@ATFHQ words have meaning

Earlier today I saw this Tweet from @ATFHQ:

PHOTO: ATF & local partners take 73 illegal firearms off the streets of Bridgeport and New Haven CT.

GunsOnStreets

The first thing that crossed my mind is that if those guns had been lying around on the streets near where I lived I would have been happy to pick them up without charge.

But that’s not what they meant by “firearms off the streets”. They actually forcibly took them from the people in possession of them.

The deceptive wording of taking them “off the streets” is intentional and serves a political purpose. Imagine the different political implications if were true and they instead said they took the “guns away from gangs.” Or they took the “guns away from violent felons.” Or they took the “guns away from white trash.” Or they took the “guns away from African-Americans.” Or they took the “guns away from Tea Baggers.” Or they took the “guns away from Jews.”

Some of those actions would not get a rise out of me. Others would have me calling for them to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Sure, Twitter isn’t an environment where the nuance of the operation can be explained. But even in their press release it is ambiguous how many of those guns were in the possession of violent felons when they took them:

The operation, headed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), resulted in the seizure of more than 73 illegal firearms and is expected to result in the prosecution of 154 individuals on federal or state charges.

By their own words not all of those people could have been illegally in possession of firearms.

And look at the resources invested to get just 73 firearms “off the streets”:

In March 2014, the ATF and the Bridgeport and New Haven Police Departments launched “Operation Samson” a multi-layered initiative targeting violent criminals and illegal firearm possession and firearm trafficking in New Haven and Bridgeport. As part of the initiative, approximately 40 ATF special agents and personnel from Connecticut and across the country were deployed with New Haven and Bridgeport Police to conduct numerous covert operations. The combined law enforcement team brought a range of expertise to the operation, including tactical, technical, analytical, undercover skills and supervisory experience.

Several other federal, state and local law enforcement agencies supported the initiative as investigations expanded into other cities and towns in Connecticut and across state lines.

The initiative employed intelligence-led policing to determine where to place resources in order to have the greatest impact. During Operation Samson, law enforcement personnel conducted approximately 425 operations, which included undercover meetings, controlled purchases of firearms and narcotics, and the execution of search and arrest warrants. As a result, a total of 80 individuals have been charged, or are expected to be charged, with a variety of federal firearms, narcotics and robbery violations.

40 ATF people, plus local cops, executed 425 operations over the course of three months to confiscate 73 guns? Assuming those guns were taken from violent gangs how long do you think it takes for the gangs to replace them? Maybe a week? Or is a day more realistic?

Another thing that pushed a button for me was what the U.S. Prosecutor said:

There is no higher calling in law enforcement than preventing violent crime,” stated U.S. Attorney Deirdre M. Daly.

Perhaps she would understand my concern if the force of government were to be used to prevent her from committing an act of prostitution or adultery by requiring she wear a chastity belt remotely controlled by government morality officers. Government has no business preventing crime through the arrest and prosecution of people when there are no victims. They should only be allowed to punish those who have victimized others.

But most importantly who were those guns really taken from? They don’t really say. The words they use appear to be deliberately ambiguous. Were these firearms taken from people who had not victimized anyone?

Taking guns “off the street” is deliberately deceptive. It makes it easy for everyone to be accepting of what may be totally inappropriate behavior. We shouldn’t let them get away with it. Make them be specific about their actions so people can better judge their actions and hold them accountable.

3 thoughts on “@ATFHQ words have meaning

  1. friends:

    “prevent” crime. take them off the streets and put them in your gun safe, or on your night stand.

    buy guns. buy ammo. become proficient in the use of your gun. develop the mind set to have it available, and to use it, in the protection of your liberty, your right, and your ancient standing as the font from which all political power in this country flows.

    the assholes do not rule us because we are subject to them, the assholes occupy offices and positions from which the power they exercise flows from us, by our express authorization and delegation.

    if one of them shows up on your doorstep without due process or notice and seeks to exercise tyranny, shoot him or her on the spot. be ready in your mind, and understand why your actions are moral and legal before it happens, so that there will be no hesitation on your part.

    john jay
    136 s.e. 8th avenue
    milton freewater, oregon 97862 usa

  2. This one stuck out to me;
    “…which included undercover meetings, controlled purchases of firearms and narcotics…”

    So, as happens regularly now, they staged some “illegal” doings, and then busted the people they had encouraged to break laws. Another variation on Fast & Furious. Oh goody. “If one does not have enough criminals, one makes them…”

    This is nothing but a desperate struggle for relevance (and funding), and an excuse to act out on someone’s will to disarm America. The are tools. The BATFE is a wholly criminal organization and should be disbanded at the earliest opportunity.

  3. Pingback: SayUncle » Embellishment at ATF

Comments are closed.