Quote of the Day
Free question to ask #KamalaHarris for any #Journalist out there who wants to do First Amendment stuff instead of PR for the #DNC
When she says she intends to ban guns, or #AssaultWeapons to make American safer, ask her this:
J: What if you are wrong?
KH:Come again?
J: What if you are wrong? Suppose you are able to peacefully confiscate all (so-called) Assault Weapons. No civil war. No armed resistance. No states seceding. And you end your term in office, proud of making all those rifles disappear.
****Here’s the important part ****
But then someone like Donald Trump, or some other MAGA extremist manages to get elected POTUS. You know, someone you and your party labels as racist, Hitler, deplorable, etc……. And when they take office and actually start to round up political enemies, including you, what will you do?
J:So again, what if you are wrong? What if you are wrong that confiscating guns will make Americans safer.
Don Kilmer @donkilmer
Posted on X, July 29, 2024
Good question. Don’t expect an answer from any gun grabber. They will change the subject.
Although I saw it in my own feed, Michael B. also sent me an email about it as well.
The unstated answer is: just like Maduro, we will make sure the “wrong” person is not elected.
They have already done that.
That is one possible endgame. The other is to disarm the law abiding citizens to allow the criminal class to run wild. (See Britain for a good example). Then the law abiding citizens demand a police state. Police state happens but the criminals are still unchecked. After all, they are class allies.
And what if were wrong about the whole thing?
What if Kamala is exactly what is she has been for the last four years?
“The best way to control the opposition is to run it ourselves.”
V. Lenin.
Kamala was brought on the Biden campaign because she was one of the few people on earth that was worse than Joetato. Disliked and unelectable.
Getting rid of Joke meant you ended up with someone even less capable. Both being meat puppets for Commie-Bama and his handlers.
So, if you want to make Donald J. Trump look good? Put Kamala Harris out there as the alternative.
Beside being a honey trap for aged negro politicians. That’s her only use.
We have a choice of stupid and evil vs. really stupid and evil.
We’re talking two points either side moronics here friends and neighbors.
Gosh, whatever shall we pick? It is the most importantist election ever, once again, right?
Reality on the ground is the dollar is cooked. We’ve been invaded at a rate of over 10,000 a day for almost 4 years. Our weapons caches are depleted right along with our oil reserve.
Our ability to feed ourselves is hanging by a tread. And every kind of hatred that has destroyed civilizations of the past is cranked up to 9.5 volume. Extra bass.
And somehow we’ve manage to piss off the only country in the world with enough nukes to fight us. At the same time we be love/hating on the country that produces almost everything we consume, which wants to kill and occupy our lands.
Ain’t nothing either one of these bitches be talking about is going to do anything but insure government management over the destruction of America. Once again, two points either side of moronics.
Were building #7 on 9/11 folks. Still standing, but It’s all bullshit till we either fall down or get knocked down.
Kamala taking our guns??? HAHAHAHAHA! Please stop. My ribs hurt!
And once again. Communism is a crime against humanity.
My version of “What if I’m wrong?”
Then I’ve left you the freedom and the resources to take care of yourself, or the available excess to take care of another. I’ve left you the freedom and resources to engage with your fellows to band together to voluntarily address the need you perceive. I’m not going to get in your way, or demand a piece of the action for my own band of parasitic bureaucrats.
You won’t get a better offer from anyone.
I’d like Kamala Harris to commit — in writing, witnessed and notarized — to Pete Venkman’s (Bill Murray) answer in the original Ghostbusters, when asked by the mayor, “What if you’re wrong?”
If I’m wrong, we go to jail. Peacefully, quietly, we’ll enjoy it.
Of course, we know she’s wrong and confiscating so-called “assault weapons” won’t save anyone. We know an honest and objective analysis of the data will prove it, just as honest and objective analyses of the data surrounding the “assault weapon” ban in place from 1993-2003 proves it. So as agreed, she can go to jail.
Peacefully, quietly, and enjoy it.
(Actually, IMO, the fact she’s still advocating for an “assault weapon” ban when the last one, at best, had no discernible effect on crime, should be evidence at her trial. 18 U.S.C. 241 – Conspiracy against rights – and all.)