Tomorrow’s battle is won during today’s practice.
Samurai maxim
[This is true of USPSA, IPDA, and steel challenge matches too. And even more importantly it is true of your encounter with a thug who wants your money or your life.
Note that the maxim has nothing to do with the hardware you carry. The caliber of your gun, the number of rounds you carry, and the terminal characteristics of the bullet are far, far less important than your training and your practice.–Joe]
Olympic Arms is having a sale on “alternate caliber” AR’s:
I watched the first episode of Top Shot last night. Barb watched about 10 minutes and then got bored and went off to do something else.
I liked it far better than I expected to. I don’t care for reality shows. When I first heard about Survivor back in late 1999 I was about to become unemployed as my contract with Microsoft expired. I thought it might be something I could do well at and I got an application and looked into the show concept further. It was completely different than I expected and I was repulsed. I expected something about working together and making conditions better for everyone on the island. I envisioned the winner being the person who did the most to improve the small “society”. I contemplated the skills and innovation I could bring to the situation. What would I bring with me and what sort of things could be accomplished with the materials on hand. It wasn’t going to be anything like that. It was going to be about getting rid of other people not working together with people. What sort of life lesson is this? It’s total crap.
That said it did cross my mind that Top Shot might be something I could participate in–for about 500 mS. I’m not a “Top Shot”. I do okay in the local matches but I’m just a “B” class shooter. I shoot at a level of about 65% (my current USPSA classification is 65.94% with a high of 68.53%) of the worlds best shooters. I could not imagine that would be good enough and didn’t pursue it.
Then I found out Caleb was accepted. What? I’m on par with Caleb! Oh well, it was at a bad time with our current project (Windows Phone Seven) at Microsoft and I had an obligation to complete that work anyway.
I really should have listened to what Caleb said last night on Gun Nuts Radio about it before making the following comments but I have other commitments for tonight and don’t have the time.
After seeing the first episode I again thought I could have had a chance. Mike Seeklander and his spotter’s performance was pathetic. Yes, as Tam pointed out the 100 yard shot Seeklander failed on is not as straightforward as one might think. But assuming the problem was not with the shooter being incompetent then either the spotter and shooter could have solved the problem had they been thinking. Here is how.
One of the shots was on paper. Use the same point of aim and try it again. If it lands on paper in close to the same place then you know offset in both X and Y from point of aim. Use that offset to put the bullet on target. If it doesn’t then the one on paper was random and you need to find the offset. The spotter should have found a nearby spot of bare ground where the bullet strike could be easily seen and directed the shooter there to find the offsets. If no such bare ground was available then systematically try offset in increments of 1/2 the paper width/height. Get a bullet on paper and confirm the offsets! They may have tried that and it was edited before airing but I was extremely annoyed that I didn’t see it happening. I felt the other team members should have put both the spotter and shooter on the chopping block. They both failed.
This episode also confirmed my hypothesis that if someone brags about how good a shooter they are it is near certain proof they are crap. All the great shooters I have personally met are extremely modest or at least silent about how great they think they are.
If you take nothing more from this post remember this. You can do a quick and dirty zero of your gun with one shot. Aim at something and shoot. Then stabilize the gun while aiming at the same place. With the gun still pointed at the same exact spot adjust the sights until the sights point at the place where the bullet hit.
As I mentioned before I broke my new video glasses while taking them off. I considered just gluing them but decided to call and see if I could purchase a replacement part. I called the number in the user manual for Global One Sales & Distribution (814-669-1953) and was told they would ship me the new part but recommended I send them in for repair. The camera is in that part of the frame and there are wires going back to the processor and memory card. The cost, including shipping back to me is $40. I sent them in for repair.
He asked me how I broke them. I told him and he said I was for the fourth person to break them taking the glasses off while the lanyard was attached. They haven’t had other people break them at all. I advise not using the lanyard. What happened to me was that I tried to take them off with one hand holding on to the frame just in front of my left ear. As I pulled them over my head the lanyard caught on my right ear and the glasses were pulled as if it were a wishbone. The lanyard had a large moment arm (engineer speak for “big lever”) and the frame could not handle the force.
There are a few other things of note here. 1) I could not find a website for “Global One Sales & Distribution”; 2) The phone number 814-669-1953 (a Texas area code) is associated with a Self-Storage facility in Pennsylvania which has the same address as that which I was requested to ship the glasses to; 3) These glasses have more features (via a comment from wizardpc) and cost less than $75 (I paid $239 + tax for mine from Afton Arms who had a booth at the NRA meeting).
You can get a crippled, but mostly functional, Ma Duce if you have the money:
The match results from Sunday are in:
| Lewiston Pistol Club | ||||||||
| Steel Match– May 23, 2010 | ||||||||
| Place | Shooter | Class | TX * | 5 2 Go | TSAR | Fadeaway | Total | Time Down |
| 1 | Mike B | Limited | 17.29 | 16.96 | 15.92 | 18.19 | 68.36 | — |
| 2 | Don W | Limited | 16.23 | 21.05 | 14.67 | 20.00 | 71.95 | 3.59 |
| 3 | Adam M | Limited | 18.70 | 18.63 | 17.91 | 17.69 | 72.93 | 4.57 |
| 4 | Roger W | Limited | 16.54 | 20.33 | 16.88 | 23.37 | 77.12 | 8.76 |
| 5 | Joe H | Limited | 15.84 | 20.90 | 21.67 | 21.64 | 80.05 | 11.69 |
| 6 | Roger W | Revo | 18.09 | 20.39 | 19.03 | 25.74 | 83.25 | 14.89 |
| 7 | Mike C | Limited | 23.85 | 29.43 | 26.08 | 41.11 | 120.47 | 52.11 |
| 8 | Bob U | Limited | 32.18 | 30.73 | 26.92 | 38.15 | 127.98 | 59.62 |
| 9 | Mike G | Limited | 31.86 | 27.17 | 24.05 | 46.51 | 129.59 | 61.23 |
| 10 | John G | Limited | 26.15 | 41.10 | 26.79 | 39.97 | 134.01 | 62.06 |
Yellow indicates the stage winner. I won the first stage and did mediocre on the rest. Since there were four stages and four strings (five actually, but the slowest string is thrown out) per stage being down 11.69 seconds means that I averaged less than three quarters of a second more per string than the match winner. It was a closer match than it might look like.
I came in second on the bowling pin side match:
AdamM: 21.63
JoeH: 23.21
Don W: 25.61
MikeB: 29.40
BobU: 30.33
RogerW: 37.84
MikeC: 42.94
JohnG: 43.30
Had I known there was going to be the bowling pin match I would have brought different ammo. I have some hollow point bullets loaded a little on the “warm” side specifically for bowling pins. As it was the ammo I was using didn’t have as much momentum to transfer and had a greater tendency to bounce off from a less than direct hit. That might have made the difference between first and second place. But there is no shame in coming in a close second to Adam.
I participated in a Steel Challenge match today. I used my new video glasses (I have Sportsman Eyewear model 465 ) and then edited out most of the boring stuff. Here is the result:
I learned some things. When obtaining video I should move my head less. When asked, “Are you ready?” I should keep my head still instead of nodding.
The electronics must have some automatic gain control on the audio. The first string of fire you can hear the R.O. and first shot well. Then it gets much quieter and you can barely hear the R.O. and the shots are muffled some.
The frame rate is supposed to be about 35 fps. This is really too slow to capture what I see when shooting. In the video it seems to go much faster than when I am actually shooting. I see far more than what you can see in the video.
Still, I like what I see and plan to do this again taking into account the lessons learned.
Fellow shooters had other applications for the glasses too. The first one I heard today, “This will revolutionize the home porn industry.” Yeah, I had thought of that too. Don’t expect to see any of that on this blog.
Another suggestion was to get about $5000 in cash and go through TSA while wearing the glasses to capture them hassling you. “What would that accomplish?”, I asked. “Maybe you could get someone fired.” “But I want them ALL fired.”, I replied.
Just anytime you are interacting with authority they could be a great asset.
And in specific, from John Hardin, in the comment here came what I thought was the best suggestion. Use them when open carrying. Great idea!
While at the NRA annual meeting I bought a pair of glasses with lenses for sunglasses or safety glasses. The also have a camera (still or video with microphone) built in. The main reason for getting them is for shooting. I expect to be able to get feedback for training (pistol matches) and for shooting explosives.
The results are suprisingly good. Here is the view from my driveway (scaled down from 1080 x 1024 to 600 x 480)–The View From North Central Idaho:
Tomorrow I have a Steel Challenge match I am going to. I’m really looking forward to the video.
I didn’t see them on the exhibit floor but Say Uncle told a few of us that he saw some neat tactical pants there.
Via email from Jeanette we now have The Ultimate Guide to Tactical Pants.
While at the NRA Annual Meeting on Saturday I wore this shirt:
It got a lot of compliments while on the exhibit floor but something happened that night while at the blogger dinner. I’ve been told that I might have to burn that shirt. I would have never worn that shirt to work and figured as long as I stayed away for places like that I would be okay. But censors are sometimes where you least expect them. Yes, the heavy hand of censorship is threatening me because of that shirt.
On the night in question there were about 20 or 30 bloggers at this bar having dinner, drinking a few, and trying to talk to each other (it was very loud). Alan Gura had expressed, rather forcefully, that it was too loud and wanted to go someplace else so we could talk easier. I was up moving around and trying to shepherd people in the general direction of the door and to a nearby outdoor plaza with a quiet fountain and seating. From a nearby table filled with college students two young women approached me and said they really liked my shirt and they wanted a picture of one of them with me and the shirt. I obliged them.
I later told Say Uncle about it and he quipped, “I’ll bet you never thought you could use that shirt to pick up chicks, did you?” I laughed and said, “No.” That would have been the end of it had I not opened my big mouth later. Later that evening as I was talking to wife Barbara and she asked how my day had gone I told her of the event and Say Uncle’s joke. In the silence that followed I blissfully babbled on and told her of another funny thing that happened. This probably sealed the fate of that shirt.
As everyone was saying goodnight someone said how wonderful it was to meet and hang out with the celebrities like Michael Bane, Alan Gottlieb, and god of gods Alan Gura. I agreed and added something like, and pointing at Mike W, “But you said I was a celebrity.” Mike protested, “But you are a celebrity. You are the Boomershoot guy!” Dixie was standing just to the right of me and said, “You are the Boomershoot guy?” and stretched her arms out with fingers straight, palms flat, and bowed to me.
Barb hasn’t actually said it in words but I’m pretty good at reading the silence.
I think I’m going to have to burn the shirt.
I had planned to walk the exhibit floor today but other than attend the debate between Gura and Helmke I spent nearly the entire time socializing. Mostly it was with bloggers but I did spend probably an hour of pretty intense face to face time with NRA Board of directors member Scott Bach (and here).
Scott told us a little bit of some of the behind the scenes stuff at the NRA and how he thinks things will shake down after the McDonald case comes down. Since he lives in New Jersey there was a particular emphasis on his home state. The application of the McDonald case will be particularly interesting there and in California. There is tremendous opportunity to gain ground but there are lots of things that can go wrong too.
I was pleased to meet some gun bloggers I have read for the first time and see others again. I screwed up and did not get a picture of Rick even though we met and talked quite a bit this morning and throughout the day. I will try to remedy that error tomorrow.
I met Breda for the first time. For some reason I expected someone much smaller.
Alan also took some pictures of Breda at dinner but she said she would kill him if he posted them.
Honest, it had nothing to do with Say Uncle making a comparison to a porn star. That was much earlier in the day.
I have five pictures of Jay G. These two suck the least. He also posted on the afternoon and evening activities.
This was my first time meeting him. But I have talked to him when I was on Vicious Circle and listened to him even more.
This was the first time I have met Weer’d Beard. He is a frequent commenter here and on daughter Xenia’s LJ.
I first met Denise and Yosemite Sam at the NRA meeting in 2008.
I got in trouble with Barb for not attending Sarah Palin’s speech so maybe Denise’s post can get me almost back in good graces at home.
I first met Alan at Boomershoot 2009 where he helped make the targets as well as shoot them.
He also is the ringleader of Vicious Circle.
I first met Mike W. at the NRA meeting in 2008. He is also a frequent commenter here.
He says I’m a celebrity so I need to keep reminding Barb that she sleeps with one.
Say Uncle and Alan decided they had to expose Breda and me to southern food. A group of ten of us went out to dinner. Say Uncle recommended the shrimp and grits which I did enjoy. Breda liked the greens and said, “I could eat these forever!”
After dinner was over, about 22:30, I was just coming alive and ready to talk until 2:00 or 3:00 but everyone else was a wimp (and mostly on east coast time instead of west coast like me) and said they were headed back to their hotels for the night.
Tomorrow, I really will get out on the exhibit floor and take a bunch of pictures.
The weather is just a little on the warm side of what I am comfortable with and the humidity is pretty high but it’s still well within tolerable limits.
There is lots of press coverage. Below is a picture of the mobile units from a couple local television stations. I later saw a “talking head” standing around in front of a camera wait for their time to say a few sentences.
In the picture below the three people on the left are NRA staff. On the right are Sebastian and Bitter. In between are the media badges.
Below is the view of the exhibit floor from the Press Office.
At ~17:30 a few bloggers and some NRA staff went to a bar for drinks and to talk. Say Uncle showed up not too much later.
At ~19:30 a few of the bloggers went to a restaurant at the Westin Hotel where we had very small tasty meals which were very expensive and very pretty.
At ~20:30 we moved to a bar in the Westin where Dave Kopel and other high powered legal types hung out with us and kept us enthralled with stories from behind the scenes and what may and may not be possible for the right to keep and bear arms in the future. I also met George after years of occasional correspondence.
At ~12:45 the last of the bloggers and one of the legal minds retired. Two lawyers went off to smoke. One a cigar and the other a pipe.
Tomorrow I will spend most of the day on the exhibit floor.
I’m at the NRA annual meeting in the Press Office. I have press credentials, free wireless Internet, and free food and drink:
I haven’t seen anyone I know yet. Currently I’m alone in the Press Office with my two Windows Phone 7 devices.
In my post last night I outlined some of the work the staff does for Boomershoot after the main event is over. I said the sound in the video doesn’t do it justice.
In Jason’s video the sound is a much better but it still doesn’t capture the THUMP that you feel throughout your body but it does hint a little better at it and give you some more clues as to what it means for Rolf to be Entertainingly Close:
This would be something useful for my aging eyes and preference for sights that don’t require batteries.
Via email from Rich R. in NH.
If you have been following along in the comments at Say Uncle you will know that my assumptions about the cartridge used in my simulation here were off a bit. I assumed a 300 grain bullet with a BC of 0.785 and a MV of 2750 fps. According to Mu the correct bullet is a 250 grain leaving the muzzle at 3070 fps with (according to SteveA) a BC of 0.587. This changes things some.
The sight angle for no hold-over is 127.8 MOA instead of 122 MOA.
The time of flight is 5.2 S instead of 4.9 S.
The velocity of the bullet at the target is about 924 fps instead of 1043 fps. This results in PF of 231 instead of 313.
The number three shot groups required to get one that was less than or equal to 1 MOA is, on the average, 4.3 instead of 4.9 (initally my program showed 83 but now it shows 4.9, I suspect some sort a caching error in Modern Ballistics). But those numbers are identical given the margins of error used in the assumptions that generated them.
Both Modern Ballistics data files for the simulations are here.
See also the comments at Tam’s.
I think I first saw it at Ry’s place. But others have mentioned it too. People at work have been asking about it too. It’s time I made a blog post about it.
According to the news reports a British sniper made three consecutive shots which were measured, via GPS, to be at a range 8120 feet. This is about 2707 yards which is the number I used with Modern Ballistics. I have uploaded the data file here if you want to tweak a few numbers and see what happens for yourself.
I used a high end 300 grain bullet with a BC of 0.785, a muzzle velocity of 2750 ft/sec, a muzzle velocity standard deviation of 10 fps and the inherent accuracy of the cartridge, gun, and shooter was 0.25 MOA. I assumed zero wind at 10,000 feet above sea level, and a temperature of 59 F. All are a bit on the optimistic, but plausible, side of “excellent” conditions.
The first thing that struck me about the situation was that with a 32-power, mil-dot reticle, scope the target was quite visible (the rectangle target is 18″ x 24″):
Even a 16-power scope gives a usable sight picture:
The sight angle to not require hold-over is 122 MOA. For best results a no hold-over shot is required.
Long range Leopold scopes give 70 MOA of adjustment so a shim of 52 MOA would be required for a no hold-over shot. This is not likely.
Some Nightforce scopes have 110 MOA of adjustment which would require a shim of 12 MOA. This would result in the closest range the rifle could be zeroed at under standard conditions to be about 460 yards. This seems plausible.
The articles claim a three second time to target but I come up with 4.9 seconds. My guess is whoever did the calculation assumed the bullet did not lose any velocity on it’s way to the target. Working backward we come up with about 2700 fps for a muzzle velocity.
The velocity of the bullet at the target is about 1043 fps. With a 300 grain bullet this corresponds to an IPSC “Power Factor” of 313. A 124 grain 9mm bullet at the muzzle is in the neighborhood of a PF of 135 so the sniper still had a lot of “stopping power” at this range.
On the average you would have to shoot 83 (the correct number is 4.9, apparently something hadn’t been updated properly in my simulation when I pulled the 83 off) three-shot groups to get one which was less than or equal to 1 MOA (about 30 inches). Only about 30% of the shots will hit a 18″ x 24″ target (1000 shot simulation):
My conclusion is there was some luck involved but it is plausible the event took place essentially as reported.
Update: I have rerun some of the simulations with what is believed to be the cartridge used by the British.
Boomershoot is the most interesting precision rifle event in the entire world.
Michael Bane
Down Range Radio #158
April 27, 2010
[My ego is probably blocking thoughts of something far more interesting but at the moment I am inclined to agree with him.–Joe]
Earlier this month I posted about a free entry for the Washington State IDPA Championship. There was an error in that post. It should have said it was open to Marksmen classification or higher instead of Master. I have updated the post.
Sorry about the error.
I shot in a USPSA pistol match yesterday. I knew I did quit well in two of the stages (I thought I probably had won both but I only won one of them). But I figured I messed up some of the other stages bad enough to drop me down to fourth or fifth place overall.
It turns out I came in second overall–a close second to Master class shooter Adam who was having a really bad day:
Place Name USPSA Class Division PF Lady Mil Law For Age Points Stg %
1 ADAM A42720 M Limited Major N N N N 269.0633 100.00%
2 JOE TY29386 B Limited Major N N N N 255.2261 94.86%
3 KW L2847 C Limited 10 Major N N N N Senior 254.4007 94.55%
4 KEVIN L2544 C Open Major N N N N 250.8631 93.24%
5 MIKE A39993 A Limited 10 Major N N N N 245.9446 91.41%
6 DON TY25213 A Limited Major N N N N Senior 217.3348 80.77%
7 Roger U Revolver Major N N N N 207.5478 77.14%
8 Robert A67563 U Limited 10 Major N N N N 185.8986 69.09%
9 John A65903 D Limited Minor N N N N 174.7153 64.93%
10 Roger U Limited 10 Major N N N N Senior 165.1802 61.39%
11 Richard U Limited 10 Major N N N N 154.8904 57.57%
12 ADAM REENTRY A Revolver Major N N N N 142.7239 53.04%
13 DON REENTRY U Production Minor N N N N Senior 132.5499 49.26%
14 Bill A67422 U Limited Minor N N N N 118.3946 44.00%
15 Trent U Limited Minor N N N N 110.4684 41.06%
Individual stage results were:
Stage: 1 3-V
Place Name Class Division Pts Pen Time Hit Fact Stg Pts Stg %
1 ADAM M Limited 64 0 8.72 7.3394 70.0000 100.00%
2 JOE B Limited 60 0 9.61 6.2435 59.5478 85.07%
3 MIKE A Limited 10 67 20 9.94 4.7284 45.0974 64.42%
4 Robert U Limited 10 66 0 14.26 4.6283 44.1427 63.06%
5 KW C Limited 10 62 20 9.94 4.2254 40.3000 57.57%
R6 DON U Production 66 0 16.46 4.0097 38.2428 54.63%
7 John D Limited 68 0 17.26 3.9397 37.5751 53.68%
8 Roger U Revolver 66 0 18.09 3.6484 34.7968 49.71%
9 KEVIN C Open 64 20 12.34 3.5656 34.0071 48.58%
10 Roger U Limited 10 64 0 18.18 3.5204 33.5760 47.97%
11 DON A Limited 60 10 14.53 3.4412 32.8207 46.89%
12 Bill U Limited 54 0 17.33 3.1160 29.7191 42.46%
R13 ADAM A Revolver 61 10 17.00 3.0000 28.6127 40.88%
14 Richard U Limited 10 70 0 24.37 2.8724 27.3957 39.14%
15 Trent U Limited 31 30 15.31 0.0653 0.6228 0.89%
Stage: 2 Paper Poppers
Place Name Class Division Pts Pen Time Hit Fact Stg Pts Stg %
1 JOE B Limited 47 0 6.90 6.8116 50.0000 100.00%
2 MIKE A Limited 10 49 0 7.31 6.7031 49.2036 98.41%
3 KEVIN C Open 50 0 7.51 6.6578 48.8710 97.74%
4 DON A Limited 49 0 8.44 5.8057 42.6163 85.23%
5 Roger U Limited 10 49 0 9.21 5.3203 39.0532 78.11%
6 KW C Limited 10 44 0 9.71 4.5314 33.2624 66.52%
7 ADAM M Limited 39 10 6.52 4.4479 32.6495 65.30%
8 Trent U Limited 44 0 10.44 4.2146 30.9369 61.87%
9 Roger U Revolver 46 0 11.06 4.1591 30.5295 61.06%
10 Bill U Limited 44 0 11.71 3.7575 27.5816 55.16%
11 Robert U Limited 10 47 0 12.65 3.7154 27.2726 54.55%
12 John D Limited 46 0 12.66 3.6335 26.6714 53.34%
R13 ADAM A Revolver 50 0 14.69 3.4037 24.9846 49.97%
14 Richard U Limited 10 50 0 16.77 2.9815 21.8855 43.77%
Stage: 3 Madness
Place Name Class Division Pts Pen Time Hit Fact Stg Pts Stg %
1 KEVIN C Open 69 0 11.96 5.7692 70.0000 100.00%
2 JOE B Limited 66 10 9.98 5.6112 68.0829 97.26%
3 DON A Limited 65 0 12.45 5.2209 63.3473 90.50%
4 Bill U Limited 64 0 14.10 4.5390 55.0735 78.68%
5 Robert U Limited 10 67 0 16.43 4.0779 49.4788 70.68%
R6 DON U Production 62 10 13.66 3.8067 46.1882 65.98%
R7 ADAM A Revolver 64 0 17.03 3.7581 45.5985 65.14%
8 ADAM M Limited 62 20 11.27 3.7267 45.2175 64.60%
9 MIKE A Limited 10 59 20 11.66 3.3448 40.5838 57.98%
10 John D Limited 56 10 13.87 3.3165 40.2404 57.49%
11 Roger U Revolver 68 0 22.68 2.9982 36.3784 51.97%
12 KW C Limited 10 58 20 13.49 2.8169 34.1786 48.83%
13 Trent U Limited 59 20 14.44 2.7008 32.7699 46.81%
14 Richard U Limited 10 68 0 25.98 2.6174 31.7580 45.37%
15 Roger U Limited 10 62 30 18.76 1.7058 20.6972 29.57%
Stage: 4 Fluffy’s Revenge 1
Place Name Class Division Pts Pen Time Hit Fact Stg Pts Stg %
1 ADAM M Limited 38 0 3.26 11.6564 40.0000 100.00%
2 KEVIN C Open 40 0 4.73 8.4567 29.0199 72.55%
3 KW C Limited 10 39 0 5.02 7.7689 26.6597 66.65%
4 Roger U Limited 10 38 0 5.21 7.2937 25.0290 62.57%
5 MIKE A Limited 10 37 0 5.18 7.1429 24.5115 61.28%
6 John D Limited 34 0 6.38 5.3292 18.2876 45.72%
R7 DON U Production 36 0 7.38 4.8780 16.7393 41.85%
8 Roger U Revolver 40 0 8.80 4.5455 15.5983 39.00%
9 Trent U Limited 38 10 6.74 4.1543 14.2559 35.64%
10 DON A Limited 34 20 4.96 2.8226 9.6860 24.22%
11 JOE B Limited 32 20 4.27 2.8103 9.6438 24.11%
12 Richard U Limited 10 34 20 6.87 2.0378 6.9929 17.48%
13 Bill U Limited 31 20 6.27 1.7544 6.0204 15.05%
14 Robert U Limited 10 39 10 18.84 1.5393 5.2822 13.21%
R15 ADAM A Revolver 33 20 9.97 1.3039 4.4745 11.19%
Stage: 5 4 Bill Drill
Place Name Class Division Pts Pen Time Hit Fact Stg Pts Stg %
1 KW C Limited 10 105 0 30.37 3.4574 120.0000 100.00%
2 Roger U Revolver 100 0 38.46 2.6001 90.2447 75.20%
3 MIKE A Limited 10 88 20 27.27 2.4936 86.5483 72.12%
4 ADAM M Limited 81 30 21.80 2.3394 81.1963 67.66%
5 KEVIN C Open 112 60 26.17 1.9870 68.9651 57.47%
6 DON A Limited 80 30 25.20 1.9841 68.8645 57.39%
7 JOE B Limited 82 30 26.56 1.9578 67.9516 56.63%
8 Richard U Limited 10 100 20 41.53 1.9263 66.8583 55.72%
9 Robert U Limited 10 60 0 34.87 1.7207 59.7223 49.77%
10 John D Limited 82 20 41.43 1.4965 51.9408 43.28%
11 Roger U Limited 10 71 30 30.39 1.3491 46.8248 39.02%
R12 ADAM A Revolver 72 40 28.44 1.1252 39.0536 32.54%
13 Trent U Limited 59 30 31.57 0.9186 31.8829 26.57%
R14 DON U Production 76 40 39.82 0.9041 31.3796 26.15%
15 Bill U Limited 33 90 31.01 0.0000 0.0000 0.00%
Update: I just realized that if you remove Kevin, who was shooting an Open Division gun, I did win two stages.
See also the official results on the USPSA website.