I review my Sitemeter referrals fairly frequently but today I got too much information:
| Domain Name | (Unknown) | |||||||||||||||||||
| IP Address | 63.241.190.# (AT&T MFS-NB 2.0– Mesa, AZ – Trial) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ISP | CERFnet | |||||||||||||||||||
| Location |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Language | English (U.S.) en-us | |||||||||||||||||||
| Operating System | Microsoft WinXP | |||||||||||||||||||
| Browser | Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Javascript | version 1.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Monitor |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Time of Visit | Sep 26 2008 11:35:03 am | |||||||||||||||||||
| Last Page View | Sep 26 2008 11:35:03 am | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visit Length | 0 seconds | |||||||||||||||||||
| Page Views | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Referring URL | http://search.msn.co… 2 fingers in rectum | |||||||||||||||||||
| Search Engine | search.msn.com | |||||||||||||||||||
| Search Words | electrical 2 fingers in rectum | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visit Entry Page | http://blog.joehuffm…aspx?date=2007-08-13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visit Exit Page | http://blog.joehuffm…aspx?date=2007-08-13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Out Click | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Time Zone | UTC-8:00 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visitor’s Time | Sep 26 2008 11:35:03 am | |||||||||||||||||||
| Visit Number | 360,904 |
I’ll be busy with lots of other things today trying to get that image out of my mind.
The only motivation for the above web search I can think of is there that must be a shortage of sheep in Mesa.
AKA “the shocker” or “two in the pink, one in the stink”. there is a version that’s two and two; they’re probably looking for the name of that version.
You aren’t helping me get the image out of my mind!
Maybe it’s just a new rock band.
(O_O)
I… no… there are no words that describe my reaction. Obviously MSN search still has a few tweaks.
*glitches. Still has a few glitches.
I don’t see anything wrong with the search engine. If you look at the post it found it was entirely appropriate for the search terms used. I just have a rather negative psychological reaction to contemplation of that type of “stimulation”.
I think it’s a term oft used to describe a session of Congress.
I think I could use some mental bleach about now…