This Single Opinion Will Set the Anti-Gun Movement Back for Generations

Quote of the Day

The rubble shall be bouncing in June 2027 when the Supreme Court opinion on AR15 bans is released. This single opinion will set the anti-gun movement back for generations.

Mark W. Smith/#2A Scholar @fourboxesdiner
Posted on X July 31, 2026

This was in response to:

Just overheard the lawyers’ phone call. The Viramontes brief at SCOTUS is gonna make the gun grabbers’ heads explode.

We’ll share more when we know more.

Firearms Policy Coalition @gunpolicy
Posted on X July 31, 2026

I look forward to hearing more. What I expect is a lot of powerful legal stuff. I doubt we will hear, in so many words, what will be just as important. The proper ruling at SCOTUS, and enforced by the DOJ, will create a huge morale boost for us and the morale of the anti-gun people will crash. That change in attitude is what will make the heads explode and set the anti-gun movement back for generations.

Our side will have them on the run. They will have no defenses. We will, metaphorically, be chasing them with torches and pitchforks.

People love to be on the winning side. They will be happy to donate money and see their abusers crushed in the courts. People will go to the range and laugh and tell jokes about the tears of the anti-gun leaders and the bankruptcies of their organizations.

We will be tearing down their remaining infringements in months and years that took them a century to construct. They will constantly on the defense and unable to even find a defensible position.

Any time an anti-gun people timidly proposes anything they will be hammered by “the plain text of the 2nd Amendment” from their opposition and even their lawyers. Shall. Not. Be. Infringed. What part do you not understand?

Share

15 thoughts on “This Single Opinion Will Set the Anti-Gun Movement Back for Generations

  1. You forget that there’s nothing the Left loves more than a lost cause. They will double their ranks once they realize there is no hope.

      • Open border advocacy.
        Abolish Law Enforcement
        Make Socialism Work (this time, really!
        Esperanto
        Ebonics
        Gun Control stops violence
        Elimination of fossil fuel in 5 years (for the last 25 years)
        …to name a few.

        [Not that the Right doesn’t have its lost causes too (eliminate the Fed, etc)]

  2. I hate to be “that guy”, I really do, but I had trouble understanding this sentence for a moment:

    “The proper ruling at SCOTUS, and enforced by the DOJ, will create a huge moral boost for us and the moral of the anti-gun people will crash.”

    The word you were intending to use (in both cases) is “morale”. I generally try to ignore that stuff unless it causes difficulty, as in this case.

    Sorry.

    • Fixed.

      I FAR prefer the correction to someone being “polite” or whatever. Send me an email or text message if you don’t want to leave a comment.

      Thanks.

      • Funny thing – I ran across that exact mistake somewhere else today, too, completely unrelated to you. Hadn’t seen it since who knows when, 2 prominent and unexpected examples in one day. Life is strange.

    • Funny – I think it would be both.
      The proper ruling at SCOTUS, and enforced by the DOJ, will create a huge moral and morale boost for us and the morale of the anti-gun people will crash.

      • That’s what made it extra hard to read – “moral” did sorta-mostly fit in the first instance but not at all in the second.

  3. His lips to God’s ears. I’m hopeful Assault Weapons Bans will be struck down but I don’t know that we’ll get the sweeping decision we’d like. Robert’s it too willing to water down decisions to get a broader consensus than I’d like.

    I saw a Washington Gun Law video yesterday where William Kirk was talking to Mark Smith. He’d like to see Viramontes deal exclusively with the AWB, and the Court remand the magazine ban cases for reconsideration based on the Viramontes ruling. Smith thinks that gets us stronger rulings on both the AWB and magazine ban cases. It made sense to me. He’s also wary of Roberts getting the decision weakened in hopes of an 8-1 or 9-0 ruling instead of 6-3.

  4. In the meantime: The U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, just found that the NFA (National Firearms Act) is unconstitutional as applied to suppressors, short barrel rifles and short barrel shotguns is unconstitutional due to a lack of connection to Article I of the US Constitution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.