Quote of the Day
I would definitely advocate for that from ground, up, like abolishing [the Constitution], rewriting it, including people’s voices that haven’t been included on there as well. I would probably also rewrite all the oppressive amendments that are in there targeting marginalized individuals.
Sravya
August 29, 2026
One question about the Constitution puts liberals’ appetite for sweeping change to the test
Abolishing the constitution, then rewriting the amendments? “Oppressive amendments” which are “targeting marginalized individuals?” Impressive! That is more of a word salad than even Kamala Harris serves up.
Background:
Fox News Digital spoke with attendees and activists at Friday’s March on Washington who voiced support for systemic political change, from sweeping reforms to bringing socialist policies to their hometowns as DSA-backed candidates notch primary victories ahead of the midterms.
…
“March on Washington 2026: Defend the Vote” was held Friday at the Lincoln Memorial held on the 63rd anniversary of the 1963 March on Washington, organized by Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network.
Fox News Digital spoke with a handful of attendees, asking whether they would support abolishing and rewriting the Constitution and whether DSA policies are good for the direction of America — questions that drew support from some of those interviewed.
I have to believe Fox News chose the most “interesting” sound bites. If that were representative of the median political awareness of the “activists” I would be impressed if they are able to able to use public transportation without assistance. Still, it is disturbing that people who are politically active are so out of touch with reality.
I’ve mentioned this before, but it is worth repeating, I’m reminded of something my counselor told me (paraphrasing), “People with personality disorders have a strong drive to control other people. They have so much chaos in their own minds that it feels good to control others.”
OK, the 16A oppresses everyone who works.
Doesn’t the Third Amendment oppress young soldiers who because of it miss out on good wholesome home cooked meals and a family atmosphere, including flirting with the homeowner’s 13 year old daughter who is impressed by a man in uniform, even a Private?
The Twentieth Amendment oppresses those people who are tasked with counting the votes again and again until the numbers come out right (see Johnny Rocco in Key Largo).
And give me a minute, I’ll figure out how the 19th Amendment
oppresses men (not to neglect the other 24 Amendments).
You know which amendment this POS is referring to, right? S/h/it wouldn’t even know the word “amendment” if not for the Second Amendment.
“People with personality disorders have a strong drive to control other people. They have so much chaos in their own minds that it feels good to control others.”
There’s no cluster like Cluster B.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/cluster-b-personality-disorders
I have to wonder if you have personal experience with dealing with Cluster B.
The is considerable evidence I am attracted to them and them to me. It took a few years to learn how to recognize and deal appropriately with them.
“People with personality disorders have a strong drive to control other people. They have so much chaos in their own minds that it feels good to control others.”
This is only a small sample, but of the mental health counselors I’ve known (as acquaintances, not as their patent) 100% of them are fuck up mentally themselves. One example, my ex-neighbor–a counselor–started having an affair with her counselor, which ended her marriage. And this was after insisting that she and her husband attend marriage counseling.
I was told many years ago by a psychologist that people go into psychology because they have mental problems. Mostly, because they went and SAW a psychologist and want to help people similarly, of course, but only mostly.
And of course, I’m sure that’s not 100% the ONLY reason… but in my experience, it’s pretty darn close.
Counselors seem to have that same problem, though not as bad (in my limited experience).
You are not the first to make that observation. My sample size is very small and does not have sufficient depth on any of the individuals to draw a valid conclusion. But one that recently came into view does have some warning signs.