Quote of the Day
This is the most volatile, complex and dangerous threat environment I’ve experienced in the 42 plus years that I’ve been involved in law enforcement and Homeland Security.
We’re an angry, polarized nation. We have a growing number of people, particularly young males, who believe that violence is the only way to express their sense of grievance or their opposition to the current political conditions in this country. They are inspired and increasingly informed by content that they consume online. That’s placed there by terrorist groups, foreign intelligence services and others, specifically for the purposes of inspiring and inciting violence.
And increasingly, we’re seeing them turn to artificial intelligence to help them develop attack plans that allow them even an unsophisticated attacker, to engage in a violent attack. So the threat environment is significantly dangerous.
John Cohen
Former Acting DHS Undersecretary for Intelligence
April 26, 2026
‘This Week’ Transcript 4-26-26: Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche – ABC News
And which political party is leading in the initiation of violence? The same as it has been for the last 100+ years in all countries. The political left. The communist revolutions in Eastern Europe and Asia, the national socialist workers party of Germany, the U.S. Democrats from the KKK, to the violent riots and bombings of the 1960s and early 1970s, the BLM, ANTIFA, and the most recent shootings of Republican political leaders, Charlie Kirk, and the multiple assassination attempts on Trump. Yes, there have been a few Democrats murdered who could be blamed on a Republican, but the Democrats are racking up points on the score board so fast that even if the Republicans and Libertarians were combined, they are not even in the game.
Why are liberals so violent? It is in their nature.
Just imagine what they would do if their political opponents were unarmed. If they come for your guns, just keep saying, “NO“ until you run out of ammo.
Just remember, they are Satanists (though most not openly), so division, destruction, and death are the goals of TPTB at the top pushing these policies. We are reminded of this in this timely post- https://censor.net/en/videonews/3611809/lavrov-s-statement-on-satanism-at-the-lavra-censor-net ). They are pushing for mass blood-sacrifices not just in Ukraine.
When you realize that the “green” agenda and the rest are just a cover for their desire for death and suffering, their actions make more logical sense.
Well, it wasn’t very good AI. It did allow him to scope out the venue (which is the same place Reagan was shot) and elude the outer layers of security. But storming the metal detector wasn’t a great idea. Put everybody on high alert, including the close protection details which he never got to. There was probably an additional layer of security between Trump’s personal detail and the guys at the metal detector. I do hope that the SS can put a stop to Trump, Vance and Johnson sitting at the same table or at least make Grassley sit there too. I assume these venues have bomb dogs or mechanical sniffers or both but so did Margaret Thatcher’s hotel.
Violence is more or less a default setting that re-emerges when people cannot get ahead by other means.
It’s a choice, but there are systemic factors at play that make it more likely that some people will choose it. Given a large enough population, an increase becomes all but inevitable.
This is why a peace-full law-abiding populace, well armed, is necessary to the security of liberty.
When the democratically-losing malcontents decide that they need to get their way by means other than being persuasive and winning elections, they need to know that resorting to political violence means putting a sign on their chest labelled “valid target”.
The peaceful citizen need fear nothing from his fellow peaceful citizens. The violent malcontent needs to be restrained into abiding the law by his fear of a vigorous justified response from anyone, not just the frequently absent agents of the government.
The problem with that view is that the violence is exclusively coming from the left, who already ARE getting ahead by other means. Life for the left is never having to work a day in your life, yet winning on every single issue and having pleasurable group sex every night. Life for the
right is working until you are basically crippled by the age of 60, and yet being banned from even having your own family.
That’s a gross oversimplification.
Yup.
I know a strong Trump supporting, retired, couple, in their 70s, living in the belly of the beast in Minnesota, who go to sex parties a couple times a month.
So… what’s the problem?
😉
Pingback: Looking Ahead (And Shuddering) – Western Rifle Shooters Association
There is a big clue here you seem to be tripping over and not saying. OK I’ll point it out since I’m rude. Suggest checking early life in Wikipedia page but with a name like that do you really need to?
John Cohen
And The Great Noticing continues…
Leftists don’t think. They emote. And among the emotions that rule their lives are anger and hate. So it’s no surprise they resort to violence to get their way.
Pingback: Instapundit » Blog Archive » YES: The Most Volatile, Complex and Dangerous Threat Environment.
Problem is that none of them have actually experienced real violence.
Just make believe violence.
Oh, some of them have experienced real violence… GIVING it, from a mob or riot that was politically protected. Practically “god mode”, where they get to enjoy hurting people, but without almost any risk of harm themselves.