about 850 grams of Boomerite. This compares well to the current seven inch square targets which contain about 900 grams of Boomerite. However the “active area” of these targets is significantly less. To be considered “a solid hit” the active area is only 4” x 5” compared with the nearly 7” x 7” of the previous cardboard box targets. We can get 16 of these targets into each of our storage crates which is a 33% increase over the 12 of the 7” x 7” cardboard targets.


The other target we tested was the “8 oz Clear Rectangle Deli” which held about 200 grams of Boomerite. This compares to current 3” x 3” cardboard boxes which hold about 215 grams of Boomerite. The active area is 3.25” x 4.25” which is a little larger than the current three inch targets about the same than the four inch targets. The current four inch targets contain about 385 grams of Boomerite. We can get 48 of these targets into each of our storage crates which is the same as the current 3” x 3” cardboard boxes compared to 18 of the 4” x 4” cardboard boxes.


On our way back to Moscow we talked about the test results and our major concern was that we expect there will be more spilled targets. An edge hit or failure to detonate results in a massive spill. This material must be cleaned up at the end of the day because it can spontaneously combust and result in unpleasant interactions with the neighbors. Later that night I figured out a way to easily spray the dumped targets with water and I had convinced myself we were a go for the new targets this year. Then I did the research on the UV resistance and biodegradability and am now mostly convinced we should not use them.


As of this minute my plan is to research some other plastic boxes (Ry found some and sent me links) before making the final decision on new target containers.

Blacklist plugin for Windows Live Writer

Several months ago I started using Windows Liver Writer for creating and editing blog posts. It is much better than the native editors for any of the blogging software that I have ever tried. Yes, I am Microsoft employee and this is a Microsoft product but I’m not exaggerating. It makes blogging much more pleasant.


Barron has improved the experience still more by creating a plugin for Live Writer such that it checks all of your links in your post against the Right Haven blacklist I created. Hence, if you have a link to one of the bad guy media outlets the plugin will catch it at publish time.


I did have some problems installing it. When I tried to save or run the .msi file it always turned into an .htm file for some reason. I ended up saving it as a .htm then renaming it to .msi and then running it to install the plugin. Another item of confusion was that there are two ways you can set options in Live Writer. One is from the “Blog Account” tab and the other is dropdown menu that has the exit menu entry. The first option setting method doesn’t give you all the configuration control over the plugin. Be sure to use the second method.

Quote of the day—Barron Barnett

This agency needs to be put down like a rabid dog and it’s behavior and rate of growth reminds me of some other agencies in the early 1990s.  The only difference  is they haven’t shot a woman holding a baby or burned a bunch of people to death. Instead they are giving people extra unnecessary dose of radiation at the point of the gun, claiming necessity, but in reality it’s pointless.

Barron Barnett
March 13, 2011
TSA Body Scanners Giving 10x Dose
[With the clarification that it is the agency and not the people that need to be put down I’m in complete agreement with this.—Joe]

Quote of the day—Milton Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.

Milton Friedman
[It is predicted the Federal budget deficit will reach $1.65 trillion this year with a $14.1 trillion debt and about $2.1 trillion in income. Yet the House cannot reach agreement on spending cuts. The House Republicans want to only cut $60 billion in spending and the Democrats only want to cut spending $6.5 billion. If you were to scale this down into numbers people might be able to relate to it would look like the following.

If your family income were $50,000 then:

  • Family debt is $335,700
  • Family deficit is $39,300 (spending is $89,300/year)
  • The head of household wants to cut $1,430 in yearly spending
  • The spouse wants to cut $154.80 in yearly spending

The children should cut up the credit cards and sell everything that isn’t the bare minimum needed for food, shelter, clothing, transportation, and communication. If the debt still isn’t being paid down they should consider selling their parents organs.—Joe]

Quote of the day—Charles Krauthammer

Passing a law like the assault weapons ban is a symbolic — purely symbolic — move in that direction. Its only real justification is not to reduce crime but to desensitize the public to the regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation.

Charles Krauthammer
April 5, 1996
Disarm the Citizenry. But not yet
Originally in The Washington Post on April 5. The above link is in the Seattle Times from April 8, 1996.
[Via email from Ry who said, “Lots of qotd material here”. This was like saying, “Nukes make lots of dust.”

This was part of the overreaching the anti-gun people did in the mid and late 1990s. They were on a roll in September 1994 and thought they were unstoppable and openly announced their intentions. They thought there were no obstacles. They thought at most there were just speed bumps causing them to slow down on their way to total domination. And they were wrong.—Joe]

The argument I would like someone to make

There has been a fair amount of discussion recently about the Illinois attorney general ruling that the names of people with Firearm Owner Identification (FOID) cards can be made public.

Some people are saying the release increases the risk a gun owner will have their home broken into by a criminal wanting a gun. Others say it gives a different type of criminal knowledge that they are unlikely to be shot at if they break in while the resident are home. Still others point out less obvious risks and concerns:

“There is some prejudice against gun owners and a perspective employer says, ‘This guy who shows up is on a list, I’m not going to hire him, I don’t want a gun nut,’” he said.

“It kind of resembles the sex offender registry in many ways,” he said. “To create this list feels like the same thing.”

I think those are all valid arguments. But I have not seen anyone make the argument that I would like made.

What if the state required all active homosexuals to be registered and there were HID cards issued? What would the reaction be if someone wanted those people’s names released? I can just hear the Brady Campaign screaming now (they did it before—check out the update), “It’s not the same thing!” Perhaps being a homosexual isn’t something under an individuals control but actually engaging is homosexual acts arguably is something under individual control. If you want to be active as a homosexual sign up for your card and then be outed by the state. After all, don’t your neighbors have a right to know? And don’t parents have a right to know those sort of things about their children’s teachers?

Okay, they are probably right. Being a homosexual isn’t a very good analogy to being a gun owner—because being an active homosexual isn’t specific enumerated right protected by the U.S. Constitution. It’s more like being Catholic, Jewish, or Muslim since exercising the religion of your choice is also a specific enumerated right protected by the U.S. Constitution. Shall we have a little discussion about requiring Jews to get their ID cards from the state and then being outed to people who claim “a need to know who their neighbors are”?

Layers of editorial oversight

It could be this was ignorance of the investigators or a communications error somewhere along the way but a fact checker or someone should have caught this before it went public:

When investigators arrived they found shell casings from a .380 magnum and an AK-47 at the scene in the 3900 block of North Lansing Place.

A “.380 magnum”? That would be something like a 9mm Lugar, right?

Quote of the day—Matt Taibbi

I’m beginning to think that pushing for gun control is a good idea, if only because there’s nothing else that will nauseate and terrify Tea Partiers more. To me, the right-wing fascination with guns is such an obviously Freudian phenomenon that it’s almost embarrassing; real and very justified fears of creeping political impotence, idiotically and self-defeatingly expressed in passionate defense of their right to shoot themselves in tragic domestic accidents. Going after Republicans’ gun rights has always seemed to me needlessly provocative and cruel, sort of like removing the tinfoil helmet your local schizophrenic thinks is protecting him from space rays.


But now the paranoia has now gone so far, it’s just too tempting not to tweak. There’s got to be some way to pursue a new gun-control law that would maximally freak out this growing population of people who literally sleep with their guns at night.


How about a new law requiring all registered handgun owners to wear white Kevlar Clockwork Orange-style jockstraps? Or how about a new campaign – and this one I actually like – in which all of us who do not have guns voluntarily send in letters to the ATF, cheerfully informing them of our unarmed status (“Dear Government Agent: In case you were keeping a database of such information…”).


Matt Taibbi
March 10, 2011
Time For Gun Control — If Only to Tweak the Tea Party
[I wonder what Taibbi would think of laws requiring journalist to be licensed and registered?


Gun owners need to know what these people think of them and Taibbi comes through. Not only is Taibbi adhering to Markley’s law he is willingly exposing his bigotry.—Joe]

The ATF can do some things right

According to CBS the ATF Chief Public Affairs officer sent out a memo early on the week of February 28th to all their “Public Information Officers” with the instructions:

Please make every effort for the next two weeks to maximize coverage of ATF operations/enforcement actions/arrests at the local and regional level. Given the negative coverage by CBS Evening News last week and upcoming events this week, the bureau should look for every opportunity to push coverage of good stories

It just so happens I have an subscription to some of the ATF news updates. For the entire month of February I received seven updates. During the three days of February 28, March 1, and March 2 I received eight updates. Here is a typical update.

So it appears they have Public Information Officers that can deliver when asked to. It’s good to know our government has quality people in their employee even if it is in the spin department. If they could only engage the “wash” cycle before the “spin” we would all be much better off.

Quote of the day—Bill O’Connor

A golf course is the willful and deliberate misuse of a perfectly good rifle range.

Bill O’Connor
From Jeff Cooper’s Commentaries
Vol. 3, No. 6
25 April 1995
[This came to mind because of a comment I saw at Roberta’s place.

That is the way I see it too. I’m a probably reminded of this far more frequently than most because there is golf course close enough to my hidden underground bunker that I could land spit wads into it if I went topside.—Joe]

It’s not paranoia when they really are out to get you

CBS is reporting that the ATF has been deliberately letting gun runners take guns into Mexico since 2008! I find that very interesting.

If I were a paranoid person I would be tempted to say it was all an elaborate plan to justify making U.S. gun laws more restrictive to “solve” the problem the U.S. government created.

Gun Control Campaigners

Yesterday Say Uncle posted about a cable network post for “Gun Control Campaigners” all over.

We can add, to no ones surprise, Boston to the list of places they are advertising.

I thought the phrase “Gun Control Campaigners” was a little odd. In our country those people would typically be called “Gun Control Activists”.

A little bit of Bing searching hints that phrase is common in the U.K.

Quote of the day—Handgun Control Inc.

Handgun Control is pleased to announce its participation in FreedomChannel.com, a new nonpartisan political internet website. FreedomChannel.com, which launches on November 8, features the first-ever video-on-demand issue statements from presidential candidates and representatives of advocacy groups.

Handgun Control President Bob Walker is featured in the FreedomChannel.com’s “Views-on-the-News” video-on-demand program, speaking about the need for common-sense measures to reduce gun violence in this country.

Handgun Control Inc.
November 4, 1999
HANDGUN CONTROL PARTICIPATES IN LAUNCH OF NEW POLITICAL INTERNET SITE, FREEDOMCHANNEL.COM
[With Handgun Control, now The Brady Campaign, being featured on “Freedom Channel” it is no surprise FreedomChannel.com no longer exists. They either had crap for brains attempting to associate freedom with an anti-freedom organization or it collapsed from the weight of the irony.—Joe]

Quote of the day—Violence Policy Center

The Violence Policy Center (VPC) today released The Endgame, a report detailing three areas that must be reformed within the gun industry in order for a settlement of lawsuits filed by major cities against the industry to have any significant effect in reducing firearms violence. Public statements by some involved in ongoing talks with the gun industry indicate a growing desire to quickly reach a settlement.



A meaningful settlement must include:



  1. Restrictions on Gun Industry Products

    • Stop innovating for lethality, i.e., developing products, especially handguns, for a combination of high caliber and concealability.
    • Close the loopholes by which assault rifles and high-capacity ammunition magazines, supposedly already banned, continue to flow onto the market.
    • Agree to recall products with safety related defects causing death or serious injury to consumers, as well as develop a system to identify and remedy these defects.

  2. Reform How Guns Are Distributed

    • Accept independent standards to weed out those distributors and retailers engaging in illegal or negligent sales. For example, manufacturers should include in their agreements with wholesalers provisions prohibiting sales to “kitchen-table” gun dealers, who operate out of their homes, and dealers who sell at gun shows. Also, a system for spotting dealers who sell a disproportionate number of crime guns is needed.

  3. Changes in Marketing Practices

    • Immediately cease marketing campaigns aimed at children, as well as fear-based marketing strategies, such as using predictions of Y2K social collapse to drive up gun sales. Also, the industry should stop making misleading and unwarranted self-defense claims in their advertising.

Violence Policy Center
December 21, 1999
New VPC Report Lays Out Minimal Terms for Settlement of Litigation Against Gun Industry
[In 1999 they still had fair amount of power. Probably not as much as they thought they had but still they had inflicted a fair amount of damage in the recent past and wanted to get another whack in before Clinton left office. The problem was that they overreached and struck out. We won that fight as a result of their grasping for something beyond their reach.


This was the same problem the Brady Campaign had with initiative 676 in Washington State in 1997. The local Washington Ceasefire anti-gun organization wanted to put a much more limited and realizable initiative on the ballot. But the Brady Campaign said they would provide support only if was made much broader. They bit off more than they could chew and lost 29% to 71%.


I remember the concealed carry fights of 15+ years ago. There were a lot of people that wanted “Vermont Carry” rather than licensing. It was believed there was no path to “Vermont Carry” once we had “Shall Issue” carry. It was believed that we were giving up too much by allowing the government to license a right. That we now appear to be on a roll to “Constitutional Carry” in many states proves that fear was unfounded. We are winning because we were willing to accept what we could get rather than what we believed was due to us.


There is something I learned in chess a long time ago which holds true in the gun games I play and it’s true in politics as well . It’s more important to not lose than it is win. Let the other guy take the chances and you win when they screw up.—Joe]