One Lawsuit at a Time

Posted on by

We are on a path to concealed carry any state we want to visit:

Federal Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction In Challenge To California’s Non-Resident Concealed Carry Ban (msn.com)

A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction in favor of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners, challenging California’s prohibition on non-resident concealed carry permits. U.S. District Court Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett, appointed by President Joe Biden in 2022, partially granted the motion for preliminary injunction, setting the stage for further legal proceedings.

Even a Biden appointed judge admits we have the constitution on our side!

See also SAF SCORES VICTORY IN CALIFORNIA NON-RESIDENT CARRY CASE.

We are making progress… one lawsuit at a time.

Share

9 thoughts on “One Lawsuit at a Time”

  1. Is this a positive result? Yes. Will out of staters be carrying legally in Kali? Not in my lifetime, probably not in yours. And if by some miracle Kali is forced to issue non resident CCW’s you will be stupefied by the hoops that will be put in place in order to get a permit. The process for a resident is onerous and expensive. For a non resident it will be insane. And that will be deliberate. Very very deliberate.

  2. Its important to note that one of the elements of granting a PI is that the party moving for it has the likelihood that they will prevail on the merits — meaning ultimately win the case. This means that the judge has just ruled that CA will most likely lose.

  3. Why not grant it? It ain’t like half the state isn’t carrying already. And most of those being criminals.
    If you live in Kali and your not packing already? Your afraid to be a criminal? Your missing the point.
    That’s all Gruesome Newsome and Co. want to live there.
    Criminal or victim. You decide.
    Carry permit? HAHAHAHAHA! Oh please.
    Let’s hope SAF can get it done. I’ll remain dubious, and outside that particular shithole till they give us the thumbs up.

  4. This case, being 9th Circuit, will have implications in Oregon as well.

    Oregon issues non-resident CHLs, but previously non-residents were “may-issue” (which “should have been” invalidated by Bruen?), and the only non-residents who could apply had to be residents of states which share a border with Oregon (Washington, Idaho, Nevada, and California). Residents of all other states could not apply.

    If this case succeeds, that “should” require Oregon to open non-resident CHLs — which “should” now be shall-issue, per Bruen — to residents of all 49 other States, plus D.C.

    I’ll be interested to see what the Governor and her Attorney General come up with to try and justify maintaining no-issue for 45 States plus D.C.

    • I have an Oregon CHL. The only county that would issue me one was Grant County. I had to apply (and renew) in person. That is a seven hour drive each way.

      I hope they get their act together before I have to renew again in 2027.

  5. CCW licenses are well and good but how about the district judge in Kansas who just ruled that MGs are 2nd Amend protected weapons? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    • He will be overruled…..soon. A ruling that’s fun to watch for the consternation it will create ultimately the power brokers aren’t going to allow the legal carry of full auto by us peons.

  6. Denying permits is so 20th Century. The new hotness on the left is making everything a gun free zone.

Comments are closed.