Quote of the Day
This is the most volatile, complex and dangerous threat environment I’ve experienced in the 42 plus years that I’ve been involved in law enforcement and Homeland Security.
We’re an angry, polarized nation. We have a growing number of people, particularly young males, who believe that violence is the only way to express their sense of grievance or their opposition to the current political conditions in this country. They are inspired and increasingly informed by content that they consume online. That’s placed there by terrorist groups, foreign intelligence services and others, specifically for the purposes of inspiring and inciting violence.
And increasingly, we’re seeing them turn to artificial intelligence to help them develop attack plans that allow them even an unsophisticated attacker, to engage in a violent attack. So the threat environment is significantly dangerous.
John Cohen
Former Acting DHS Undersecretary for Intelligence
April 26, 2026
‘This Week’ Transcript 4-26-26: Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche – ABC News
And which political party is leading in the initiation of violence? The same as it has been for the last 100+ years in all countries. The political left. The communist revolutions in Eastern Europe and Asia, the national socialist workers party of Germany, the U.S. Democrats from the KKK, to the violent riots and bombings of the 1960s and early 1970s, the BLM, ANTIFA, and the most recent shootings of Republican political leaders, Charlie Kirk, and the multiple assassination attempts on Trump. Yes, there have been a few Democrats murdered who could be blamed on a Republican, but the Democrats are racking up points on the score board so fast that even if the Republicans and Libertarians were combined, they are not even in the game.
Why are liberals so violent? It is in their nature.
Just imagine what they would do if their political opponents were unarmed. If they come for your guns, just keep saying, “NO“ until you run out of ammo.
Just remember, they are Satanists (though most not openly), so division, destruction, and death are the goals of TPTB at the top pushing these policies. We are reminded of this in this timely post- https://censor.net/en/videonews/3611809/lavrov-s-statement-on-satanism-at-the-lavra-censor-net ). They are pushing for mass blood-sacrifices not just in Ukraine.
When you realize that the “green” agenda and the rest are just a cover for their desire for death and suffering, their actions make more logical sense.
Well, it wasn’t very good AI. It did allow him to scope out the venue (which is the same place Reagan was shot) and elude the outer layers of security. But storming the metal detector wasn’t a great idea. Put everybody on high alert, including the close protection details which he never got to. There was probably an additional layer of security between Trump’s personal detail and the guys at the metal detector. I do hope that the SS can put a stop to Trump, Vance and Johnson sitting at the same table or at least make Grassley sit there too. I assume these venues have bomb dogs or mechanical sniffers or both but so did Margaret Thatcher’s hotel.