Get your Boomershoot 2015 swag here.
The image used is this one:
You don’t have to attend Boomershoot to wear Boomershoot stuff or have a cool mug laying around on your desk at work.
Get your Boomershoot 2015 swag here.
The image used is this one:
You don’t have to attend Boomershoot to wear Boomershoot stuff or have a cool mug laying around on your desk at work.
Here is an update on the total number of rounds I have reloaded:
223.LOG: 2027 rounds.
3006.LOG: 467 rounds.
300WIN.LOG: 1351 rounds.
40SW.LOG: 38807 rounds.
45.log: 0 rounds.
9MM.LOG: 21636 rounds.
Total: 64288 rounds.
This is a delta of 3064 rounds since last month. This is composed of 1,137 rounds of .40 S&W and 1,927 rounds of 9mm. So far this year I have reloaded 6,859 rounds.
This morning I ran some bullets over the chronograph using the ETR7 powder I got last month. Using the Montana Gold 180 grain JHP and the loads suggested somewhere else I tried 4.5 grains and 4.8 grains with an OAL of 1.135. The results were a little lower velocities than what I expected. All tests were with the muzzle 10 feet from the first screen of the chronograph and an ambient temperature of 32F. The low temperature may have affected the velocities some but I need to be able to make major power factor (165) even when it is cold out.
4.5 grains of ETR7:
Mean Velocity: 861 fps
Standard Deviation: 17.5 fps
Minimum Velocity: 832 fps
Maximum Velocity: 891 fps
Extreme Spread: 59 fps
Power Factor: 155.07
4.8 grains of ETR7:
Mean Velocity: 891 fps
Standard Deviation: 20.6 fps
Minimum Velocity: 864 fps
Maximum Velocity: 935 fps
Extreme Spread: 71 fps
Power Factor: 160.54
The suggested max load is 5.0 grains. But what I need to do is check the primers of the 4.8 grain loads before bumping the load up to the max. And if linear interpolation is valid for this range of loads 5.0 grains isn’t going to get me into major.
Barb got a new water heater installed recently and one of the installers poked his head in the laundry room to ask Barb to turn on the hot water facet in the kitchen to get the water to drain.
Some time later he asked, “Who here works for Blackwater?”
Barb told him no one, but that I had got a tour through their facility. That wasn’t exactly correct (see also here) but it was close enough.
Apparently he saw the hats hanging up in the laundry room:
Yesterday I went to Whidbey Island for a steel match at Holmes Harbor Rod & Gun Club. It was a beautiful day to be on the island:
The match was run the same as Steel Challenge but none of the stages were the classifier stages.
The stages were the most interesting steel stages I have shot. In each of the pictures below you shoot the white plates in any order then shoot the yellow stop plate last.
![]()
You had to be careful on this one. It was undefined what happened if one of your shots hit both the yellow and white plate. Our squad gave the shooter credit for whichever plate gave him the best result.
![]()
One guy in our squad called this stage “Saw tooth”.
![]()
They called this stage “Train crossing”.
![]()
I don’t recall there being a name for this stage.
![]()
They called this stage “Drag race”. Obviously it was a very fast stage.
“Drag race” was the last stage our squad shot and I was “getting into the zone”. As per Steel Challenge rules we shot each stage five times and threw out the slowest time and summed the remaining four times. My cumulative time for the four best strings was 11.87 seconds (an average of 2.9675 seconds for the draw and five hits). One string was 2.83 seconds. When I finished a guy on our squad told me, “Fancy shooting!” I’m not sure “Fancy” was the appropriate term but I was very pleased with the results. Although I’m nearly certain there are a lot of shooters could do it in under two seconds.
The overall results are as follows. Most people shot more than one gun in different classes. The class definitions (IIRC) are:
RF-RI-O: Rim Fire Rifle Optics
RF-O: Rim Fire Pistol Optics
CF-I: Center Fire Iron
CF-RV-O: Center Fire Revolver Optics
CF-RV: Center Fire Revolver
CF-LR: ??
| Name | Class | Total Time |
| Brian | RF-RI-O | 40.88 |
| Dan | RF-RI-O | 51.58 |
| Brian | RF-O | 53.89 |
| Jeff | RF-RI-O | 55.26 |
| Jeff | RF-O | 62.29 |
| Mac | RF-O | 66.97 |
| Jim | CF-RI-O | 68.13 |
| Joe | CF-I | 78.15 |
| Dan | CF-RV-O | 80.36 |
| Jeff | CF-I | 87.68 |
| Mac | CF-RV | 95.31 |
| Bruce | CF-I | 97.78 |
| Dennis | CF-LR | 111.99 |
| Jim | CF-RV | 139.34 |
It wasn’t a big field of competitors in my class but I did win by a pretty wide margin.
I’m thinking this is on Ry’s wish list for Boomershoot clean up:
H/T to Say Uncle.
I participated in an USPSA match today. The results are:
| Place | Name | USPSA | Class | Division | PF | Lady | Mil | Law | For | Match Pts | Match % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TY55787 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 767.5256 | 100.000 % | |
| 2 | A89049 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 573.9757 | 74.783 % | |
| 3 | L3253 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 556.5122 | 72.507 % | |
| 4 | A71227 | B | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 555.3398 | 72.355 % | |
| 5 | A79458 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 552.1760 | 71.942 % | |
| 6 | TY29386 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 529.4745 | 68.985 % | |
| 7 | PEN | U | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 527.5801 | 68.738 % | |
| 8 | TY13332 | A | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 527.0083 | 68.663 % | |
| 9 | A71578 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 516.8853 | 67.344 % | |
| 10 | TY71576 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 516.2424 | 67.261 % | |
| 11 | A47451 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 455.2447 | 59.313 % | |
| 12 | A72439 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 445.7381 | 58.075 % | |
| 13 | A89438 | U | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 434.0948 | 56.558 % | |
| 14 | A85786 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 418.2819 | 54.497 % | |
| 15 | A88218 | B | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 410.8311 | 53.527 % | |
| 16 | A83199 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 399.8011 | 52.090 % | |
| 17 | A85741 | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 387.1407 | 50.440 % | |
| 18 | TY37515 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 374.8925 | 48.844 % | |
| 19 | A84564 | D | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 364.6060 | 47.504 % | |
| 20 | A84974 | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 354.9776 | 46.250 % | |
| 21 | PEN | U | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 347.6332 | 45.293 % | |
| 22 | A85106 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 310.2931 | 40.428 % | |
| 23 | A88208 | U | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 281.3870 | 36.662 % | |
| 24 | TY4508 | C | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 181.1482 | 23.602 % | |
| 25 | PEN | U | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 172.6321 | 22.492 % |
I came in at the 76th percentile this time. This is a slight improvement from last Sunday. But what is most interesting to me is that at the last match Andrew Hong came in ahead of me getting 99.6% of the possible match points (I got about 78.6%). This time he came in number 16 with 52.1%. He must have had some equipment problems or something. He zeroed stage 1 and stage 2. And he came in 9th on stage 3.
Here are pictures of stage 5, “More Disaster Factor (13-08)”, and stage 7, “Window Pain”:
This was before it started raining. It got pretty muddy and for most of the match we had clear plastic bags over the targets. It wasn’t nearly as wet as last Sunday but it was enough to cause a few issues with the targets and the tape failing to stick.
I took a former boss of mine, Marcello, to the range today. It was over two months ago that he had express an interest in going shooting for the first time but schedules hadn’t worked out until today.
Before we stepped onto the range we did the normal safety, grip, stance, and sight alignment stuff. I thing asked what he wanted to get out of this range session. His was a different story than I had ever heard before. He was a little bit scared of guns. He wanted to resolve that. He wanted to be either comfortable with guns or know for certain that it wasn’t for him. I’m sure nearly all of my readers know how this is going to resolve.
Here is just the bull’s-eye:
That is the result of firing his first 20 rounds of .22 LR from my Ruger Mark III into a target nine feet away. I verified on another target at 21 feet the sights are a little off. The gun is shooting a little bit to the right.
I would edit the picture to emphasize his smile but it is big enough to easily see in the picture above.
I put up a more difficult target (four diamonds) and moved it out to 15 feet where he continued to do extremely well. I had him put one shot on each diamond. I had him go from low ready to fire on one diamond. I had him go from low ready to fire one round on each diamond until the gun was empty. I had him go from low ready to fire two rounds on each diamond until the gun was empty.
He kept probably 80% of the shots inside the diamonds and his speed rapidly increased.
I had him shoot a .22 LR revolver in single action mode from 15 feet. First dry fire, then live fire. He did great. Then I had him shoot double action dry fire about a dozen times. It looked pretty good even though you could tell he was struggling a little to get a consistent pause between the cylinder rotation and the hammer falling. The first cylinder of live fire was not very pretty. Everything was on paper but not many were on the diamonds. The second cylinder was much better. Nearly all were in the diamonds.
He moved on to 9 mm. Dry fire followed by a single round in the gun. He was a little bit surprised at the recoil even though I told him it would be a lot more. Then I had him shoot two rounds. All the shots were great and I had him empty a magazine into the target. Again all good and his speed was picking up as well.
I had him shoot a few rounds of .40 S&W through my STI. He could tell there was more recoil and it was a bit more than he wanted. He went back to the 9mm and soon his shots were getting a bit wild. Still on paper but not the tight groups on the diamonds like before. It had been nearly two hours on the range and I was pretty sure he was getting tired and maybe developing a bit of a flinch. I suggested he might be getting tired because of the shots weren’t as good as he was doing earlier. He agreed and we packed up and left.
I told him about professional training available from Insights offered at the same range, different range options in the area, rental guns, and competition. He seemed interested and told him I would be glad to give him more lessons. He just needs to let me know when and next time he needs to buy the ammo.
Winning. One new shooter at a time.
I have been doing some organization of my ammo and shooting up the older and small quantity stuff. I noticed the packaging for CCI Mini-Mag .22 LR ammo has changed over the years:
The leftmost is the oldest and the one on the right is the most recent.
On Tuesday I finished off the box on the left. I suspect it was getting close to 20 years old. Every round fed, fired, and ejected without a problem in my Ruger Mark III.
I shot in another USPSA match on Sunday. It was raining. At times it was really pouring. At other times it was a mild drizzle. It never stopped.
One of the guys at the match has been to a couple of Boomershoots and I know both he and his wife from outside of the gun community. He came up to me, said hi, and I told him it seemed a little damp. He said, “I’m not staying. I just came to check on my stage.” He had a shovel over his shoulder and had dug a ditch to carry some of the water away.
It wasn’t the wettest match I have ever heard of but it was the wettest match I have ever attended.
| Place | Name | Member # | Class | Division | PF | Lady | Mil | Law | For | Match Pts | Match % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hoang, Vinh | TY55787 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 786.2780 | 100.000 % |
| 2 | Hong, Andrew | A83199 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 783.4298 | 99.638 % |
| 3 | Huffman, Joe | TY29386 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 617.8207 | 78.575 % |
| 4 | Banks, David | A79458 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 604.0272 | 76.821 % |
| 5 | Baleros, Rae | A83018 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 549.8423 | 69.930 % |
| 6 | Leander, Mike | A28558 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 522.8482 | 66.497 % |
| 7 | Glines, Sterling | A81856 | U | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 503.5897 | 64.047 % |
| 8 | Domiolio, Noel | A85786 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 347.6279 | 44.212 % |
| 9 | Bell, Eric | A32654 | A | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 230.1977 | 29.277 % |
| 10 | Stephens, Scotti | A73026 | none | LTD | MAJOR | Y | N | N | N | 141.6806 | 18.019 % |
| 11 | (DQ) Huggins, Rick | A88883 | C | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 0.0000 | 0.000 % |
This is a much better outcome that previous matches. Only two master class shooters were ahead of me. Another B, an A, and a Master class shooter were below me. Although clearly they were having a “bad day”. I came in at about the 73rd percentile of the shooters. This is much better than the 52nd percentile, and 59th percentile of the previous two matches.
I have been practicing and then testing myself with El Presidente. Here are the results from January 30th of this year. To make it easy for the spreadsheet and to reduce the need to tape the targets I only track the strings where I got all A-zone hits:
| Mean Draw Time: | 1.79 |
| Mean Split Time: | 0.60 |
| Mean Transition Time: | 0.72 |
| Mean Reload Time: | 2.086 |
| Mean Total Time: | 10.36 |
This sucks. I had no idea how slow I had become until I did this test.
And from February 12th:
| Mean Draw Time: | 1.60 |
| Mean Split Time: | 0.54 |
| Mean Transition Time: | 0.64 |
| Mean Reload Time: | 2.43 |
| Mean Total Time: | 9.83 |
Better but not by much. Things still weren’t clicking. I had to really go slow to get the A-zone hits. This was especially true with the first shot after the draw and the split times for shots on the same target. It shouldn’t take almost as long for a second hit on the same target as it did for a transition to another target over three feet from the previous one. Why was it taking so long to get on target with the sights and pull the trigger? I just didn’t know.
From March 11th, a few days before this match:
| Mean Draw Time: | 1.75 |
| Mean Split Time: | 0.39 |
| Mean Transition Time: | 0.63 |
| Mean Reload Time: | 2.30 |
| Mean Total Time: | 8.45 |
The splits on the same target got a lot better. I had been practicing with a .22 on multiple shots on the same target when it suddenly just clicked. The splits just happened without me having to think about them. The sights lined up and the gun went “bang!” without me having to think about it. When I substituted the .40 caliber it still happened.
When I shot the match on Sunday things felt a lot better. The gun went bang without me thinking about it. There were some very short range shots where either I didn’t let up on the trigger enough to get a reset or I was cycling the trigger faster than the gun was cycling the slide. I’ll have to do some tests to find out what is going on with that. And for all except the stage with the 50 yard targets I got good hits. My speed improved without problems with my accuracy.
8.45 second El Presidente’s are still slower than they used to be. I’m pretty sure I was doing them in the mid to high sevens years ago. More practice is needed. The transitions need work. I know this because of this. I should be able to remove at least a tenth of a second. I would then get down into the low 8’s for El Presidentes.
I’m going to the range tomorrow and doing a bunch of transition work with the .22. I’ll do another El Presidente test on Thursday.
I finally found the USPSA match results from last month when I shot a match the day after Valentines day. One stage was particularly well themed:
![]()
Shoot them in the heart. The black is considered “hard cover”.
![]()
This (quasi) heart shaped outline on the ground is the shooting box.
The results for my division are as follows:
| Place | Name | USPSA | Class | Division | PF | Lady | Mil | Law | For | Match Pts | Match % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TY55787 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 675.1016 | 100.000 % | |
| 2 | A83199 | A | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 599.5350 | 88.807 % | |
| 3 | TY71576 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 548.9420 | 81.313 % | |
| 4 | A28558 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 528.9624 | 78.353 % | |
| 5 | A51227 | A | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 528.2475 | 78.247 % | |
| 6 | A71541 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 443.7927 | 65.737 % | |
| 7 | A88883 | D | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 424.4684 | 62.875 % | |
| 8 | A54628 | A | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 419.2345 | 62.099 % | |
| 9 | A83018 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 418.2772 | 61.958 % | |
| 10 | TY29386 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 412.9623 | 61.170 % | |
| 11 | A21888 | C | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 406.3468 | 60.190 % | |
| 12 | A71578 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 391.8932 | 58.050 % | |
| 13 | TY37515 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 319.1640 | 47.276 % | |
| 14 | TY59608 | D | LTD | MINOR | Y | N | N | N | 293.3518 | 43.453 % | |
| 15 | TY18977 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 290.2087 | 42.987 % | |
| 16 | TY41939 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 285.7136 | 42.322 % | |
| 17 | PEN | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 257.2086 | 38.099 % | |
| 18 | A88068 | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 247.2043 | 36.617 % | |
| 19 | A87093 | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 246.3886 | 36.497 % | |
| 20 | TY4508 | C | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 123.7345 | 18.328 % | |
| 21 | A85475 | D | LTD | MINOR |
As you can see I didn’t do all that great. There were ‘C’ and ‘D’ class shooters who came in above me. Among other things, on the last stage I had a major brain fart and fired six shots on the wrong side of a shooting line. That was worth 60 points of penalties. It didn’t even give me any advantage to do so. I just forgot I needed to be on the other side of the line to shoot those targets.
This match was shot before (February 15 versus February 22) that last USPSA match I reported on. In that match I came in at the 59th percentile. In this match I came in at the 52nd percentile. That is a little better but it is essentially unchanged even though there was some practice between the matches.
When writing a review on a firearm, some ammo, or an optical sight, etc., it is probably not a good idea to say that you had “zero issues” or “zero problems” or “zero failures” with it. I’m going to be left wondering exactly what these specific zero issues/problems/failures were, and why you’re not telling us more about them. If you had “no issues” then it would be best if you put it just like that. “Zero issues”, on the other hand, are a whole different subject, and they are potentially very frustrating.
(for those of you who aren’t part of the gun culture, your “zero” is that particular adjustment, or set of adjustments, of your sighting system that puts your bullet right on target at a specific distance when using a specific load [often under specific atmospheric conditions])
I attended a Steel Challenge match last Sunday. Here are the results:
| Stage # | SCSA ID | Stage Name |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SC-103 | Smoke & Hope |
| 2 | ?? | Renton Plate Rack |
| 3 | SC-105 | Accelerator |
| 4 | SC-108 | Roundabout |
| Place | Name | Comp | SCSA | Division | Aggregate | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 | DQ | Additional |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christian S | 8 | PROD | 58.29 | 58.29 | 12.14 | 12.97 | 19.79 | 12.83 | Junior | ||
| 2 | Alexander W | 3 | 3362 | OPN | 66.09 | 66.09 | 16.73 | 16.24 | 16.39 | 16.17 | Junior | |
| 3 | Lukasz T | 21 | A82888 | ISP | 82.76 | 82.76 | 15.69 | 25.34 | 20.17 | 21.00 | ||
| 4 | Matthew M | 51 | PROD | 83.54 | 83.54 | 16.39 | 21.61 | 25.56 | 19.42 | Military | ||
| 5 | Tim R | 50 | PROD | 87.74 | 87.74 | 19.45 | 23.23 | 22.51 | 21.99 | |||
| 6 | Steve L | 64 | A22574 | OPN | 87.79 | 87.79 | 16.68 | 24.08 | 25.48 | 20.99 | ||
| 7 | Joe H | 44 | TY29386 | ISP | 89.72 | 89.72 | 18.76 | 22.40 | 24.57 | 23.43 | Senior | |
| 8 | Jeff K | 18 | PROD | 90.04 | 90.04 | 19.23 | 20.98 | 25.55 | 23.72 | |||
| 9 | Jeffrey K | 36 | PROD | 93.97 | 93.97 | 19.54 | 18.88 | 28.90 | 26.09 | Senior | ||
| 10 | Eric W | 4 | 3362 | PROD | 96.27 | 96.27 | 19.82 | 23.92 | 29.95 | 22.02 | ||
| 11 | Tim R | 49 | ISR | 98.39 | 98.39 | 20.56 | 30.00 | 23.87 | 23.40 | |||
| 12 | Charles B | 57 | OPN | 99.64 | 99.64 | 21.34 | 29.82 | 23.50 | 24.42 | |||
| 13 | Justin H | 58 | PROD | 100.54 | 100.54 | 17.96 | 21.27 | 31.59 | 29.16 | |||
| 14 | Michael M | 34 | OPN | 104.90 | 104.90 | 22.74 | 26.23 | 29.20 | 26.17 | |||
| 15 | Dan P | 7 | A87261 | ISP | 106.69 | 106.69 | 17.86 | 38.78 | 26.85 | 22.64 | ||
| 16 | Greg M | 55 | PROD | 108.58 | 108.58 | 20.77 | 21.76 | 31.18 | 34.31 | |||
| 17 | Lance B | 32 | PROD | 109.73 | 109.73 | 24.65 | 22.43 | 30.28 | 31.81 | |||
| 18 | Steve N | 63 | A88468 | PROD | 110.86 | 110.86 | 20.00 | 27.69 | 29.86 | 32.75 | ||
| 19 | Charles B | 62 | ISP | 112.13 | 112.13 | 20.65 | 31.21 | 29.75 | 29.96 | |||
| 20 | Earl B | 54 | ISP | 112.61 | 112.61 | 18.37 | 34.80 | 28.12 | 30.76 | |||
| 21 | Dan G | 47 | PROD | 115.70 | 115.70 | 20.27 | 28.90 | 31.25 | 34.72 | |||
| 22 | Don C | 45 | A85736 | PROD | 116.66 | 116.66 | 23.92 | 24.74 | 26.08 | 41.36 | Senior | |
| 23 | Connor P | 6 | A87260 | PROD | 117.44 | 117.44 | 18.80 | 24.54 | 21.20 | 52.37 | Junior | |
| 24 | Jen M | 29 | ISP | 120.22 | 120.22 | 25.41 | 19.30 | 21.46 | 53.52 | Lady | ||
| 25 | Thomas P | 14 | PROD | 120.97 | 120.97 | 24.28 | 33.41 | 36.65 | 26.07 | |||
| 26 | Brad M | 1 | ISP | 121.43 | 121.43 | 24.30 | 41.73 | 25.32 | 29.52 | |||
| 27 | Mark P | 24 | A75542 | ISR | 123.14 | 123.14 | 11.53 | 76.16 | 16.70 | 18.19 | ||
| 28 | Jason F | 31 | PROD | 133.70 | 133.70 | 20.95 | 40.28 | 35.02 | 36.89 | |||
| 29 | Jason G | 25 | A86456 | ISP | 133.88 | 133.88 | 21.10 | 46.10 | 26.35 | 39.77 | ||
| 30 | Jesse P | 40 | PROD | 138.20 | 138.20 | 23.98 | 34.09 | 46.09 | 33.48 | |||
| 31 | Todd H | 26 | ISP | 140.42 | 140.42 | 29.08 | 44.49 | 28.73 | 37.56 | |||
| 32 | Campbell T | 48 | ISP | 181.74 | 181.74 | 32.02 | 54.54 | 37.99 | 56.63 | Lady | ||
| 33 | Dave N | 11 | PROD | 214.24 | 214.24 | 41.79 | 76.71 | 50.36 | 50.75 | |||
| 34 | Patrick D | 52 | PROD | 229.03 | 229.03 | 32.26 | 83.97 | 75.25 | 36.99 | Military | ||
| 35 | Jim C | 60 | PROD | 238.21 | 238.21 | 36.02 | 67.70 | 89.38 | 44.61 | |||
| 36 | Gail C | 46 | PROD | 238.29 | 238.29 | 34.34 | 79.19 | 61.48 | 62.72 | Lady |
I did a little better this time than last. I still made a serious mistake that cost me about two seconds which cost me a couple of positions. On stage two there were six, instead of the usual five, small plates that were a bit harder to hit than most. On string three is had several misses and should have reloaded before shooting the fourth string. But instead I figured I had eight rounds left and it should be fine. I again had a lot of misses and had to reload for the last two plates.
I know better. There was no point in taking that risk. I had a fully loaded magazine on my belt. It would have cost me another couple of seconds off the clock to reload before the fourth string rather than two seconds on the clock during the string.
Here is an update on the total number of rounds I have reloaded:
223.LOG: 2027 rounds.
3006.LOG: 467 rounds.
300WIN.LOG: 1351 rounds.
40SW.LOG: 37670 rounds.
45.log: 0 rounds.
9MM.LOG: 19709 rounds.
Total: 61224 rounds.
This is a delta of 1896 rounds since last month. This is composed of 830 rounds of 40 S&W and 1066 rounds of 9mm.
I still haven’t found any of my favorite pistol powders available. But I found a pound of Longshot on my shelf and another local source had some so I bought a pound from them as well.. I’m working up a load for 40 S&W with it. Even 0.2 grains less than the suggested starting load gives higher velocities than what I really want. I’m getting 1047 fps with Montana Gold 180 grain JHP for a Power Factor of 188 when I really want a PF on the order of 175. I may reduce the seating depth and see if that helps. I was able to order eight pounds of ETR7 which I’m hoping works out okay. If so then that should keep me in business for quite a while.
Via email from Toastrider we have this:
For some reason I haven’t been able to find any commercially available ammo. It must be that a high demand for it hoovered the shelves like a lot of the other ammo. This would appear to be consistent with the abundance of large rifle ammo, moderate availability of .223 ammo, and scarcity of .22 ammo. Thus I claim we have proof that if the size of a gun is inversely related to penis size then the caliber of the gun owning man in this country is much larger than average.
I received a IWB holster from Alien Gear for review. I have the Ruger P89 Cloak Tuck 2.0 but they have different versions of holsters for a very wide selection of guns. I count 441 different pistols and 14 different revolvers.
I can’t ever recall giving unqualified praise for a product I have been asked to review. While I do have a minor quibble about the instructions I really like the product. As they claim on their web site, “You are not just going to like your new Alien Gear Holster – you’re going to love it. Guaranteed.”
My minor quibble with the instructions is with how they tell you to put the holster on:
First put on your pants and sturdy belt. Leave your pants unbuttoned and unzipped. Insert the holster into your pants in the front just to the right of the zipper. Then, slide the holster around to where you will be wearing it.
…
This didn’t work for me. The padding gripped the t-shirt I was wearing and slid it around with the holster. If I had not been wearing a shirt then it would have worked but why do this at all? Perhaps there is a good reason but I didn’t see it. I just rotated it into the position I wanted it and then slid it straight down sort of like I was tucking in a shirt.
The holster is very comfortable to wear. It has good retention for a holster without a locking mechanism. I could draw from it as rapidly as any other IWB holster I have worn and could reholster without a collapsed shell that needed to be opened up.
Although I found the defaults to be ideal for me the holster has a great deal of adjustment available. It has adjustable tilt angle, adjustable ride height, and adjustable retention.
It is a very versatile holster. You can even use it with a tucked in t-shirt.
Their warranty is awesome. With free shell trades for life if you change carry guns and forever protection against breakage.
Give this holster very serious consideration.
This is a demonstration of the principle represented here:
This isn’t me. I can quit any time I want.
I shot in another USPSA match today. The results for my division are as follows:
Place |
Name |
USPSA |
Class |
Division |
PF |
Lady |
Mil |
Law |
For |
Match Pts |
Match % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hong, Andrew | A83199 | A | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 376.4578 | 100.000 % |
| 2 | LeRoux, Scott | L3253 | M | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 292.5846 | 77.720 % |
| 3 | Gillaspie, Brent | A89049 | U | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 255.9800 | 67.997 % |
| 4 | Denton, Charis | A79746 | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 237.9736 | 63.214 % |
| 5 | Mc Nees Jr, Donald | A52430 | C | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 227.0105 | 60.302 % |
| 6 | Sherman, Todd | TY37515 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 215.8692 | 57.342 % |
| 7 | Huffman, Joseph | TY29386 | B | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 213.4978 | 56.712 % |
| 8 | Feucht, Alan | A72439 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 212.2518 | 56.381 % |
| 9 | Fischer, Sarah | A77996 | C | LTD | MAJOR | Y | N | N | N | 199.2419 | 52.925 % |
| 10 | Adams, Bryan | A85106 | U | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 189.7108 | 50.394 % |
| 11 | McClure, David | A71541 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 180.8689 | 48.045 % |
| 12 | Baleros, Rae Arsen | A53054 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 169.9922 | 45.156 % |
| 13 | Cook, Jason | A85741 | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 124.4949 | 33.070 % |
| 14 | Mathena, Lee | A54215 | D | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 120.5627 | 32.026 % |
| 15 | Domingo, Noel | A85786 | C | LTD | MAJOR | N | N | N | N | 106.1564 | 28.199 % |
| 16 | Daniels, Stephen | PEN | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 101.9012 | 27.068 % |
| 17 | Reibman, Ryan | A84564 | U | LTD | MINOR | N | N | N | N | 95.8378 | 25.458 % |
I really need to practice more. I’m not shooting at a ‘B’ level like I used to.
This match was all classifiers and the “National Percentage” from these stages are, according to the classifier calculator, probably as follows:
It takes 60% to be in class ‘B’. I had problems with each of the stages which accounts for some it. The best example of this was that I shot a no-shoot target and got a miss on “Both Sides Now #1”. If I had achieved the same time and got the A-zone hit I would have had a 72.9621% percentage. I hit another no-shoot target with a miss in “The Roscoe Rattle” which would have translated into 62.9157% had I been a little more careful.
I had some minor equipment problems too. In “Can You Count” I loaded five rounds into each of my magazines because I can’t count as fast as I can shoot. In both strings the magazine did not lock the slide back. In the first string I was a bit confused and it took a while to reload and rack the slide. It happened in the second string as well but I was better prepared for it and it two seconds less than the equivalent first string. Had the slide locked back like it should have I probably would have had something like a time of about three seconds less. This would have resulted in a percentage of 61.6266%.
But I didn’t shoot like that. I made mistakes and my shooting represents that of a solid ‘C’ shooter (40%->59.9%), not ‘B’.
Height over bore, that is.
I’ve only half jokingly mocked other “future weapon” designs in the past, saying that the trend is toward an ever more clownishly high sight axis. My educated guess is that this is in fact a psychological problem.
With the lower velocity of the grenade/shotgun, it would make actual sense to put it on the bottom, with the flatter trajectory rifle barrel closer to the sight axis.
The new terms like “Soldier integrated such and such” (which obviously turn ordinary warfare into something totally new and different) are also the result of psychological problems. Years ago, while reading one of the supposedly big cheese U.S. military publications, I found that such a thing as an “army” is, technically speaking, no more. No, ladies and gentlemen; we now have a “Soldier-Centric Force Structure” instead, don’t you know, which no doubt changes EVERYTHING.
The advantage you see is that people who have actual experience in stuff are no longer needed, and can therefore be safely and conveniently brushed aside. Who needs an Army General when you can have a shiny, new, Soldier-Centric Force Structure Command and Control Engineering Specialist? Hmm? Was General Patton a Soldier-Centric Force Structure Command and Control Engineering Specialist? I don’t think so. All he did was lead an Army to kill a bunch of folks and break things. Feh!
And who needs a stupid old rifle when you can have something that looks like it came out of a bad Sci-Fi movie written by an ignoramus, and having the ergonomics of a cinder block?
This is somewhat like a family reunion.
Carl Z.
December 31, 2014
[This was part of the note which Carl sent to me with his check for Boomershoot 2015.
It’s true. Many of the people who go to Boomershoot have been attending for many years and it’s the only time they see each other. It’s a very friendly and happy place. No real competition, just everyone turning money into noise, laughter, and smiles.
Be a part of it.—Joe]