Deceitful news reporting

The Seattle PI reports:

In an effort to drum up support for a proposal requiring background checks on those who buy firearms at gun shows, a gun control advocacy group reported a survey strongly supporting the idea. 

Washington Ceasefire conducted the survey, asking 403 registered voters whether they would be more or less likely to support candidates who wanted to close a loophole in state law that allows gun sales without background checks at gun shows.

Current state law allows people to buy firearms at gun shows without a background check, although federal law requires such checks when the firearm is sold at a store.

There is a problem with this article.  This last sentence is false.  And I’m willing to bet (an extremely rare thing for me to do) the survey takers worded their question(s) in such a way that they mislead the people being surveyed in a similar manner. 

The truth is Federal law does not even define a gun show let along make some sort of exception for them.  The laws that apply at a gun store apply at a gun show, the parking lot at the mall, and your backyard.  There is a reason these people lie–the truth is painful to them.  They cannot hope to get their way if they stick to the truth.

Gay marriage lawsuit in Iowa

I’m surprised this is occurring in Iowa.  California, Massachusetts, and even Washington state.  But Iowa?  Apparently the Iowa constitution looks friendly to the pursuit of gay marriage via the courts. 

DES MOINES — A gay rights group filed a lawsuit on behalf of six gay and lesbian couples Tuesday in Polk County District Court, asking for the right to marry for same-sex couples.

Lambda Legal, which has spearheaded the same-sex marriage drive across the country, said it wants full recognition of the civil rights of same-sex couples.

I’m all for gay marriage but I’m not comfortable with it being implemented via the courts.  I would prefer that it happen legislatively or via a popular vote of the people.  Particularly when it is indisputable that the original intent of the constitution or law being utilized was that marriage only be for men and women.  The original intent may have been wrong but there is a procedure for changing it that should be utilized.  Changing the meaning via the courts is just wrong.  Freedom of the press could just as easily come to mean the government printing office has the freedom to print the news but private or corporate “press” is not.  You think it couldn’t happen?  Look at what has happened with the Second Amendment.

Quote of the day–Cullen Hightower

Our laws can be friendly to those who obey them, and too often useful to those who don’t.
    
Cullen Hightower
[Among the most useful laws to those that disobey them are the laws that attempt to ban or restrict goods or services.  The black market always finds a way whether it is something physical like booze, guns or recreational drugs or some service such as high interest loans (loan sharking), gambling or prostitution.–Joe]

Ice crystal beauty

It’s been cold in Moscow recently– then the fog rolled in.  The result was everything became covered in ice crystals.  Xenia has the pictures.

Someone at PNNL earns some brownie points

I previously reported PNNL screwed up a corporate American Express account I had at PNNL by not forwarding the bills to me after my wrongful termination.  I received a bill from American Express last month then tried to call AE a couple times and had the call dropped or otherwise wasn’t able to get things straightened out.  Honestly, I didn’t put much effort into it.  I would get so angry over it that I just wanted to ignore it.  I got another bill on Saturday and opened it up yesterday.  Surprise!  The bill has been paid.  I presume someone at PNNL read my posting (I know some of them do read my blog) and made sure it got taken care of at that end.

Whoever you are, thank you.

Quote of the day–Adolf Hitler

Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.

Adolf Hitler
[For my readers, see Dan’s comment, that don’t “feel” people living under restrictive gun laws are oppressed.–Joe]

This is what happens in places without guns–Case I

If this had been in a gun friendly state in the U.S. these scumbags would be suffering from acute lead poisoning after about the second “unannounced visit” and the expected winners of the next Darwin awards.  Instead they invaded several homes before getting caught and will get another chance to invade homes after they get out.

A Dublin man was tonight sentenced to nine years in jail for trying to force a young woman to have sex with her flatmate and then cutting her with a knife.

Stephen Phelan, 20, from Poddle Close in Kimmage was found guilty of aggravated sexual assault and assault causing harm to the woman by a jury in June.

At the sentencing hearing, Judge Phillip O’Sullivan also imposed concurrent sentences ranging from three to seven years for 17 other offences carried out on the same night.

On February 11 2003, Phelan and an accomplice began a spree of burglaries which led to the sexual assault, the stabbing of a student nine times and the crashing of a car into a Dublin Bus.

Judge O’Sullivan said Phelan had been involved in a series of violent incidents and outlined the impact on his victims: post traumatic stress disorder, the loss of power in an arm, permanent scar wounds and a fear of sleeping alone at night.

“No summary of mine can do justice to the trauma suffered by these people,” he said.

He imposed a five-year probation sentence on Phelan to commence on his release, after hearing from a psychiatrist who said he had serious reservations about him getting out into society again under the influence of drugs.

Phelan had been spending €1500-€1600 euro a day on crack cocaine and had been using robberies to fund his habit.

Detective Sergeant George McGeary said Phelan and his accomplice, who has since fled the jurisdiction, had broken into a house in Harold’s Cross, where four people were living, including the young woman.

They armed themselves with a screwdriver, a Stanley knife, a Swiss army knife, a dumb-bell and a hacksaw.

After searching the house for property and money, Phelan went into the bedroom of a 24-year-old tenant. She screamed when she saw him and shouted at her flatmate to get her trousers.

The court heard he came into the room and told her: “Give us what we want or we’ll cut you.”

He was unable to find her ATM card and told her to take off her clothes, where he believed she was concealing it.

Later in the burglary, he came back into her room and told her to lie down on the bed or he would cut her nipples.

She refused several times to take off her clothes but then Phelan came back, held a knife to her throat and told her to ’take off her f*****g clothes’.

Detective Sergeant McGeary told the court that she was crying while she took her trouser bottoms off.

He used his knife to cut off her underwear and then told her to have sex with one of her two male flatmates.

He refused, saying “She’s my friend” but was then cut twice on the upper arm in a X shape.

The young woman was then ordered into the bedroom of another flatmate, who had been forced to lie naked on the bed.

Phelan told them to have sex together and they kissed, pretending to have sex.

Phelan then cut the woman’s buttocks with a knife and also made a cut running from the top of her back to the base.

Detective Sergeant McGeary told the court that the flatmates had been terrified by Phelan’s threats.

Home invasions are rare where people’s rights to defend themselves are not infringed by oppressive governments.  And this is just a hint of some of the things that happen.

Blog advertising

In case you hadn’t noticed the identical ads on so many different blogs, including the second one from the top here on the right.  Here is the story:

The MSNBC cable network plans to flood the Internet this week with its largest concentrated online pitch, running advertising on hundreds of Web sites and blogs. The cost of the campaign, to promote three prime-time programs, is estimated at just under $1 million.

There’s more to the story but basically they are trying to see if they can drive traffic from the internet to their cable channel.  They are advertising on 800 different blogs.  I wish I was getting 1/800 of $1,000,000 but I’m not.  I’m far, far cheaper than that.  So far they have had 24 clicks from 313 page views.  That, 7.67%, is a rather outstanding click through rate.  My boomershoot ad only gets 1.73% and the t-shirt ad currently on top gets 2.94%.

Heads up!

I don’t know if this is something to be looking out for or if it’s
just some random event. But from watching my sitemeter I discovered the
following. The ATF (“Executive Office of the Asset Forfeiture” no
less!) just did a web search for the words {exploding targets}. 
Regardless of their intent I doubt that it will affect Boomershoot much
since we don’t sell them just provide the opportunity to shoot at
them.  But it might affect Tannerite
and others.  Or it could just be they wanted to purchase some for
their own amusement.  Further conjecture on my part would be
unwarranted.

Domain Name   atfonline.gov ?
(United States Government)
IP Address   199.196.144.#
(Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture)

199.196.144.17
ISP   Executive Office of Asset
Forfeiture
Location  
Continent  :  North America
Country  :  United
States
  (Facts)
State  :  Virginia
City  :  Dulles
Lat/Long  :  39.0853, -77.6452 (Map)
Language   English (United
States)
en-us
Operating System   Microsoft Win2000
Browser   Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0
(compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)
Javascript   version 1.3
Monitor  

Resolution  :  1024 x 768
Color Depth  :  32 bits

Time of Visit   Dec 12 2005 11:28:00 am
Last Page View   Dec 12 2005 11:29:42 am
Visit Length   1 minute 42 seconds
Page Views   2
Referring URL http://www.dogpile.c7/top/-/Moderate/0/1
Visit Entry Page   http://blog.joehuffmploding
Targets.aspx
Visit Exit Page   http://blog.joehuffmmerite
II Tests.aspx
Time Zone   UTC-6:00
CST
– Central Standard Time
CDT – Central Daylight Saving Time
Visitor’s Time   Dec 12 2005 1:28:00 pm
Visit Number   52,344

Quote of the day–Robert Fulford

My generation of Canadians grew up believing that, if we were very good or very smart, we would someday graduate from Canada.

Robert Fulford
[Particularily relevant now with the proposed ban on handguns in Canada.–Joe]

Office sex mishandled

I believe this was entirely mishandled.  I would have used my camera (the cell phone camera if nothing else) to take pictures for the web.

Posted in Sex

Fuel depot blast in England

It’s too early to know for certain if it was an accident or if it was terrorism.  And even if it was determined to be terrorism there is a good chance that knowledge would be restricted.  In any case, it sure was a big explosion (latest news here):

A series of explosions rocked a major oil depot just north of London just before dawn Sunday, injuring 36 people.

Huge balls of fire shot into the sky and the area was filled with clouds of thick, black smoke.

People living nearby have been forced to leave their homes in Hemel Hempstead.

Some residents said they heard a small plane flying overhead just before the first blast. But Hertfordshire police said rumours that the aircraft was involved were unfounded.

Witnesses said there were three explosions at the Buncefield fuel depot. The blasts were heard as far away as the Netherlands.

Some firefighters said that this was the biggest fire they’ve ever tackled.

Thick clouds of smoke were spreading to the southeast and southwest, but were not believed to be toxic.

The oil depot supplies fuel for a large part of southeast England. However, a spokesperwosn for oil giant BP said there would be no problems with fuel shortages.

And if it does happen that it was a terrorist attack the VPC and Brady Bunch should take note that this sort of thing happens even where .50 BMG’s are banned.  It’s the people not the guns.

Exporting the gun culture

It’s not much, but it’s a start:

READING, England — During his training to become a British police
officer, Ben Johnson recalled, an instructor told him and other
recruits, “If you ever see somebody carrying a gun, turn and run away
as quickly as possible.”

“It was a bizarre situation,” said Johnson, 34, a former police
officer in Garland, Tex., and U.S. Army soldier who moved here with his
British wife three years ago and became this country’s first
non-British police officer. He said running from trouble was exactly
the opposite of what he learned as an American cop.

Now Johnson is publicly challenging one of the great traditions of
law enforcement in Britain, what he calls the “old-fashioned idea of
the unarmed bobby on the beat.” He has written to his chief asking for
permission to carry a gun, arguing that Britain is no longer safe for
unarmed and under-trained police officers. He says he will resign if
the chief refuses.

Johnson’s case has caused a media furor here, partly because an
American — a Texan no less — is claiming he feels less safe as a
police officer in Britain than he did on the beat in the United States,
which is routinely portrayed here as a gun-drunk Wild West.

Britain has some of the world’s toughest gun-control laws, and
violent crime, while increasing, is still far less common than in the
United States. There were 184 murders last year in London, a city of
more than 7 million people, compared with 572 in New York City, which
has 8 million people.

“The U.K. is changing rapidly, and the police have been slow to
adapt,” said Johnson, 6-foot-4 and razor thin, cradling his infant
daughter in his lap in the dining room of his neat row house. “We
should value the lives of police officers enough to properly equip them
and train them to do the job — even if that means getting rid of some
old-fashioned notions.”

He said he had 36 weeks of academy training and
supervised field work to become a police officer in Texas. But at
Thames Valley he said he received less than half that, and most of the
instruction involved how to fill out paperwork.

Johnson said British officers are instructed to retreat if they see
a gun and call for backup from armed officers, but that can give
suspects time to escape.

I love how they compare the entire U.K.
London, with tough gun control laws, to NYC also with tough gun control
laws.  Why not compare it to the states of Washington and Idaho
combined?  Those states are almost friendly to gun owners and the
right to self defense.  They have about the same population and a good mix of urban and rural areas.  Why?  Because it’s the Washington Post and they have an agenda.  Here is a comparison they could have done:

Washington and Idaho Population according to the 2000 census: 5894143 + 1293953 => 7188096
Washington and Idaho murders and non-negligent manslaughter (FBI Year 2000 UCR): 196 + 16 => 212.

So, even with the “gun-drunk” Wild West states of
Washington and Idaho the number of murders is comparable.  Could
it be that something other than rate of gun ownership is the dominate
factor?  Any sane person would conclude that, but the anti-gun bigots aren’t sane.�
That there is even a debate about keeping policemen disarmed in the
U.K. is further proof of that nationwide case of Hoplophobia.  Fortunately there is help–if they would just take advantage of it.

Update: My mistake.  The Washington post
comparison was London to NYC, not the entire UK to NYC.  I’ll
update with city to city murder rates when I have more time.

Quote of the day–Robert Heinlein

If it can’t be expressed in figures, it is not science; it is opinion.

Robert Heinlein
[One of my favorite Heinlein quotes.–Joe]

Help Washington Ceasefire

It’s an exceedingly rare event when I encourage people to help Washington Ceasefire rather than Washington Ceasefear.  But this is one of those rare times.  Ceasefire is conducting a poll.  The question of the poll is: “How serious do you think handgun violence is in Washington?”  Currently the results of the poll (on the main page, this may not last long) are:

Answer Votes Percentage
Not at all serious: 14 60.%
Very serious: 6 26.1%
Somewhat serious: 2 8.7%
Not very serious: 1 4.3%
A little serious: 0 0.0%

There are so few votes it’s not a good statistical sample.  Why don’t we help them out?  And just to be fair–only vote once.

Update (04:20, December 12, 2005): Analog Kid posted about the poll and his readers helped out too.  Thanks to everyone that participated. Here are the latest results:

Answer Votes Percentage
Not at all serious: 425 77.6%
Not very serious: 83 15.1%
Very serious: 27 4.9%
A little serious: 11 8.7%
Somewhat serious: 2 0.4%

Special Boomershoot pricing for Canadians

Considering recent news from Canada and the real reason for Boomershoot I have decided to give Canadians entering Boomershoot 2006 a rebate of one half the price their entry fee.  Payable upon showing their Canadian drivers license or other proof of Canadian citizenship at Boomershoot 2006.

Quote of the day-L. Neil Smith

Those who sell their liberty for security are understandable, if pitiable, creatures. Those who sell the liberty of others for wealth, power, or even a moment’s respite deserve only the end of a rope.

L. Neil Smith

Quote of the day–Greg Hamilton

Happiness is being near the top of the food chain.

Back of a T-shirt worn by
Greg Hamilton
Self defense and firearms instructor
September 15, 1997
[Also applicable to the truth laid bear ecosystem for blogs.–Joe]

Jason’s blog has moved

The new address is http://captjason.blogspot.com.  I have also created a backup site that I will update about once a week so we don’t lose all the postings and comments if something catastrophic happens to blogspot.com.  The backup site is https://www.joehuffman.org/Jason.

This post will stay at the top for one week.  See below for newer postings.

Males: Do you have a brain? Or balls?

The following story reminds me of this old joke:

I went to the County Fair. They had one of those “Believe it or not?” shows.

They had a man born with a penis and a brain.

Here’s the story:

Syracuse University biology professor Scott Pitnick knows a lot
about the birds and the bees (or in this case, bats). He teaches
courses in evolution and population biology, and researches topics such
as sexual selection, sexual conflict and speciation. His latest
research sheds light on a little-explored area of evolutionary biology:
the contribution of sexual selection to brain evolution. “The brain can
be considered the most important ‘sex organ,’” says Pitnick.
“Nevertheless, the relationship between breeding system and relative
brain size has received little investigation.”

A recent study by Pitnick and colleagues Kate Jones of the
Institute of Zoology at the Zoological Society of London and Jerry
Wilkinson of the Department of Biology at the University of Maryland
was funded by the National Science Foundation and used comparative
analysis to show that bat species that roost in larger social groups
and those with promiscuous females have relatively smaller brains than
species with females that are faithful to their mates. Male infidelity,
by contrast, had no evolutionary impact on relative brain size.

According to Pitnick, a likely explanation for this relationship
relates to the energetic demands of producing and maintaining both
brain and sperm cells; males cannot afford a lot of both. Under this
explanation, males with relatively large testes and small brains leave
more offspring than larger-brained, less fertile, competitors.

“When females mate with more than one male, sperm compete to
fertilize the female’s eggs. Such ‘sperm competition’ is rife in many
bat species, perhaps due in part to the unusual ability (among mammals
at least) of sperm to survive inside the female’s reproductive tract
for a very long time,” says Pitnick. “The
male who ejaculates the
greatest number of sperm may win at this game, and hence many bats have
evolved outrageously big testes—as much as 8.5% of their body mass.
Because they live on an energetic knife-edge, bats may not be able to
evolutionarily afford both big testes and big brains. We’re excited
about these results, as they may stimulate more research into the
correlated evolution of brains, behavior and the extravagant and costly
ornaments and armaments favored by sexual selection.”

The full results of Pitnick’s study have recently been published in Proceedings B (London) a biology journal of the Royal Society, the United Kingdom’s national academy of science.

You know what this means, don’t you?  If someone says you have big balls they are also saying you are pea brain and your mother was promiscuous.

Posted in Sex