# Sunday, November 30, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 30, 2008 9:44:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Home Life )

James and Kim just had lunch there this weekend. Barb and I go there fairly frequently but it's going to be a while before we go back. I took these pictures this morning about 0800 at the University Mall in Moscow Idaho:

And before someone asks, I haven't been within 30 miles of my chemistry set since Thursday evening.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 30, 2008 4:28:34 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Bloggers | Gun Fun )

Cool! I am especially thrilled with all the tall good-looking women (RobertaX, Tamara, and Brigid) I get to hang out with and help save the world.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 30, 2008 4:18:20 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Quote of the Day )

Liberals absolutely cannot deal with facts. Cannot weigh evidence. In a place far away geographically and in the past a liberal would not believe me, and stood up, and was cut in half by NVA machine gun fire. This poor fools last words prior to committing suicide was "...they won't shoot at us if we wave to them."

Terry
November 26, 2008
From a comment to Kevin's Quote of The Day for November 26, 2008
[I could have pulled quotes from the comments for my collection for an hour and it was inspiration for a future post that I would spend several hours writing if I ever get around to it. There was some really good stuff in there.--Joe]

# Saturday, November 29, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 29, 2008 10:49:53 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Work )

If you have a cell phone and it is turned on your cell phone company knows where it is within a few hundred yards. If the government wants this data from the provider it generally (emergency exemptions apparently exist) has to get a court order.

However, the FBI has the technology to trigger phones into giving up their serial numbers and their phone numbers. This does not require a court order! Currently they use a van to drive around town and try to find their target. But that doesn't have to be the way they always do it. All they have to do is put this technology on major travel routes and in travel hubs and they can do a pretty good job of tracking a large proportion of the population. If they put up their own devices on most of cell towers around the country they can track every active cell phone in the country.

I write software for mobile phones for Microsoft and it is rare that a day goes by where we don't talk about and implement privacy protections for the customer and now I find out the Federal Government is actively working to defeat us.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 29, 2008 9:10:25 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun )

I said I was going to a bowling pin match yesterday.

Only three people showed up in the cold and the rain. I was the only one who had ever actually shot at a bowling pin match before and that was probably 10 years ago. We didn't exactly remember the rules and some of the things we did we knew were "not according to spec". For example we always drew from a holster with a starting position of wrist above our shoulders.

Also, the plan was to have a little bit of money riding on the results. We didn't do that.

After doing the five pins in any order pretty much as the game is usually played we messed around with other things.

The results were:

5 pin first stage
Joe 7.55 7.40 8.91 Total: 14.95
Mike 17.09 8.74 6.11 Total: 14.85
Roger(winner) 7.41 16.40 7.08 Total: 14.49

5 pin second stage
Joe 8.87 8.95 9.00 Total: 17.82
Mike(winner) 5.75 7.22 8.73 Total: 12.97
Roger 8.77 6.54 12.65 Total: 15.31

10 pin (arranged like in a bowling alley)
Joe(winner) 9.25 8.21 19.78 Total: 17.46
Mike 11.08 8.31 11.34 Total: 19.39
Roger 13.94 15.18 14.59 Total: 28.53

Inside Out 7 pin (7 pins in a line, but you had to shoot the standing pin in the middle then work your way out)
Joe 12.17 +1 = 13.17 (I got a 1 second penalty for shooting one pin out of order)
Mike(winner) 10.32
Roger 14.65

Inside Out 5 pin (5 pins in a line, but you had to shoot the standing pin in the middle then work your way out)
Joe 12.11
Mike(winner) 6.46
Roger 9.08

Outside In 7 pin (7 pins in a line, but you had to shoot the standing pins in the ends first then work your way in)
Joe 9.65
Mike(winner) 7.83
Roger 10.92

Shoot one, skip one 7 pin (7 pins in a line, but you had to shoot every other standing pin from one end first then reverse it, repeating until all the pins were down or off the table)
Joe 11.92
Mike(winner) 11.33
Roger 21.33

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 29, 2008 8:43:38 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Politics )

Alan Korwin confronts them asking if the bias hadn't been there might have the presidental election gone the other way and they say:

Her answer: "No. Because the country was ready for change, you could just tell." Her husband Carl Leubsdorf, Washington Bureau Chief for the Dallas Morning News, agreed.

...

What does she read to get a sense of what people are thinking?

Her answer: "Daily Kos and The Huffington Post." She saw nothing unusual in this, adding, these are good places for finding story leads.

There is more. Take your blood pressure meds with you.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 29, 2008 7:34:14 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun | Home Life )

Xenia has them.

Also from Xenia is a set from Thanksgiving 1991 with the Huffman family. I especially like this one:

That is her first gun. It was given to her by her Grandpa Huffman who made it himself.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 29, 2008 7:02:47 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

As I proceeded further and further with my inquiry into the atrocities that had been committed on the people, I came across tales of Government’s tyranny and the arbitrary despotism of it’s officers such as I was hardly prepared for, and they filled me with deep pain. What surprised me then, and what still continues to fill me with surprise, was the fact that a province that had furnished the largest number of soldiers to the British Government during the war, should have taken all these brutal excesses lying down.

Mathatma Gandhi
An autobiography. The story of my experiments with Truth. There are many versions but I have this one.
[H/T to Ry who has the background on another, more famous quote, from Gandhi. Gandhi is no stranger to my QOTD posts either:

--Joe]

# Friday, November 28, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Friday, November 28, 2008 3:54:54 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun | Technology )

In a lot of ways it would take a lot of the fun out of long range shooting but I'd still buy a few rounds if I could get them "cheap". I'm sure even as mil-surplus they would be expensive enough I wouldn't be shooting a lot of these:

Darpa, the Defense Department's far-out research arm, announced a pair of contracts yesterday, to start designing a super, .50-caliber sniper rifle that fires guided bullets. Lockheed Martin recieved $12.3 million for the "EXACTO" (EXtreme ACcuracy Tasked Ordnance) project, while Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, LLC got another $9.5 million.

If the system works, it'll "provide a dramatic new capability to the U.S. military," Darpa says. "The use of an actively controlled bullet will make it possible to counter environmental effects such as crosswinds and air density, and prosecute both stationary and moving targets while enhancing shooter covertness. This capability would have the further benefit of providing increased accuracy and range while reducing training requirements."

And from the same article:

The agency has earmarked $7.5 million for a laser-guided bullet program. Darpa gave Lockheed $2 million for advanced sniper scopes that could boost kill rates by tenfold, or more. If the system works out as planned, it would actually allow snipers to remain virtually invisible, lost in the "heat haze" in between them and their targets. Our own David Hamling called the project the "next war's secret weapon."

By: Joe Huffman Friday, November 28, 2008 9:11:03 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

People get so caught up in their right to have a gun that they lose sight of what is important: Public safety.

I know there are some legitimate hunters who think they are allowed to have semi-automatic guns too. It is ridiculous to call yourself a sportsman if you need to use a semi-automatic gun. Each shot should be carefully calculated, not just haphazardly shot repeatedly in seconds in the approximate direction of an animal.

These guns, the ones that should never hit the streets, are getting into the hands of criminals and innocent people are dying. Why? Because guns get stolen.

In my opinion, there is no legitamate use for civilians to use a semi-automatic weapon.

Boyertown Berk Montgomery News
November 27, 2008
Gun restrictions are inevitable in today's violent climate
[Reading the article I kept thinking, "This could have been written by a sixth grader." I'm not surprised they didn't put their name on it. It was pathetic in organization, illogical, and obviously had no basis in fact. I guess he or she is just another bigot proselyting.--Joe]

# Thursday, November 27, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, November 27, 2008 10:46:45 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun )

I plan to attend a pistol match at the Lewiston Pistol Club outdoor range tomorrow (Friday). From organizer Mike Brown:

We're going to have a "Black Friday" bowling pin shoot for those of you who would rather shoot than shop. $1 a table, fastest time in each run gets the pot.

Just pistol. 1100 start.

Everyone who can play safe is welcome.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, November 27, 2008 8:42:39 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Quote of the Day )

A new generation of young people who have never heard of Ruby Ridge are now emerging from the public school system and are heading off to college and will thereafter begin their careers in business, education, journalism, government and other fields. This generation will find it hard to fathom that the federal government could have killed a boy and an unarmed woman and then tried to deceive everyone about what had actually occurred and, in some instances, rationalize what did occur. That is why it is important to remember Ruby Ridge. Someone needs to remind the young people (and everyone else) that it really did happen -- and that it will happen again if the government is not kept on a short leash. No one will learn about the incident when they tour the FBI facility in Washington. It goes unmentioned for some reason.

Timothy Lynch
August 21, 2002
Remember Ruby Ridge
[Read the whole thing if you don't understand why we are outraged.--Joe]

# Wednesday, November 26, 2008
By: Lyle at UltiMAK Wednesday, November 26, 2008 4:57:41 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun | Home Life | Technology )

I started buying guns during the Clinton years, simply because they were trying to ban them, but never thought much about hunting until my son was old enough to carry a youth-stocked shotgun in the field.  I took him through hunter safety and we'd gotten a few upland game birds together, but he was always interested in big game hunting.  Three years ago we bought him his own rifle, and the next day he'd gotten his first deer.  I'd gotten a deer tag here and there, and gone out a day or two some seasons, but it was never a big priority for me.  We went out with Joe once near his folks' place, which was really nice, but only managed to see one deer in full sprint, which makes for a lousy (and dangerous) shot.  No dice.  I did what I could to help Son get his deer or two each year, and the vicarious satisfaction was enough, I guess.

Not this year.  When I took Son to get his '08 deer tag, I decided to get one for myself-- for late muzzleloader season, and I meant it this time.  Fewer hunters in the field and the cooler weather of the late season appealed to me.  We'd selected the perfect site for a tree stand, just a short walk from our house on a steep hill covered by thick brush where humans rarely tread, and where the deer trails all seem to converge.  This is a choke point in their travel around the city of Palouse, along the Palouse river.  Son got a deer there last year, and had seen several deer almost every time he'd been up there.  Last year I sat in that tree and watched a doe with two fawns, sitting, chewing the cud, the young ones chasing a covey of quail, and just generally hanging out, for about an hour.  My tag was for buck only at that time, so I just sat there watching them, not 15 yards from me.  It's good to really blend into the environment now and then.  You see some amazing things.

This year I went out before dawn on the first day of the season, November 20th, with the caplock muzzleloader.  Some people use in-line muzzleloaders with substitute propellant pellets, modern sabots, shotgun primers, and scopes.  I don't quite understand the benefit.  A sidelock with the right load, standard percussion caps, using black powder which ignites more easily, can perform just as well at reasonable distances, and it's not as if these rifles are 300 yards hunting worthy.  I charged the rifle with powder and round ball with a lubricated patch before heading out of the house (a muzzleloader that is not primed is not considered "loaded").  A few yards from the house and I was out of the city limits.  Time to cap the nipple.  If I see a deer after about 15 minutes I can legally fire.

Nothing.  No other hunters and no deer.  I crawl through the brush and up the steep slope to the tree.  Tough going.  I'm winded.  I have a tendency to be afraid of heights.  Huffing and puffing, I start up the tree.  Too shaky.  Not safe.  Back to the ground.  I have to think; my hands aren't going to suddenly let go just because I'm a little winded.  Back up the tree (it's a hairy climb) to sit on the small stand.  I experience just a bit of vertigo for a minute, and then everything's fine.  The rifle was decapped and tied to some parachute cord at the ground, so I hoisted it up to the stand and capped it again.  I sat there for two hours as the sun came up and then, suddenly; nothing happened.  No prey was doing me the favor of walking in front of my extremely limited field of fire that day.  Tons of sign on the ground, but no luck.  Time to climb down and get ready for work.

Two days later, I went back up to the tree late in the day and sat there for an hour and a half.  Nothing.  Tons of fresh sign, but nothing.  I was thinking of climbing down and taking a hike along the river for about two miles.  Anywhere along that corridor there could be deer.  I wanted to act.  But no-- if I'm moving, the deer are infinitely more likely to detect my presence and high-tail it before I can get a shot.  If you're still, and your prey is moving, you have the advantage, especially if your prey is somewhat predictable.  These deer are predictable.  For sure, they'll be moving at dusk, which is right now.  The only questing is where.  But I should act-- he who hesitates is lost.  But haste makes waste.  But the early bird gets the worm.  Look before you leap.  There's no time like the present, tomorrow's another day, etc.. I was trying to think of more contradictory words of wisdom when I heard a rustling in the brush behind me.  Had to be a human or a large animal, no question.  A large doe appears from the brush, followed by more deer.  Who cares-- this one looks really good.  The muzzleloader tag is for a deer with either a 3-point minimum rack or antlerless.  I'm shooting for the table, not for trophies.

She's directly below me now, oblivious to my presence, walking fast.  I could have shot downward, through the spine and anchored her right there, but I'd rehearsed this in my mind many times and the picture was always of a side-on shot.  No matter, she's moving quickly, leading more deer up the hill to feed on the farmers' wheat.  It's a herd.  She's still oblivious.  Have to hurry.  I pull the trigger, thumb the hammer all the way back, release the trigger, and ease the hammer forward into full cock.  Silent cock-- rehearsed this hundreds of times.  It wouldn't have mattered because the deer were trundling through the brush making plenty of noise, but it's the way this was rehearsed.  Keep the trigger finger straight along the stock.  Can't touch this trigger.  Its pull is as light as some set triggers-- a pound or less.  I'd spent hours on it, messed it up, replaced the tumbler and sear, and started over.  Now the trigger pull is as light as you'd ever dare, even slightly dangerous, but this isn't a social rifle.  The charge has been in the barrel for over 48 hours, it came in from the cold last time and into the warm house where it could have pulled in some condensation, but it should be fine.  I've tested this and there should be plenty of headroom in that regard.  I'd been using CCI caps, but it was a little frustrating that once in a while I'd get a misfire.  The caps fit too tight on this nipple, and some of the hammer's energy had to be spent seating the cap.  The same thing can happen with metallic cartridges if the caps aren't properly seated, or if headspace is too great.  I'd read that Remington caps tend to fit looser, so this time I had a Remington cap on there, as I'd tried them and couldn't get a failure.  No worries about a misfire.

The doe turned her side to me in the perfect spot, not 20 yards from my tree, with perfect backstop.  Front sight behind the shoulder, rear sight, finger on trigger, Bam!  On later reflection, I recall having sensed no recoil and he noise, without hearing protection, was not uncomfortable.  You do this at the gun range and it hurts.  Here it's not even noticed.  It's a strange thing.

The doe bounded away from the cloud of smoke, up the slope, and into the field like a perfectly healthy deer, several others behind her.  No time to reload-- that's not an option.  I could not possibly have missed.  I know.  I was there.  I saw the whole thing.  But off she ran.  Crap...no, wait, she's slowing down.  At the top of the hill out in the wheat field, she stumbled and went down.  OK.  I have to remember to breathe at this point.  Sometimes that's important.  I tied the rifle to the cord, lowered it to the ground, called Son on the radio & told him to bring the pickup, and then started climbing down.  He called back about something or other.  Crap.  I felt I had to answer right then, holding onto one of the "steps" (angled metal screws we put in the tree for hand-holds) with one hand while operating the radio with the other.  Probably not a good idea.

The 50 caliber ball (mass; ~180 grains) pushed by 110 grains of Goex FF black powder (this is the charcoal, sulfur and KNO3 mixture of yore) had traveled squarely through the rib cage and out the other side, behind the shoulders and in front of the diaphragm.  That's the "boiler room"--the heart/lung cavity.  I'd been told this wouldn't happen-- that the round ball would stop just short of full penetration, but maybe those hunters use a lighter powder charge.  Still, more velocity should mean more deformation of the soft lead ball...  Impact velocity was about 1850 fps, and the exit hole was about the same size as the entry.  That's a "one-shot stop" but, both lungs partially liquefied, this doe ran up a steep slope, bounding over bushes as pretty as you please, and into a field before going down.  That was about 75 yards total, with some rough going.  Something to keep in mind.  If you want to "anchor" the animal, it has to be a critical skeletal shot, like right through two shoulders (they can run pretty well on three legs) or a central nervous system (CNS) shot.  Little else will stop an animal (two legged or four legged) in its tracks, Hollywood notwithstanding (see update below).  I tried to avoid the shoulders because there's some good meat there.  One of Son's deer had had a scapula shattered, and that was a mess.  No thankee.

The whole sequence, from first hearing noise in the bushes to the deer falling, lasted around 15 seconds.

What, I can't go on and on about it?  I'm 50 years old, this was my first deer, and now we have a lot more good meat for the freezer.  Yahoo!  For those who fear "gamy" venison; maybe we've just been lucky, but we've not noticed a trace of this phenomenon with the animals we've harvested so far.  We've gotten does because they're vastly more common.  People who tell me they hate venison because its gamy all seem to have eaten bucks.  I really don't know what makes for sweet meat verses gamy.  More research is obviously needed.  No doubt a federal grant is in order.

Next I'd like to try a flintlock.  Why?  Just 'cause.  For one thing, a modern rifle is for long shots, and the hunting we do near the house is limited to no more than about 70 yards (so far we've killed no deer beyond about 40 yards).  For another; I just want to.  I'd've used a muzzleloading pistol if the WA game department allowed it.  I won't go on about how using a primitive gun is some sort of superior life choice or anything.  It isn't.  I admit it's a distraction.  The people who used them back in the day were in fact using state-of-the-art technology.  We should learn the state-of-the-art for our own time, and endeavor to advance it.  If they'd wanted to be old-fashioned in the 18th or early 19th century, they'd have used matchlocks or bows and arrows.

Here's the obligatory, grizzly post kill photo along with the rifle;

Yes, some people find liver to be disgusting.  I like it.  I'd show you a big juicy steak, but for best flavor and tenderness, the muscle meat has to age for several days before cutting and cooking.  The liver is great if eaten right away.  These deer liver steaks were fried in olive oil with shallots, just a pinch of crushed of rosemary, and salt & pepper, served with a nice baked potato and a glass of red Zinfandel.  Simply lovely.

Update Dec. 1 / 08

Butchering the deer this weekend, we found the heart had been grazed by the ball, opening a hole in one chamber (yeah, we leave the heart in while it hangs.  Call us weird).  The ball entered straight through one rib and out through another, severing both.  The doe had run about 75 yards with two blown lungs, a blown heart and two severed ribs.  I also found an almost pristine 17 caliber air rifle pellet lodged against the pelvis.  It would have had to travel through the hide, through a layer of fat, through 2.5 inches of meat and stop at the bone.  I doubt this could have happened to the adult doe. 17 cal air rifles don't typically have near enough penetration, plus there was no apparent wound channel, so I'm thinking someone shot a fawn in the butt.  Some people's kids.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, November 26, 2008 9:10:45 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun )

From Gun Blogger 2008 Summer Camp. See also the slide show I made.

My pathetic run:

Others have put theirs up too:

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, November 26, 2008 8:03:11 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

Who really cares about it being unconstitutional? This is what's right to do, and if this means that we have to go out and have a court battle, then that's fine ... We have plenty of dead bodies coming up in our streets every single day, and that is unacceptable.

Tonya Payne
Pittsburgh City Councilwoman
November 24, 2008
Litigation likely on weapons measure City wants missing guns reported to police in 24 hours
[H/T to Sebastian.

Forget about her crap for brains for thinking the proposed law would reduce crime in any way, this statement should be sufficient grounds for the Feds to immediately arrest her along with her co-conspirators and to get a conviction for an 18 USC 242 violation.--Joe]

# Tuesday, November 25, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:47:47 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Gun Rights )

I won't be buying HS Precision any time soon. I have a HS Precision stock on my Spud Gun and really like it. But not if they are going to be associating with people like Horiuchi. Horiuchi was a sniper and had kills at Ruby Ridge and (allegedly) Waco.

I would like to suggest McMillan stocks as a great alternative.

Update: See also what Tamara, Say Uncle, Caleb, and David Codrea have to say about it.

People are checking it out and remembering:

Domain Name   qwest.net ? (Network)
IP Address   65.121.133.# (Abrams Airborne Manufacturing)
ISP   Qwest Communications
Location  
Continent  :  North America
Country  :  United States  (Facts)
State  :  Arizona
City  :  Tucson
Lat/Long  :  32.2686, -111.0022 (Map)
Distance  :  1,047 miles
Language   English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008102920 Firefox/3.0.4
Javascript   version 1.5
Monitor  
Resolution  :  1280 x 1024
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Nov 26 2008 6:10:32 am
Last Page View   Nov 26 2008 6:10:32 am
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...ial&client=firefox-a
Search Engine google.com
Search Words lon horiuchi jeff cooper
Visit Entry Page   http://blog.joehuffman.org/2006/09/26/Jeff%20Cooper.aspx
Visit Exit Page   http://blog.joehuffman.org/2006/09/26/Jeff%20Cooper.aspx
Out Click    
Time Zone   UTC-7:00
Visitor's Time   Nov 26 2008 7:10:32 am
Visit Number   390,655

Update2: See also my Idaho neighbor Laurel's post.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 25, 2008 7:41:44 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Technology )

Ephemeral conversation is dying.

Cardinal Richelieu famously said, "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged." When all our ephemeral conversations can be saved for later examination, different rules have to apply. Conversation is not the same thing as correspondence. Words uttered in haste over morning coffee, whether spoken in a coffee shop or thumbed on a Blackberry, are not official pronouncements. Discussions in a meeting, whether held in a boardroom or a chat room, are not the same as answers at a press conference. And privacy isn't just about having something to hide; it has enormous value to democracy, liberty, and our basic humanity.

We can't turn back technology; electronic communications are here to stay and even our voice conversations are threatened. But as technology makes our conversations less ephemeral, we need laws to step in and safeguard ephemeral conversation. We need a comprehensive data privacy law, protecting our data and communications regardless of where it is stored or how it is processed. We need laws forcing companies to keep it private and delete it as soon as it is no longer needed. Laws requiring ISPs to store e-mails and other personal communications are exactly what we don't need.

Rules pertaining to government need to be different, because of the power differential. Subjecting the president's communications to eventual public review increases liberty because it reduces the government's power with respect to the people. Subjecting our communications to government review decreases liberty because it reduces our power with respect to the government. The president, as well as other members of government, need some ability to converse ephemerally -- just as they're allowed to have unrecorded meetings and phone calls -- but more of their actions need to be subject to public scrutiny. But laws can only go so far. Law or no law, when something is made public it's too late. And many of us like having complete records of all our e-mail at our fingertips; it's like our offline brains.

In the end, this is cultural.

The Internet is the greatest generation gap since rock and roll. We're now witnessing one aspect of that generation gap: the younger generation chats digitally, and the older generation treats those chats as written correspondence. Until our CEOs blog, our Congressmen Twitter, and our world leaders send each other LOLcats – until we have a Presidential election where both candidates have a complete history on social networking sites from before they were teenagers– we aren't fully an information age society.

When everyone leaves a public digital trail of their personal thoughts since birth, no one will think twice about it being there. Obama might be on the younger side of the generation gap, but the rules he's operating under were written by the older side. It will take another generation before society's tolerance for digital ephemera changes.

Bruce Schneier
November 24, 2008
The Future of Ephemeral Conversation
[What I fear will happen is that people, and politicians in particular, will fail to realize is that the society needs to compensate for the power differential and open up government while securing the individual and private organizations. They will think government "needs" to be private and that in order for the government to "protect" us they need to monitor our every word and move.

You can see this mindset in that so many people fear "large corporations" more than governments. They want the government to protect them from the corporations. They want more power for the government so it can further regulate businesses and individuals. They apparently are totally oblivious to the fact that an abusive corporation can be taken down in a few months by a massive boycott. Corporations don't have the means to force you to buy their goods. On the other hand a government uses guns to take your money, your property, your freedom, and/or your life. Giving governments a monopoly on force and privacy is extremely poor social hygiene.--Joe]

# Monday, November 24, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Monday, November 24, 2008 5:52:53 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot | Gun Fun | Technology )

Saturday I mentioned some sniper detection devices designed by the Brits. It turns out the U.S. Army ordered $10 million dollars worth of them:

QinetiQ North America's Technology Solutions Group, a global developer of innovative technology solutions for national defense, today announced a $9.95 million order from the U. S. Army's Rapid Equipping Force (REF) for SWATS(R) Soldier-Wearable Acoustic Targeting Systems. Part of the Ears(R) Gunshot Localization System product family, SWATS(R) soldier-worn units will be deployed to U.S. Army troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan this year. The deployment is expected to be completed by early next year.

A brochure and other info are here.

I wonder if it would crash if it were placed down range at Boomershoot when the opening horn was sounded.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, November 24, 2008 5:02:24 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

The dumber people think you are, the more surprised they're going to be when you kill them.

William Clayton
[There are more than one William Clayton I found on the net and none are particularly good candidates for this quote. But he is the only one I found this quote attributed to.--Joe]

# Sunday, November 23, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 23, 2008 7:14:43 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Ballistics | Gun Fun | Technology )

I have my software project ready for an alpha release (feature complete, but there are known bugs which must be fixed before release).

This was designed for cell phones not a desktop. It will work on desktop and laptop computers but whenever a user interface design was a trade-off between a desktop user and a mobile user the mobile user was given the advantage.

The software is a web based exterior ballistics calculator and can be found here: http://test.joehuffman.org/ http://field.modernballistics.com.This is much different that Modern Ballistics but uses the same algorithms and concepts. This web based version is for use in the field. Example, while at Boomershoot you can input the exact ranges and inclination to a set of targets combined with the weather conditions to get the scope setting needed for one shot, one "kill" hits on the boomers. I plan to have it running on a local server at Boomershoot 2009 so cell phones (and laptops) with WiFi support can get really fast results even with a heavy load of users.

I'm also thinking that maybe for Boomershoot 2010 I will have a weather station on site that will update the conditions for a special version of the software in real time.

Known bugs:

  • The help page is for the desktop version not the web based version.
  • If the bullet velocity at the target is less than 1400 fps all parameters such as elevation angle, windage, time to target, etc. are in error.
  • Some optimization for response time and load handling should still be done.

All data is stored in cookies on your device. This means the website does not need to save the data on the site in order to save your data. The downside is that all your input from the desktop does not show up on your cell phone or if you get a new cell phone the data will have to be reentered.

At this point I’m mostly looking for user interface and device compatibility issues. Does it appear to work on your Blackberry? Does it work on your iPhone? Is the user interface easy enough to understand and use? If you have problems with your cell phone try using it on a desktop computer to make sure you are using the software right before assuming the cell phone is having problems with the website.

Leave comments here.

Thanks for your feedback.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 23, 2008 6:42:48 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun | Quote of the Day )

Recently I was told "well you guys are all Glock guys" "you all just like glocks" we are surely NOT "glock guys" I don't shoot glocks because I like them. I like them because they do for me what I want. They have the combination of reliability and longevity I want; in a reasonable package size, for a reasonable price. Funny things is a lot of people pick Glocks because of how much ammo they carry, that wasn't really in my criteria at all. The only way that would fit into my decision making is if two guns were equal in ALL other areas and one carried more ammo, then sure I'll always take more for no trade off.

Greg Hamilton
Founder and Chief Instructor Insights Training
Insights Email List: October 25, 2008 12:21 PM Subject: Random Thoughts
[I frequently get asked "What gun should I buy?" My response is typically a heavy sigh. It depends on what you are going to use it for, how often you are going to shoot, and probably a dozen other things. The Insights instructors mostly shoot Glocks but their criteria is a little different than mine. And my criteria is a little different than the last five people that have asked me what gun to buy.

I advise new shooters to buy something fairly cheap and shoot it until they are fairly certain they are shooting better than the gun or they understand their needs well enough to buy something more appropriate. My first rifle was a SKS I paid $125 for. I put over 1000 rounds through it before I had a need to for a better rifle. But I knew the rifle was holding me back and a better rifle would get better results. My first handgun was a Ruger P89. I put about 30,000 rounds through it. I even won a few steel and USPSA matches with it. By that time I knew the P89 was holding me back and I knew why. I then bought my STI Eagle because it would overcome the weaknesses for my uses I had exposed in the P89.--Joe]

# Saturday, November 22, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:16:27 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun | Technology )

This is a very cool device:

The palm-sized device designed by Qinetiq, the British defence firm that was once the government research laboratories, is pinned to the uniform and uses acoustic technology to calculate the exact position of the rifle fire.

Then a electronic voice passes on the "bearing and range" to the soldier allowing him to jump to safety and return fire.

The machine has already been purchased by the Americans for deployment in the New Year and the British are looking at a vehicle mounted version.

...

The device, which costs around £2,500, works by isolating the crack of the sniper rifle thanks to four microphones, a GPS system and a powerful microprocessor.

It takes less than a tenth of a second and provides the results in audio and visual formats. It can even send a grid reference via radio to supporting artillery and aircraft.

The system, which weighs less than 6oz, is so sensitive it can tell the difference between outgoing friendly fire and incoming enemy fire and can distinguish a sniper even in a gun battle.

It also works when the soldier is travelling at up to 50 mph on a vehicle.

The device has already been road tested in Iraq and Afghanistan to claims of great success.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 22, 2008 5:17:20 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

The mayor is beating his chest trying to make a statement that he's anti-gun. The mayor and violent criminals in this case have something in common this time -- neither of them have any respect for the law.

Alan Gottlieb
November 21, 2008
Nickels expects December start to city gun ban
[Seattle Mayor Nickels says he is going to defy state law and prohibit guns by executive order on city property. The Washington State Attorney General says state law prohibits him from doing that. A public hearing is scheduled for 6:30 PM, December 15, at City Hall.

You can read the proposed rules and comment on them here. See also the Citizen's Committee to Keep and Bear Arms news release. Be polite, run your comments through spelling and grammar checkers, and ask someone else to read them before submission. You might also consider get yourself into the proper State of Mind, and/or thinking about Just One Question before writing your comments.--Joe]

# Friday, November 21, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Friday, November 21, 2008 6:57:25 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun | Home Life )

Last January I reported a fellow shooter, Joe Metz, was terminally ill. He passed away April 26 but there is another service being performed this Sunday, November 23, at the Bernie Petersen Memorial Range at 9:30. There will be a small memorial and they will spread the remainder of his ashes.

I will be in the Seattle area and unable to attend but I wanted to make the announcement a little wider.

By: Joe Huffman Friday, November 21, 2008 12:38:36 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics | Quote of the Day )

History suggests that capitalism is a necessary condition for political freedom. Clearly it is not a sufficient condition.

Milton Friedman
[It's really sad that people are:

  1. Unaware of this
  2. Unwilling to accept this
  3. Or, most likely and saddest of all, don't want political freedom

For those interested in political freedom I would like to suggest the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, and 13th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution would be good additions to capitalism toward achieving political freedom. Although if the Second is uninfringed then the 13th pretty much should be taken care. Isn't it ironic that our first president with a skin color strongly correlated with slavery in our country wants to continue the infringements that kept those people in slavery? And furthermore the first infringements upon that right in this country were enacted to keep people of that skin color from obtaining and using firearms? Condi Rice gets it. Barack Obama doesn't. What makes the difference?--Joe]

# Thursday, November 20, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, November 20, 2008 6:21:26 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( A Security Theater | Crap for brains | Freedom | Technology )

The new machines being proposed for airplane security give results like this:

Never mind What TSA Really Stands For, that almost for certain it can never be effective security, and it costs billions each year that could be spent on something more effective, the response is:

After the machines were introduced at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport last year, officials there said they had few complaints from passengers, saying most approved because lines moved faster.

Sheep.

By: Lyle at UltiMAK Thursday, November 20, 2008 11:46:04 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Current News | Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics )

Death by a thousand, self-inflicted cuts.  This from our friend Howard;

Friends:
 
Today we really have a poporie of news. 
 
I'm on duty patrolling downtown this evening.  20:30 I get the patrol officers briefing.  21:00 we get our volunteers briefing.  Hope the rain holds-off.  Then again if it starts raining for real I guess we just go home.
 
Soon we may be all the protection the public gets.
 
The public transportation unit is gone.  More cops are leaving than replacements can be found.  The Ministry of Interior is disarming the public who have licensed guns...after passing [a] process determining need for a gun and background, physical and mental record checks.

Who ever said registration and licensing were the path to confiscation?  Once again we see Jews being disarmed, only this time Jews are doing it to each other.

Now the Finance Ministry is not going to fund the minimum wage school guards receive.  So the schools will be totally unprotected.

This is what is known as the "Peace" process-- The lack of meaningful opposition to socialist, Marxist, Fascist, communist or jihadist military expansionism.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:45:54 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot | Crap for brains | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

The handgun ban is a reasonable restriction, because handguns constitute a unique class of firearm that have an unmatched ability to cause violence and kill human beings.

Daniel G. Jarcho
Brief of Violence Policy Center and the police chiefs for the cities of Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and Seattle as amici curiae in support of petitioners in D.C. v. Heller.
[Handguns cause violence? Unmatched in their ability to kill human beings?

And all this time I would have thought it was atomic bombs (super novas probably outperform A-Bombs but they haven't actually been demonstrated on human inhabited planets that I know of) that were unmatched in their ability to implement violence and kill human beings. And that is why I was accepting of "reasonable restrictions" on atomic weapons. But now that the Supreme Court says handguns are protected by the Second Amendment and, according to Mr. Jarcho, atomic bombs are less dangerous than handguns I guess that means atomic bombs should be protected as well.

I'm glad Mr. Jarcho was able to clear that little misunderstanding up for me. I'll be consulting his work more frequently from now on to make sure I don't make some future similar mistake in my classification of weapon systems. Now, where is a nearby public range where I can rent an atomic capability artillery piece and buy some ammo for it? I want to evaluate some possibilities for the next Boomershoot.--Joe]

# Wednesday, November 19, 2008
By: Lyle at UltiMAK Wednesday, November 19, 2008 8:02:08 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Freedom | Politics )

I've referred to Jim Jones and the "People's Temple" several times.  They represent my ideal of the ultimate fate of a socialist organization.  I visited San Francisco twice in the mid to late '70s.  My older siblings had spent time in West Coast quasi-religious, socialist communes (all very, very "hip" you understand) and I'd visited them, spending several nights at one of them in Oregon.  I was even "touched by the spirit" at one of their rallies, and I'm here to tell you; that s#^t is real and it is powerful (something about human evolution having selected in us a tendency to bond tightly with our group, with extremely powerful emotions, in times of stress, but I'll leave that to the sociologists, anthropologists and biologists).  I learned all I wanted to know about these groups.  Specifically, that I never wanted anything to do with them ever again.

These groups had sprung up in a lot of places back then, accepting the assertion that "All You Need is Love" or other similar nonsense.  They were very socialist, as any description with the word "free" in it was super cool: Free love, free food, free store, free drugs, etc..  Everything belonged to everyone and all was love, love, love...  Only trouble was, as you would expect, the takers always seemed to outnumber the givers, and so the givers (most anyone with options in life) would become disgusted at some stage and leave the group.  You had to use extreme measures to coerce members into staying on, much as the Russians had to build the Berlin Wall and Jim Jones had to imprison his followers in a remote jungle.

I'd seen the History Channel's documentary on Jim Jones, but there is a ton of stuff in Dan Flynn's account that was never mentioned.  I mean, Wow!  Take some time to read the article (hat tip to Micheal Savage).

By virtue of producing rent-free rent-a-rallies for liberal politicians and causes, Jim Jones engendered enormous amounts of good will from Democratic politicians and activists. They allowed their political ambitions to derail their governing responsibilities. Frisco pols like Harvey Milk never seemed to care how Jones could, at the snap of his fingers, direct hundreds of people to stack a public meeting or volunteer for a campaign. City Councilman Milk just knew that he benefitted from that control, and therefore never bothered to do anything to inhibit the dangerous cult operating in his city. Instead, he actively aided and abetted a homicidal maniac. It wasn't just local hacks Jones commanded respect from. He held court with future First Lady Rosalyn Carter, vice presidential candidate Walter Mondale, and California Governor Jerry Brown.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:59:11 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot )
By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:27:05 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

Guns got to go! Too many redneck, bible toting racist with them. There honestly is no need for anyone to have a gun, for any reason. Hunting included. Obama said he would get rid of guns and he will. Last season for hunters. Enjoy while you can.

Cedric T
THE AGENDA: GUN CONTROL
November 19, 2008 10:05 AM
Chicago, IL
[Μολὼν λάβε Cedric. Μολὼν λάβε!--Joe]

# Tuesday, November 18, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:30:43 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

Self-determination, the autonomy of the individual, asserts itself in the right to race his automobile, to handle his power tools, to buy a gun, to communicate to mass audiences his opinion, no matter how ignorant, how aggressive, it may be.

Herbert Marcuse
An Essay on Liberation, ch. 1 (1969)
[Some people don't want to be liberated. And a great many more don't want others to be liberated either.--Joe]

# Monday, November 17, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Monday, November 17, 2008 10:19:24 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Politics | Quote of the Day )

President-elect Obama, I wish you all good fortune as you embark on your Presidential career. I suspect that you will come to realize (if you haven't already) that Socialism and Communism don't work, that we can't tax our way into prosperity, and that punishing motivated people who succeed on their own by forcing them to support those with little or no ambition is a recipe for disaster. If you don't figure those things out, that's okay too. We might have to wait for the midterm elections of 2010, but one way or another, because of you, the nightmare of Socialism will finally be over for America.


John Ross
November 8, 2008
Hallelujah! The Nightmare Is Over!, or Thank You, Mr. Obama, for Putting So Many Bad Things Behind Us
[If it were only so easy. Maybe he's right. But Barb tells me I always optimistic and I'm not optimistic in our present situation. Is this the way it has ever been? People elect a socialist to the top spot, he or she takes the country down the toilet and everyone realizes it was a terrible mistake and becomes capitalistic overnight (two years)? Show me an example where that has been the case and maybe I can be optimistic again.--Joe]

# Sunday, November 16, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 16, 2008 10:35:33 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Politics | Quote of the Day )

A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.

Edward Abbey
(1927 - 1989)
[Among other accomplishments, such as his books, Abbey inspired the formation and associated with the members of Earth First! I find it very interesting how the words of one set of extremists can match the words of their opposites.--Joe]

# Saturday, November 15, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 15, 2008 12:54:11 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun )

If you are in the Moscow area you might be interesting in going to the range with some (University of Idaho) Vandals:

This Sunday, the 16th is a range day sponsored by the Vandals for Firearms Education and Training (VFET). We are meeting in the Safeway parking lot here in Moscow at 1pm and caravaning out to the range out on Lenville Road.

Look for the silver Subaru Forester with the fishing bobber antenna topper and the yellow flag on the antenna on top.

So come on out and have some fun at the range.

Daughter Kim and I plan on attending.

Update: Kim can't make it due to a study session with a fellow classmate. I'm going to work on Caleb and Xenia and try and get them out there.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:01:41 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Freedom | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

I won't apologize for concluding that anyone who supports the free and unfettered possession of deadly weapons is sick in their head. Why in God's name should the Democratic party, or any organization dedicated to improving the lives and future of Americans, give up on the idea of gun control? Has mental illness spread so far in our country that the concept of curbing violent death by gun is no longer viable?

Here's my take: all gun owners should immediately submit themselves for psychiatric examination, to determine the extent of their illness and begin treatment before they do harm to someone.

Rifled, single-shot hunting weapons aside, this country should immediately consider laws making the possession of any handgun or assault weapon evidence of serious and dangerous mental illness, and anyone having such a weapon on their possession should be subject to immediate immobilization, hospitalization and confinement for treatment. The sale of -- or display with intent to sell -- any handgun or assault weapon to a private citizen should result in that person's inventory being seized and immediately destroyed, and the seller hospitalized immediately for treatment. Any factory producing handguns or assault weapons caught selling their product to private citizens should be closed, their corporate officers hospitalized, and the inventory destroyed.

Sick in the U. P.
Oct 27, 2008 06:07 PM
In a comment to this article: Why we all need the Democrats to abandon gun control
[Sounds like some people are in full support of sending us for an extended stay in the reeducation camps. I wonder if he realizes what it would entail to get 80 million (or even a significant fraction) armed people to the camps. I would like to suggest it is they that need to seek psychiatric help.--Joe]

# Friday, November 14, 2008
By: Lyle at UltiMAK Friday, November 14, 2008 6:58:08 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Freedom | Politics )

I sometimes do a back-and-fourth with a self described centrist, or moderate (which is another name for a leftist in denial, something like a "moderate drinker" who can't get through a day without alcohol) over at Say Uncle in the comments, but I thought it should be posted here too.  Today we're talking about the proposed (yet another) GM "bailout".  I explained how propping up failure is inviting more failure, while at the same time negatively influencing the way we make decisions, while at the same time freezing out some of the small, hungry, innovative businesses and potential businesses, to say nothing of unfairly punishing taxpayers for the bad decisions of others.  He offered some of the regular arguments against pure capitalism;

"…the party with leverage will take advantage of that leverage, often to the level of exploitation.."

To which I replied;

I know that is the age-old argument, but what you describe has a simpler name. It’s called crime [or corruption]. That's what government is for– to protect basic rights by punishing (retaliating against) crime.

And the reason why centrism is the superior stance;

"…pure capitalism and pure socialism are both bad…"

How so? Do you have any proof of that? Any evidence? Have we ever seen pure capitalism? If so, I’d like to know. Give me an example. I’ll bet you a case of beer that any example you attempt to give will in fact be an example of what happens when government get its nose into the market, creating some form of monopoly [either that or government has simply failed to do its job as protector of basic rights].

I've been all through this many times before. Please read the book, Capitalism, the Unknown Ideal or I'll be forced to re-write the whole damned thing right here. Trouble is; that would take months and I'd go broke wasting my time writing. As I said, you haven't seen this stuff [these ideas] before, and so you're falling into all the old traps. You need some genuine de-programming. I know that sounds really insulting and condescending, but the same is true anytime you try to tell an alcoholic he's an alcoholic. This is damned tough stuff. I'm saying here that you're addicted to a belief in government-sponsored coercion. You're convinced that it has a proper place in a free society. I'm saying that that is a contradiction in terms.

The coercion pushers have gotten to you and got you hooked. You've grown up with pushers and you've known nothing else. The same happened to me and it was a tough, slow, painful withdrawal. Even still it's one day at a time. I have to go to regular meetings with other people struggling with the destructive effects of believing in socialist theories. Oh sure, I thought a little bit here and a little bit there would be fine. A lot of people do it just to get along in social situations. Lots of people think like that, but a little bit is never enough, is it? You always end up needing another fix, and there's always another pusher ready and willing to sell it to you…

"Hello. My name is Lyle and I'm a recovering socialist…"

You have to first admit you have a problem before you can take the steps to solve it. Your original post is a good start– you're asking questions. That's good, but you're fighting the answers because they go against everything you've ever known. If you really want the answers, it's going to take a lot of effort on your part. It will be time-consuming and it will be painful. Some of the people you thought were your friends are going to chastise you [even disown you]. Stay strong. Only you can help you, but we can help point you in the right direction. You will have friends.

What the centrist doesn't realize is that, though some people are bad and as a result sometimes people will get burned, when government shifts away from being the protector of rights and becomes the main perpetrator of coercion, we're all screwed.  This has been referred to as the equal distribution of misery.

By: Lyle at UltiMAK Friday, November 14, 2008 4:06:52 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Freedom | Politics )

When I was five, my first-grade teacher taught us to repeat a random string of syllables she called "the Pleh-juh, Vuh-Lee-junss".  We were to recite it every day at the beginning of class for the next several years, while holding our right hand to the left side of the chest (reportedly, this is where our hearts were to be found inside the chest cavity).


Getting ready for that first day of school (I never attended kindergarten) my mother told me, "Now, do what the teacher tells you".  No "goodbye" no "be sure to learn something new and interesting so you can come back and tell me about it."  Just "Do what you're told."  I was frightened.
And so we learned to repeat these random syllables, every day, for years.


It was only much later in life that I began to wonder whether these syllables could be broken out into actual words, and even later before I wondered what the actual words meant.  No one ever attempted to teach us.  I suppose the teachers were doing this exercise for the same reason we kids were doing it-- because we were told to do it.  If you'd asked me, at age six, what language the Pleh-juh, Vuh-Lee-junss was in, I'd have been at a loss for an answer.  Surely it's a trick question.  Are you trying to make fun of me?  I want my mother...


"Eye Pleh-juh Vuh-Lee-junss, tootheuh flag, of the united states uvuhmerika, and toothuhrepublik for whitchit stands...Won nation, induhvizuhble (invisible?) with libertee and just us four all."  I knew there were actual words in there (I could recognize several) but it never occurred to me even to wonder about them.  All the other kids apparently did the same thing, for the same reason, and never spoke about it.  It was simply the thing to do because we were told, like so many of the other things we did in school for no readily apparent reasons and no explanation.  The school principal would occasionally step in, see that we were at attention, right hands on the left sides of our chest cavities, facing the flag and reciting all the correct syllables in the correct order, and it all appeared to be fine and dandy (the principal was vastly more powerful than God.  He could physically grab you by the arm, shake you, and demand; "Why were you doing that?  Huh?  Why? To which you invariably gave the standard reply; "I don't know...")  Wonderful how the kids are learning respect for the flag of their country, and the critically important principles it represents!  He left satisfied.  The God was satiated.  All was well.


But they never taught us a damned thing about it.  Nothing.  Ever.  Likewise, we were taught "America the Beautiful" and "God Bless America" and we'd occasionally sing "Alaska & Hawaii" (this was in 1963 when those were brand new states. We knew nothing about such things, but dutifully repeated the syllables) and no one ever discussed the lyrics.  At all.  It wasn’t until I was out of high school that I began to actually learn some of this stuff, such as the difference between a republic and a straight democracy, or what a pledge is, or an allegiance.  That was after the effects of having my curiosity crushed to death in school had started to wear off.

 

Richard P. Feynman wrote about this in his autobiography.  As a professor of theoretical physics, he often visited other universities.  When on a visit to a South American university (in Brazil, IIRC) he was introduced to a class of very high-level students (which is to say they got extremely good grades).  It took him some time speaking with them to figure out that they knew next to nothing.  They could recite, practically word for word, from the text books but when it came to understanding and applying the concepts they were at a total loss.

 

This is the Soviet model, come here to roost in our public education system.  Hope you like crap.

By: Joe Huffman Friday, November 14, 2008 7:36:42 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Gun Rights )

From admittedly "not the wisest person in the world":

One way to probably lower gun use would be to make the price of the bullet higher. I think one bullet should cost almost as much as a gun and I think bullets should be sold individually.

I feel that if people had to pay a lot more for bullets, they wouldn't buy them as freely.

I'm not the wisest person in the world, but I know if people had to pay $100 just for one bullet, people would think twice about how important it really is to kill themselves or other people with that bullet.

The black market starts appearing when the tax on something goes above 15%. $100 for a single round is on the order of 20,000%. Her suggestion would work about as well as the prohibition against recreational drugs and probably would use much of the same supply chain.

Jeff has other comments.

By: Joe Huffman Friday, November 14, 2008 7:10:56 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

He says "these" firearms (Clinton included normal magazines like police use for protection), belong on "foreign battlefields." God help us if they're needed on domestic battlefields against a government confiscating rights. Mr. Obama -- I know these people. Disarm criminals, mobilize robust support, disarm the public, mobilize robust resistance. Please choose wisely.

Alan Korwin
November 13, 2008
Hope for Obama's Gun Bill
["Battlefields" appear to be a theme recently. I wonder why.--Joe]

# Thursday, November 13, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:44:17 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics )

The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind. When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.

Dr. Lyle Rossiter
The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. 2006
[H/T to Jeff.

While looking around for an Zune compatible format for my consumption I ran across this:

Rossiter's dream is to construct a grand, idealized libertarian, nightmarish, dystopia that creates hardships and inflicts wounds. This is dangerous, tragic, and sick.

So both sides accuse the other of being mentally ill.

Interesting.

So one then has to ask, "Which world view has resulted in the worst outcome for the affected populations?" I would presume the United States has best approximated (and poorly at that) the Libertarian viewpoint. But I'm not sure which of the following best represents the centrally planning government of the Liberal viewpoint: Communist China, USSR, Nazi Germany, or the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. But then I decided that it really didn't matter.--Joe]

# Wednesday, November 12, 2008
By: Lyle at UltiMAK Wednesday, November 12, 2008 8:14:17 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Freedom | Politics )

Prolific writer, economist and historian, Thomas Sowell, gives us some frank talk about our self-appointed intellectuals.  I post it here for some who have felt it necessary to tell us that they are smart, or that those from whom they get their ideas are smart.  Seriously, if I haven't noticed it already, your telling me won't help either of us, one way or the other.  Here's a small sample of Sowell's piece on the subject;

What is more telling, form [rather than substance] was enough to impress the intellectuals, not only then but even now, years after the facts have been revealed...

That is one of many reasons why intellectuals are not taken as seriously by others as they take themselves.

How right you are, Mr. Sowell (I mean, yeee haaww, Baby!)  He continues;

The intellectual levels of politicians are just one of the many things that intellectuals have grossly misjudged for years on end.

During the 1930s, some of the leading intellectuals in America condemned our economic system and pointed to the centrally planned Soviet economy as a model— all this at a time when literally millions of people were starving to death in the Soviet Union, from a famine in a country with some of the richest farmland in Europe and historically a large exporter of food.

New York Times Moscow correspondent Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for telling the intelligentsia what they wanted to hear— that claims of starvation in the Ukraine were false.

Things never seem to change, do they?

As an aside, when I use the word "socialist" to describe people who express anti-capitalist ideas, I mean it.  I know what the word means and I know where the ideas came from even if socialists don't.  I'll use it when it fits, even if the socialists protest, scream, hold their breath, or try to brow-beat me into silence.  If you disagree, get a bloody dictionary, or better yet, a history book.  A very old one.  If you consider yourself a progressive intellectual, never mind.  It won't help (see above quotes).

But that's not the main subject of Sowell's piece.  I'll summarize it with a simple thought; logically, if you had some horrific defect in your ability to perceive reality, surely you'd be the last to know.  Wouldn't you?  Keeping that in mind, go ahead and read the whole piece.  It won't make you comfortable but it will certainly interest you, personally, one way or the other.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:18:29 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Crap for brains | Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

I have absolutely no use for protecting those trafficking in illegal guns. Even those who would do so on principle. Street guns, slithering from state to state, do too much harm.

Fred Lebrun
November 12, 2008
Lock, load and try taking aim at the illegal handguns
[This is from a guy that claims to support gun ownership. This was the first instance I had heard of guns slithering. I would have thought they sort of hopped when the slide release was disengaged. But maybe this "street gun" he talks about is some new type that I'm not familiar with.

Regardless of their mode of locomotion Lebrun has a very naive viewpoint of the world. He thinks the following would somehow be a good idea and wouldn't be a problem for gun owners:

...a national identification system for handguns. A computerized system that would be accessible to all law enforcement agencies, and that would standardize the requirements for handgun ownership coast to coast.

What he apparently doesn't understand is there is already a Federal standard requirement for handgun ownership coast to coast. It's called the Second Amendment. And even with that there are people who been chipping away at that with waiting periods (the original Brady Act), restrictions on who can purchase (age, prior felony convictions, prior domestic violence convictions and accusations), storage requirements, and types of handguns ("junk guns", "Saturday Night Specials", "armor piercing", too powerful, too concealable, too many rounds). This incremental approach is what the people of the UK bought into which ultimately resulted in their complete loss of handguns.

It appears he is suggesting universal registration of handguns. He is hopelessly naive if he believes this will fly. He need look no further than Canada to see their gun registration failure. Then he should try to answer Just One Question.--Joe]

Update: Jeff and Sebastian both have posts up about the same article.

# Tuesday, November 11, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 11, 2008 7:33:44 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

I have some quotes from a fellow, Joe Argenzio, interviewed by the History Channel.  He fought in Europe with the 1st Infantry Division ("The Big Red One") 16th Infantry Regiment.  His unit was clearing socialists (SS in this case) out of the Falkenau death camp;

"I know some of them that I encountered committed suicide-- they jumped in front of my M1."

Suicide.  OK.  That's what the man said.

"As far as I know we got 'em all.. and they deserved what they got."

Over 21 thousand members of the U.S. First Infantry Division were killed or wounded fighting the socialists and the Imperial Japs in W.W. II.  Our only job is to remember them all.  We have it easy.  The socialists have it easy now too-- all they have to do is stay out from in front of our M1s, so to speak.  Today, there thousands more American and coalition GIs in the middle east and elsewhere fighting the latest socialist/statist menace-- the Jihaddists.  As in previous wars, their job is often thankless, but they know what they're doing.  Thanks, people.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 11, 2008 7:58:15 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom )

I haven't finished it yet but I found this fascinating. It is a study on terrorist groups from 1968 until now. It gives data on how often terrorist groups were successfully (not very often) and why they were successful (goals were somewhat narrow). What brought about their downfall (police, and negoitations with the government) and what indicators there are for a groups longevity (religion is strongly associated with longevity) and chances of success (religion is negatively associated with success).

Al-Qaeda doesn't have a good future if history is any indicator.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 11, 2008 6:55:53 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Politics )

Remember that when Obama announced his Vice-President candidate Joe Biden he bragged that Biden was instrumental in getting the "assault weapon" ban of '94:

Fifteen years ago, too many American communities were plagued by violence and insecurity. So Joe Biden brought Democrats and Republicans together to pass the 1994 Crime Bill, putting 100,000 cops on the streets, and starting an eight year drop in crime across the country.

CCRKBA reports:

CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb said gun owners are legitimately alarmed that president-elect Barack Obama has selected virulent anti-gun-rights Democrat Rahm Emanuel as his White House chief of staff. Emanuel was “point man” on gun ban efforts for the Clinton Administration.

“Scores of Democrats, including Senator Obama and his running mate, Joe Biden, assured voters over the past several months that they ‘support’ the Second Amendment,” Gottlieb stated. “Well, America’s gun owners do not merely ‘support’ the Second Amendment, we live by it every day. We value the right to keep and bear arms, and will zealously protect and defend that right, as much as we value the rest of our fundamental individual civil rights, and that is something Democrats need to understand. To think otherwise is a monumental mistake.

“Mr. Obama, whose history on gun rights is abysmal, appears to be considering his party’s most extremist gun control advocates for key positions in his administration,” Gottlieb continued. “That is not a sign of goodwill toward gun owners or their rights. It’s a red flare warning of high winds and rough weather looming on the political horizon.

David Hardy reports:

Supporting it is an insider DC tip that his people are seriously considering a federal ban or restriction on "right to carry" laws.

Countertop reports (see also this post):

Looks like the fix is in and Henry Waxman and Nancy Pelosi are going to toss John Dingell aside...

This was an easy decision for Pelosi who has long clashed with Dingell and ran Lynn Rivers against him in a primary attempt to defeat him.

The Lynne Rivers campaign was all about gun control.

President-Elect Barrack Obama is exceedingly anti-gun. His VP is exceedingly anti-gun. His Chief of Staff is exceedingly anti-gun. The pro-gun John Dingell, Chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, who blocked anti-gun legislation from reaching the floor of the House is being booted and replaced with the anti-gun Henry Waxman.

It seems to me that things are shaping up to be "a Perfect Storm".

I'll announce my latest software project by sometime next weekend. It may come in useful if things get really ugly.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 11, 2008 5:24:56 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Quote of the Day )

For two decades, many liberals have thrived on despising the NRA and its members. Those who believe in gun control often hold enormous prejudice against those who don't. But there are already reams of laws pertaining to the use, abuse, purchase and sale of firearms. What new regulations would the gun-controllers create, and how would they work to address the problem of gun violence? Do they want to prohibit private ownership of firearms altogether? Many would like to ban handguns, without considering just what this would entail, what inequities of power would result, and what new, potentially dangerous, powers would have to be awarded to government to accomplish it. Like activists who want to ban pit bulls, the gun-control advocates remain relentlessly unspecific about what they hope to achieve. It has become clear, too, that these advocates hold a double standard regarding the U.S. Constitution: The First Amendment is vital to the health of a free nation, as is the Fourth, but the Second is respected only by the un-evolved and the violent. Only the parts of the Constitution that their side respects are valid, in this view.

Hal Herring
October 27, 2008
Why we all need the Democrats to abandon gun control
[H/T to Jeff who has a still better quote from the comments to this same article.--Joe]

# Monday, November 10, 2008
By: Lyle at UltiMAK Monday, November 10, 2008 8:45:21 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Fun | Gun Rights | Politics )

Maybe.  But that 10% figure alone doesn't account for the buying shift away from bolt actions and revolvers and into semi automatics and EBRs*.  Anyone selling semi automatic pistols and EBRs is seeing more like a 100% or greater increase in sales of those items.  Mere accessories for EBRs, I can tell you first-hand, are up 100% in sales from two months ago.  Ammo sales are up substantially too, in this "get it while you still can" market environment.

Manufacturers; If you're making ARs, AKs, auto pistols, other self-loading carbines, or magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, you would do well to put on another shift if you haven't done it already.

Citizens; This is a great time to learn just how much fun it can be to learn some shooting skills and to get your first gun.

One wonders if the anti second amendment rights movers and shakers understand how great they've been as gun salesmen, or how great they've been at recruiting new shooters.  Gun and gun related sales haven't been this good since the Bubba years.  Gun ranges in populated areas are running at full capacity.  Maybe we'll have to start renting booths at gun shows again.

*EBR = "Evil Black Rifle".  In case you were recently revived from a years-long coma; the term applies to anything that might be included in the next "Assault Weapons" ban under ObamACORN (I just added "ObamACORN" to my MS Word spell checker dictionary.  Odd that it wasn't there already, but I suppose this is an older version of Word. If you work for Microsoft, you might put in a memo reminding those in charge of spell checkers to make sure it's there) and the Pelosi/Reed Congress, even if (or maybe especially if) they're tan in color, or green, a nice pink with rainbows, dolphins, unicorns and shiny red hearts on them, etc..  We also speak of "Evil Features" like pistol grips on rifles (oh..."shudder") or bayonet lugs, or standard capacity magazines (as opposed to the puny five or ten round capacity mags).

By: Joe Huffman Monday, November 10, 2008 6:36:52 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( A Security Theater | Freedom | Gun Rights )

Via Bruce Schneier:

New Contest: Can You Out-Lame the TSA?

Last week, in response to my article about the idiocy of airport security, the head of the Transportation Security Administration, Kip Hawley, essentially conceded the main argument of my article, which was that America's aviation security system is not designed to catch smart terrorists, but stupid terrorists. Here's what Hawley wrote last week:

"Clever terrorists can use innovative ways to exploit vulnerabilities. But don't forget that most bombers are not, in fact, clever. Living bomb-makers are usually clever, but the person agreeing to carry it may not be super smart. Even if "all" we do is stop dumb terrorists, we are reducing risk."

Not quite believable. And yet he really said it.

And so, a contest: How would the Hawley Principle of Federally-Endorsed Mediocrity apply to other government endeavors?

...

So, go to it. E-mail your entries to Goldberg.Atlantic@gmail.com.  The Goldblog reader who comes up with the funniest application of the Hawley Principle wins a subscription to the Atlantic.

Here are my entries. They are probably too close to the truth to be funny but still I figure it's worthwhile to mock politicians in public anytime you get the chance:

  1. Gun "buy-backs", restrictions on the type of guns, and carrying of guns don't slow down a violent criminal any. But getting guns out of the hands of small stature women, the elderly, and the infirm will at least prevent those people from being able to go out and commit violent crimes.
  2. Hundreds of millions of meals are prepared each day in the U.S. by unlicensed food preparation people. These people prepare food for small children, the elderly, trusting family members, and unsuspecting friends. Food borne illness and accidental poisoning are exceedingly rare given the vast numbers of meals prepared without inspection by the health officials. Licensing and inspecting the professionals who prepare only a small portion of the total meals won't stop anyone but a minority of incompetent capitalists but at least it raising the cost of doing business will encourage more people to obtain their meals from those who are unlicensed and less tainted by capitalistic inclinations.

If Tamara enters I will concede--sight unseen.

By: Joe Huffman Monday, November 10, 2008 6:20:39 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics | Quote of the Day )

This gun control effort is part of an overall government takeover by the radical left who now control the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. The next part of the Obama-ACORN plan is a new military force separate from the US Armed Forces.

Obama has called for a 'civilian national security force' (http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s) as powerful as the US military, comments that were ignored by the vast majority of the corporate media but compared by conservatives to the Nazi Hitler Youth.

Mike Baker
November 8, 2008
OBAMA AND ACORN OFFICIALS SET SIGHTS ON GUNOWNERS
[It's interesting to me that the left compared Bush to Hitler so often when it seems to me that there are much closer ties to Hitler from several directions such as:

  • A philosophical basis (socialism)
  • Ignoring the constitution and human rights (hostility to private gun ownership)
  • Adoration of a charismatic leader
  • Organization of a "civilian" security force
  • Mandatory "volunteer" service to the state

We'll just have to wait and see. It doesn't appear that Bush is going to start loading people into the cattle cars anytime soon and Obama hasn't announced plans for any "work camps" yet. So comparisons for either of them to Hitler seem to be a bit weak still.--Joe]

# Sunday, November 09, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:18:31 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Bloggers | Home Life )

Don't forget there is a gun blogger meet this evening. Details are here. Barb and I plan to attend.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:43:25 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics | Quote of the Day )

Why do we need so many dang guns? Wouldn't the world be a better place with fewer weapons? I haven't had a gun since the one I had in the U.S. Army in the 1960s.

Jim Purdy
Tulsa (11/9/2008 3:52:49 AM)
Comment to Obama win spurs gun purchases
[Try selling the idea that fewer guns would make the world a better place to these people:

Oh yeah. That's right. You can't convinced them of that because they are dead. They are dead because their own government murdered them. With only a few thousand thugs actually involved in the murdering of 10 million people the victims would only had needed a kill ratio of 1:100 to have completely stopped the butchery. But guess what--their government took their guns away from them with Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons. They had no effective weapons to defend themselves and you, Mr. Purdy and President-Elect Obama, want to recreate the same conditions here.

No thanks. Keep the change.--Joe]

# Saturday, November 08, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 08, 2008 6:18:17 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

Laurel lives close by and recently had this to say about the Obama "transition plan" in regards to firearms:

Hey, at least you really can’t accuse me of unfoundedly predicting impending doom at this point, considering the arrogant bastard is openly flaunting his intention to wage war on my rights.

Fine. If Obama wants to see our rifles on a battlefield, we’ll give him a battlefield. Μολὼν λαβέ.

I'm done blogging for today. I have software for the battlefield to finish.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 08, 2008 6:04:29 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Politics )

Sebastian said,

Hope/Change is soliciting feedback. Be sure to give them some.

So I went to the website and said:

The Second Amendment guarantees a specific enumerated right which is being violated by numerous state and local officials. Prohibitions against certain types of firearms such as so called "assault weapons", prohibitions against carrying of handguns for self defense, and prohibitions against buying and selling of firearms without approval of the government are just a few of the many violations of this essential civil right. I would like for the Justice Department to enforce 18 USC 242 and prosecute the government officials involved in these violations.

By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 08, 2008 5:37:41 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics | Quote of the Day )

This is still the United States, not a socialist gulag. Public money should not be given to private organizations which then turn around and utilize that funding to usurp the electoral process and erode constitutionally-guaranteed civil rights.

Alan Gottlieb
October 28, 2008
‘ACORN USES PUBLIC FUNDS TO STEAL ELECTIONS, NOW YOUR GUN RIGHTS,’ SAYS SAF
[H/T to Jeff for putting me on the trail for this one.--Joe]

# Friday, November 07, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Friday, November 07, 2008 6:34:48 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

In early November, we get to choose between four weeks of riots and four years of socialism.

Personally, I'm rooting for riots.

Doc Russia
October 26, 2008
...we won't be fooled again
[Yeah, so was I. We don't always get what we want though.--Joe]

# Thursday, November 06, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Thursday, November 06, 2008 7:27:50 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights )

Jeff Knox tells us where he and Mike Vanderboegh agree on the idea of using arms against a repressive government.

That's all for today. I have more software to write.

By: Joe Huffman Thursday, November 06, 2008 9:12:33 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

Sure; the terrorists are just lonely, misunderstood, and a little insecure. They'll probably settle down, get jobs and start raising families as soon as we start being nicer and more understanding (and quit being productive, ban alcohol, eliminate our credit banking system, pull all military forces from everywhere, keep our females out of school and force them to stay out of sight, adopt their form of Islam, ban all other religions, banish the Jews, allow them to wipe Israel off the map and finish Hitler's Final Solution, execute all homosexuals, et al).

But if we get unicorns in the bargain, that should make up for it all. Flying unicorns, too, damn it. None of that Earthbound species. Then I won't mind not having oil or electricity, 'cause I can get around on my flying unicorn, what feeds on grass (and so I won't need gas for the lawnmower) left-over bean sprouts and old tofu. Make that four flying unicorns. I need four 'cause I have a family. Either that or the big sport utility flying unicorn (SUFU) that can haul as much as my gigantic, American, 4 x 4, eight-foot bed, super cab, air-conditioned pickup. At least a half-ton SUFU, with the towing package and a big antenna for my ham radio. Oh, and a gun rack. And it can't mind having my 17 ft. Grumman canoe strapped on top either. It had better be one big damned unicorn or I'm going to be pissed.

Lyle @ UltiMAK
November 5, 2008
In the comments.
[In the same comments Tony says, "I want my unicorn to come with rainbows." I'm not sure but I think I'm detecting an entire symphony of sarcasm here.--Joe]

# Wednesday, November 05, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, November 05, 2008 6:16:35 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Politics )

I've been pushing the anti-gun people as bigots meme for quite a while now (since nearly day one on my blog). Here that concept gets mentioned in a more public venue:

Sigler described Massachusetts as a tolerant state, in terms of race and sexual orientation, but criticized the state's intolerance towards handguns, saying lawmakers are "[promoting] bigotry against gun owners." He even proposed that because of these laws, citizens are forced to hide their guns as if they were obscene or wrong, and are ultimately treated as second-class citizens.

Good. It's one of the few defenses we have against the next administration in the White House.

By: Lyle at UltiMAK Wednesday, November 05, 2008 1:01:10 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Current News | Freedom | Politics )

...almost daily;

Friends:
 
Obama may not get the 6 months Biden said the new president would have before he was "tested."   President Bush may be the one.
 
While everyone was looking elsewhere, Syria has enveloped Lebanon and moved the Syrian 3rd Army to Israel's border.  In the meantime the cease-fire farce with Hamas is a shooting war.  In the last 36 hours we had rockets fired into Israel.  Last evening we raided into the Strip, Hamas responded with 20 Mortar bombs. What followed this morning the Jerusalem Post calls "Massive" Kassam rocket fire into Israel.
 
This is all being fueled by the Israeli and American elections.
 
I mourn the Republic.
 
Howard

Surely this sort of thing will be nothing but an uncomfortable memory after the world is "united" by Obama.  The oceans will recede, the clouds of suspicion between cultures will part, earthquakes, storms, pain and hunger will be a thing of the past, the Angels of Peace, Love and Tranquility will sing forever more above all the skies of the world.  Yea, and there will be much rejoicing, amen.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:24:06 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights | Home Life | Politics )

Nice article. Laurel has the story. There is even a picture of Sarah Palin sitting on the bed of her University of Idaho dorm room. The article is here. It starts out like this:

They tell me that about one person in 50 on the streets of Moscow, Idaho, is legally carrying a concealed pistol. A lot more have them in their cars. I rather approve of this, though I don't think I'll join in.

By: Joe Huffman Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:18:38 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics )

I'm actually starting to feel sorry for Barry (even more than I already felt sorry for whoever was going to wind up with a key to the Augean Stables and a garden trowel.) There is a large slice of his constituency that is going to feel betrayed if he doesn't walk to the inauguration across the Reflecting Pool in the Mall.

Tamara K.
November 5, 2008
Even better than a President...
[There will be some disappointment alright. But will it be enough disappointment to keep the nation and world from disappearing into the abyss of socialism and tyranny forever?--Joe]

# Tuesday, November 04, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:48:22 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

There are still lots of things to be done. People have a delaying action to do and a few have some attacks they can make in the short term. The Second Amendment Foundation just announced one of those attacks that can probably bear fruit:

BELLEVUE, Wash., Nov 04, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The Second Amendment Foundation, joined by the National Rifle Association, today filed a lawsuit in federal court against the State of Washington, seeking to overturn a state law that discriminates against legal resident aliens who own firearms by violating their Second Amendment rights under the equal protections affirmed by the 14th Amendment.

The SAF/NRA suit is joined by three legal resident aliens who face loss of jobs and firearms collections, and possible prosecution for owning a gun for self-defense when their current Alien Firearms Licenses (AFL) expire. Under a statute unique to Washington State, aliens must possess an AFL to legally possess firearms.

Also named in the lawsuit are Liz Luce, director of the State Department of Licensing and Paul D. Ayers, chief of police in Issaquah, WA where two of the resident plaintiffs live. Ayers is a defendant for not issuing concealed pistol licenses (CPL) to plaintiffs Roelof Kroes, a South African national, and Adrian Coombes, a British citizen. The other plaintiff is Philip Grady, also a British national and a resident of Everett.

Among the aspects of the case are that are interesting to me are that I know Roelof Kroes and Adrian Coombes. Roelof has been to several Boomershoots and Adrian is the guy I worked with at the FFL to get my Gun Blog 45 from Para. And of course I know people at the Second Amendment Foundation. They get money from me which is matched dollar for dollar from Microsoft.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:35:01 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics )

Obama is our next president. The Federal courts have huge vacancy rates that will be filled by Obama and the Democrat dominated Senate.

Last month I made more posts, 127, than I ever have in a single month. The extra can be attributed to Obama.

At this point talking and writing isn't going to have much effect on our fight for freedom. It's game over man, game over. I'm going to be spending far less time reading blogs and posting. I have a bunch of software I want to write and I'm going to be concentrating on getting that out the door instead of spending so much time with the blogs.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:29:02 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Gun Rights | Politics | Sex )

I'm very depressed today. I can't even blame it on Internet sex (it should be safe for work). It's the election. I voted yesterday and I think that started it.

Then at the cafeteria at work there is a woman that for some reason has been particularly friendly to me. She recognizes when I show up at a different time than usual and always wants to talk a bit (it’s time to introduce her to my wife…). Yesterday she asked if I was excited about “the big day tomorrow”. I told her I was rather depressed about it actually--it is the choice between the lesser of two evils. I then asked if she was excited about it. “I. Am. SO. Excited. About it." she said. I wanted to tell her how many people were murdered last century by attempts to make socialism work. Was she excited to be a part of the next attempt? Was she looking forward to adding her body and the bodies of millions of others to the pile?

It’s the Second Coming or something. Once the Messiah is on his throne all will be forgiven, all will be peace and love.

I see ethics, rules, and the law do not matter to them. I see Brown Shirts.

By: Joe Huffman Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:19:51 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Home Life | Politics )

I voted!

Xenia
8:17 AM, November 4, 2008
Via a text message to me.
[Barb called me, as usual, about 45 minutes ago and gave me the latest news from home. She had just dropped Xenia off to vote. It was Xenia's first time at the polls. Xenia just sent me the above text message. Barb said Xenia was wearing her elephant earrings.--Joe]

# Monday, November 03, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Monday, November 03, 2008 7:15:23 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics )
By: Joe Huffman Monday, November 03, 2008 6:15:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.

Barack Obama
January 17, 2008
Audio: Obama Tells SF Chronicle He Will Bankrupt Coal Industry
[Deliberately bankrupting an industry that supplies 50% of the energy in this country?

Where is John Galt when we need him?--Joe]

# Sunday, November 02, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 02, 2008 11:09:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Gun Rights )

It's not a felony conviction and prison time but it amounts to a fine for attempting to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

By: Joe Huffman Sunday, November 02, 2008 9:56:28 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics )

And we're going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy. We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

Barack Obama
July 2, 2008
Colorado Springs, Colorado

[Lots of people are wondering what he meant by this. Xenia says, "He's the reincarnation of Hitler. He's charismatic and doesn't like our military."--Joe]

# Saturday, November 01, 2008
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 01, 2008 6:33:36 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Boomershoot | Home Life )

We blew up a bunch of pumpkins today. No time for the whole story or any pictures. Just a link to Barrons post (which has pictures and video) and the best of the video (from Kris who made it as a day trip from Seattle):

<STRONG>Update:</STRONG> <A href="http://hunter006.livejournal.com/79462.html">Kris has a post</A> about his little "day trip".
By: Joe Huffman Saturday, November 01, 2008 6:30:09 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) ( Freedom | Politics | Quote of the Day )

I do, however, blame the press for allowing an individual citizen to do the work that they employ standing armies of so-called professionals for. I know they are capable of this kind of investigative journalism: it only took them a day or two to damage Sarah Palin with wild accusations about her baby’s paternity and less time than that to destroy a man who happened to be playing ball when the Messiah decided to roll up looking for a few more votes on the way to the inevitable coronation.

We no longer have an independent, fair, investigative press. That is abundantly clear to everyone - even the press. It is just another of the facts that they refuse to report, because it does not suit them.

Remember this, America: the press did not break this story. A single citizen, on the internet did.

There is a special hell for you "journalists" out there, a hell made specifically for you narcissists and elitists who think you have the right to determine which information is passed on to the electorate and which is not.

That hell - your own personal hell - is a fiery lake of Irrelevance, blinding clouds of Obscurity, and burning, everlasting Scorn.

You’ve earned it.

Bill Whittle
October 27, 2008
SHAME, CUBED