You don’t hurt ’em if you don’t hit ’em.
Lieutenant General Lewis B. Puller
USMC
1962
From Marine Corps Quotes
[Making a case for accurate rifles and ammo?–Joe]
You don’t hurt ’em if you don’t hit ’em.
Lieutenant General Lewis B. Puller
USMC
1962
From Marine Corps Quotes
[Making a case for accurate rifles and ammo?–Joe]
Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion…in private self-defense.
James Madison
That’s kind of like the ACLU giving people who believe in freedom of speech a D in the First Amendment.
Linn Armstrong
A National Rifle Association handgun instructor
Grand Valley Colorado
March 10, 2006
After the Brady Bunch gave Colorado a ‘D’ grade on “gun safety”.
Reno tells us that the weapon is totally safe, the finger was off the trigger.
I now know I’ll never need a trigger lock if I just keep my finger off the trigger.
“Lee Enfield”
Regarding the raid the took Elian from his relatives and back in the hands of his Cuban father.
They are pulling the plug on the gun and gun owner registry in Canada and the nationwide long gun registry (handguns have all been confiscated–except those owned by the criminals) in the UK can’t get off the ground after ten years. Details are here:
Dunblane gun crackdown ‘a failure’
ALMOST a decade after the Dunblane massacre, ministers have been accused of an “abject failure” to crack down on the number of firearms in circulation. Tories have joined Labour MPs, gun-control campaigners and peers in condemning the government over the National Firearms Register, which was promised after Dunblane but will not be delivered for at least another year.
The need to establish a searchable, nationwide computer system to track those who hold firearms licences was established after Thomas Hamilton’s murderous attack on Dunblane Primary School on March 13, 1996.
Several investigations, including the inquiry led by Lord Cullen, found disparities in the records of legally held firearms maintained by police forces across the country. Hamilton had legal certificates allowing him to own the guns.
Legislation paving the way for the register of certificates was rushed through Parliament during Tony Blair’s first days in office in 1997, but the project has since become bogged down by a succession of technical problems.
The Home Office and police chiefs have since reversed the plan for a standalone firearms register, opting instead to link it to the Police National Computer. That will not happen until March 2007 at the earliest.
More details are here:
Pilots highlighted “data quality issues” which have yet to be ironed out, much to the anger of campaigners such as Dr Mick North, father of five-year-old victim Sophie.
Chief Constable Bernard Hogan-Howe told the Jonathan Dimbleby programme that there had been “great progress” in gun control but admitted that 10 years was “too long” for the register.
He said: “I understand that they’ve had two pilots and we’re told that there are IT problems to actually resolving it, but I’m with Dr North in the sense that 10 years on, this is too long.
“We want it, there’s certainly no resistance from the police service to have it and clearly what we do need is a register of all the people with a licence and we certainly need a register of those people who have applied for a licence and had it refused because the danger is they apply to one force, fail, and then re-apply to another.”
The establishment of a searchable database of everyone who holds a firearms certificate, or who has ever applied for one, was one of the central demands of the campaign for greater gun control that followed the Dunblane massacre in 1996.
It was promised by Prime Minister Tony Blair to members of the Snowdrop Campaign, set up by victims’ families to call for tighter gun controls.
About £5.5 million has so far been spent on setting up the register, which will be piloted once again in May.
“Great progress” in gun control? They make that claim when the number of crimes committed with guns has skyrocketed? Oh yeah, I forgot that’s not how they measure progress. They measure progress by how few people can legally own firearms, not how often guns are used criminally. These people have mental problems.
This delay is yet another example of Home Office inability to operate computer systems, and if they cannot get a relatively simple system for a firearms register like this to work so many years after such an awful disaster, what hope is there for the vast system needed to make identity cards work?
Alistair Carmichael
Orkney and Shetland MP
March 5, 2006
Dunblane gun crackdown ‘a failure’
News.Scotsman.com
[There is no hope of a system of national identity cards working. If you have doubts read this.–Joe]
We were recently treated to a bizarre exchange between a hapless Englishman and some BATchick in some front office in Washington. Our English friend was inquiring about bringing his arms into the United States, and was told that he could not import a Peacemaker (Colt Single-action Army) because it had no “legitimate sporting purpose!” Now, apart from the fact that “legitimate sporting purpose” is a blatantly unconstitutional interpretation of the Second Amendment, it is apparent that these poor souls who are confined to the District of Columbia cannot keep up with the times. Clearly the girl involved had not heard of the proliferation of “Cowboy Action Shooting.” I stuck my oar in to tell her that this sort of bureaucratic behavior gives ignorance a bad name. I guess I can expect the black helicopters any night now.
Jeff Cooper
From Jeff Cooper’s Commentaries
Vol. 5, No. 5
April 1997
I’m all for religious tolerance as long as they are also tolerant of others. I’m intolerant of intolerance. The Supreme Court of Canada just made an important ruling with an 8-0 victory for freedom and tolerance. I think it’s time for some Canadian gun owners to start a new religion to “push the envelope” just a little bit more for the cause of freedom. Here are the details on the ruling:
For nearly five years, Gurbaj Singh has argued that he has a legal right under religious freedom to wear a ceremonial dagger to school.
The Supreme Court of Canada now agrees with him.
In a unanimous 8-0 decision yesterday, the top court sided with Singh, now 17, that a Montreal school board went too far in banning his wearing of a Sikh kirpan, stating that it is an infringement on religious freedom that “cannot be justified” under the Charter of Rights.
The Illinois State Rifle Association walloped the Brady Bunch, etc. yesterday in a news release:
The very foundations of the gun control movement were rocked today by the results of a survey taken by the National Association of Chiefs of Police (NACOP). In a nutshell, the survey shows that the nation’s top law enforcement officers believe that average citizens can be trusted to responsibly own firearms; that criminals ignore gun control laws; and that concealed carry laws reduce crime.
These revelations come as a stark contrast to gun control movement propaganda that asserts that police officials feel that our streets would be safer if law-abiding citizens were disarmed.
Specifically, the survey revealed that 93 percent of chiefs and sheriffs felt that citizens should be able to purchase firearms for sport and self defense; 73 percent opposed so-called “one gun a month” laws; 96 percent believed that criminals ignore gun control laws and; 63 percent supported laws that allow citizens to carry defensive firearms as a means to control crime.
The complete survey can be found here.
Keep the pressure up. We need to politically exterminate these bigots.
For them, a gun is a symbol of power and potency… The gun has replaced the spear as a phallic symbol.
Peter Mwaura
Nairobi
The Nation
Owning a Gun Sign of Power And Success
February 25, 2006
[I get rather annoyed at people that believe they can read the minds of others and invariably fail. This guy is no exception. In all likelihood it is Mwaura that has the mental problems. Thanks to Jeff for the pointer.–Joe]
Long story made short: There is a new version of Modern Ballistics available here.
Long story made long: As many of you know I wrote the exterior ballistics program Modern Ballistics. I had the free demo require a license to be updated once a month by contacting server which kept track of how many computers were using the demo. The user interface to the server had a limit of 100 computers using any copy of the software at a time. It turned out that more than 100 people were using the demo in a month and new users couldn’t test out the software. This happened just as I moved everything to a new computer and was in the middle of converting my code to use a new compiler. I had deleted the old compiler off the old computer and I had no way to fix the problem people were having. Last night (early this morning actually) I got the new build of the program tested. To get things out quicker I just made the demo not require connecting to the server at all. Then I had to update the installation process and test it. Then I had to update the website. I finished up about 0200 this morning. Download the latest version here.
Let me know if you run into any bugs. The testing was rather “thin”. In particular I am concerned about it working on various operating systems. I only tested it on Windows XP and XP-x64. I have a Win98 and Win95 available at home but I’m not home now. Send an email to bugs@modernballistics.com if you notice something broken. Thanks.
I’m not praticularily surprised to see the average barking moonbat saying guns used in a murder are going to hell. But when the leader of a nation says “they’re evil” you have to wonder what kind of insanity has taken hold of an entire nation. The story is here:
PRIME Minister John Howard tightened gun laws after the Port Arthur massacre because he did not want Australia going down the same path as the US, he said today.
Mr Howard, on the eve of his 10th anniversary in office, said today the nation’s grief over the 1996 Port Arthur massacre had been a great opportunity to tighten Australia’s gun laws.
“I would call that very definitely an extraordinary outpouring of amazement and grief in this country and I knew out of that there was an opportunity to grab the moment and think about a fundamental change to gun laws in this country,” he told the Nine Network.
Mr Howard said he did not want Australia to adopt the American stance on guns.
“I did not want Australia to go down the American path,” he said.
“There are some things about America I admire and there are some things I don’t.
“And one of the things I don’t admire about America is their … slavish love of guns. They’re evil.”
And you, mister Prime Minister, are irrational. Answer Just One Question.
And one of the things I don’t admire about America is their … slavish love of guns. They’re evil.
John Howard
Prime Minister of Australia
March 01, 2006
The Australian
The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be.
Lao Tsu
[In the more narrow context of “gun crime” this is also true. The more restrictions on firearms the more useful they are to criminals and the more likely they are to use them. If all potential victims were armed the criminals would be more likely to avoid situations where they could be shot.–Joe]
Chances are, if you’re ever going to be involved in a home defense situation with a shotgun, you’ll be in your birthday-suit. So unless you’ve got ammunition Velcro’d to your ass, all the extra ammunition you’ll have will be on the gun.
Greg Hamilton
Self Defense Instructor
March 7, 1999
Here’s what the public thinks:
(Angus Reid Global Scan) – Many adults in the United States believe the current regulations regarding firearms are adequate, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 52 per cent of respondents believe the U.S. does not need stricter gun control laws.
…
Polling Data
Does the U.S. need stricter gun control laws?
Yes
39%
No
52%
Source: Rasmussen Reports
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,000 American adults, conducted on Feb. 14 and Feb. 15, 2006. Margin of error is 3 per cent.
Here’s what’s on the agenda for Congress (from Volume 3, Issue 1, January/February 2006 Firearms Coalition, Hard Corps Report):
The Democrats are fractured over gun control. The Canadian Gun registry is about to be scrapped. New Orleans. The list goes on.
Keep up the pressure. Drive these bigots into political extinction.
What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.
Thomas Jefferson
Letter Nov. 13, 1787
referring to Shay’s rebellion
[Present day examples of tyrants and patriots abound and are a constant reminder we must not give up the fight to keep our right to keep and bear arms.–Joe]
The ineffectual, expensive, and dangerous gun registry in Canada is about to get dismantled:
OTTAWA (CP) – The Conservative government has created a committee of two cabinet ministers and a backbencher to figure out how best to kill the long-gun registry as soon as possible.
Registry critic Garry Breitkreuz, who is working with Justice Minister Vic Toews and Public Security Minister Stockwell Day, said he has been given wide leeway to deal swiftly with the registry.
Remember New Orleans and remember Canada.
From Connecticut:
HARTFORD — Getting guns off the streets was the focus yesterday of 15 Connecticut mayors and Gov. M. Jodi Rell at a summit on a statewide urban violence problem.
A rash of shootings, fights and other violent incidents that has plagued Stamford and Norwalk in recent months has also hit other cities. Rell last month invited the top local officials of the state’s 14 largest cities and the town of Windham to meet to share suggestions and strategies for attacking the problem, particularly among Connecticut’s youth.
Most of the 90-minute meeting, which was closed to the public, focused on the problem of illegal guns, participants said.
Just as Heinlein said. I have Just One Question for them.
If “everybody knows” such-and-such, then it ain’t so, by at least ten thousand to one.
Robert Heinlein
[Can you say “we need more gun control?”–Joe]