Shoot to kill these extremists!
Norma M Atkinson
March 10, 2016
Facebook comment on Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America page.
[They don’t just want to take your guns. They want (someone else) to take your life.—Joe]
Author Archives: Joe
Law-abiding
This has come up in the comments here before but Alan Korwin expresses it better than most people:
We have reached a point where so many laws are immoral or infringements, or can no longer be legitimately obeyed by anyone dedicated to constitutional governance, the phrase “law-abiding” has become arcane and a relic. “Law-abiding gun owners” are reduced to shivering vestiges of their former selves, dependent on government travel papers, expiration dates, qualification tests, violations based on ammunition types and amounts, infringements so vast and immane it defies the average person’s ability to even know them all, let alone obey them and not step into violation.
In place of the olden standard “law-abiding gun owners” we now find ourselves in need of better and more accurate phrases such as:
good gun owners
honest gun owners
decent gun owners
honorable gun owners
righteous gun owners
innocent gun owners
They really don’t understand
I just have to shake my head at people like this:
You don’t need an automatic weapon to hunt deer or shoot targets,” she said. “If you really need a gun for target practice, why don’t the gun clubs have guns to rent?”
A statement like that only vaguely even makes sense to me. And when you try to talk to these people they seem incapable of understanding what you are saying as well. I would assert people like this really are that stupid, but yet they manage to dress and feed themselves with no apparent difficulty.
Quote of the day—Lee Cruse
These groups have the need to combine and change names on a regular basis. They put out so many false statements that are so far over the top that their supporters stop being able to defend them. So, they are “born again” with a new name and an unsoiled reputation.
In contrast, how long has the NRA been around under the same name?
Lee Cruse
March 17, 2016
Comment to Giffords group merges with Law Center
[To answer his question, since November 17, 1871. This makes it 144 years, four months and one day.—Joe]
Quote of the day—Malcolm Gladwell
Those who say that you can solve this problem with gun control are engaging in a fantasy. Um, can you prevent some cases of this by locking up all the guns? Sure. Is that politically possible in the near-term in the United States? No. Uh, my problem with the gun control argument is that it so grossly simplifies what’s going on here, that this is, you know, we had tons and tons and tons of guns in this country and no school shootings for a long time. So, school shootings are not a necessary or inevitable consequence of having lots of guns.
Malcolm Gladwell
March 16, 2016
Malcolm Gladwell: Gun Control Won’t Stop School Shootings But We Should Still Ban Guns
[I’ve read a number of Gladwell’s books. Including Outliers: The Story of Success, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, and Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. He’s a smart guy. But I think he failed to study this particular issue with the usual thoroughness he has devoted to other subjects.
After getting the essence of the school shooting correct he goes on to say:
This is a, gun control can solve the much bigger problem of the kind of unpremeditated shootings done in the heat of passion or drunkenness or drug use that claim the lives of tens of thousands of Americans every year. That’s the reason to ban guns.
This is complete B.S. without support of any data beyond his speculation. There are less than 10K illegal homicides in the U.S. each year. Hence there cannot be “tens of thousands” of “unpremeditated shootings” each year that result in loss of life.
Don’t ever let anyone get away with telling you that no one wants to take your guns.—Joe]
Giffords group merges with Law Center
This is interesting:
The group created by former congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords to push for tighter control on the sale of guns is merging with a group focused on the legal issues surrounding gun control.
The merger, announced Wednesday, brings together the notoriety of Giffords’ Americans for Responsible Solutions in Washington with the legal acumen of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence in San Francisco.
For now, the two groups will retain separate names and separate offices.
Usually when an anti-gun group merges with another it means one of them was broke. This doesn’t seem to be the case this time:
Americans for Responsible Solutions Foundation took in $159,900 in 2014, according to its most recent tax return filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Americans for Responsible Solutions Political Action Committee raised about $3 million in the final six months of 2015, according to its filing with the Federal Election Commission. There was about $4.2 million in its campaign account at the start of 2016.
The Law Center took in about $1.4 million in 2014, according to its most recent tax return.
I wonder if Giffords just doesn’t have the time and/or energy and is basically selling her name and donor list.
Quote of the day—John Niven
It seems increasingly obvious that the real infant with a gun here is America itself. Watch it stumbling around like a giant toddler, wreaking untold havoc and then screaming its head off if someone dares to confiscate its beloved toy.
It’s about time someone took the toys away for good.
John Niven
March 14, 2016
John Niven: American gun laws are just crazy, it’s time we took the firearms away from them
[H/T to Say Uncle.
Don’t ever let anyone get away with telling you that no one wants to take your guns.—Joe]
Just keep thinking that
Anti-gun activist pastor Michael (how does he keep his tax exempt status?) Pfleger says:
Until America is so wounded by gun violence in the white and wealthy communities, till that happens and people start voting out politicians who are owned and bought by the NRA, it’s not going to change.
As is common with these type of people they believe it is all about the money. They do not, and perhaps cannot, comprehend there are many people who are guided by things other than money. Those other things include facts, logic, and principles.
As long as these people don’t understand the motivation for people to exercise and protected their specific enumerated right to keep and bear arms they have little hope of gaining political traction.
Even if we were to grant his statement as true the facts are that violence in general is reducing as gun ownership increases. So, by his own logic, gun control is projected to be less likely in the future.
So if Pfleger keeps thinking that he’ll live the rest of his life bitter, hateful, and deluded. He’ll likely end up being one of those people that I feel sorry for as they wander around town shouting at clouds, mumbling at lamp posts, and spending their nights at homeless shelters.
Of course there is another way to interpret his words. He could be calling for people to begin shooting up “the white and wealthy communities”. If so, and he continues in that direction, then his life could have a much different, but no more pleasant, path.
Either way Pfleger and those who believe like him are on the losing side of history.
Quote of the day—Brett
In a modern organizational environment you sometimes feel compelled to telegraph your feelings, but it is important to remember to not put them on broadband.
Brett
March 14, 2016
[I work with Brett. A co-worker of ours unnecessarily consumes a lot of bandwidth. This is a detriment to everyone involved.—Joe]
Why Men Think Women Are Flirting
This explains some things:
Basically, quoting Justin J Lehmiller, “It’s adaptive for men to error on the side of over- rather than under-perceiving women’s sexual interest.” There is little to lose and something to gain by misperceiving friendliness or politeness as sexual interest. Hence it may have become hard-wired into human males.
Update: This is not to say this justifies men being aggressive, in any form, toward women. Men need to realize it is easy for them to make erroneous conclusions and women need to realize they may sometimes need to be “less than subtle” in their communication with men.
Quote of the day—Nelson ⚒@NeLoNe79
@MilitiaJim @wallsofthecity @JClaireBurke You love need guns I get it, God didn’t bless you enough in the trousers.
Nelson ⚒@NeLoNe79
Tweeted on November 30, 2015
[It’s another Markley’s Law Monday!
Via a tweet from Linoge.—Joe]
Steel challenge match results
The forecast was for 100% chance of precipitation for every hour of the match at Renton today. Although the sun did break out for about 45 minutes of the hour from 12:00 to 1:00 the forecast was technically correct. They had canopies over the shooting areas, I wore a good hat, rain pants, and a waterproof coat so I stayed dry. But I didn’t wear warm enough clothes and I got rather chilled. And once I spent a few minutes in the car to warm up. Next time I’ll bring more clothing options.
I hadn’t practiced all this week and the first few stages I shot (my stage shooting order was 2, 3, 4, 1) demonstrated this.
Still, I had fun.
The Leprechaun
| Final | Name | SCSA | Class | Division | Time | String 1 | String 2 | String 3 | String 4 | String 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | ||||||
| 8 | Huffman, Joe | 29386 | U | RFPI | 13.53 | 5.01 | 3.93 | 3.36 | 3.24 | 3.00 | |||||
| 15 | Huffman, Joseph | U | ISP | 18.99 | 7.08 | 3.94 | 3.55 | 4.71 | 6.00 | 4.42 | |||||
Lucky Charms
| Final | Name | SCSA | Class | Division | Time | String 1 | String 2 | String 3 | String 4 | String 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | ||||||
| 13 | Huffman, Joe | 29386 | U | RFPI | 13.69 | 3.56 | 3.60 | 3.57 | 2.96 | 3.87 | 3.00 | ||||
| 29 | Huffman, Joseph | U | ISP | 22.49 | 4.57 | 7.24 | 6.08 | 6.84 | 5.00 | ||||||
Renton Plate Rack
| Final | Name | SCSA | Class | Division | Time | String 1 | String 2 | String 3 | String 4 | String 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | ||||||
| 12 | Huffman, Joe | 29386 | U | RFPI | 17.65 | 5.07 | 3.64 | 4.41 | 4.90 | 4.70 | |||||
| 18 | Huffman, Joseph | U | ISP | 24.35 | 8.05 | 5.46 | 6.85 | 6.34 | 5.70 | ||||||
Saving Ammo
| Final | Name | SCSA | Class | Division | Time | String 1 | String 2 | String 3 | String 4 | String 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | Raw | P | ||||||
| 17 | Huffman, Joe | 29386 | U | RFPI | 19.60 | 3.77 | 2.95 | 6.00 | 3.75 | 13.53 | 3.13 | ||||
| 25 | Huffman, Joseph | U | ISP | 25.58 | 4.83 | 9.00 | 7.53 | 6.15 | 5.09 | 6.81 | |||||
My guns worked well except for one failure to properly strip a round out of the magazine with my .22.
The complete results are here, but the divisions in which I participated are below.
| Rim Fire Pistol Iron (RFPI) | |||||||||
| Final | Name | SCSA | Class | Division | Time | Stage 1 The Leprechaun | Stage 2 Lucky Charms | Stage 3 Renton Plate Rack | Stage 4 Saving Ammo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sailer, Christian | A86982 | U | RFPI | 36.48 | 10.81 | 8.35 | 9.41 | 7.91 |
| 2 | Larson, Addison | U | RFPI | 51.08 | 11.58 | 12.51 | 14.47 | 12.52 | |
| 3 | White, Alex | U | RFPI | 58.12 | 24.61 | 10.49 | 12.09 | 10.93 | |
| 4 | Huffman, Joe | 29386 | U | RFPI | 64.47 | 13.53 | 13.69 | 17.65 | 19.60 |
| 5 | Meboe, Joey | U | RFPI | 79.71 | 27.53 | 13.48 | 22.91 | 15.79 | |
| 6 | Jackson, Duane | U | RFPI | 92.22 | 21.49 | 18.36 | 35.97 | 16.40 | |
| 7 | Gile, Conner | U | RFPI | 94.04 | 23.72 | 16.64 | 25.50 | 28.18 | |
| 8 | Kenny, Dan | A23624 | U | RFPI | 99.40 | 17.49 | 16.67 | 33.26 | 31.98 |
| Iron Sighted Pistol (ISP) | |||||||||
| Final | Name | SCSA | Class | Division | Time | Stage 1 The Leprechaun | Stage 2 Lucky Charms | Stage 3 Renton Plate Rack | Stage 4 Saving Ammo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dougan, Brian | U | ISP | 85.79 | 22.56 | 20.07 | 24.71 | 18.45 | |
| 2 | Komatsu, Jeff | U | ISP | 89.62 | 20.04 | 22.42 | 24.73 | 22.43 | |
| 3 | Huffman, Joseph | U | ISP | 91.41 | 18.99 | 22.49 | 24.35 | 25.58 | |
Quote of the day—Glenn Reynolds
When you have a society that can’t do things that need to be done because every change threatens somebody’s rice bowl or offers insufficient opportunities for graft, you’ve got a society that is due for a reset, not for incremental change.
The thing is, resets are often kind of ugly.
Glenn Reynolds
March 11, 2016
UNEXPECTEDLY: Walmart’s customers are too broke to shop. Fundamentally transformed!
Quote of the day—Hognose
The guy or girl who holsters a .45, or a Beretta, or a Glock, or an M&P, or a Chief’s Special five-shot revolver, for that matter, and closes the book on pistol selection can get on to the more serious business of pistol training and practice. The principle resource that satisficing can buy you is time, which is the one resource you can’t buy or produce more of, and the one resource that is ever in short supply.
Hognose
January 25, 2016
Pistols & Optimizing vs. Satisficing
[H/T to Tamara.
Greg Hamilton has insight on a closely related topic which is relevant here as well:
If during the time you were reading the latest “stopping power” article you were instead practicing to save your life you would be far, far ahead.
You should spend far more of your time and money budgets on training and practice than on your equipment. I know this is difficult and it’s easy to run down the equipment rabbit hole but try to avoid it.—Joe]
Quote of the day—Will Franken
I am still one of the most oppressed minorities living in the West today.
I am an individual.
Will Franken
March 7, 2016
What Life As A Transgender Woman Taught Me About Progressives
[I have nothing to add.—Joe]
Quote of the day—Robert Rotberg
We’re not taking anything away. We’re strengthening the rights of Lexingtonians to be secure in their private houses and less fearful of people spraying bullets at them.
Robert Rotberg
Founding director of Harvard Kennedy School’s Program on Intrastate Conflict and Town Meeting member
March 8, 2016
Lexington debates proposal to ban semi-automatic weapons
[What this guy wants:
the proposal seeks to ban any semi-automatic rifle or handgun that has a removable magazine capable of holding 10 or more rounds. It also seeks to ban any magazine that holds 10 or more rounds.
And he claims, “We’re not taking anything away. We’re strengthening the rights of Lexingtonians…”?
Gun banners lie because it’s the only way they can win.
And don’t ever let anyone get away with telling you that no one wants to take your guns.—Joe]
Quote of the day—Alan Gottlieb
This is a big win. Not just for gun rights but for the freedom movement in the battle against billionaire elitist gun prohibitionists like Michael Bloomberg. West Virginia just told him he can’t buy away our Second Amendment rights.
Alan Gottlieb
March 7, 2016
Gun control group ‘livid’ about permitless carry override veto
[While there is a certain amount of truth to this, 10s of millions, or more, of dollars can buy more repression of our rights than we care to tolerate.
Probably the best we can do is make the cost, in time, money, and public opinion, as high as practical such that the return on Bloomberg’s investment is as low as possible. In the case of West Virginia, gun rights supporters caused him to do the equivalent of setting a very large pile of $100 bills on fire. Bloomberg has an distressingly large number of $100 bills he is willing to throw on the fire but getting nothing except reports of his failures in return for spending large amounts of money will be discouraging to both him and the people he is funding. It also demonstrates that the claim that “the greedy gun manufactures with lots of money” and the NRA get legislative votes by outbidding the virtuous anti-gun activists is false. With this key assumption falsified it demoralizes them and makes it more difficult for them to recruit additional people and raise money in general.—Joe]
Quote of the day—surfinbird512 @surfinbird512
some big fat piece of shit behind an AR 15! he can’t even see his dick.
surfinbird512 @surfinbird512
Tweeted on November 25, 2015
[It’s another Markley’s Law Monday! Via a tweet from Linoge.
Just remember, we have SCOTUS decisions, they have childish insults.—Joe]
Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel expansion test
I recently hand loaded some 180 grain “Gold Dot® Short Barrel®” rounds in .40 S&W. Yesterday I did the promised “chronograph and water jug testing”. Here are the results:
Powder: 3.9 grains of Bullseye
Primer: WSP
OAL: 1.13210 shots over the chronograph from 10 feet away.
Minimum velocity: 814 fps
Maximum velocity: 864 fps
Mean velocity: 838.1 fps
Standard deviation: 15.5 fps
Power Factor: 150.86
The water filled milk jug test was to determine if the bullets would expand at this relatively low velocity. The 0.401 bullet expanded to just under 0.6 and retained nearly 99% of it’s mass:
This is very good.
Brother Doug was a little worried that with the lower velocity perhaps a non-expanding bullet would be better for self defense because of the better penetration. Would it penetrate deep enough to “do the job”? I didn’t have any ordinance gelatin but my guess is that it penetrates just fine. They fully traversed three one gallon milk jugs filled with water. This is just under 18 inches of water.
I didn’t expect it would penetrate that far and for my first shot I only used two jugs for depth and put one on each side of the rear jug in case the bullet didn’t go straight after hitting the first jug:
It fully penetrated the two jugs and I was unable to find the bullet in the berm.
The second time I changed the configuration to just three jugs lined up in a row:
Again the bullet penetrated all the jugs but I found the bullet just sitting on the ground behind the jugs.
That was interesting
Barb and I were out running errands this morning and we stopped at Walmart to pick up what I think is the last remaining components for Boomershoot targets (we should have also picked up some rubber bands but I’ll get those sometime this week during lunch). As we were approaching the checkout counter I told Barb, “This is sure a strange combination of stuff. I wonder if they will notice and say something.”
People noticed. They said things:
Clerk : What are you going to use all that <baking component> for?
I hesitated and thought about it for a second or two. He was still ringing stuff up and I hadn’t paid for it yet. If I told him the truth it could delay our departure. Before I could decide what to do he continued:
Clerk (with a smirk on his face): Are you going to use it with the anti-freeze?
Guy in line behind me: With all that anti-freeze, you could make quite the <dessert component>.
Joe (addressing the clerk with a big smile): Actually, I am going to use them together. I make explosives with them.
Clerk: Excuse me?
Joe: I use them to make explosives.
The clerk’s hand froze in midair over the keypad and the smile on the face of guy in line behind me disappeared into blank, ashen colored, stare.
I continued:
Joe: I have a license to make high explosives. I put on a shooting event each year with exploding targets. People come from all over the country to shoot at them.
Clerk: Where do you do this at?
Joe: Idaho.
GILBM: You come all the way over to Washington buy this?
Joe: I live over here but put the event on in Idaho because I need a lot of land and tolerant neighbors. I have the property and the right neighbors over there.
Clerk (hands moving again): Oh. I was thinking maybe Mount Index.
Joe: Nope.
I finished paying for the components then Barb and I quickly loaded up the car and left before the cops could get there.