Quote of the day—Jeff Ingebritson


Jeff Ingebritson
September 17, 2016
Comment on Fox News Facebook via Andrew Benghazi.
[And just so the text will be available for searching:

If asking Hillary to disarm is a call for her assassination, then asking the American people to disarm is calling for their genocide.

Very well done.—Joe]


13 thoughts on “Quote of the day—Jeff Ingebritson

  1. For related humor: It appears that Agelina Jolie is a guest lecturer at the London School of Economics. Her subject is the use of rape as a weapon of war. I wonder if her head would explode if someone asked her a question about the massive number of rapes, gropings, and intimidation of females by groups of male middle-eastern immigrants in Europe, where hundreds of thousands have migrated. Could she distinguish in any meaningful way between mass migration and immigration vis-à-vis the topic of her lecture?

    • Another good question would be to point out that these things happen in Europe, which is a disarmed victim zone.
      “Victim disarmament types are sick, sick people, who’d rather see a woman raped in an alley and strangled with her own pantyhose than see her with a gun in her hand.” — T. D. Melrose

  2. Stated conversely, the Hildabeast needs weapons for her protection from deranged killers and we need them in similar fashion because the government is not trustworthy.

  3. VERY well put.

    This would also be an opportunity to turn the “If you think you need a gun for protection it’s because you’re either paranoid or you have a blood lust” meme back on the Progressives.

  4. The thing is a lot of people that are anti-gun want the US government to kill all gun owners. To them we are nothing but murderers and monsters. So to them if they did call for the genocide and systematic extermination of gun owners that would be acceptable action to take and they would cheer it on as tens of millions of people die.

    Normal people cannot fathom the sheer evil that is in the hearts and minds of many of the people that oppose us. Some have called for the US government dropping nuclear weapons on United States citizens to force people to turn in their guns. So to them extermination of half the country would be an acceptable action to take for their dream of a disarmed America socialist wonderland.

    • That is the sort of people that supported the Final Solution, because, well, it wasn’t like any actual human beings got hurt, it was just Jews (and gypsies, and mentally deficient, and other sub-human undesirables), right? The left does the same group-identity “othering” to salve their own conscience and avoid cognitive dissonance.

      • …well, it wasn’t like any actual human beings got hurt, it was just Jews (and gypsies, and mentally deficient, and other sub-human deplorables), right?

        There. FTFY. 😉

        • And “Les Deplorables” happen to have the highest percentage of personal gun ownership in world personal gun owning history.
          Even if it’s only a small percentage that decides they won’t get on the bus or go to the train terminal quietly, the result will not be as planned.

    • Well Shawn, we do see one thing: They want somebody else to do it for them.
      So, we can take from that, they’re cowards and the one thing that really does have them scared $#!+less is that people do have all those guns and they just might be singing a line from ‘Santa Claus Is Coming To Town’.

  5. Pingback: Yep …. | Freedom Is Just Another Word…

  6. Very nicely put!

    Saying that Trump, by calling to disarm Hillary’s bodyguards, is in fact calling for her assassination, means that Hillary can’t survive without armed bodyguards.

    Noted. Let’s explore that concept. Why is she in greater need of armed bodyguards than someone else? Because she’s running for President? (I don’t believe she’s had any significant physical threats in this campaign. Trump actually has.)

Comments are closed.