A FORMER Civil Rights Division Attorney

Posted on by

Quote of the Day

The Civil Rights Division’s new focus on the Second Amendment, which is far outside its longstanding mission, is moving us even further away from our nation’s commitment to protecting all Americans’ civil rights.

Stacey Young
A former Civil Rights Division attorney.
November 25, 2025
US Justice Department plans gun rights office within civil rights unit | Reuters

Is she so “tone deaf” she cannot even hear her own words? She contradicts herself in a single sentence. How can the Civil Rights Division be moving away from protecting “all Americans’ civil rights” by protecting a civil right they have never protected in the past?

I would also like to point out the article authors don’t mention the contradiction either.

This is mental illness and/or a deliberate intent of manipulation.

I would like to emphasize the “former” in her title. She richly deserves it.

Share

10 thoughts on “A FORMER Civil Rights Division Attorney”

  1. Look up her picture. Another bitter and prune faced product of the liberal establishment. She exudes her false sense of intellectual superiority in her pictures. She isn’t tone deaf. She is convinced she is the smartest person in the room.

  2. The new Civil Rights division needs have a process for any new gun laws in states that have been serial abusers of the 2A. The old Civil Rights division had this for serial abusers of voting rights. I suggest MA, NY, MD, IL, CO, WA, OR, CA, DE, NJ, CN, RI. May have to add VA soon.

  3. It’s the right that protects all the others – as well as those not specifically named in the BOR.

    I refer you to the British subject who, upon return to the UK, was arrested for posting a picture of himself holding a firearm while on a visit to the US. No threatening speech, simply engaging in an activity completely legal to residents, and guests, of the US.

    https://metro.co.uk/2025/11/29/british-man-arrested-posing-gun-us-instagram-post-24963842/

    Spoiler alert: they dropped the charges prior to his court date, but the fact that it got that far is absolutely chilling.

  4. It appears the operative term for her is “former”…as she certainly has no business being a part of the Federal government with that attitude…

  5. Pingback: Instapundit » Blog Archive » IDIOT.  OUR GUNS ARE THE ULTIMATE ASSURANCE OF OUR CIVIL RIGHTS:  A FORMER Civil Rights Division

  6. It springs from a sincere, if horrible, belief that owning guns is a malum in se crime. Indeed, the worstest of crimes; an act of treason against civilization itself. So laws that legalize gun ownership are evil laws, as badWrong as the legalized ownership of slaves in the antebellum South or the legalized shipment of Jews to extermination camps in Nazi Germany. And so it is utterly wicked and malicious to treat gun ownership as a civil right. Instead, it is a blow for Great Justice to somehow, by whatever means necessary, reinterpret the 2nd Amendment and the Constitution so that gun ownership as not being a civil right.

    In the eyes of her and her ilk, Americans have an important, fundamental civil right to not be entrapped into committing the horrid crime of owning guns.

  7. The weird thing about gun control psychopaths is that although their aims are Rousseauan–throw away a working imperfect system for a utopian solution that is almost certainly going to fail–they have created an entirely mythical Lockean justification for their sick fetishes.

    For them, the single most important, and most beautiful, moment in American history was George Washington putting down the Whiskey Rebellion. For a normal human being with a conscience, the WR was an unfortunate event that served to illustrate that even the greatest events in history, such as the American Revolution, weren’t completely without negative results. But if you look at their writings, the crushing of the WR was the one shining light that came out of the morally unimportant ugliness that constituted the American Revolution.

    David Frum has said that Athens banned weapons in public, and so we should as well. (God, I wish that parasite had the balls to try). Of course Athens also considered the molestation of young adolescent boys a critical part of male development; looking at him, Frum would probably be okay with that as well.

  8. A weird thing about most gun laws is that they primarily affect “no victim” acts.
    Who is damaged by someone carrying an eleven round magazine? Or bringing a holstered pistol into the library? Or owning an automatic weapon?

    • The answer is simple: it threatens those who want to do things to us they can’t do so long as we remain (adequately) armed.

Comments are closed.