Of course we will get strict nationwide gun regulations. We will subjugate Insurrectionist Gunloving maniacs like you.
David Hluchy @davehluchy
Tweeted on April 20, 2019
[It’s good to have such people finally come out and admit what we always knew. It will be useful at their trial.
Enjoy your trial David Hluchy.—Joe]
Good luck with that cupcake.
Kind of fun reading the thread and watching him twist in the wind.
From the inane use of catch phrases it’s almost like dealing with an autistic who’s doing a copy and paste from a prepared list because he can’t deal with the conversation.
And even if he is mentally ‘challenged’, he gets no sympathy from me. He can work at hard labor in the prison industries just a well as the next man.
But that ‘early childhood educator’. Oh my, oh my. It’s another reason every parent should do their due diligence about who they’re letting in close proximity to their young children.
Yeah…
OK. We’ll see how that works out, I guess.
What is it with the power trip some folks are on? Swallwell going to nuke us. This guy. I’ve lost count of the others…
Jeff B.
The Left has been talking themselves into violence against those they hate.
“We will subjugate Insurrectionist Gunloving maniacs like you.”
This is the language of the Dark Ages. Do you hear the echoes coming down through the centuries? The millennia?
And, by the way, I believe them. I can call them the real insurrectionists, which of course they are, but they will nonetheless subjugate us. They’re most of the way there already, mainly because we cannot comprehend or acknowledge the depth, degree or scope of their evil. They are protected by our incredulity.
They will get their way; they’ll get their total power, right before they’re totally destroyed.
Joe, you may need a new category of “People Who Individually And Completely Justify The Most Expansive View Of The Second Amendment”.
A bit long… I’ll workshop it a bit.
It would be convenient to have a list ready so when someone says, “What do you need an AR-15 for?” the response is, “This guy: he says he’s going to subjugate us; This guy: he says he’s going to nuke us; This gal: she envisions camps and mass graves; and if that’s not enough for you, then YOU. You specifically, by yourself, exhibiting anything less than total condemnation with any single part of that, completely justify specifically me and my fellow citizens owning fully automatic weapons with silencers and grenade launchers and enough ammo to shoot until it’s not fun anymore, then store ten times that much.”
https://blog.joehuffman.org/category/this-is-what-they-think-of-you/they-want-you-dead/ and https://blog.joehuffman.org/category/this-is-what-they-think-of-you/ are insufficient?
Every one on those lists perfectly fits the concept, but then one must make the mental connection to “…and that’s why there is a Second Amendment.”
The kind of people who can’t make that mental leap are frequently the people that simply can’t understand things like the inalienable right of self-defense. I think you’ve come across this yourself in the person on one J. Peterson (Mrs). These are the individuals for whom ‘one plus two plus three plus four’ is an example of the chaotic nature of the universe, that someone would even conceive to ponder such a thing, and even more baffling is that they themselves are the two in that expression.
Besides, it would be kind of cool if someone plugs their own name into a search engine, they get a result that says, “Firstname Lastname, all by themselves and beyond the shadow of a doubt , completely justifies the Second Amendment in its most expansive interpretation.” (Ten, LastName. TEN. You are two, but we got to ten because of you. Stop looking at me like I’m a wizard.)
Eh, I’m not doing a feature request. I’m just having one of those moments where I despair.
New category with a few old posts added to it: https://blog.joehuffman.org/category/gun-rights/this-is-why-we-have-the-2nd-amendment/
Of course it is. But this is the way you move the Overton window.
Oh! I misunderstood. Sorry about that.
Yes, I can see your point.
My optimism extends to the hope that such “chaos” can be avoided for the good of everyone.