If only the politicians and the reporters would be factual and accurate we could have a rational discussion on the topic. But expecting people to be rational is irrational.
I’m probably jousting with windmills again.
Subject: Re: Assault weapons ban back in play.
From: Joe Huffman
Date: Tue, February 10, 2004 0:17
I just read your February 9th article:
I would like to point out some errors for your future reference:
1) There is no such thing as “automatic ammunition clips”. You probably
are referring to a “magazine” which is commonly, and mistakenly, called a
clip. The law does refer to a “detachable magazine”. And this detachable
magazine is required for it to be an “assault weapon”, not one of two
features from the list. See
http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/laws/majorlaw/h3355_en.htm for more
2) You make reference “the banned AR-15 assault rifle”. Again there is no
such thing. An “assault rifle” is a fully automatic rifle. The AR-15 is
a semi-automatic firearm. See
for more details.
3) Feinstein and Schumer pick their words very carefully to avoid lying
but yet be deceptive. The “guns recovered from crimes” is not the same as
what is implied in your article. These are not guns that were used to
commit crimes because it includes guns that were recovered stolen
property. The “assault weapons”, as defined by Federal law are used in a
such a small portion of crimes that any measurable reduction in crime by
their complete removal from the planet would be lost in the noise of year
to year fluctuations. The politicians pushing the “assault weapon ban”
know this and are careful to avoid the topic.
See also: http://www.clintongunban.com/
Senior Research Scientist II
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
NRA Certified Firearms Instructor