Quote of the day–Julia Gorin

In short, he is a man begging for subjugation. He longs for its promise of equality in helplessness. Because only when that strange, independent alpha breed of male is helpless along with him will he feel adequate. Indeed, his freedom lies in this other man’s containment.

Julia Gorin
The anti-gun male
Jewish World Review
March 8, 2002 / 24 Adar, 5762
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/julia/gorin030802.asp
[Thanks to Zendo Deb for the pointer to this article.–Joe]

This is what happens in places without guns–Case X

I saw reference to this on Kim du Toit’s blog the other day but it wasn’t until a comment was left on my “…Case IX” post that I read the source document.  Excellent example:

Outside of school hours, my Cornish village of St Day descends into a state of anarchy. Feral yobs run wild while adults live in fear of threats, vandalism and intimidation. I despair that while we spend millions battling global warming, terrorism and drugs, the biggest threat is harassment by degenerate thugs.

For years St Day, like most rural settlements with a bored young population, suffered the usual mischiefs of the odd problem family and occasional petty vandalism.

Then, in spring 2005, yobs began to gather every night below the village clock tower (right). There are incessant screams, threats to passers-by, regular blockades: motorists have been forced to turn back, while boy racers are permitted to screech through. A chav checkpoint.

For local residents, the protocol on Fore Street is simple: do not confront, do not engage, stay inside. A resident who raised thousands of pounds for a village youth club was repaid with a bag of horse manure, mixed with petrol, set ablaze against his front door.

Things got worse at the end of the summer. A gang broke into a funeral wake in the church hall. They smashed ornaments and hurled abuse at terrified guests, who were ferried home while the attackers ransacked the vicarage.

Days later a church wedding rehearsal suffered a similar attack. Despite plenty of witnesses, and evidence, no arrests were made because the police wanted to catch the suspects in the act.

…

After a long, hot summer confined to our homes amid the perpetual cacophony of idle, ferocious children, we hoped to regain daytime control of the village with the start of the school term. But while waiting for the school bus one day, yobs set fire to an outbuilding and smashed every window of the parish church.

A middle-aged woman was fenced into a telephone box by 20 screaming thugs; a household was forced out of Fore Street overnight. In total five households left the main street in 2005.

If I found a middle-aged woman fenced into a telephone box by 20 screaming thugs in one of the states I can legally carry I might have to do a magazine change (only 18+1 of .40 S&W in my STI) but she wouldn’t be in the telephone box when I left and the screaming of the thugs would have changed pitch if not completely stopped.

Survival blog

James Wesley, Rawles – www.SurvivalBlog.comTM quoted me about people, society, guns, and explosives on his blog today.  He also promoted this blog and Boomershoot some too.  He said this blog was “wonderfully addictive.”  I hadn’t realized that anyone other than me was addicted to it.  I met Rawles a couple times at gun shows a long time ago.  Nice guy to talk to.  I have read a couple versions of his book TEOTWAWKI which I enjoyed too.

National Ammo Day is site of the month

Kim du Toit should be proud.  “The Gun Guys” (anti-gun bigots) decided his National Ammo Day BUYcott website was worthy of being their site of the month.  Here is a sample of their bigotry:

…if du Toit really wants to support the gun industry, maybe he should just cut out the middleman and have a “Kill People Day.” One day a year, every gun owner would just kill a hundred people. It would accomplish the goals of the gun industry, without the trouble of going to the store and buying all that ammo!

Congratulations Kim!  Now if we could just get Boomershoot.org to be site of the month sometime.  As Ry said to me today on these nut cases, “Great!  Every bit of traffic helps.”

Quote of the day–Kim du Toit

And that’s the difference between Mr. B and myself. He shakes his head in bafflement, I resume sharpening the M4 bayonet while crooning “Soon, soon, my precioussss…”

Kim du Toit

January 24, 2006
[I can relate to that–in so many ways.–Joe]

This is what happens in places without guns–Case IX

From the U.K. Sun:

O’Mahoney used her video phone to film the attack that left David dying from 44 injuries, including a ruptured spleen and five fractured ribs.

She booted the 37-year-old’s head like a football as other gang members piled in, making sure she had it all on film.

She even gloated: “Pose for the camera.”

Three other members of O’Mahoney’s evil gang were sentenced to 12 years each for manslaughter — in a crime that shocked Britain.

…

The gang attacked SEVEN other victims later that night and filmed their agony in an orgy of violence on London’s South Bank.

After they were sentenced there were sickening scenes outside the court. Friends and relatives of the killers hurled insults at David’s pals and family, including his elderly dad Geoffrey.

They screamed and even made throat cutting gestures. Incredibly, one voice shouted: “Your friend has cost my cousin 12 years.”

Emphasis in the original.

Don’t you wish we too lived in a gun free paradise like the U.K.?

Introspection hint

The more I learn about people and society the more I love guns and explosives.  Guns and explosives are more understandable, more predictable, and less hazardous.

Quote of the day–Jeff Cooper

I have been criticized by referring to our federal masked men as “ninja,” when in the view of the critic the traditional role of the ninja in Japan was to fight against oppression and tyranny. Let us note that almost no one ever resorts to force and violence unless he is convinced that his cause is right, but without going into that let us reflect upon the fact that a man who covers his face shows reason to be ashamed of what he is doing. A man who takes it upon himself to shed blood while concealing his identity is a revolting perversion of the warrior ethic.

It has long been my conviction that a masked man with a gun is a target. I see no reason to change that view.

Jeff Cooper
From Jeff Cooper’s Commentaries
Vol. 2, No. 16
20 December 1994

Quote of the day–George H. Smith

It is my firm conviction that man has nothing to gain, emotionally or otherwise, by adhering to a falsehood, regardless of how comfortable or sacred that falsehood may appear.  Anyone who claims, on the one hand, that he is concerned with human welfare, and who demands, on the other hand, that man must suspend or renounce the use of his reason, is contradicting himself. There can be no knowledge of what is good for man apart from knowledge of reality and human nature-and there is no manner in which this knowledge can be acquired except through reason.  To advocate irrationality is to advocate that which is destructive to human life.

George H. Smith
From: Atheism: The Case Against God
[I regard gun control and socialism as religions.  They are faith based and ignore factual data.  Understanding the psychology of religiosity is useful in understanding the psychology of the anti-freedom crowd.–Joe]

Another example of socialist losers

Canadian liberals are about to get trounced in the upcoming election (recent polls are saying there is a 13 point margin).  And what do you think the issues are that are getting them in so much trouble?  Health care and gun control!

Among the main policy differences is health care reform. The Tories want to allow for public and private health care provision, and, along with the Liberals, have pledged to shorten waiting times. The Liberals and the NDP have vowed to stop any privatisation of the system.

On gun control, the Liberals have promised to move towards a ban on handguns, which are already tightly regulated, and consider tightening gun crime laws.

Handguns have been essentially banned in Canada for decades.  And in the last few years spent nearly two billion dollars on registration of all guns.  And what is the result?  The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms has the scoop on that:

CANADA’S GUN REGISTRATION FAILURE: VIOLENT CRIME RATE DOUBLE THAT OF U.S.

For Immediate Release: January 17, 2006

BELLEVUE, WA – Canada’s billion-dollar boondoggle – the national gun registration scheme – has proven itself an abysmal failure, as that country’s violent crime rates are double those reported in the United States, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) noted today.

“We looked at violent crime rates per 100,000 population in both countries, using the most recent available data,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, “and we were not surprised at what we found. Since Canada started this ridiculous and costly program, violent crime has gone up dramatically, at the same time that crime in the United States has declined. Yet, there are people in the states who think Canada’s gun legislation should be the model for America.

“By comparing the data,” he detailed, “we found that the violent crime rate in the United States was 475 per 100,000 population, while up north, there were 963 violent crimes per 100,000 population. The figure for sexual assault in Canada per 100,000 population is more than double that of the United States, 74 as opposed to 32.1, and the assault rate in Canada is also more than twice that of the states, 746 to our 295 for the population rate.”

Noted CCRKBA Executive Director Joe Waldron: “What happened in the states to actually contribute to a reduction in our overall crime rate is simple. We’ve got 38 states with shall-issue, right-to-carry concealed handgun laws. While Canada has clamped down on its citizens’ gun rights, our citizens have been empowered against criminals by passage of these laws. The disparity in crime rates between the two countries says it all about how well gun registration works to stop crime, as opposed to actually carrying guns to deter criminals, and fight back if necessary.”

A Jan. 3 story in Canada’s National Post by writer David Frum confirmed CCRKBA’s independent finding. Frum wrote, “Canada’s overall crime rate is now 50% higher than the crime rate in the United States.” Later, Frum added: “Gun registries and gun bans…do not work.”

“Instead of promising to ban legally-owned handguns in Canada,” Waldron observed, “Prime Minister Paul Martin should be urging citizens to arm themselves. He should encourage Parliament to scrap gun registration and replace it with a gun ownership and training program.”

“Since going on the warpath against guns, Canada’s Liberals have presided over the sharpest rise in violent crime in the nation’s history,” Gottlieb said. “There are more rapes, more robberies and more murders. If that tells Canadian citizens anything at all, it’s that Paul Martin and his Liberals have literally been ‘dead wrong’ on guns.”

What is it called when you keep trying the same thing over and over expecting a different result?  Yeah, that’s right, it’s called insanity.  Socialism and gun control have been shown again, and again, and again, to be the tools of tyrants and cost hundreds of millions of lives.  Won’t people ever face reality?

Seattle wants a gun control advocate

This has been reported elsewhere but tomorrows Quote of the day is from some XXXXX people (Updated– People that preferred their associations not be known) that needs this as background material:

(CNSNews.com) – The City of Seattle is running a
help-wanted ad for a “Crime Gun Program Coordinator,” who will
“develop, maintain and coordinate a centralized and regionally
comprehensive crime gun database” and “integrate” that data with other
law enforcement databases.

The person hired for the job also
will “assist in the development of local and regional strategies to
stop illegal gun trafficking and related gun violence.”

A Second
Amendment group says don’t be fooled — the person hired for the job
will be the Seattle Police Department’s “official gun control
advocate,” and as such, he or she will be expected to “create and
advocate gun control schemes under the guise of stopping criminal
misuse of firearms.”

The Seattle Police Department’s “Crime Gun Program Coordinator” will
be paid between $61,366 and $92,060 — a waste of taxpayer money, said
the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA).

CCRKBA
also objected to the term “crime gun,” calling it an inflammatory term
intended to demonize any and all firearms, including those that are
stolen in burglaries but are never actually used in crimes.

The actual job posting is as follows (emphasis added):

 

Job

Crime Gun Program Coordinator (SPD-701177)

 

Status

Regular / Full Time

Shift

Day Shift

Filing Dates

Sun, Jan 15, 2006 – Sun, Jan 29, 2006

Openings

1 Opening

Salary

$61,366 – $92,060 (Ord. Title: Strategic Advisor 2)

Department

Police

Location

Seattle Justice Center

 

Position Duties

Provide
strategic support to the City’s Crime Gun Violence Reduction Program.
Develop, maintain and coordinate a centralized and regionally
comprehensive crime gun database and integrate the data with relevant
information from the State Department of Licensing (DOL), Federal
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), and other law
enforcement agency databases. Assist in the development of local and
regional strategies to stop illegal gun trafficking and related gun
violence. Serve as inter-agency liaison and represent SPD at local and
regional meetings pertaining to crime gun issues. Provide information
and support to the Office for Intergovernmental Relations in developing
legislation relating to firearms. Assist in the development of other
specialized information technology systems with SPD relating to crime
gun tracking gun violence reduction.

Required Qualifications

Bachelor’s
degree in criminal justice, public administration or a closely related
field, and three years of experience working in planning and research
related to program design, including data collection and analysis, and
program development and coordination involving a variety of
stakeholders. Experience in policy analysis and development, strategic
planning, and advising management on program direction and allocation
of resources. Must pass a Seattle Police Department background
investigation.

Desired Qualifications

Master’s
degree in criminal justice, public administration or a closely related
field; the proven ability to design, develop, implement and evaluate
complex programs involving sensitive issues and requiring interagency
cooperation between multiple jurisdictions; experience, knowledge
and/or technical expertise in crime gun issues; expertise in database
management practices, statistical analysis and report writing; the
ability to analyze data using the Geographic Information System; and
excellent oral and written communication skills.

Additional Requirements

  • Candidates selected for this position will be required to provide a conviction history.
  • A background check will be required for candidates selected for this position.

Another good question

Bruce at mAss Backwards left a comment for my post Just One Question:

I’ve been contemplating the “just one question” approach for a while now. There’s a series of town meeting-style forums coming up in Boston with our Mayor Tom “Never Met a Gun Control Scheme I Didn’t Like” Menino.

I’m going to put my name in for one of the limited slots available. Shoudl I get the chance to address the Mayor, I’d ask:

“Mr. Mayor, as you know, the City of Boston over the last year has seen a marked increase in the rate of homicides and armed robberies. My question for you is a simple YES or NO question. Do the hard-working, law-abiding citizens of Boston have the right to defend themselves from violent criminals?”

A “yes” answer woudl be an outright lie.

A “no” answer, though truthful, would be cause for his immediate removal from office (not that that’s very likely, though).

That seems to be a very good question to ask as well.  The only disadvantage I can see is that they can say, “Yes.”, “Yes, but not with a gun.”, or “Yes, but guns only make the situation worse.”  And you are left with having to justify the use of a firearm for task of self-defense.  My question forces them defend their desire to impose restrictions on firearms.  In nearly all situations it’s better to make your opponent defend rather than for you to defend against them.

As I write this I see Bruce has posted on this “Just One Question” topic with the request “So…what would your “one question” be?” in the context of being able to ask some politician a question in a public forum.

Quote of the day–Alexander Hamilton

The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.

Alexander Hamilton

Hunting whitetail alternatives

Every once in a while people laugh at my method of getting a deer this year (something along the lines of “The Geek Goes Hunting”).  Well, here is someone else for you to laugh about:

THE WHITETAIL DEER HUNT WITH A MOUNTAIN HOWITZER

For those of you unfamiliar with cannon artillery talk, a 12 pound Mountain Howitzer cannon was a small cannon used during the Civil War. The early mt howitzer cannons were originally designed to be disassembled and packed into the mountains on horseback, hence the name, Mountain Howitzer. The later model Mountain Howitzers, like this one, were built on a carriage designed to be “pulled” by horses. The “pound” designation ( 12 pdr ) in the name ” 12 pound Mountain Howitzer ” refers to the weight of the projectile that the mt howitzer cannon shoots. Therefore, a 12 pound Mountain Howitzer ( 12 pdr ) shoots a 12 pound cannonball. All artillery cannons with smooth bore barrels were described in the “pound” weight of their projectiles and were called “Cannons.” ( like the 12 pound Mountain Howitzer Cannon ) Artillery cannons with rifled barrels were described in the “inch” of their bore diameters and called “Guns.” ( like a 3 inch Gun ) First, let me start by saying that I’m pretty sure that it may not be entirely legal to use a Mountain Howitzer Cannon for deer hunting, at least not here in Wisconsin. ( I didn’t actually ask the DNR about using a Mountain Howitzer, but I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t like it ) Be sure to check with your own State Hunting regulations, …… ( see the “Hunting with Artillery section )

He goes on in great detail on how to build the Mountain Howitzer cannon, the ammo to use, how to use it safely in a hunting environment, and finally a picture of a whitetail buck harvested with a Mountain Howitzer cannon.

Quote of the day–Larry Keane

It’s monumentally stupid to use a weapon to commit any crime.  It takes a special class of stupidity to do so with a BB gun.

Larry Keane
Legal counsel to the National Shooting Sports Foundation in Newtown, Conn.
USA Today January 15, 2006
[For the clueless I’ll spell this out.  After all, with a weapon you would think you would get better victim compliance.  The disadvantages are:

  1. In many jurisdictions using a weapons will mean you serve more time in jail when you get caught.
  2. Committing a crime using something that looks like gun is the universal sign for “shoot me” (masked men with guns are always targets).
  3. Using a BB gun means you have all the disadvantages of using a gun without the advantage of real force multiplier.

–Joe]

If you repeat a lie often enough

Via Alphecca and Say Uncle this Washington Post editorial
repeats a lie from a previous editorial.  I sometimes wonder if
they repeat these lies on purpose or if they are just
ignorant/careless/stupid:

As writer Jenny Price noted in a Dec. 25 op-ed in The Post, only 160 of
the 12,000 guns used to kill people every year are employed in
legitimate self-defense; guns in the home are used seven times more
often for homicide than for self-defense.

I corrected Ms. Price in my previous post.  No need to do it again.  This editorial goes on to the expected conclusion.

Political long shot that it may be, a national ban
on the general manufacture, sale and ownership of handguns ought be
enacted. It would not pacify kids or adults with violent tendencies,
and it might not curb general criminal activity markedly. But it might
well save thousands of lives. Handgun exceptions could be made for
federal, state and local law enforcement and military agencies;
collectors of antique firearms; federally licensed handgun sporting
clubs with certain safety procedures; security guard services; and
licensed dealers, importers or manufacturers that are determined to be
meeting those needs.
Such a bill was proposed more than a decade ago by Sen. John Chafee
(R-R.I.), who has since died. “I hear people say it’s a radical
proposal,” he said then. “Well, I think to have the current situation
is radical. No other country has anything like it.” He described
slaughter by handguns as killing in record numbers, threatening
education and pushing the high costs of education even higher. So
what’s new today?

I’ll answer that question.  The data is even more
overwhelming than it was a decade ago–weapon restrictions do not save lives.  They
divert resources that would be better spent elsewhere.

Now, editors at the Washington Post, answer Just One Question.

Quote of the day–Timothy Dwight

The difficulty here has been to persuade the citizens to keep arms, not to prevent them from being employed for violent purposes.

Timothy Dwight
1752-1817
Travels in New England

Celebrate diversity

Father-Daughter style.  Father is carrying an STI Eagle 5.1 in .40 S&W with an 18 round magazine using a Milt Sparks inside the waistband (IWB) holster and a spare 18 round magazine in an offside dual magazine Sure-Fire flashlight holster.  Daughter is carrying a Star M43 FireStar in 9mm with a seven round magazine using a Kramer IWB holster with a Kramer spare magazine holster on the offside.  This was the first gun daughter Xenia ever fired when she was five years old.

Quote of the day–Joe Huffman

Crime “prevention” is a very hot button for me.  There is no limit to the evil that can be justified and/or enabled once you accept the premise that it is acceptable to prevent crime by restricting liberty.

Joe Huffman
December 3, 1998 6:53 PM
Microsoft Gun Club Public Folder
[In response to yesterdays Quote of the Day by the “Gun Guys.”–Joe]

Quote of the day–The Gun Guys

What we really need to pass are laws that act before the crime has taken place– stop dealers from selling weapons without consequence to criminals. Outlaw weapons that have no civilian needs, like assault weapons or the .50 caliber sniper rifle. Shut down the newspaper and gun show loopholes. Those laws are the ones that will prevent violence. You can lock up all the criminals you want, but that won’t stop crime, because everyone we know in jail committed their crime before they got there.

The Gun Guys
January 13, 2006
[Excellent thinking.  We can also prevent drunk driving by banning alcohol, reckless driving by banning cars, rape by castrating all men, prostitution by…–Joe]