Quote of the Day
With classic commie mind-control methodology, anti-gun radicals project their fears and biases on us. Whatever they are, that’s what they call us. We’re awful at refuting and resisting. We’re not racists, they are. Lefties see everything through skin color. We’re not violent, we’re just armed. They riot, burn, pillage, deface and are tolerated by the captured power structure, which they neutered. Defunding the police is not our plan. Using the FBI against school moms horrifies us. Turning the Patriot Act into a CIA tool for managing the right side, namely us, and label-smearing us domestic terrorists are clever but evil.
Your guns are sadly helpless against this onslaught. I ask constantly — who are you going to shoot when they incrementally steal your rights and soul? We have grown too comfortable and rich — through the combined miracles of capitalism, free speech and liberty — to stand tall and kill off the worst of the anti-freedom perpetrators. The ones who twist and malign our institutions in their favor. The ones who now hold what our Founders feared — more firepower than we can match.
Long ago, the communist-socialist-Marxist axis proposed that they would hang us, and we would sell them the rope. It’s happening.
Alan Korwin
May 31, 2024
It’s Time to Think Past Your Guns
This was posted one year ago. Things have changed a lot. But there is still a lot left to change.
Celebrate our victories and continue the fight. Never get tired of winning.
This seeming indifference or cowardice demonstrated by the majority of moral, upright citizens was recognized in our founding documents: “…experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed…”. This is human nature or perhaps the nature of Judeo-Christian civilization. We should also consider a very astute observation by author Larry Correa: “…for most people on the left political violence is a knob, and they can turn the heat up and down, with things like protests, and riots, all the way up to destruction of property, and sometimes murder…. But for the vast majority of folks on the right, it’s an off and on switch. And the settings are Vote or Shoot Fucking Everybody.” That is, everybody in favor of destroying our God given rights and our Republic. At the moment things are sufferable, barely! Hey! Socialist $hitbags! Fuck Around, Find Out!
“Who are you going to shoot?”
When the initiation of violence comes to your door, defend yourself. Even if it is a mathematically provable fact that you cannot succeed, there are no exceptions to this rule.
“There are things that knaw on a man worse than death” There are things worth dying for. Anything worth dying for is worth killing for.
Actually our guns WOULD solve our problems with the leftists…if we only had the gumption to use them. It wouldn’t be nice, it wouldn’t be civil and it would not be legal…but it WOULD be effective.
Where are these leftists who would imprison and kill everyone who loves liberty? When the time comes to respond as at Lexington and Concord, we cannot respond properly if we cannot locate the people who will kill liberty.
The enemies of liberty are counting on us forgetting the Nuremberg law.
The lower-level foot soldiers are only following orders. They aren’t the ones who gave the orders. The ones who gave the orders didn’t actually kill anyone. Who is to be punished?
I have wondered for quite some time why very silent disappearings have not occurred among the small, very select cadre of anti-freedom financiers and manipulators.
One kills a snake by cutting off its head.
I recommend reading(or re-reading “Unintended Consequences”.
The late John Ross’ book is among the many reasons I posed the question.
Edited to add: After reading the comments in the later post (Sheriff Civil Disobedience, above) by Tirno and GrayDog, I am now also wondering why government authorities – supposedly committed to Constitutionalism and enforcement thereof by oath of office as well as personal position – have not sought sanctions against individuals and organizations actively engaged in subverting the provisions of said Constitution.
It would seem there is sufficient documentation, including high court decisions as well as Congressional legislation, to support such action. Not that Citizens are incapable of enforcement themselves, but that mechanism is bound to be somewhat messier and subject to loud devisiveness of public opinion stirred up by those opposed to Constitutionalism.