I have pinned this post to the top of my blog. It is to remind people of what many of our opponents want. Alison Aires wants a tyrannical government. They want summary execution for private possession of firearms.
This is why we have a Bill of Rights. This is why I created Boomershoot.
While a lot of reports have done good work documenting the Antifa and leftist protests that attempted to shut down a Turning Point USA event on the campus of UCLA at Berkeley earlier this week (here, here, and here), I want to highlight one fundamental and truly ugly aspect of these protests that I think we no longer see because it has become so common.
While it is clear these leftist protesters have nothing positive to propose, it is their hate and anger that stands out above all. All they can do is vent hate, pure and simple.
Robert Zimmerman
November 12, 2025
The leftist protest at Berkeley this week: Feel the hate! – Behind The Black – Robert Zimmerman
Surely everyone has gotten frustrated and/or angry and threw or struck something and broke it, right? It is an easy thing to do.
The difficult thing to do is the design, build, and maintain something of value. In minutes an arsonist can destroy a building which took months or years to design. A valuable painting created by a master such as da Vinci, Michelangelo, or Raphael took months or years and “climate change activists vandals” thrown paint on it and think they have accomplished something.
By the time they have made it past the toddler stage of development most people realize that willful destruction of life and/or valuable property is seldom a good use of your time. But those that advocate for and participate in riots are a special type of socially retarded.
One has to wonder, this willful destruction is far more common from the political left, so is bell curve for this social retardation shifted compared to other political persuasions? Or is the mean the same and the standard deviation greater such that there end up with more people in the tail of the bell curve willing to participate in anti-social behavior?
The solutions to reducing this behavior might vary depending on the answer to those questions.
While many Americans still believe the courts are the key to restoring liberty, gun rights leaders say it’s time for a reality check — because the courts aren’t coming to save you. That’s the blunt warning from Hannah Hill, Vice President of the National Foundation for Gun Rights, who says far too many liberty activists have fallen into the trap of thinking they can sue their way back to freedom.
“No. The courts are NOT coming to save you,” Hill said in a recent statement. “If you’re waiting for a judge to fix this country, you’re going to be waiting forever.”
According to Hill, too many well-meaning conservatives are convinced that “one big lawsuit” will topple gun control laws or fix deep-rooted corruption, when in reality, the legal system is stacked against liberty from top to bottom.
Chris McNutt
November 14, 2025
Reality Check: The Courts Aren’t Coming to Save Your Gun Rights – Shooting News Weekly
I have been saying just the opposite for quite a while now. The legislatures in so many states are completely hopeless. I think the courts and/or prosecutions are the only hope in those gun-rights hellholes. If we can maintain an originalist majority on the SCOTUS long enough, we can get most of the bad laws removed from the books. Once the bad laws are off the books we can create a history of life without oppressive gun laws. The more history we can create the better our chances for a non-oppressive gun law future.
The risk is losing the majority on SCOTUS via the anti-gun politicians packing the court in the next five to ten years.
That said, having all the bad law the Federal level is plausible even without the support of SCOTUS. And if we can get rid of all the bad laws at the Federal level and in half or more the states then we have additional leverage for the remaining states.
I see the point of the article, and I am not entirely in disagreement with them. And redundancy in protection and plans are always a good thing. If we can get both the courts and the legislatures to see the plain and clear language of the 2nd Amendment that would be great. It would be much better than having just one or the other. So, both right?
The problem is that resources are limited and must be allocated to best accomplish the final goal. With the current SCOTUS I believe the path forward is more certain and less resource intensive than attempting to make similar progress in the legislatures. Hence, I’m going to be expending my resources on the courts for now. But I’m certainly not going to fault someone who can make a difference at the legislative front.
Romcom premise: therapist of a woman with chronic TDS that’s ruining her life tells her that part of her therapy is exposure: she needs to spend time around a Trump supporter until her anxiety wears off. She must date a Trump supporter to be cured of her disease.
Hilarity ensues.
Title: “Making Amelia Great Again”
Peachy Keenan @KeenanPeachy
Posted on X, November 15, 2025
My impression is that many of those opposed to the Trump presidency go to great lengths to not be soiled by contact with any information that might cause them to question their hatred. Hence, while I could find humor in watching a movie or show like that, it would probably be a marriage breaker in some relationships to even suggest viewing something like that.
Don’t get mad and leave until you get into the good stuff at about 1:38 into the video.
“Universal Basic Income” means “feed the goldfish in the aquarium, until the time is right to pull the plug.”
Matthew Bracken @Matt_Bracken
Posted on Gab November 13, 2025
This appears to be a reasonable hypothesis.
Whoever (the “elite”, a super AI, The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement, etc.) has or acquires the power to pull the plug is likely to at some point in time come to the conclusion most other people are “just parasites”. From there the obvious conclusion is that the world would be a better place without “those people.”
I am listening to a fascination book, On Tyranny (Expanded Audio Edition): Updated with Twenty New Lessons from Russia’s War on Ukraine by Timothy Snyder*. Snyder is a historian and makes the claim there is a frequent crossroads in the late history of an empire. This is my paraphrasing so I may misrepresent him some… The controlling elites get tired of giving so much to the far reaches of the empire and decide it is time to collect on their investment. At about the same time the far reaches of the empire get tired of the controlling elites taking all their resources and decide it is time to get something in return. For some reason the resulting resolution does not go well. I could see Universal Basic Income arriving at a similar crossroads and those involved do not see the humor in the situation as much as I do.
Prepare appropriately.
* You may wish to skip the book part where he makes his case as to why President Trump is a tyrant, and get to the history of Ukraine, Poland, Germany, Vikings, and Russia where the good stuff is.
Despite his website promising “compassionate leadership for a just future,” Smeltzer vowed in a recent post to “round up EVER [sic] SINGLE red hat wearing MAGA and put them in hard labor camps for the rest of their lives.”
While locking up those with whom he disagrees appears to be one of his key objectives, Smeltzer told the Washington Free Beacon that he is running a “health care and tax-the-rich campaign” and would use a role in Congress to advocate for his fellow “furry” fetishists.
Joseph MacKinnon
November 10, 2025
‘Furry’ Democrat running for Congress celebrated Kirk assassination, wants to put MAGA voters in ‘hard labor camps’ | Blaze Media
This refers to Samuel Smeltzer, a Democrat seeking to represent Michigan’s 7th district in Congress. He has six to eight opponents to defeat in the primary, then he would face the Republican incumbent in the November 2026 election. So, he still has a long journey ahead before he seizes the reins of power.
He certainly has the attitude I would expect from a socialist. The compassion part may not seem obvious in the current context. But if he really thinks all “red hat wearing MAGA” should be lined up in front of a ditch to be shot, then I suppose hard labor for life could be considered compassionate.
This is why we have the Second Amendment. This is why I created Boomershoot.
Prepare appropriately.
Chuck Schumer stepped on a rake with the shutdown and the hammer and sickle wing of the Democrats wants to use Mamdani narrowly beating Cuomo as justification for taking over. I am happy to let AOC take the wheel and drive off a cliff.
Slow Joe Crow
Comment to Becoming Woke
While there is the certain hazard the rest of the country suffers as the car goes over the cliff, I cannot plausibly imagine a less bad outcome from our current predicament. What can we do to make sure the drive train is in good working order and the car is fully fueled? I don’t really care whether or not the vehicle has working brakes. They always double down on their mistakes so I would not expect them to be used in any case.
Democrats are looking ahead with hope that the anger in their party boils over so they can focus on hammering Republicans over health care. Next month, Republicans will give Democrats a vote on extending the enhanced ACA subsidies. It will almost certainly fail, and Republicans are preparing an alternative plan they can put on the floor to vote for instead. Nevertheless, it will give Democrats another opportunity to go on offense.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) said while it’s “definitely a disappointment” the shutdown didn’t end with the outcome Democrats preferred, people should be directing their anger at those imposing higher health care costs on Americans.
Igor Bobic, Jennifer Bendery, and Arthur Delaney
November 11, 2025
Why Democrats Caved In The Shutdown Fight | HuffPost Latest News
What I don’t see discussed in the media in plain language is the consequences of these higher premiums. Except for U.S. New & World Report, the wording is all, at best, very circumspect:
5 Consequences If ACA Premium Subsidies End in 2026 | AJMC
The return of the subsidy cliff would likely lead to “coverage churn,” where individuals cycle in and out of insurance due to fluctuating income. This instability not only undermines continuity of care but also disrupts the broader insurance market by reducing the number of healthy, continuously insured individuals.
What expiring ACA subsidies could mean for consumers and the economy | Mizuho Insights
In the absence of subsidies, the U.S. healthcare system will confront lower volumes, tighter margins, and renewed financial pressure across the board. For a sector already navigating demographic shifts, labor shortages, and cost inflation, the withdrawal of federal support could prove a defining headwind in the years ahead.
What the End of Obamacare Subsidies Could Mean for Your Health Coverage | TIME
Insurers across the market—not just those relying on ACA subsidies—are bracing for the effects of the expiration, as volatility is expected.
The shutdown is about to end. Will millions lose their health insurance?
Without the pandemic-era subsidies, ACA health insurers could face the prospect of serving a larger share of high-cost enrollees, Corlette said.
“We could be in for a stretch where insurance companies have to raise their premiums again to reflect a smaller and sicker market,” Corlette said. “So 2027 premiums are likely to be even higher, and some insurance companies may decide this is not a market they want to continue being in.”
Hospitals Face a ‘Slow Train Wreck’ if ACA Subsidies End, Expert Warns | Health Care | U.S. News
Could the loss of these subsidies destabilize insurance markets, and if so, what kind of consequences could we see for patients and for providers?
We already know that insurance companies are bracing for a market that is much smaller, has fewer enrollees but is also much sicker than it has been.
That’s because insurance companies are assuming that the people most likely to be deterred by a higher premium are folks who are relatively young and healthy. What insurers really need is what they call a balanced risk pool, where there’s essentially a balance between healthy and sick people, with healthier people subsidizing sicker folks. Then the healthy people drop out, which means that the insurance companies have a smaller group of more expensive people to cover and then they raise their premiums.
Some of them may find the market less attractive because they worry they can’t fully recoup their costs. So we could see over time, not only rising premiums in this market but also fewer insurance companies participating.
Let me translate this for you. With the subsidies ending there is a high risk of a death spiral in the health insurance industry. As premiums rise, healthier enrollees are likely to drop coverage, leaving insurers with a sicker, costlier pool. This forces insurers to raise rates further, compounding “instability.”
Copilot supplied:
Bottom Line
The end of ACA subsidies would mean higher premiums, fewer enrollees, and greater instability for insurers, while threatening the ACA’s long-term viability. Unless Congress extends or replaces subsidies, the ACA could face a slow-motion collapse driven by adverse selection and affordability crises.
The insurance companies will have to revert to some of the previous practices which protected them against this sort of death spiral insurance premium situation. They will need to be able to refuse insurance to people with preexisting conditions. While unpopular, they may revert to having lifetime and annual limits which were banned by Obama Care.
As near as I can tell, the U.S. Constitution does not give the U.S. Government the power to provide health insurance. Of course, during the Obama administration SCOTUS disagreed with my reading of the U.S. Constitution.
My take on this is that the money has to come from some place. The subsidies are paid by taxes. By cycling the money through the tax process, then back to insurance companies, then to healthcare providers a considerable amount of “friction” has been introduced, and the total cost of health care has been increased. This is a waste of money.
Free markets are best because they reduce “friction” and the competition results in innovation.
Let ACA fail. Let people evaluate their own risks and be responsible for their own health care. Let insurance companies tailor their coverage for the markets and how they decide to define them. Let private charity groups vet and pay for deserving people unable to afford insurance or pay out of pocket. Let the people who chose to abuse their bodies with consumption of alcohol, tobacco, other recreational drugs, and other risky behaviors pay the price for their stupidity.
Prepare appropriately for the transitions.
Via Alice Smith @TheAliceSmith:
I think it is a rhetorical question.
To me, the answer is obvious. Those pushing the “war on women” cannot tolerate being in agreement with their political opponents no matter how clear the truth is. Yet, they are willing to distort the truth to whatever extreme they can get away with to harm their political opponents.
Via Matthew Bracken @Matt_Bracken:
I wish this were not true. But it has been true for decades. I remember one of my daughters bringing home a paper from college when she was going to the University of Idaho. I recall it being from a set of papers assigned by an economics professor. The students were to report on the errors they found in them. The paper was about some set of people in South America having freedom forced on them and how bad it was.
How do you argue with someone like this? How can you even have a conversation? We do not even share the definitions of words. Is there even a common basis for communication? Is it some sort of alternate reality?
I fear that at some point the only communication they will understand are hand signals. There are universal hand signals which everyone recognizes and usually comply with. Use them as a last resort.
Will Rogers once said, “I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat.”
That’s even truer today than when the comedian uttered it almost a hundred years ago. While always a much better option than the Republicans, the Democrats are a broken party incapable of offering the type of resistance this era calls for. Even worse, when a candidate like Zohran Mamdani comes along—one with ideas about helping the poor and middle-class—the very people Democrats are supposed to stand for—they mostly refuse to back him and many offer support instead to an independent candidate in Andrew Cuomo with numerous sexual harassment allegations against him and a record that includes likely causing thousands of unnecessary deaths of the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic and then trying to cover it up. Why is Mamdani considered such a threat? Because he wants to experiment with free buses and government-run grocery stores, and because he’s shown signs that he will not kowtow to the interests of the economic elites.
Ross Rosenfeld
November 10, 2025
This May Be the End of the Democrats | Opinion
If he thinks the solution to the problems the Democrats have is more socialism, then he is part of their problem.
Assuming he is not actually working for their defeat and pretending to offer them good advice, then he is clueless. Totally clueless.
They deserved what is coming to them. The dustbin of history.
Layoffs hit NBC News this week with the network division facing cuts ahead of Comcast’s spinoff of Versant. About 150 jobs have been eliminated so far which only represents 7% of the total newsroom staff. However, the company has been less forthcoming on where the jobs are being cut: The majority of layoffs are targeting Diversity and Equity teams.
Tyler Durden
October 17, 2025
DEI Going Jobless: NBC Joins Media Trend And Cuts Diversity Journalists | ZeroHedge
See also: NBC News’ 150 Layoffs Gut Black, Latino, Asian American and LGBTQ+ Diversity Teams.
This is supporting evidence for some of my claims that there are big changes happening in this country regarding racial and sex discrimination.
“Go woke, go broke” is more than a slogan. It is reality. One could say there is a new meaning to “becoming woke”.
I hope this doesn’t go too far. Just as the political left pushed the pendulum too far, the right could do the same thing in the other direction. Backlash can be hazardous to everyone’s health.
I was doing some clean up in my work area and found an old newspaper clipping from the April 15th, 2012, edition of the Lewiston Morning Tribune (Idaho):
Barbara A. Scott is my ex-wife. This was her response to getting served papers seeking a separation. There was also an entry in the Idaho State Patrol blog (now just a collection of news releases) about the incident. And there was a short video from a Spokane television station.
I’m so grateful to now be married to someone without mental health issues. I don’t tell my current wife (also named Barbara Anne) every day how grateful I am to have her as my wife, but it probably is close to weekly. Not having a person with a personality disorder in your immediate life makes a huge a difference.
A silver lining from my first marriage is that I learned a lot about psychology and we created some great kids together.
The simplest way to sum up modern progressive activists is this: they’re sociopaths who identify as empaths. Forever lecturing others about compassion, while themselves being brutally cruel.
This was never clearer than during Black Lives Matter mania, which saw almost the entire progressive elite pursue a frenzied vendetta against anyone suspected of ideological impurity.
Michael Deacon
November 7, 2025
Black Lives Matter made our elites lose the plot – and they’re finally starting to admit it
People wondered where it would end. Would the purity tests go as far as they did in the USSR? One never knows. Fortunately, some semblance of sanity gained traction and things turned around. I can see it at my employer. As near as I can tell anyone officially associated with the DEI staff, and many others only tangentially related, no longer work there. The scholarships which were only for “people of color” and the special mentoring programs only for women and minorities are all gone.
Then, the Democrat party paid a price for their involvement in the 2024 election. They are still paying. It remains to be seen if the debt will be repaid by the 2026 election. I’m not certain they have learned their lesson. Sociopaths are notoriously difficult to train. They can learn to not get caught, but changing their nature is an entirely different matter.
My message is, I can see in my mind’s eye those rows and rows of white stones and all the hundreds of my friends who gave their lives, for what? The country of today?
“No, I’m sorry, but the sacrifice wasn’t worth the result of what it is now.
…
What we fought for was our freedom, but now it’s a darn sight worse than when I fought for it.
Alec Penstone
November 7, 2025
Winning Second World War was not worth it, says D-Day veteran
He is talking about the U.K. I cannot help but conclude this means people must be thinking their government of today is tyrannical. With the surveillance society, restrictions on free speech, firearms ownership, and even knife ownership I can see how a strong case can be made for that.
I wish them luck in recovering their freedom.
Voting for communists because you’re poor is roughly akin to throwing virgins into a volcanic caldera to stop an eruption.
But then so are most of the things governments think they can do to improve the economy, from printing more money or less money, raising or dropping interest rates, regulating several aspects of the economy, or just about anything else.
I mean, all of those do something. They just rarely do what the government thinks its doing/wants them to do.
…
Which is why communism is the worst of all systems, because it thinks it can “scientifically” and “top down” control all of economy from production to consumption.
And all it does, over and over again, is throw virgins in volcanos to stop the lava flow.
Only the promised wonderland of free stuff never arrives.
And you end up tragically short on virgins. And everything else, as well.
Sarah A. Hoyt
November 6, 2025
Throw Another Virgin Into the Volcano! – According To Hoyt
My analogy for this is that an economic system is a like a machine. Government is like friction in the machine. It removes energy (wealth) that could have been used for something else. Some of this government removed energy is put to beneficial interests. Enforcing contracts and protecting the rights of individuals are essential functions that government has the potential to do reasonably well. When government imposes regulations the friction does little more than turns the machine energy into heat and the benefit is near zero as far as the machine (economic system) is concerned.
As more friction is inserted (regulation and taxes) into the machine the net energy decreases and more and more system in the machine must be shut down to conserve energy while still allowing the machine to run in some capacity. Black markets appear as bypasses around the friction points. These bypasses work after a fashion but there are other problems. Contracts are ultimately enforced by violence and threats of violence. Trust decreases because of all the laws that are being broken put people at risk of being ratted out to the government. Planning becomes difficult because supply chains are not predictable. If enough friction is added the machine slows down and stops (economic collapse).
The socialist will not admit responsibility for their destruction of the economy. Among other excuses, they will claim it was bad luck.
Today, there’s possibility in politics. Mamdani’s win ensures that the Democratic Party isn’t dead. It’s just in need of a redesign.
Sara Pequeño
November 4, 2025
Mamdani’s win is bigger than New York. Now Democrats have a clear path forward. | Opinion
This is an interesting perspective. I wonder how these words will stand the test of time.
US could take Canada with eight Scout Troops, a supply of Mountain Dew, beef jerky and .22LR.
Mexico is a bit more sporty. Need eight Venturing Crews with .223 AR-15s.
Tirno
November 3, 2025
Comment to Instapundit » Blog Archive » AS IT SHOULD BE: Gun Control in the U.S. is Futile.
I suspect he is exaggerating. But he is the scout leader and would know better than I.
In a landmark operation, U.S. authorities have seized 127,271 Bitcoins—valued at roughly $15 billion—from an international scam syndicate operating out of Cambodia. This unprecedented recovery, the largest in American history, marks a turning point in the global fight against cyber-enabled financial crime. Investigators traced the digital currency to a sprawling network of fraudulent investment schemes orchestrated by Chen Vincent Zhi, a prominent Cambodian businessman. The case not only exposes the dark underbelly of cryptocurrency but also highlights the growing sophistication of law enforcement in tracking illicit digital assets.
Shay Johnson
November 2, 2025
World’s Largest Crypto Seizure Announced—DOJ Takes Down $15B Pig-Butchering Empire Across 30 Nations
I heard a presentation on the pig butchering* scams about two years ago. The stories told were just heartbreaking. Lonely, frequently elderly people where completely drained of all their wealth and left with huge loans they were unable to repay. They were frequently convinced to borrow money from friends and family.
The authorities knew the geographical location of the scammer were. It was near the border with China. When the location was revealing in the presentation, I was of the mood to advocate for just bombing the place. If the local authorities would not shut them down, a few dozen bombs should do the job, I thought. Then they told of the slaves they held to implement the scams. Their situation was even worse than the financial scam victims. My high explosives solution to the problem suddenly became significantly less ethical.
That this evil empire has been broken up, some restitution is likely, and the slaves are being rescued is extremely good news to me.
* “Pig butchering” is a type of financial scam where fraudsters build trust with victims over time—often through social media or dating platforms—before convincing them to invest in fake or manipulated financial schemes, such as cryptocurrency or forex trading. The term refers to “fattening up” the victim with attention and false profits before “slaughtering” them by draining their funds. It’s a blend of romance scam and investment fraud, often run by organized criminal networks.
Via Newsweek:
You can stop looking for glitches in the Matrix—it’s finally been proven that our universe is not merely a simulation running on some powerful alien civilization’s supercomputer.
I did not read the original paper. But the claimed solution involves quantum gravity and Kurt Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem. There is more than enough mind twisting physics and logic in there that I am not going to even try to really understand it. That complexity means there might be room enough for an oversight in their proof.
I don’t know that it matters to me one way or the other, but I am vaguely pleased it is less likely our reality is huge computer simulation.