@PC_Banned_Humor Ok, you need it as phallus replacement @ZeitgeistGhost
Berlincopa @Berlincopa
Tweeted on February 23, 2015
[It’s another Markley’s Law Monday! Via a tweet from LowRider @PC_Banned_Humor.—Joe]
The View From North Central Idaho
Ramblings on explosives, guns, politics, and sex by a redneck Idaho farm boy who became a software engineer living near Seattle.
WTH is wrong with these people that they can’t believe all of my equipment is fine and doesn’t need any sort of replacement? My guns are good, too.
Aside from being slanderous lies, this shit’s getting real old.
I think that’s the point of Joe’s weekly Markley’s Law posts.
Old you say?
Stuart Margolin mentions the conflation as a anti-gun insult in the original 1974 Death Wish.
I still want to have it explained in detail how a gun can serve as a penis replacement. The two don’t seem to have any commonality in function. What am I missing?
As a very poor replacement for a penis, maybe a “strap-on” would work a lot better than a gun I think. If the objective is to deliver sperm to a uterus, then a turkey baster or similar device would serve better still.
Someone on the insane left (you know who you are – say, anyone who still likes Obama as a president for example) please explain your “gun = penis” reasoning, if any. Be concise; avoid any emotional outbursts or subjective language.
In a choice between a small dick and a small brain , I chose a small dick it appears you chose otherwise. We can see how well that is working out for you. The stupid it burns.