Quote of the day—Take All The Guns @GunzTake

Yes. I am the one honest voice in the gun control community.

We are coming for your guns. First the assault weapons, then the saturday night specials (pistols), then the high powered sniper rifles and street sweepers (bolt guns and shotguns).

We are coming, we are legion.

Take All The Guns @GunzTake
Tweeted on March 16, 2021
[Via a private post on Facebook by Jonathan S.

I can believe everything except the last sentence. He is not going to be taking guns from anyone and they don’t have a legion of people willing to do the taking.

I do appreciate the majority of his tweet was honest and accurate though. That is rare among anti-gun people. Which, of course, makes me suspicious that they aren’t really an anti-gun person. Or, if they are, they are just a troll.

See also here.

Do not ever let anyone get away with telling you, “No one wants to take your guns.”—Joe]


8 thoughts on “Quote of the day—Take All The Guns @GunzTake

  1. Since were being honest. I bet I practice keeping my guns, more than you practice trying to take them away?
    There’s only a hard way of finding out who’s better at which.
    And you got the talk’in part done. Let’s find out if your genitals are sufficient.
    Play for blood, remember?

  2. There are some that are under the misapprehension that the US Constitution is something that happened to us.

    No. The US Constitution is our deal, not the politicians’, not the judges’ and definitely not the bureaucrats’ and flunkies’. As The People, we wanted this arrangement: we’d empower a government to exist, to take care of specific things so that we don’t all individually have to do them. Oh, yes, it just occurred to us: we’ve seen similar arrangements go awry, so furthermore, here are some restrictions that override all the powers we said could be used in our name. The deal exists because we, The People said it could and tolerate it to continue in the manner outlined.

    “But I didn’t vote for it!”, one might whine. Well, yes, you do, by staying here. If it’s not entirely to your liking, there is an amendment process that only requires you to get a sufficient level of popular support to amend it how you want it to be. By failing to amend, we The People consent to the form passed down to us. If that’s not for you, there are no practical obstructions on Our end to prevent you from finding the paradise you want somewhere else, or just living somewhere here with like-minded people in the manner you wish, albeit without the authority of force to compel anyone to conform without persuasion.

    But the deal comes first with the limitations, then the powers. If you want the powers, but not the limitations, well… The People have spoken, and we wanted it that way. If you ignore the limitations, we ignore your assertions of the powers.

    I think I’ve said this before, but we should use the first clause of the Second Amendment as a legal sword, not ignore it or diminish it or simply write it off as the subjunctive clause separate from the operative clause.

    “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state…”

    What do we, The People, want? To live individually in a state of freedom.

    What is necessary to achieving that? A well-regulated militia.

    What is a well-regulated militia, in the understanding of those that voted for that clause? The whole of the people (less a few elected officials), equipped and trained to perform in a regular manner their required purpose: to preserve the freedom of The People.

    Who opposes the freedom of The People? The Enemy of The People, regardless of their nationality, creed, race or simple location.

    How does the Enemy undermine the security of the free state? By disrupting the regular function of the militia.

    How is that accomplished? By infringing upon the right of The People to keep and bear their own arms, or to learn how to use those arms, or to organize themselves to defend their liberties.

    What is the proper term for those that act to imperil the security of the free state of The People? TRAITOR, in the strict and limited sense established by Our Constitution.

  3. To all the socialists, communists, progressives, so-called liberals, and Democrats that want to take guns from the people, look up what your hero Karl Marx said about this subject:

    “Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary” ― Karl Marx

    Let that blow your mind.

  4. So far the “gun grabbers” are correct. They ARE and HAVE BEEN ‘coming for our guns”. Hardly a week goes by where there isn’t a news story of some “raid” on an
    normal honest American who was targeted by some agency to be publicly crucified for owning guns. Just a few days ago some poor soul in Flathead Valley Montana had DOZENS of agents raid his property and steal untold thousands of dollars of his property…..based upon an allegation by a FORMER girl friend made in ANOTHER STATE. So yes…they gun grabbers ARE taking our guns. And GETTIING AWAY WITH IT. And since they have been getting away with it they WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO. Until they start DYING when they try.

Comments are closed.