Gun control glamor

Stunning photo:

And high praise:

Still on guard

Gun-control advocate keeps up the fight 16 years after Montreal massacre

TORONTO — Wendy Cukier didn’t stand by and weep for the 14 young women who were murdered by a lone gunman on Dec. 6, 1989, in Montreal.

Instead, she formulated a plan to eradicate the use of illegal firearms, and has been working tirelessly towards that goal ever since.

The Ryerson professor, and founder and president of the Coalition for Gun Control, was lauded for her initiative 14 years ago when she was one of 10 winners at the Sun Media’s annual Women on the Move celebration in Toronto.

Today, Cukier is still a prof at Ryerson, as well as an associate dean of its business school, which is the largest business undergraduate school in Canada.

And she’s still involved in gun-control issues.

Cukier, mother to a 17-year-old daughter, says there’s still a lot of work to do in light of all the gunplay Toronto is witnessing.

“It’s important to continue the fight and ensure gun legislations that have been implemented are properly enforced, and not watered down,” says Cukier.

“It’s clear you can strengthen the laws in your own country, but if you are next to a country with as many guns as people and no effective gun control, you remain vulnerable,” she adds.

Currently, the dynamic activist is doing a lot of work at the United Nations level trying to establish international standards.

“Canada is often recognized as a model for other countries – they think we’ve done a good job. Amnesty International recognizes Canada’s gun laws as a model for preventing violence against women with guns,” says Cukier.

And even though there has been an increase in homicides by guns in Toronto this year, the death and injury rate by guns in Canada is at the lowest it’s ever been.

“Gang-related murders are definitely a problem and shows there is more work to do. Yet murders of women with guns is down 75%,” she adds.

“The big thing is, even though it’s been 16 years since the Montreal massacre, we’re still having to fight very hard to preserve the gains we’ve won,” says the author of The Global Gun Epidemic: From Saturday Night Specials to AK-47s.

“The gun lobby is fighting every step of the way and my message is for people … to speak out. Victims of violence and police officers are trying to get the attention of our politicians, but if the public doesn’t get engaged in the solution, then they become part of the problem.”

No mention of what really is important–the overall death and injury rate in Canada since they implement their “model” gun control.  Further questions include “How many people were injured or killed because they didn’t have the appropriate tool to defend themselves?”  And “Would the nearly two billion dollars spent on the failed gun registry have been better spent on more police officers, equipment, and prisons?”

And finally, “Has this paper ever given a pro-freedom advocate high praise similar to what they give this anti-freedom advocate?”

2 thoughts on “Gun control glamor

  1. Ms. Cukier as lobbiest (paid via government grants to the organizations she represents) has done little to address the real problem with regard violence against women in our society. She has accomblish two things however. One she has successfully lobbied the government to divert over $2 billion dollars away from the criminal justice and social support systems, leaving many police departments and social agenices under funded and under resourced.

    Second, she has made it far more difficult for the elderly, and the weakest members of Canadian society to defend themselves against those that would harm them.

    Her misguided efforts to promote her own agenda has only served to mask one of the most brutal terrorist attacks in Canada by a radical Muslin Gamil Gharbi, who murdered 14 women in Montreal in 1989.

    Shame is the only comment worthy of her actions.

  2. Ms. Cukier as lobbiest (paid via government grants to the organizations she represents) has done little to address the real problem with regard violence against women in our society. She has accomblish two things however. One she has successfully lobbied the government to divert over $2 billion dollars away from the criminal justice and social support systems, leaving many police departments and social agenices under funded and under resourced.

    Second, she has made it far more difficult for the elderly, and the weakest members of Canadian society to defend themselves against those that would harm them.

    Her misguided efforts to promote her own agenda has only served to mask one of the most brutal terrorist attacks in Canada by a radical Muslin Gamil Gharbi, who murdered 14 women in Montreal in 1989.

    Shame is the only comment worthy of her actions.

Comments are closed.