Gun control advocates are ‘moderates’

It isn’t the first time I’ve seen this and it probably won’t be the last:

Bloomberg, who was a Democrat before he switched parties for his first run for mayor in 2001, is a political moderate on such issues as abortion and gun control.

Why aren’t politicians that want to, and do, violate the constitution considered extremists instead of moderates?

A history of going postal

From the AP via the Washington Post comes this list of 12 different deadly postal shootings.  Should we ban postal buildings?  If it only saves one life…

Quote of the day–John F. Kennedy

The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.

John F. Kennedy (1917 – 1963)
[Think gun control.–Joe]

U.K. is realizing it’s worst fear

Considering some of the crazy things the Brits have done in relation to firearms it should come as no surprise they are creating the circumstances in which their worst fears are realized:

Muggings and violent attacks up by more than 10%
By Richard Ford, Home Correspondent

MUGGINGS and violent attacks on people soared by more than 10 per cent in the third quarter of last year as the police struggled to contain street crime, according to figures published yesterday.

Street robbery is rising at its fastest since Tony Blair demanded action three years ago by the Home Office and police to tackle the issue.

Robberies soared by 11 per cent on top of a 4 per cent increase in the second quarter of last year. The Metropolitan Police has said that one of the main factors behind an increase in mugging in London is the rising number of portable hi-tech goods, such as mobile phones and MP3 players. In the weeks after the July 7 bombings, muggings in London rose 23 per cent after thousands of police were sent to guard the capital’s transport network.

Gun crime rose by 1 per cent in the year to the end of September 2005, to more than 11,000 incidents. Violence against the person rose 4 per cent overall, although more serious cases including homicide, threats to murder and serious woundings fell by 10 per cent.

Offences in lower category crimes such as less serious woundings rose by 10 per cent. Serious injuries from gun crime rose by 18 per cent to 470 in the year to the end of September but the number of deaths from gun incidents fell by more than one third to 50 compared with 80 in the previous year.

I find it engages my sick sense of humor that they blame the increase in muggings on the rising number of portable hi-tech goods.  Do they even hear what they are saying?  Muggers don’t attack someone they think has a fair chance being their equal.  They “interview” their potential victim and attack those that look and act like “grass eaters”.  Carrying a concealed firearm makes the victim selection process much more difficult and if that process misses something the possibility of catastrophic failure is quite high.  Muggings go way down when the wolves can’t distinguish between the sheep and sheep dogs.

Canadian gun registry hits

This is just a letter to the editor and in general these are extremely unreliable sources of information.  But if true it explains something that has bugged me for a while, “Why are there so many accesses to the Canadian gun registry?”

Every time a car’s licence plate is checked to see if it is a stolen car, or a driver’s licence is checked to see if it is suspended, a “hit” on the gun registry gets recorded. We see thousands of those each day, so what? None of them have anything to do with keeping guns away from criminals, which should be the primary role of any gun-control initiative. Not even its most adamant supporters claim that the gun registry does that.

The writer goes on to nail the real reason for the registry–it makes some people feel good:

It was an interesting idea which didn’t pan out; it’s now an extremely expensive pink elephant that people cling to because it gives them a warm fuzzy feeling. One thousand more police officers with state-of-the-art equipment will do a lot more to combat gang violence in Toronto than some inaccurate and error-filled list of who owns which duck hunting guns.

Elena Markina, Thornhill

Quote of the day–The Brandon Sun

The new Conservative government has the federal long gun registry in its crosshairs, which has prompted some defenders of the program to plead with the Tories not to pull the trigger on the much-maligned registry.

But the cries of clemency coming from crime victims and now police chiefs, as compelling as they may be, must not be heeded and the registry must be put out of its misery.

The Brandon Sun
Say goodbye to the gun registry
January 31, 2006
[If this actually comes about it will give freedom lovers everywhere hope.–Joe]

This is what happens in places without guns–Case XI

Restrictions both by the state and the U.S. Post Office prevented people from having effective defensive tools available when a woman went postal yesterday.  Six killed, one wounded:

GOLETA, Calif. — A female ex-postal worker opened fire at a mail processing plant, killing six people and critically wounding another before committing suicide, authorities said early today.

Deputies responding to a call of shots fired about 9:15 p.m. Monday found two people dead outside the plant.

Two wounded women were located inside and were taken to Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital. One died and the other was listed in critical condition early today with a gunshot wound to the head.

Nearly five hours later, deputies found four additional bodies, including one believed to be the female shooter, Santa Barbara County Sheriff Jim Anderson said. The shooter, who was not identified, died of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound, he said.

Quote of the day–Decree of the Council of People’s Commissars

The Council of Peoples’ Commissars has resolved that:

   1) All Citizens and all civil organizations should surrender machineguns, rifles, revolvers of all kinds – whether working or defective – as well as cartridges, and all models of sabres.

This decree also applies to all organizations which possess the above-mentioned weapons, and which are not part of regular military detachments approved by the People’s Commissariat of Military Affairs or the Revolutionary Military Council of the Republic.

NOTE: All certificates for keeping weapons are therefore invalidated.

 

Deputy Chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Republic, E. Sklyansky
Approved 29/X 1918
Chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars
V. Ulyanov (Lenin)
From Lethal Laws–Gun Control is the Key to Genocide
[Instructions that accompanied the decree specifically exempted members of the Russian Communist Party from the requirement that all firearms be surrendered.  From 1929 to 1953 Stalin murdered about 20,000,000 persons.  Never register all, if any, of your guns.  Registration fails my Jews in the Attic Test.–Joe]

Quote of the day–Julia Gorin

In short, he is a man begging for subjugation. He longs for its promise of equality in helplessness. Because only when that strange, independent alpha breed of male is helpless along with him will he feel adequate. Indeed, his freedom lies in this other man’s containment.

Julia Gorin
The anti-gun male
Jewish World Review
March 8, 2002 / 24 Adar, 5762
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/julia/gorin030802.asp
[Thanks to Zendo Deb for the pointer to this article.–Joe]

This is what happens in places without guns–Case X

I saw reference to this on Kim du Toit’s blog the other day but it wasn’t until a comment was left on my “…Case IX” post that I read the source document.  Excellent example:

Outside of school hours, my Cornish village of St Day descends into a state of anarchy. Feral yobs run wild while adults live in fear of threats, vandalism and intimidation. I despair that while we spend millions battling global warming, terrorism and drugs, the biggest threat is harassment by degenerate thugs.

For years St Day, like most rural settlements with a bored young population, suffered the usual mischiefs of the odd problem family and occasional petty vandalism.

Then, in spring 2005, yobs began to gather every night below the village clock tower (right). There are incessant screams, threats to passers-by, regular blockades: motorists have been forced to turn back, while boy racers are permitted to screech through. A chav checkpoint.

For local residents, the protocol on Fore Street is simple: do not confront, do not engage, stay inside. A resident who raised thousands of pounds for a village youth club was repaid with a bag of horse manure, mixed with petrol, set ablaze against his front door.

Things got worse at the end of the summer. A gang broke into a funeral wake in the church hall. They smashed ornaments and hurled abuse at terrified guests, who were ferried home while the attackers ransacked the vicarage.

Days later a church wedding rehearsal suffered a similar attack. Despite plenty of witnesses, and evidence, no arrests were made because the police wanted to catch the suspects in the act.

After a long, hot summer confined to our homes amid the perpetual cacophony of idle, ferocious children, we hoped to regain daytime control of the village with the start of the school term. But while waiting for the school bus one day, yobs set fire to an outbuilding and smashed every window of the parish church.

A middle-aged woman was fenced into a telephone box by 20 screaming thugs; a household was forced out of Fore Street overnight. In total five households left the main street in 2005.

If I found a middle-aged woman fenced into a telephone box by 20 screaming thugs in one of the states I can legally carry I might have to do a magazine change (only 18+1 of .40 S&W in my STI) but she wouldn’t be in the telephone box when I left and the screaming of the thugs would have changed pitch if not completely stopped.

Survival blog

James Wesley, Rawles – www.SurvivalBlog.comTM quoted me about people, society, guns, and explosives on his blog today.  He also promoted this blog and Boomershoot some too.  He said this blog was “wonderfully addictive.”  I hadn’t realized that anyone other than me was addicted to it.  I met Rawles a couple times at gun shows a long time ago.  Nice guy to talk to.  I have read a couple versions of his book TEOTWAWKI which I enjoyed too.

National Ammo Day is site of the month

Kim du Toit should be proud.  “The Gun Guys” (anti-gun bigots) decided his National Ammo Day BUYcott website was worthy of being their site of the month.  Here is a sample of their bigotry:

…if du Toit really wants to support the gun industry, maybe he should just cut out the middleman and have a “Kill People Day.” One day a year, every gun owner would just kill a hundred people. It would accomplish the goals of the gun industry, without the trouble of going to the store and buying all that ammo!

Congratulations Kim!  Now if we could just get Boomershoot.org to be site of the month sometime.  As Ry said to me today on these nut cases, “Great!  Every bit of traffic helps.”

Quote of the day–Kim du Toit

And that’s the difference between Mr. B and myself. He shakes his head in bafflement, I resume sharpening the M4 bayonet while crooning “Soon, soon, my precioussss…”

Kim du Toit

January 24, 2006
[I can relate to that–in so many ways.–Joe]

This is what happens in places without guns–Case IX

From the U.K. Sun:

O’Mahoney used her video phone to film the attack that left David dying from 44 injuries, including a ruptured spleen and five fractured ribs.

She booted the 37-year-old’s head like a football as other gang members piled in, making sure she had it all on film.

She even gloated: “Pose for the camera.”

Three other members of O’Mahoney’s evil gang were sentenced to 12 years each for manslaughter — in a crime that shocked Britain.

The gang attacked SEVEN other victims later that night and filmed their agony in an orgy of violence on London’s South Bank.

After they were sentenced there were sickening scenes outside the court. Friends and relatives of the killers hurled insults at David’s pals and family, including his elderly dad Geoffrey.

They screamed and even made throat cutting gestures. Incredibly, one voice shouted: “Your friend has cost my cousin 12 years.”

Emphasis in the original.

Don’t you wish we too lived in a gun free paradise like the U.K.?

Introspection hint

The more I learn about people and society the more I love guns and explosives.  Guns and explosives are more understandable, more predictable, and less hazardous.

Quote of the day–Jeff Cooper

I have been criticized by referring to our federal masked men as “ninja,” when in the view of the critic the traditional role of the ninja in Japan was to fight against oppression and tyranny. Let us note that almost no one ever resorts to force and violence unless he is convinced that his cause is right, but without going into that let us reflect upon the fact that a man who covers his face shows reason to be ashamed of what he is doing. A man who takes it upon himself to shed blood while concealing his identity is a revolting perversion of the warrior ethic.

It has long been my conviction that a masked man with a gun is a target. I see no reason to change that view.

Jeff Cooper
From Jeff Cooper’s Commentaries
Vol. 2, No. 16
20 December 1994

Quote of the day–George H. Smith

It is my firm conviction that man has nothing to gain, emotionally or otherwise, by adhering to a falsehood, regardless of how comfortable or sacred that falsehood may appear.  Anyone who claims, on the one hand, that he is concerned with human welfare, and who demands, on the other hand, that man must suspend or renounce the use of his reason, is contradicting himself. There can be no knowledge of what is good for man apart from knowledge of reality and human nature-and there is no manner in which this knowledge can be acquired except through reason.  To advocate irrationality is to advocate that which is destructive to human life.

George H. Smith
From: Atheism: The Case Against God
[I regard gun control and socialism as religions.  They are faith based and ignore factual data.  Understanding the psychology of religiosity is useful in understanding the psychology of the anti-freedom crowd.–Joe]

Another example of socialist losers

Canadian liberals are about to get trounced in the upcoming election (recent polls are saying there is a 13 point margin).  And what do you think the issues are that are getting them in so much trouble?  Health care and gun control!

Among the main policy differences is health care reform. The Tories want to allow for public and private health care provision, and, along with the Liberals, have pledged to shorten waiting times. The Liberals and the NDP have vowed to stop any privatisation of the system.

On gun control, the Liberals have promised to move towards a ban on handguns, which are already tightly regulated, and consider tightening gun crime laws.

Handguns have been essentially banned in Canada for decades.  And in the last few years spent nearly two billion dollars on registration of all guns.  And what is the result?  The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms has the scoop on that:

CANADA’S GUN REGISTRATION FAILURE: VIOLENT CRIME RATE DOUBLE THAT OF U.S.

For Immediate Release: January 17, 2006

BELLEVUE, WA – Canada’s billion-dollar boondoggle – the national gun registration scheme – has proven itself an abysmal failure, as that country’s violent crime rates are double those reported in the United States, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) noted today.

“We looked at violent crime rates per 100,000 population in both countries, using the most recent available data,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, “and we were not surprised at what we found. Since Canada started this ridiculous and costly program, violent crime has gone up dramatically, at the same time that crime in the United States has declined. Yet, there are people in the states who think Canada’s gun legislation should be the model for America.

“By comparing the data,” he detailed, “we found that the violent crime rate in the United States was 475 per 100,000 population, while up north, there were 963 violent crimes per 100,000 population. The figure for sexual assault in Canada per 100,000 population is more than double that of the United States, 74 as opposed to 32.1, and the assault rate in Canada is also more than twice that of the states, 746 to our 295 for the population rate.”

Noted CCRKBA Executive Director Joe Waldron: “What happened in the states to actually contribute to a reduction in our overall crime rate is simple. We’ve got 38 states with shall-issue, right-to-carry concealed handgun laws. While Canada has clamped down on its citizens’ gun rights, our citizens have been empowered against criminals by passage of these laws. The disparity in crime rates between the two countries says it all about how well gun registration works to stop crime, as opposed to actually carrying guns to deter criminals, and fight back if necessary.”

A Jan. 3 story in Canada’s National Post by writer David Frum confirmed CCRKBA’s independent finding. Frum wrote, “Canada’s overall crime rate is now 50% higher than the crime rate in the United States.” Later, Frum added: “Gun registries and gun bans…do not work.”

“Instead of promising to ban legally-owned handguns in Canada,” Waldron observed, “Prime Minister Paul Martin should be urging citizens to arm themselves. He should encourage Parliament to scrap gun registration and replace it with a gun ownership and training program.”

“Since going on the warpath against guns, Canada’s Liberals have presided over the sharpest rise in violent crime in the nation’s history,” Gottlieb said. “There are more rapes, more robberies and more murders. If that tells Canadian citizens anything at all, it’s that Paul Martin and his Liberals have literally been ‘dead wrong’ on guns.”

What is it called when you keep trying the same thing over and over expecting a different result?  Yeah, that’s right, it’s called insanity.  Socialism and gun control have been shown again, and again, and again, to be the tools of tyrants and cost hundreds of millions of lives.  Won’t people ever face reality?

Seattle wants a gun control advocate

This has been reported elsewhere but tomorrows Quote of the day is from some XXXXX people (Updated– People that preferred their associations not be known) that needs this as background material:

(CNSNews.com) – The City of Seattle is running a
help-wanted ad for a “Crime Gun Program Coordinator,” who will
“develop, maintain and coordinate a centralized and regionally
comprehensive crime gun database” and “integrate” that data with other
law enforcement databases.

The person hired for the job also
will “assist in the development of local and regional strategies to
stop illegal gun trafficking and related gun violence.”

A Second
Amendment group says don’t be fooled — the person hired for the job
will be the Seattle Police Department’s “official gun control
advocate,” and as such, he or she will be expected to “create and
advocate gun control schemes under the guise of stopping criminal
misuse of firearms.”

The Seattle Police Department’s “Crime Gun Program Coordinator” will
be paid between $61,366 and $92,060 — a waste of taxpayer money, said
the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA).

CCRKBA
also objected to the term “crime gun,” calling it an inflammatory term
intended to demonize any and all firearms, including those that are
stolen in burglaries but are never actually used in crimes.

The actual job posting is as follows (emphasis added):

 

Job

Crime Gun Program Coordinator (SPD-701177)

 

Status

Regular / Full Time

Shift

Day Shift

Filing Dates

Sun, Jan 15, 2006 – Sun, Jan 29, 2006

Openings

1 Opening

Salary

$61,366 – $92,060 (Ord. Title: Strategic Advisor 2)

Department

Police

Location

Seattle Justice Center

 

Position Duties

Provide
strategic support to the City’s Crime Gun Violence Reduction Program.
Develop, maintain and coordinate a centralized and regionally
comprehensive crime gun database and integrate the data with relevant
information from the State Department of Licensing (DOL), Federal
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), and other law
enforcement agency databases. Assist in the development of local and
regional strategies to stop illegal gun trafficking and related gun
violence. Serve as inter-agency liaison and represent SPD at local and
regional meetings pertaining to crime gun issues. Provide information
and support to the Office for Intergovernmental Relations in developing
legislation relating to firearms. Assist in the development of other
specialized information technology systems with SPD relating to crime
gun tracking gun violence reduction.

Required Qualifications

Bachelor’s
degree in criminal justice, public administration or a closely related
field, and three years of experience working in planning and research
related to program design, including data collection and analysis, and
program development and coordination involving a variety of
stakeholders. Experience in policy analysis and development, strategic
planning, and advising management on program direction and allocation
of resources. Must pass a Seattle Police Department background
investigation.

Desired Qualifications

Master’s
degree in criminal justice, public administration or a closely related
field; the proven ability to design, develop, implement and evaluate
complex programs involving sensitive issues and requiring interagency
cooperation between multiple jurisdictions; experience, knowledge
and/or technical expertise in crime gun issues; expertise in database
management practices, statistical analysis and report writing; the
ability to analyze data using the Geographic Information System; and
excellent oral and written communication skills.

Additional Requirements

  • Candidates selected for this position will be required to provide a conviction history.
  • A background check will be required for candidates selected for this position.

Another good question

Bruce at mAss Backwards left a comment for my post Just One Question:

I’ve been contemplating the “just one question” approach for a while now. There’s a series of town meeting-style forums coming up in Boston with our Mayor Tom “Never Met a Gun Control Scheme I Didn’t Like” Menino.

I’m going to put my name in for one of the limited slots available. Shoudl I get the chance to address the Mayor, I’d ask:

“Mr. Mayor, as you know, the City of Boston over the last year has seen a marked increase in the rate of homicides and armed robberies. My question for you is a simple YES or NO question. Do the hard-working, law-abiding citizens of Boston have the right to defend themselves from violent criminals?”

A “yes” answer woudl be an outright lie.

A “no” answer, though truthful, would be cause for his immediate removal from office (not that that’s very likely, though).

That seems to be a very good question to ask as well.  The only disadvantage I can see is that they can say, “Yes.”, “Yes, but not with a gun.”, or “Yes, but guns only make the situation worse.”  And you are left with having to justify the use of a firearm for task of self-defense.  My question forces them defend their desire to impose restrictions on firearms.  In nearly all situations it’s better to make your opponent defend rather than for you to defend against them.

As I write this I see Bruce has posted on this “Just One Question” topic with the request “So…what would your “one question” be?” in the context of being able to ask some politician a question in a public forum.