Mostly this is confirmation of what we already knew:
In this study, we formally examine the association between penis size dissatisfaction and gun ownership in America. The primary hypothesis, derived from the psychosexual theory of gun ownership, asserts that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises will be more likely to personally own guns. To test this hypothesis, we used data collected from the 2023 Masculinity, Sexual Health, and Politics (MSHAP) survey, a national probability sample of 1,840 men, and regression analyses to model personal gun ownership as a function of penis size dissatisfaction, experiences with penis enlargement, social desirability, masculinity, body mass, mental health, and a range of sociodemographic characteristics. We find that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises are less likely to personally own guns across outcomes, including any gun ownership, military-style rifle ownership, and total number of guns owned. The inverse association between penis size dissatisfaction and gun ownership is linear; however, the association is weakest among men ages 60 and older. With these findings in mind, we failed to observe any differences in personal gun ownership between men who have and have not attempted penis enlargement. To our knowledge, this is the first study to formally examine the association between penis size and personal gun ownership in America. Our findings fail to support the psychosexual theory of gun ownership. Alternative theories are posited for the apparent inverse association between penis size dissatisfaction and personal gun ownership, including higher levels of testosterone and constructionist explanations.
There is something new in here. There is an inverse relationship that is useful for us to use. It IS projection:
men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises are less likely to personally own guns across outcomes, including any gun ownership, military-style rifle ownership, and total number of guns owned.
See also:
Considering that my first rifle was a gift at age 6, and I bought my first shotgun at age 12 – when I barely even was aware of that appendage – I can provide at least one data point that denies any causal relationship between the size of my stick and my acquisition of boomsticks.
Why does it matter what size wang you got?
As long as your wife is happy with it, who cares?
We should look at Markley Mondays as a totally vain attempt by communists to use Sal Alinsky’s ridicule factor on us.
It’s truly a wonderful in-dic-cator of how moronic and brainwashed your enemy of humanity is.
Like Alison Airies at the top of the page. It’s a good reminder of who they are.
There has to be something totally Freudian about communist’s always out looking for the big dick?
That and this proves conclusively research groups have way too much money.
Working backwards we can hypothesize that inadequate tallywhackers are probably endemic among gun grabbers, gun control is form of penis envy.
Well, if they can’t/don’t have them, it’s offensive to them for anyone else to.
On either subject.
Wow, so much for the ‘compensating’ argument! If anything, the data seems to suggest that dissatisfaction might correlate with avoidance rather than overcompensation.
Pingback: Lame and Sad | The View From North Central Idaho