Experience a Sudden Increase in Posterior Luminosity

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

The matter is simple. Hawaii passed a law that, in practice, prohibits the state’s concealed carry permit holders from exercising their right to armed self-defense in virtually any location outside of their homes. Hawaii knows well that this law violates both the spirit and letter of Bruen v. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, the Supreme Court’s 2022 landmark case on public carry. It just does not care.  

Now, the state should brace itself for a more-than-deserved judicial head-bopping. 

Amy Swearer
January 23, 2026
SCOTUS likely to head-bop Hawaii over gun rights

All the reports I have heard say the oral arguments went well for the good guys.

In addition to getting their head bopped I think some other corrective measures are warranted. I would like to suggest all of the following applied as near as concurrently as is practical to each of the politicians who participated in this injustice:

  • Bitch slapped
  • Britches dusted
  • Ears boxed
  • Experience a sudden increase in posterior luminosity
  • Get their hide tanned
  • Have their sit-down region encouraged to reconsider their life choices
  • Knuckles rapped.
  • Receiving a cuff upside the head
  • Taken to the woodshed
  • Undergo some corrective percussion therapy

If they still continue to misbehavior they should be prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to prison.

Share

8 thoughts on “Experience a Sudden Increase in Posterior Luminosity”

  1. I had a nun once tell she was going to box my ears. She also said I was a brazen pup and shanty Irishman.

    Good memories!

  2. You are correct that this will continue until elected officials and judges go to prison.

  3. All these bad laws will continue until the Courts order everyone involved: the drafting parties, every legislator who voted for them, and the governor who endorsed it removed from office, have their pensions forfeited, and imprisoned for the maximum term called out by the offending law with no parole. If the law struck down allowed for life, Life. If it made the death penalty an option, then Death.

    They virtue signal with no penalty for infringement.

    • Aside from the moral and legal issues, it dramatically increases the risk of creating a martyr to rally around.

      With relatively minor corporal punishment, they get laughed at and they have a more difficult time being taken seriously after that. If you think the world would be a better place if they were dead, hope for them to walk into an open manhole or pass out drunk and drown in a toddler’s pool.

  5. “Hawaii knows well that this law violates both the spirit and letter of Bruen v. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, the Supreme Court’s 2022 landmark case on public carry. It just does not care.”
    As yet I know of no penalty for violating a court precedence? (I could be wrong.)
    But this was a violation of the 2A by all involved. Which does have a penalty.
    And could also come with a conspiracy charge as well. Which no one is willing to impose. But the violation of the court precedence is proof of intent.
    In the mean time.
    Maybe we need to make “tar & feathers” great again?

  6. They did this for a simple reason. Nothing of consequence will happen to them personally. A higher court may over rule them. But it won’t punish them. And they can still violate the Rights of citizens with impunity. Because there is no mechanism to punish politicians who do so.

  7. ” Posterior Luminosity”
    Yes, I remember the glow. More times than I can count. Or would care to.
    But I’m of the mind that these be adults (in age anyway) that were talking about.
    So it would at this point seem more fitting to literally “hold their feet to the fire”?
    Just once, please?!?!?!

Comments are closed.