Quote of the day—Redcap ReaverBait‏ @ReaverBait

Yes, because nothing is more important than your manly phallic symbol and getting to murder someone. No way that could possibly go wrong…

Redcap ReaverBait‏ @ReaverBait
Tweeted on June 16, 2017
[It’s another Markley’s Law Monday!

This is what they think of people who exercise their specific enumerated right to keep and bear arms.

Via a tweet from BFD‏ @BigFatDave.—Joe]

Update: ReaverBait replied on twitter to this blog post. Absolutely amazing! It is a classic response as predicted by SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police in less than 140 characters:

Replying to @JoeHuffman

Yes, you reeaally needed to @ me with your bullshit “waaah I need a gun to feel manly” nonsense. Grow the fuck up.

The three rules of SJWs are:

  1. SJWs always lie.
  2. SJWs always double down.
  3. SJWs always project.

The initial tweet quoted above was a lie. Then in the response she doubled down on the lie and projected her immaturity onto people exercising their specific enumerated rights.


8 thoughts on “Quote of the day—Redcap ReaverBait‏ @ReaverBait

  1. Guns are solely for murder then? That would mean the American founders considered the “right to murder”, along with the need to compensate for sexual dysfunction, so important that they had to include it in the Bill of Rights.

    Wow! America must really suck, if you’re a victim of Progressive Marxist propaganda. No wonder the Progressives fantasize about having us killed.

  2. Looks to me like ReaverBait and most anti-gun people have a bad case of PIS. ( Pronounced, pissssss )
    Penile Infatuation Syndrome!


    • I think it is because of their frustration of not having any type of argument. They are defeated on principles, logical/data, and legal grounds. All they have are insults.

  3. “Reaverbait” as a nickname sort of implies a Firefly/Serenity fan. At least, one who has not absorbed a single bit of the message in Firefly….

      • “Pathetic ableism”. Like the desire of practically all men and boys who haven’t given their manhood to the left to be preserved in a jar of formaldehyde to be competent at the skills they need for daily life and the provisioning and for the preservation of their families?

        Such men respect the literary device of the “competent man” characters beloved of Robert Heinlein among others, and strive to be like them. Men who have “put up” the family jewels in order to fit in amongst the leftists, do not respect any abilities.

      • Considering the biggest cause of divorce by women is the man no longer being able to be the sugar-daddy, er, I mean, major breadwinner, then yes, being able is rather important to a man. If he’s not able to provide, she dumps him and uses the guns of state to strip him of pride, children, paycheck, and rights. Because they are so caring and supporting and sensitive and all that.


      • “Ableism”, eh? Pretty bizarre, considering that victim disarmament is a clear case of ableism, misogyny, and racism. After all, the need for self defense with effective tools is particularly urgent for those who are not so strong or nimble, and for those who are more likely to live in high crime areas. By insisting such people be rendered defenseless, you are infringing on their interests.
        It’s the advocates of gun ownership who are feminists, supporters of the disabled, and so forth.

Comments are closed.