Truth destroys their agenda

The headline is 40 Armed Gun Advocates Intimidate Mothers Against Gun Violence In A Restaurant Parking Lot.

The picture is:

Viewpoint0

The text starts out as :

On Saturday, nearly 40 armed men, women, and children waited outside a Dallas, Texas area restaurant to protest a membership meeting for the state chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, a gun safety advocacy group formed in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

According to a spokeswoman for Moms Demand Action (MDA), the moms were inside the Blue Mesa Grill when members of Open Carry Texas (OCT) — an open carry advocacy group — “pull[ed] up in the parking lot and start[ed] getting guns out of their trunks.” The group then waited in the parking lot for the four MDA members to come out. The spokeswoman said that the restaurant manager did not want to call 911, for fear of “inciting a riot” and waited for the gun advocates to leave. The group moved to a nearby Hooters after approximately two hours.

The reality is:

Viewpoint1

Because the truth destroys their agenda.

H/T to Linoge.

24 thoughts on “Truth destroys their agenda

    • Why dont they take care of their children and not let them sit in front of these video games (call of duty) for 15hrs at a time then maybe these children wouldnt become anti-social and disconnected with society. Its not rocket science people. When I was growing you never heard of such a thing of children killing children. These video games and I-phones are disconnecting our children with society. Kick your damn kids off the computer and video games and make them go outside and play. GUNS DONT KILL PEOPLE THEY PROTECT THEM……….ITS THE PEOPLE USING THE GUNS THAT KILL PEOPLE.

      • As popular as video games are, we’d have a lot more mass shootings if they were the cause. Don’t fall into the same trap as the antis.

        The only entity to blame for mass shootings are the mass shooters themselves — and the media that portrays them as troubled, brooding antiheroes instead of the pathetic losers they really are.

  1. I think it’s particularly interesting that in a state the size of Texas, the state chapter of MILFs (Mother’s in a Liberal Fog) includes only four members.

    • My first thought, too. A “scheduled meeting” draws four people. A photo op brings 40 gunnies. Hmmm…one wonders where the grass really has its roots…

  2. If the Moms were getting more action, maybe they wouldn’t be so concerned with my gun (we all know what it’s a substitute for, right?). Remember Dr. Joe’s Cure for Everything.

    • Are you volunteering? Not me. These people are almost always very unhappy and unpleasant to be around. Maybe a few treatments would cure them but they probably couldn’t afford to pay me enough.

  3. Pingback: SayUncle » Think progress v. reality

  4. These mothers moved to Hooters? I don’t know why, but I would have assumed they were against Hooters, too.

  5. The so-called leader of that “herd” – Shannon Watts – was just on with that moron Ed Schultz on MSNBC spewing her vitrol and hate for the 2nd Amendment and America in particular with downright lies…showing exactly the same side picture of the gun group….liars every single one of them

    • She actually lives in the next town over from me, which is pathologically yuppified anyway, but I thought some OC there might provide some headgasket blowing amusement.

  6. “Moms Demand Authoritarianism” (MDA)

    There; fixed it. Now it’s clear and honest, though “Mothers Demand Forced Helplessness” (MDFH), or “Moms Opposed to Liberty” (MOL) would work also, as would “Moms Hate Liberty” (MHL), “Moms Hate Humanity (MHH), “Moms Hate America” (MHA), “Moms Against Human Rights” (MAHR), “Mothers Against the Constitution” (MAC), “Mothers Against American Principles” (MAAP), “Moms Against America (MAA), “Communist Moms Against America” (CMAA), “Mothers Against the Principles of Liberty (MAPL), or “Mothers At War With America” (MAWWA), etc. “Gals For Gangs” (GFG) or “Females Advocating Gangsterism” (FAG) would work too, but they’re maybe a bit less clear or direct.

  7. Pingback: Now, see, this is funny. | The Ultimate Answer to Kings

  8. Pingback: Larwyn’s Linx: Study: IRS suppression of Tea Party swung 2012 election | Preppers Universe

  9. I was kinda wondering about carrying long guns instead of signs spelling out the major fails of the Moms Hate Self-Reliance group. Dealing with people like that, you’ve got to hit them where they live: high-sounding language and higher dudgeon. Bearing arms just gives them an excuse to pull I’m-so-scared nonsense.

    (Alas, Texas, where only long guns may be openly borne — that’s a law they need lobby against with the same fervor as they take on Shannon Watts band of paranoids.)

  10. Pingback: What media bias? | The View From North Central Idaho

Comments are closed.