Someone IKnow (hereinafter refered to as SIK) related an incident at his home that occurred some weeks ago, and I thought that this blog would be a good place to mention it.
In the wee hours of the morning, SIK woke up, went to the living room for some reason or other, and found a stranger passed out on his couch. He tried rousing him to no avail. Shook him a bit, even, as you would do to wake up someone for an urget conversation. No response. The stranger was breathing, but obviously very drunk. SIK went back to bed. In the morning SIK’s wife went to the combination room to make coffee while SIK managed to rouse said drunk for a little chat. Mr. 20-something-year-old Drunk didn’t know where he was at first. He apologized for the intrusion. SIK offered him a ride. Drunk declined, and went on his way. Wife said that she thought she’d seen him at a nearby house before (nothing suspicious – just there, like a neighbor or friend of a neighbor) but wasn’t sure. SIK and his wife have guns in the house and know how to use them, if that matters to you.
End of story.
What would you do? What is the right thing to do? SIK has no small children or anyone else at the house. Just he and his wife, if that matters to you. I think it would matter to me, as I am something of a mother bear if you will. I don’t know the answer for my sake. There are many, many situations that are extremely difficult, at best, to second-guess if you’re not there– if you’re not the person responsible for making the decision. So don’t. You weren’t. Just think about it. I can tell you from experiences (though very different from this scenerio) that I have a hard time going counter to my “instinct”, which ever way that “instinct” might go. Or is it “conscience”? That could be a strength or it could be a weakness. I admit that I don’t know. Reason, alone, as I believe most people think of it, doesn’t always provide the best answer, but then maybe it depends on the depth of the reason. In this case I think it could be argued that SIK made the worst possible decision, from a “tactical” point of view, and that at the same time it had the best possible outcome. But what if the guy had been in a diebetic coma or something?
Edited to Add; The front door was unlocked, so the guy just walked in.
This is the weirdest response to my profile yet. I didn’t view them or contact them in any way. Yet this is the message I got:
Subject: Your a moran GET OFF MY PROFILE U TWIT….
10:34 PM on 9/22/2012
YOUR PROFILE SUCK BIG TIME…STOP WASTING MY TIME… UR AN IDIOT ANY WAY…SOME MEN BORE ME…U BORE ME…OXEY MORAN…
My profile is probably a little “different” but I’m pretty sure someone was off their meds when they wrote the above.
My profile:
A little about me…
Update: I’m going to leave my profile active for a while and probably will eventually answer messages but I think I have found my match.
—-
Extremely patient, gentle, generous, quiet, and kind. And I admire myself for my modesty. 🙂
I spend a lot of time on my blog and am involved in civil rights activism. Libertarian is the closest description of my politics. I’m a certified firearms instructor but my career is writing software.
I like women with strong personalities. Think “Sarah Conner” from the second Terminator movie. That’s an exaggeration but it should illustrate the point.
Long walks on the beach are nice–if we brought the explosives to see how big a crater we can make in the sand and how high the water will shoot up into the air.
The adventures I create for other people are written up in magazines, newspapers, and documented on TV shows. And that is just what I do in public.
I push limits and have adventures most people have never imagined. Many people consider me the most interesting person they know. Life is never boring with me.
About the one I’m looking for…
I’ve thought that I would like a harem of super models with a mean IQ of 150 and a minimum of 130. But I’m pretty certain drawing a square circle using a unicorn horn is more likely. Also, taking care of more than one woman is probably beyond my ability so, upon further reflection, I have decided I’ll just have a more conventional relationship.
Must be smart, sane, and rational. My wife of 36 years lacked the last two.
Must live close (less than 20 miles, 5 would be better). I’m not interested in a long distance relationship.
Must like to cuddle and have long conversations in bed on a variety of topics. Must have a strong sex drive, somewhat adventuresome in bed, and comfortable in the nude.
Bonus points for being 5′ 10″ or more in height. Lost points for tattoos and/or piercings.
I’d just like to add…
I hope to find someone who likes hiking in the woods and mountains. Good physical condition would be a big plus.
Although I am generous I won’t fund shopping sprees for trinkets and frilly clothes. I’m a very practical and functional sort of person. But I would pay for a class on rappelling, defensive knife, or shooting a handgun faster and more accurately.
Susan September 20, 2012 [I’ve been dating a bit via match websites. I met Susan for the first time today for lunch. She has lead a very interesting life. She has been to 22 countries—in Africa. Then there are the trips to Laos, Myanmar, Mongolia, North Korea, Iran, all five ‘stans, USSR (before and after the collapse), all the ordinary places like Europe, and several trips to Antarctica.
Once I recover some I have to write up something about some of them. I have had nine dates with six women in nine days recently. I have repeat dates with some on this Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. I think I’m done. Yes. I tend to focus intently on one task at a time.
Wow! There are some strange people out there as well as some nice and ordinary people. And there are the nice but not ordinary. Susan was in the later category. The one self-proclaimed liberal was a walking, talking, caricature that could be used by liberals most vehement critics.—Joe]
I arrived back at my clock tower last night after being on the road for nearly 15 hours, got six hours sleep and went to work. Tonight I had the usual dinner and Sci-Fi video evening with son James and Kelsey.
I have lots of pictures and stories to share about Gun Blogger Rendezvous but I’m just too tired to do that tonight. Perhaps I’ll make some progress on that tomorrow night.
This morning marks the beginning of a very busy schedule for me.
Today I “work from home” (actually I’m at Barron and Janelle’s home in Colton Washington). Tonight Barron, Janelle, and I go to Lewiston Idaho to have dinner with daughter Kimberly and Jacob. Then Barron and I go to Boomershoot Mecca to spend the night camping out under the stars and the trees. 3000 pounds of Ammonium Nitrate will be delivered at 0700 tomorrow. Barron and I then take off for Reno and Gun Blogger Rendezvous. Gun Blogger Rendezvous means sleep is optional until Saturday night when we will have to get a little shut eye before we drive back to the Seattle area.
Last weekend daughter Kim and Jacob came to visit so as something new my friend Maggie (and here and here) took us sailing. We brought along Audrey, the former Navy EOD expert. It was a fantastically beautiful day. The wind could have been a little better but we had a nice time. Again four out of five of us were carrying.
This is an actual conversation. It has been slightly modified to enhance comedic effect. Names have been withheld to protect the guilty.
Gal: So what was she wearing? Guy: Uhh… Clothes? Gal: Wrong answer! Guy: I’m pretty sure I would have noticed if she wasn’t wearing clothes. That is one of the things I check for. So I don’t think I got that answer wrong. Gal: You can do better. Women put a lot of effort into choosing just the right clothes. But I suppose it’s good to know that guys don’t pay any attention. Guy: I probably shouldn’t say this but I’ve read that women dress to impress and show dominance over other women rather than to get the attention of men. If they were interested in getting the attention of men they wouldn’t bother with clothes. Gal: You’re right. You shouldn’t have said that.
Update: I have a report on what she was wearing. From top to bottom:
Light green scarf with images of Bugs Bunny on it.
Jacob S. To my daughter, Kim, every morning before she leaves for work. [Nice. I want my daughter safe and I know most of the time she has to look out for her own safety. That Jacob is encouraging her to carry tools that enhance her safety is comforting to me.—Joe]
I gotta tell ya’, time travel is a thing of beauty.
A week or ten days ago, I clicked on a link and got a
Microsoft Security Essentials warning about an attack from that web site. I
closed the window, and ran a full check. It found something, appeared to clean
it off, and things looked cool. Then, a few days later, I started to get some
weird behavior, such as doing a search that had OK looking results, and then ANY result I clicked on sent
me so some overseas site selling various things. “Ah, shit!” I said, and closed
the browser and everything else, then ran another full cleaning. A couple more
things found and removed. The OhShit!Ometer seemed to fade back from yellow into
green.
Then, a couple days ago, I decided I should to do a manual
“check for updates on Windows and MSE”, and I got an odd error. Crud. OhShit!Ometer
was up into the yellow. Dig, dig, dig. Update not working at all. And now I
can’t scan for problems because it says I don’t have security services running.
I check. It’s not even listed as a service. “Ah, shiiiiit!” Just pegged the
OhShit!Ometer hard over in the red.
Dig, dig, dig. Several
things are not listed as services that Update needs. Uninstall MSE,
download and install it again which also puts in the latest updates, run it,
clean out a bunch of un-cool stuff. Too much stuff. NOT GOOD. Can’t get
updates, MSE can’t update any more, not sure everything is off the system, so
there’s a bunch of stuff I can’t do, or at least can’t be sure of.
Try using the Win7 built-in System Restore to go back to an
earlier restore point. No dice, they are all bad.
Download the free SuperAntiSpyWare sweeper, and the free
ESET virus checker. Clean out some MORE stuff. Enough evil bits to gag TRON.
Well, I think it’s all gone, now, but
security and updates are still shot. Save my recent work off to the server,
then… Well, time to pull out the big guns.
Time Travel. Go back and Don’t
click that link!
I get out the Windows Home Server “Recovery” disk, pop it
in, planning on having my problems solved. It can’t find the server… “Ah,
@#$)(*&%$***!@!#$%!!” OhShit!Ometer just broke the peg.
Dig, dig, dig. I have Win7, my old WHS is based on an old
version of Win NT, it needs an older 32bit NIC driver. Dig, dig, dig,
eventually I find the right one, boot on the Recovery disk, with the 32-bit NIC
drivers on a USB flash drive, FINALLY find my Home server from the recovery
program, and tell it “pave the C: drive FLAT, turn back the clock and make it like it was two Saturdays
ago.”
The platters on the drive go ‘round and ‘round, ‘round and
‘round, ‘round and ‘round… Grind, grind, grind. Go to dinner. When I come back,
my C: drive is like it was two Saturdays ago. Run Virus scans. Get updates.
Uninstall Java. Get more updates. Scan more. Clean a couple of things out that
apparently were there before Update broke. Restore recent work files, get
better malware protection installed. Scan again. Scan with something else,
again. The meter appears to be edging cautiously back in the green again.
And I will NOT be clicking on that interesting looking link
again, because it took me too long to go back in time and straighten it all out
again.
But that fact is, that is more or less what happened,
because I have a WHS backing up my stuff every night, for every machine in the
house. An old HP EX470, the first official WHS model. And yet MSFT is doing
everything they can (product management-wise) to kill Windows Home Server for
some reason…. And yet, it’s the only product they have that is GOOD at home computer
time travel. It is something that I think EVERY home should have, if they have
more than one computer and any data of any value. It’s the second time it’s
saved my butt. Worth every penny I’ve spent on it. MSFT has really blown the marketing campaign for
their home server product.
And… virus writers who make stuff like what I just ran into need
to spend some serious time in jail.
But then I thought; What would I do with it? If my Glock is in carbine config, I don’t have it as a carry pistol. Do I carry another pistol in a smaller caliber? Do I get another pistol? But in the latter case I’ve spent enough I could get another puspose-built carbine like an AR, an M1 Carbine, used Ruger Deerfield etc. for the same money or even less. And come to think of it a 44 Mag levergun would be pretty nice, or an old Marlin Camp.
At this stage I have so many guns, and each one is this on-going program (load selection or load development, sight configuration, magazine and ammo inventory, on and on) so each one demands a certain amount of time. On the other hand, what is cool and fun is cool and fun, so I never stop thinking of that next cool gun or that next cool caliber.
Today I took son James and daughter-in-law Kelsey shooting. This was the first time for Kelsey. James and I had told her it was an option for her if she was ever interested. But I never pushed her on it. To the best of my knowledge James has not either. A few weeks ago they informed me that Kelsey had decided she would like to learn to shoot because it would help her feel safer when James wasn’t home.
This was a really big deal for Kelsey. Her family is somewhat anti-gun. When she told them she was going to learn to shoot a gun they “sort of freaked out”.
This morning I went over to do the “classroom” portion of the lesson. I had done a tiny bit previously in the weeks previously when I would go over for dinner on Monday nights. I wanted to refresh those lessons and get her ready for actually pulling the trigger on a live round.
I reviewed the sight picture with her and immediately noticed that she was cross-eye dominate. She is right handed but her left eye is dominate. We reviewed her options and she tried various things with my plastic gun. She decided she probably would be shooting left handed.
I asked her if she remembered the three safety rules (I teach the NRA rules, not the Jeff Cooper’s). She hesitated just a bit but told me:
Never point the the gun in an unsafe direction.
Never put your finger on the trigger until you are ready to shoot.
Never load the gun until you are ready to use it.
Wow! That was interesting! She got the essence of the rules correct but she turned them all into negatives. The NRA rules are positive statements of what you should do. I explained that it was, to exaggerate the point some, like telling someone not to think of pink elephants. The actual NRA three gun safety rules are:
ALWAYS keep the gun pointed in a safe direction.
ALWAYS keep your finger off the trigger until ready to shoot.
ALWAYS keep the gun unloaded until ready to use.
I showed her the proper grip and stance then went over the mantra “trigger prep, sight alignment, squeeze, follow through”. I had her use one of my plastic guns to practice going from a high ready position to a fire position simultaneous with using the mantra.
I told her that eventually she would be able to look at something close her eyes then point the gun at what she had just seen without needing the sights. Just like pointing at something with her finger.
It was at this point that she said, “I’m not sure I ever want to be able to do that.”
Huh?
She explained that when she held a gun in her hand she was very aware that she was holding “Life in her hands.” Interesting choice of words I thought but didn’t tell her that. Most people, in particular anti-gun people, would say, “Death in their hands.” She did not want to be so comfortable with a gun that she took it causally. She even expressed concern that she might become a sociopath. I tried to explain that wasn’t something that was going to happen at her age but she interrupted and said that she had been concerned that she might give birth to a sociopath since the age of 13 and no one had been able to dissuade of that in the intervening years and I wasn’t going to be able to talk her out of that concern in the next few minutes. I let that drop but asked, “What about using a gun to stop an attack against you?” She wasn’t sure, “It depends on what their situation was. What if they were just at a really bad point in their life?” “What about defending the life of your child?”, I asked and got a similar answer. The same for someone stomping on her puppy or cat.
Interesting.
I went on to the next lesson and showed her how to determine if a gun was unloaded–verify the source of ammunition has been removed and the chamber is empty.
I had her dry fire my STI. I repeatedly manually racked the slide and she “got” the reason for leaning into the shot and having the elbows slightly bent to absorb the recoil.
We went to the range and the public bay was crowed. Very crowded. The members bay was less crowded but we had to go through the public bay to get to the member’s bay. A shot went off as we entered the public bay and even with my best electronic muffs on Kelsey jumped and cowered. James and I hurried her into the members bay. But even there the shots from next door caused her to jump and nearly curl into a fetal position while still standing.
“It’s so loud!”, she said. After a brief consultation, James asked if I had any foam plugs she could use. I didn’t but the gun store was open and we left to get them.
She put them in and we returned. I can’t say that I could see it improved her demeanor any. And each shot made it worse. She was curled up, shaking, sweating, and crying. I told James that we should take her home. If she still wanted to learn we could go again sometime out in the woods with Ry and his suppressed .22. James started talking to Kelsey and I packing up our stuff. I shouldered my backpack and was ready to walk out but James said she still wanted to try it. I asked why. Kelsey said because she had said she would do it. “That doesn’t matter,” I told her. If you really want to do this we can do this another time when and where it’s much quieter. She insisted and I relented.
I had her dry fire the Ruger Mark II. She still jumped every time another gun went off some place. But the crying and shaking had stopped.
I put a single round in a magazine, racked the slide, and let her pick up the gun to shoot at the target about eight feet away. She brought the gun up and pointed it at the target. She hesitated and then quickly put the gun down. “I can’t do it!”, she said. “Okay, you don’t have to,” I told her. “You don’t have to do this. I don’t think you are ready and I think we should go home so we can talk about this.”
I started to pack up again. But she said, “How about I just hold the gun and you pull the trigger?” “I’m fine with that”, I said.
She picked up the gun and pointed it at the target. I repeated the mantra as I put my finger over hers in the trigger guard. I just barely touched her finger and was starting to say “squeeze” when the gun went off.
She put the gun down and started jumping up and down. “I did it!” she exclaimed. The guns booming on either side no longer mattered. From then on she didn’t stop smiling until we left the range except to pout when she had emptied a magazine. I started taking pictures and then a video:
I showed her where first shot ever hit. It was about 5:30, just inside the black.
She asked to do it again. I started to put in a half-full magazine. “Not that many. Just one. Maybe two,” she said.
I loaded the gun with two rounds.
Those went quickly and she asked for three rounds.
Then a full magazine.
And then another, and another, and another.
James shot for a while then Kelsey returned to the bench. I had her hold my partial brick of .22 ammo. She didn’t understand the joke but held it for me anyway:
I merely said the boxes had gotten a little bit wet, then dried, and were sticking together. I’ll have to explain it to her tomorrow when we go sailing.
She burned through magazine after magazine with fire blazing from the barrel. She emptied the magazines faster than I could reload.
She moved the target out to nearly 30 feet and could still keep them in the black at will. It was only when she pushed the speed that the rounds strayed a bit. But only one was outside the rings and all were on the paper:
When we brought the last target in she pointed to the big hole in the paper and with almost a growl said, “I killed it!”
Anti-gun for 25+ years then turned into a budding sociopath in just over an hour. Sarah Brady’s worst nightmare just came true. Damn! I’m good.
After I had forcefully expressed my extreme frustration with my insane boss at Microsoft a manager higher in the chain of command told me, “It’s good to have clarity.” Although I was infuriated at the time the phrase stuck with me and I see it’s application to many situations.
Obviously, with clarity of the problem the solution set is smaller and more likely to succeed. What’s even more interesting to me is that in so many of the cases the clarity of widely varying situations lead to the exact same, obviously correct, solution.
Some examples will make my point. The following are not even half of the things that immediately come to mind. But some were close enough telling the stories would have been somewhat repetitive.
Nearly a dozen years ago I met a young woman, Patrycja, at a party who after learning I was an engineer cheerfully told me of all the money she had been making recently. She was a stripper at a club (no, she wasn’t working the party I was at, she was fully clothed) and although she made very good money there it was nothing to what she made from a recent “gold mine” she had been working. Some middle aged engineer who had near zero social skills and had never had a girl friend had been paying her for private visits to his home. No, she never had sex with him. She would strip and/or just spend time with him a couple times a week for a few hours. He had lived alone and frugally for many years while making good money. He had a lot of savings. In the last few weeks he had paid her over $20,000. He had another $80,000 or so left in savings and in a few months she expected she would have collected all of it.
Maybe the guy thought he was getting his money’s worth but my thoughts were different. I never, ever, wanted to have anything to do with this person again. I knew I probably wouldn’t remember what she looked like a year (or 20) later but I wrote down her unusual name so that I wouldn’t forget.
It was good to have clarity. That relationship, even though just a few minutes at a party, needed to be terminated.
Over 30 years ago my boss repeatedly told me, “You’re the project engineer on this, make the decisions and get it done.” But then a few weeks later a group meeting he was telling us how important my project was and how it was going to make such a huge impact to the company and especially those that had stock options. “Who gets stock options?”, I asked. His answer floored me, “I of course have stock options and at review time the company allocates options that I can distribute to the people I manage. I give them to my project managers.” I was shocked that he would say this in front of everyone in our group because most of them were clearly not project managers. Still, it would be good for me even though I hadn’t been awarded any stock options yet. But then he continued, “And my project managers are Jim and Bill.”
When he told me I was the project manager on the project he just meant he wanted me to assume that role. He didn’t mean that was my actual title or that it meant anything beyond assuming responsibility for making the decisions. And further research indicated that the two people with the actual title of Project Manager were more than we really should have for the number of people in the group. I wasn’t going to be promoted anytime soon.
It was good to have clarity. I terminated the relationship and moved on to another company.
For many years I unsuccessfully tried to get my wife to go to counseling with me. I finally got a highly recommended book for couples and we listened to it as we driving from the Seattle area to Idaho. After a couple chapters she asked me what I thought of our marriage and what needed to change. I told her we needed to work on some things and I enumerated some items that could be improved. She unfastened her seatbelt, opened the door, and tried to jump out as we were driving 60 MPH down the freeway.
That was sufficient clarity that something was seriously wrong and further investigation was instigated. There were compelling signs there was a personality disorder involved. If true then there was no chemical imbalance that drugs could mitigate. Counseling and therapy is so rarely helpful and problematic that most therapists refuse these type of patients.
I was 95% sure but not entirely convinced it was time to terminate the relationship. Within an hour and 20 minutes after having been served papers she tried to kill herself again.
A few days later when talking to my counselor she said the last suicide attempt pretty much confirmed my suspicion about the personality disorder. But what was odd, she said, was that my wife had only one husband for 35+ years. Most women with her condition would have had three or four by her age. “Mere mortals,” she said, “Would have left her years ago.”
It was good to have clarity. There are no second thoughts or wondering if terminating the relationship was the right thing to do.
The government deliberately gave and let sales go through for thousands of guns to known violent criminals hoping to “recover them at crime scenes.” And just what sort of crime scenes would they expect those guns to show up at? It sure wasn’t going to be jaywalking, tax evasion, or running a lemonade stand without a license. If they had two or more brain cells to rub together they had to know some of those guns would be used to murder and injure innocent victims. Hundreds died from the use of those guns and there are laws that if enforced against the government for those gun transfers would put people in jail for decades if not life sentences. As far as I know there are no exceptions in the law for government agents and I know for certain there aren’t going to be any prosecutions for those gun transfers. Those people believe they are above the law. U.S. Attorney General Holder and President Obama all but.admit that by refusing to cooperate with investigators.
Although it is not yet certain the leading hypothesis for the motivation was to justify another assault weapon ban. The direct infringement of a specific enumerated right under the color of law which results in the death of innocent people is punishable by death under 18 USC 242. Hence, a case can be made for the death penalty for the government perpetrators. But that will not be given even a second’s thought by prosecutors.
It was good to have clarity. It was clear to me but perhaps not the general population who really don’t know the law and the details of Operation Fast and Furious.
The day Obama Care was ruled constitutional Ry told me something like, “Things are clear now. There is no mistaking where we stand.”
The constitutional limits of power are relegated to the status of a myth. If taxes and/or penalties can be levied and collected for failure to buy a product or service imagine the corruption that enables. What kind of return on “investment” can made by a company which bribes enough politicians such that every family or person in this country had to buy a particular service or product?
The only limits to government corruption and power in our country are the limits of physics and economics.
It’s good to have clarity. It’s time to terminate the relationship.
I was weeding my garden the other day. A neighbor sees me out there and remarks; “Nice looking garden you have there.” “Thanks” I reply, “Other than some deer nipping the tops off a few of my beets, it’s doing pretty well. I have some nice radishes coming in right now. Would you like some radishes?” “Rabbit stew!” he replies, with enthusiasm. (I paused a moment) “No; radishes. Would you like some radishes?” Without another word, he turned around and walked away.
That one was quick in getting to the point where both parties realized that they were engaging in a conversation which had nothing to do with what the other was saying. I’ve had this sort of thing go on for a long time before I realized that the conversation I was having bore little or no resemblance to the conversation the other person thought he was having, even when the individual words were all intelligible.
A recurring theme in such instances relates to the difference between principles and group identification, or “group think”. There is a saying floating around lately, which says “When the government has its boot on your throat, it makes no difference whether it’s a left boot or a right boot.” It makes sense, I suppose, if your world centers around group, or political party, identity, but it’s a blitheringly stupid statement if you care about principles. I stated, over at Kevin’s, that if there’s a government boot on your neck (and you don’t deserve it) then by definition it is a left boot. QED– those who uphold the principles of liberty do not abuse people as a matter of policy.
The response?
“I find your lack of insight disturbing. As a libertarian, I see just as much interference in my life coming from the so-called right as from the so-called left.”
Fair enough– the operative term being “so-called”. But that was my whole point after all, see.
“Maybe because I have friends from each of those camps, I can somewhat understand how each only sees the abuses of the other, but not their own.”
I’m sorry; my own abuses?
“The ‘giveaway’ in your case is the ‘deserve’ line: who are you, or anyone else, to be the sole arbiter of whether someone “deserves” abuse? Please don’t go on about breaking the law, that is not what the poster is referring to, as I would suspect you know. And having a boot on one’s neck is not an appropriate response to law-breaking; arrest and trial would be (if the crime is real and not a consensual activity of which you disapprove).”
What if they resist arrest? Yeah, I’m going with the boot, thank you.
“No arbitrary political group is either all good or all bad; the same goes for people in general, unless you want to bring up mass murderers or serial child molesters. So to attribute all evil intent to your political opponents is not only facile and simplistic, but often leads down the path to violence, pogroms, and war.”
Umm….yes; I do attribute all (political) evil to my political opponents. The moment someone commits an evil, I oppose them, see. Individually. Not the whole group, unless the whole group embraces the evil act in which case the whole group is leftist and I oppose it.
I was talking about principles and he was talking about political parties (group think– tribal association). Two different subjects. Lets break this down further.
If some members of the Catholic Church are found to be sex abusers, are all those who try to follow the teachings of Jesus then to be held accountable for the abuse? More important; are the teachings of Jesus thereby rendered invalid and useless, or even evil? If some who claim to be Christians are practicing serial child abuse, then Christ himself was an evil man, and anything he said should be dismissed out of hand? That would have to be the conclusion of the tribalist, and of course it would be insane.
If I’d left out the “and you don’t deserve it” bit, someone would have said, “Oh yeah? What if you just murdered someone? Does that mean that anyone who comes after you for it is a leftist?!!!” Since I put it in, I got criticized with “…who are you, or anyone else, to be the sole arbiter of whether someone ‘deserves’ abuse?” Either way it’s a change of subject– a diversion from the point. I’m talking about principles and he’s talking about something else– anything but the point. It’s a sophisticated version of “Oh yeah? Well your mother wears Army boots!” after which I suppose I am to argue about my mother’s fashion sense instead of the fact that leftists are all authoritarians and all authoritarians are leftists whereas those on the right are for liberty. That someone may falsely claim to be on the right, or that someone on the right might commit a crime of some kind, is not my fault, and it certainly does not say anything whatsoever about the validity of my principles.
What that self-described libertarian is actually saying (probably without thinking about it) is that the principles of liberty are invalid because, for generations, leftists have been posing as Republicans. Therefore, if I espouse the principles of liberty, I’m a hypocrite.
With the 4th falling on a Wednesday this year I would have had to take two days of vacation to properly take advantage of it with a trip to Idaho and blow stuff up. My vacation is a little bit in short supply for all the other things I want to do this year so I let Barron serve as my proxy:
Instead I went sailing for the first time in 40 years. And last time it was on little boat that was maybe 15 feet long.
This was a 36 foot yacht:
And how many yachts do you know that have a switch panel like this:
Close up of the more “interesting” switch:
Yes! This is my type of boat.
We didn’t actually use the front (or rear) torpedoes. Our entire cruise was within a few miles of U.S. naval and/or Coast Guard ships at all times and had there been torpedo activity in the water near them I suspect they would have noticed and their response would have been less than friendly.
But we did watch the fireworks display from the yacht that evening. It was very nice:
If the recent text messages between my favorite daughter-in-law and I are any indication she has an addiction to ice cream, but only the finest brands, so bad that she snorts it–with both nostrils.
Of course I’m still very interested in knowing the answer to the question, “When do we get ripped apart by tidal forces and our subatomic components get sucked into the singularity?” It affects my deciding whether I should unpack my boxes of stuff from Idaho and do some reloading or spend quality time with my kids.
My brother had called me the day before from Californistan, when it was nice and sunny here, and told me to look for it between five and six PM, my time. As I was driving home with my daughter from a panic shopping trip to Moscow, I noticed the time. “It’s right now.” But it was cloudy– full overcast with occasional rain. As I turned to look toward the sun, sure enough. There it was! For whatever reason, I could see it much better with my polarizing glasses than the little Cannon Powershot ever could. For one thing, the auto focus was somewhat at a loss for doing anything with clouds. Here are the best two out of about a dozen shots I took from the highway;
I guess around southern Oregon/Northern Cali/Nevada way, they had a full annular. I’ve never seen one of those, but back around 1979/1880, I remember another, even more overcast day that went full dark in the middle of the day. That was pretty cool.
Friday night son James and I packed all of Barbara’s stuff into a U-Haul truck and I left for Idaho with it. Saturday with help from Jacob and Nancy I unloaded the truck and loaded up a bunch of my stuff in Idaho. Tonight son James, and daughter-in-law Kelsey helped me unload the truck and pack the stuff up the stairs to my clock tower.
The water bed is still nothing but a bunch of pieces of wood:
The reloading bench is inaccessible behind a sea of boxes:
But everything did fit and after I put things on shelves and in closets then go through things and throw away stuff that I haven’t touched in 20 years I think I’ll have enough room.
I will need some help putting the bed together but other than that it will just take a couple weekends on my own to sort through the stuff.
The toughest part was getting the gun safe up the stairs. It fell once but didn’t get scratched because it landed on James’ leg. The leg will heal on it’s own. Scratched paint requires assistance.