It is a Start

Judge Orders Election Re-Do After Democrats Commit Voter Fraud

Ajudge has overturned a Democratic primary race in a Connecticut town after video evidence allegedly showed the incumbent mayor, Joe Ganim, cheating.

Ganim was initially trailing his opponent, John Gomes, but suddenly gained votes after absentee ballots were counted.

“The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the results of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary,” Clark ruled.

“The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties” Clark pressed.

It is noted that Ganim was previously convicted of corruption but was re-elected after serving his sentence.

It was just a primary between two Democrats so perhaps the judge figured he wouldn’t get assassinated if he threw out an election because of fraud. Had a judge done this for a critical state in the Biden v. Trump election it could mean his life would never be the same again. I suspect this sort of thinking contributed to some of the legal avoidance in the 2020 precedential election.

But, this election getting appropriate legal attention could make it easier for a more significant election to get appropriate attention as well.

What I don’t understand is even though the fraud was clear the candidate is still allowed to run for office rather than being unable to serve due to a long term commitment to a small room with metal bars for a door:

The judge called for a new primary race while the general election is still planned with Ganim as the Democratic nominee and Gomes as an independent candidate.


5 thoughts on “It is a Start

  1. “The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties” Clark pressed.
    Ya, that was the sentiment of the 2020 election. And to this day even the republicans refuse to talk about it. Let alone address that fraud we saw with our own eyes.
    And yet they would have us going about as business in usual, acting as if at worst it was just a one-off fraud to remove Trump. And after all the communists promised they would never do it again, didn’t they?
    81 million votes for Sloppy Joe?
    And yet not even the SCOTUS would touch it.
    Saying the “fix is in”, or that the “elections are rigged”. Somehow seems lacking as a descriptor.
    And only proves that our forefather’s thoughts on democracy were well founded.
    Mobcracy indeed!

  2. The fraud may have been clear..,but was it clear that the candidate solicited/induced/perpetrated the fraud?

    • Understood. But I would have thought an immediate investigation would have been initiated with the candidate being the prime suspect.

  3. I was arguing, back in 2017 and 2018, that we needed a fall guy. We needed a Republican, running for office, to cheat so badly that Democrats would scream to high heaven for election integrity.

    It didn’t happen. I wish it had.

    • It wouldn’t matter. Election integrity is only important to losers.

      What does the scoreboard say, ese?

Comments are closed.