I am strangely okay with the city of San Francisco designating me a terrorist. If San Francisco liked me I would be wondering where I had gone wrong in life.
Larry Correia
September 4, 2019
Controversial Gun Politics Opinion Time
[There is more than a little truth for all of us in that statement.
In related news:
- NRA is suing after San Francisco labels it a terror group (CNN)
- NRA Sues San Francisco After Lawmakers Declare It A Terrorist Organization (NPR)
- NRA sues San Francisco after leaders brand it a ‘terrorist’ outfit (Washington Examiner)
- NRA sues San Francisco over ‘domestic terrorist organization’ declaration (Fox News)
- NRA sues San Francisco over city declaring it a domestic terrorist organization (The Hill)
I would like to think that San Francisco inadvertently volunteered to bail the NRA out of its poor financial situation.—Joe]
Then there are the democrats that want to make joining any gun organization illegal.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/gun_control/28_of_democrats_say_it_should_be_illegal_to_join_the_nra
This blog has often suggested this or that anti-gun activists’ behavior would be used as evidence at their trials for Suppression of Rights Under Color of Law, TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242. If this action isn’t a case for that law to be applied, I don’t know what is.
Yes. But does anyone know a Federal D.A. who would bring that charge? That’s the problem with criminal law such as this.
Isn’t there some federal statute allowing private citizens to initiate civil lawsuits due to some breaches of federal law, and splitting the take with FedGov?
If so, could this be one of those causes of action?