Do you remember my hypothesis about our universe being a black hole? I was not the first, but I did come up with it independently and added the black hole being in the forward direction of our time axis.
There are now people who suspect the origin of our universe was not a big bang, but a bounce from a black hole:
Universe was not formed in big bang but ‘bounced’ out of black hole – new study
The Universe may not have started with the Big Bang, but instead “bounced” out of a massive black hole formed within a larger “parent” universe, according to a new scientific paper.
Professor Enrique Gaztanaga, from the University of Portsmouth’s Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, said that the current Big Bang theory was problematic as the laws of physics “broke down” when used to explain it.
His new explanation, published in the journal Physical Review D, suggests that the Universe was formed as a result of a gravitational collapse in a larger universe which generated a massive black hole leading to a rebound or “bounce” causing our universe to emerge.
It appears this hypothesis is consistent with my hypothesis.
“The Universe may not have started with the Big Bang, but instead “bounced” out of a massive black hole formed within a larger “parent” universe, according to a new scientific paper.”
Wait, what???
Sorry, but I was under the impression that black holes are black because they are so powerful even light is pulled into them.
How does “matter” bounce out of something that can suck up photons?
Can’t imagine rocks and dust bouncing out of my vacuum cleaner nozzle.
That said, the real limitation is in “origins”, from our perspective. Everything has to start and end from our view. We can’t/will never be able to explain how it all started from where we are.
We mentally have to start with something. Big bang, blackholes, matter.
No one can explain how all that matter came into being in the first place.
Or the gravity that shapes it.
So, ya. The black hole we live in is a mental one. (And like being an ant caught by a giant Hoover. I imagine were going to get blown out the backside into the “dustbag” of history.)
But on the sunny side of our blackholes.
Beside Chris Langan. Another of the “world’s smartest man” (276 IQ), YoungHoon Kim, has declared Jesus Christ as his lord and savior.
It is well established that matter appears out of empty space.
It is an electron/positron pair that quickly recombine and dissappear. But they do happen.
This same phenomenon is how black holes “evaporate.” The position gets pulled in, and the electron escapes. The position then destroys a bit of the black hole mass.
As for the bounce, I haven’t looked at the math, but think about the incoming mass hitting mass from the opposite direction. What happens when two moving billard balls hit each other head on? They conserve both energy and momentum. They bounce off each other in opposite directions.
OK, but both objects are moving in the same direction. Into and through the blackhole.
Gravity works the same regardless of mass.
So, all they could do is deflect off each other while traveling into the hole.
Maybe some kind of explosion from collision could eject something out passed the gravity’s grasp?
But from a gravity well strong enough to hoover up all light?
Matter cannot appear out of nothing. Only our ability to see it. Or see it’s shockwave.
Just like using a voltmeter. You’re actually reading the field around it. The shockwave of electrons travelling around a nucleus at millions of FPS.
Space, time, and matter can be manipulated by spirit. Jesus showed us that.
But he didn’t make something from nothing. It just appeared that way to us.
Right now we get zapped by 65 billion neutrinos per second per square centimeter. Zipping right through us, through the core of the earth and out the other side into space.
And the only way to detect them is by finding the occasional collision with an atom.
If it doesn’t make a wave formation. We can’t detect it.
Maybe I’m all wrong, wouldn’t be the first time!
Matter does appear out of nothing. When it does it is paired with an equal amount of antimatter. Sometimes, they are separated immediately after they pop into existence. If the antimatter is pulled into a black hole, a part of the black hole is destroyed. The matter left behind is a net addition to the mass outside the black hole.
In a black hole matter is coming in from all directions. Imagine the simple case of just two identical objects coming in from opposite directions. When they hit each other, assuming they are inelastic, they exchange velocities. They then try to climb back out of the gravity well.
What this hypothesis is suggesting is that with enough mass and stored energy at the bottom of the black hole at some point, the black hole explodes (bounces) some or most of the mass back out.
Really? something from nothing?
As for dark-matter. I’ll have to take your word on that one.
Certain things I am very limited at thinking about.
(I had a lot of fevers as a child. Or maybe being dropped on my head by older brothers all those times?)
Dark matter may not exist. The jury is still out on that.
But yes, something from nothing is pretty well settled.
And it turns out that it isn’t just positron getting captured by black holes that cause them to evaporate.
https://copilot.microsoft.com/shares/P7wZzR7TSZmWVeqQtXK7h
So does this mean that you will be referring to yourself as “Leading Expert Astrophysicist Joe Huffman”, now?
ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!
Took you all of 7 minutes to sputter your way out of your indignation and shut THAT idea down!
Nice to know I can leave you speechless for at least a short time, J!
It took me those 7 minutes to notice the new comment.
I had a thought, ages ago, similar to this.
If the universe collapses, it will have enough mass to form a MASSIVE black hole.
Black holes eventually dissipate, or “evaporate”, and when they do, all the matter they “swallowed” will be ejected at a physics-bending rate.
My thought was, “Wouldn’t that physics-bending expulsion of energy and material look an awful lot like a gigantic explosion? Kind of like … the Big Bang?”
And then, taking that a step further, “Mightn’t that answer the question of ‘What was there before the Big Bang’?”
My current working hypothesis — which I don’t have the math to prove — is that before the Big Bang, there was another universe, slightly more massive than ours, that collapsed into an ultra-massive black hole, and when that black hole evaporated, our present universe was born in the resulting expulsion of energy and matter we call the Big Bang. There may have been another, slightly more massive, universe before that. And when this universe eventually collapses into a black hole, and that black hole evaporates, there will be another universe.
I call it my Balloon Hypothesis, because spacetime and the expansion of the universe has been described as a balloon. Draw the galaxies on a deflated balloon and then blow it up — everything moves further apart, representing the expansion.
But now let the air back out (letting it go so it goes “pbbbbt” and flies around the room is optional :D). The balloon collapses and everything comes back together. But you can fill it back up again, and let the air out again. Expansion, followed by collapse, followed by expansion, followed by collapse … again and again over mind-breaking numbers of years.
As all evidence of the structure of the previous universe would be destroyed when it collapses into the black hole, there’s no way I can think of to prove this. But it’s a thought.
That’s the fun of it, isn’t it?
Astrophysics is like trying to understand the workings of a machine by peeking through a small vent in the side. Even the folks who understand the math have to take great huge leaps of understanding to each their conclusions.
We amateurs, playing on the sidelines, have just as much chance of reaching a valid hypothesis as they do, and sometimes can illuminate their search in ways they never imagined.
Your balloon theory is intriguing and, who knows! Some big head might see it and have an AH-HA moment that spawns a whole new cosmos!!