There is absolutely no reason at all for anyone to buy an assault weapon. These high power firearms have one sole purpose — to commit mass murder.
U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez
January 19, 2019
Gun control push is back in Washington, and N.J. lawmakers are all in
[Interesting. Since there are tens of millions of these guns in circulation in the U.S. and only about 400 murders committed each year with rifles of all types we have a limited number of possible conclusions:
- Those tens of millions of “assault weapons” are almost all being misused for peaceful purposes.
- Menendez is lying.
- Menendez is living in an alternate universe.
I’m going with #2 with the added extrapolation that he probably has evil intentions as his motivation to pursue this legislation.—Joe]
Is Menendez also alleging that our police and military carry them for their one sole purpose?
He’s hoping. He really is.
He just think they’ll be at his bidding, not the firing squad a just universe would have him facing after a speedy and public trial for his offences and violation of his oath of office.
Yeah: why shouldn’t such an open display of hostility toward the Bill of Rights be considered grounds for immediate removal from public office?
I don’t know about the firing squad bit, but automatic and immediate removal from office would certainly be the minimum reasonable response. Let’s call it a “Common Sense Solution”.
If that were implemented, of course there would be few if any politicians or other public office holders remaining. Not that it would be a bad thing. Just sayin’.
You don’t think he deserves a firing squad? Ok, I’d settle for a good hanging for him. The rope can be reused for a number of his colleagues who are equally corrupt and treasonous. Waste not, want not.
Is this Yazidi woman carrying an assault weapon for its one sole purpose?
Yes, if, as Menendez does, you identify with and make common cause with the men who would rape and beat and murder her for being independent and insisting on her dignity and liberty.
While we’re making broad generalizations: the only reason for becoming a US senator is to line your own pockets and enslave those who don’t agree with you. Which is more and more the reason to own battle rifles.
As Dr. Hupp states.
People like me need them to protect them from people like you.
That’s a pretty good reason you Commie bastard.
I have an alternative hypothesis. Perhaps The Senator is being absolutely honest. It is possible that when he thinks about semi-automatic varmint guns the only thing he can imagine is killing people. He visualizes the gun in his hand and can only possibly visualize himself murdering people. No other use for a gun comes to mind.
It is very possible that he is crazy.
“Accuse others of what you do”, being a standard leftist operating procedure, can readily be interpreted as “Accuse others of thinking like you think”.
Here is a short list for example (there are MANY other examples besides);
–In 1865, a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President
of the United States .
–In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield,
President of the United States – who later died from the
–In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John
F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
–In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald
Ford, President of the United States.
–In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald
Reagan, President of the United States.
–In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and
killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
–In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and
killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
–In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed
10 people at a GMAC office.
–In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and
killed 23 people in a Luby’s cafeteria in Killeen , TX.
–In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot
and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
–In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and
killed 8 people at a church service.
–In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the
White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush,
President of the US.
–In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and
killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
–In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung – Hui Cho, shot
and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
–In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee
Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Gifford and killed 6 others.
–In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into
a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
–In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and
killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
–In 2013, a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and
killed 26 people in a school in Newtown, CT.
–In Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
–As recently as 2016, an angry Democrat attacked and shot up a
Republican Congressional baseball practice in D.C.,
wounding US Congressman Steve Scalise.
Do we need “gun control” then, or “leftist control”? Clearly, the U.S. constitution is anti-leftist and pro gun, so…
However; we should be very careful not to make this a party distinction, being as the Republican Party has been largely infiltrated by leftists.
I’ve wanted to vote for liberty, but in all my life I’ve never found it on the ballot. It’s simply not an option in the thinking of either party. Neither would ever stand for it, in fact, and would do everything in their considerable power to prevent its implementation.
January 19 2019 Houston Texas.
Home owner uses an AK to drive off a 4 man home invasion bunglary killing 3.
March 28 2017 Broken Arrow Oklahoma
Teen at home uses an AR-15 to drive off 3 man home invasion bunglary, killing all of them.
November 5 2017 Sutherland Springs Texas
Neighbor Stephen Willeford hears the shooting at the local church and uses an AR-15 to shoot the deadhead and stop any further mayhem.
Self Defense, including multiple justifiable homicides, which by definition isn’t murder, all these times using a proggie demoncrap dreaded “assault weapon”.
Looks to me like these types of rifles are extremely suitable for giving crims exactly what they’ve asked for. Which seems to be something that Menendez isn’t happy about.
So, I think I can figure out whose side Menendez and the rest of the demoncraps are on, and it isn’t on the side of decent law abiding U.S. citizens.
If you liked underage girls as much as Bob MENENDEZ, you wouldn’t want their fathers to have ‘assault rifles’ either.
Yeah, well, someday I may have to commit mass self defense, so piss off, Bob.