Quote of the Day
The injunction is significant—not only for its immediate protection of NRA members but also for the precedent it sets in reining in agency overreach. Beyond striking down a single rule, the ruling reasserts a fundamental principle: that the power to make or change laws lies with Congress, not unelected bureaucrats.
For the firearm community, Butler v. Bondi is more than a courtroom win. It is a reaffirmation that the boundaries of federal power must be respected, and that constitutional rights cannot be redefined by agency decree.
Susanne Edward
October 13, 2025
Judges Rules Against Another Biden-Era Policy | An Official Journal Of The NRA
This is good, but it reminds me of something else I want the gun rights organizations to work on… How does anyone believe the 2nd Amendment allows restrictions on interstate sales of firearms? Why can’t someone in California legally buy a gun in Oregon or Nevada without it being shipped to a California FFL?
It is not that I think the interstate sales restrictions should be a higher priority than semi-auto rifle bans, standard capacity magazine bans, and the “sensitive places” B.S. But it should be on the radar.
Also, in an era of President Trump pushing the envelope with executive orders, this precedent will be interesting in its application to recent events.
The interstate sales prohibition appears to be statute rather than regulation.
18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(3)