# Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Snoqualmie Pass is getting snow today. Probably not so much that I can't make it home on Friday but of interest because its so unusual for this time of year. It is snowing in Moscow Idaho (my home) and the Boomershoot site too. Maybe I should schedule Boomershoot 2009 for July 4th so the snow will be light enough the roads will be plowed and people can make it without snowmobiles.

Crank up those coal fired power plants and rev the engines in your trucks while waiting at traffic lights--we need to head off the next ice age.

Either Al Gore has crap for brains and/or his motivation is solely for political gain.

Update: Daughter Kim says not to blame Al Gore:

From: Kimberly
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:10 AM
To: Barbara Scott; James Huffman-Scott; Joe Huffman; Xenia Joy

I apologize for the snow it was my fault I cut the dogs hair yesterday

Update2: From my weather advisory email alert:

OROFINO/GRANGEVILLE REGION-
135 PM PDT TUE JUN 10 2008

...SNOW ADVISORY IN EFFECT FROM 8 PM THIS EVENING TO 8 AM PDT WEDNESDAY ABOVE 3500 FEET...

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN MISSOULA HAS ISSUED A SNOW ADVISORY ABOVE 3500 FEET...WHICH IS IN EFFECT FROM 8 PM THIS EVENING TO 8 AM PDT WEDNESDAY.

TOTAL SNOW ACCUMULATIONS OF 1 TO 3 INCHES ARE EXPECTED TONIGHT THROUGH EARLY WEDNESDAY MORNING ABOVE 4000 FEET AND OVER THE WHITE BIRD GRADE ON HIGHWAY 95. ELEVATIONS DOWN TO 3500 FEET...INCLUDING THE CITY OF GRANGEVILLE...CAN EXPECT TO SEE ACCUMULATIONS UP TO AN INCH.

A SNOW ADVISORY MEANS THAT PERIODS OF SNOW WILL CAUSE PRIMARILY TRAVEL DIFFICULTIES. BE PREPARED FOR SNOW COVERED ROADS AND LIMITED VISIBILITIES...AND USE CAUTION WHILE DRIVING.

This could mean certain types of crops in the area will be killed by the cold.

Something the global warming doomsday people ignore is that, typically, farm yields are better with abnormally warm weather than abnormally cold weather. Hence to be on the safe side of things we should try to push things in the direction of excess heating rather than risk excess cooling.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:39:54 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [9]  | 

I don't have a T.V. in my Seattle area bunker so the only shows I watch are DVD sci-fi stuff with James (we just started the third season of Farscape).

With Barb I watch DVDs/on-line stuff like:

  • Bones She is extremely smart, likes guns, and is hyper-rational--where was Temperance when I was a freshman in college and looking for a mate?
  • Columbo He's like a puppy dog wagging his tail and digging holes in the yard--but what the murders don't know is that he's placing land mines (from the episode "How to Dial a Murder").
  • Medium Just accept the premise and enjoy the show.

Barb and I might have to add Swingtown to our list of things to watch while in bed (together).

The following review came to me from someone who picked it up from a email list they subscribe to. This was in response to a comment where someone said they had never been to a party that they didn't know what was going on before they arrived.

I thought it did a pretty fair job of portraying reality without being hostile to swingers. The biggest thing I noticed was that, as with nearly all Hollywood, the time scale was sped up dramatically. From the time a newbie couple was told by people they had just met they were swingers until they decided to participate there would be a lot more time and talking involved rather than just a few glances and walking off to the back bedroom with the experienced couple.

I do know of a case where a couple had monthly parties and the next door neighbors asked why they were never invited. The hosting couple told them to just show up next time--without telling them the nature of the party. The neighbors did show up, figured things out after a half hour or so and left--never to ask about attending again. So, I know it does happen.

The bottom line is I think the writers know a lot about swinging. I think they either have been involved or did a lot of research with people who are or have been involved. I think in order to make the show interesting they will, of necessity, have to introduce stress of some sort into the characters and situations. In the pilot they introduced characters who will enable them to do that. The reality of swinging is not the utopia we would like it to be (neither is monogamy or anything else). The writers of the show will have to exaggerate reality some and create conflicts to make things interesting. I believe it's possible they can do this without making swingers out to be immoral perverts and I think they have made a good first step toward that goal. I'm looking forward to the next episode.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:22:36 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Man catches girlfriend's sex romp on mobile call:

The court was told that the girl named Toni Milton sat on her cell phone by mistake while having sex with her old flame, and thereby unknowingly dialled the number of Neil O’Brien.

She came to know about the blunder only when she heard the muffled sounds of O’Brien.

Not knowing who was on the other side, she said “Hello”, and heard O’Brien shouting in rage.

"I take it we’re finished, then?" British tabloid The Sun quoted O’Brien as shouting.

Angered by what his girlfriend had done, O’Brien drove 15 miles to her home, beat her up in her bedroom and smashed up her possessions.

Just wait until your cell phone GPS can be queried remotely and without your permission.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:49:35 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  | 

How can an individual be free if he is unable to secure his own home? Never did the founding fathers intend our citizenry to be reliant on an overreaching, all inclusive government to protect our individual rights. Rather, the powers of the government were to be limited so that the government served the people, not that the people served the government.

Jeanette M. Moll
Ohio Concealed Carry Permitholders and the U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation.
D.C. v. Heller brief for amici curiae in support of respondent.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34:53 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, June 09, 2008

Via the Para website:

You can help send your favorite gun blogger to summer camp at Blackwater USA with world class shooter and instructor Todd Jarrett... and have a chance to win a invitation for yourself as well. Para USA, along with Blackwater, USA is sponsoring a weekend of first class instruction at the most exclusive training facility in the United States.

The top ten gun bloggers in our contest will get an invitation to shoot a special Para pistol and learn the secrets of a World Champion from Todd Jarrett. Blackwater USA is hosting the event at their facility in North Carolina. Gun Blogger Michael Bane and a video crew will record the event for Down Range TV.

Best of all, by voting for your favorite gun blogger, your name will be put into a drawing for an invitation to this exclusive event. That’s right 10 gun bloggers, and maybe you could spend a weekend learning the shooting secrets of the best shooter in the world.

The Para-Blackwater Gun Bloggers weekend will be August 22-24, 2008. Invitees must provide their own transportation to Norfolk, Virginia. Firearms, ammunition, accessories, room and board during the event will be provided by the sponsors. Participants must be 21 years or older and legally able to own and shoot a handgun.

Act now, voting ends July 1st! Winners will be annouced in early July. You may only vote once in this contest.

You want to see Todd Jarrett blow up a car by shooting at it, don't you?

And I'm sure I can find excuses why you shouldn't vote for anyone else, for example, that last time I talked to Kevin he had has a project he has to finish up in late August anyway so he won't be able to make it.

Barb has to work that weekend so we will be celebrating our anniversary another weekend anyway.

Pretend you are a democrat and vote early, vote often, and vote for ME!!! I'm listed as "The View From North Central Idaho" near the bottom of the list.

Joe Huffman  Monday, June 09, 2008 5:09:18 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [10]  | 

Hobbes believed that the primary purpose for which societies are formed was to enhance the ability to protect oneself, and as such, the first law of nature could never be compromised, altered or diminished by any contract establishing that society. This right was so fundamental that it was deemed unalienable: "A covenant not to defend myself from force, by force, is always void."

James R. Schaller
D.C. v. Heller
Brief of International Scholars as amici curiae in support of respondent.
[Having not read Hobbes (shame on me) I have always said this differently. Instead I have said, "Self defense is a right all species on this planet have claimed for all time." This brief is interesting for other reasons as well. They explain in great detail how the anti-gun bigots who filed briefs in support of the D.C. gun ban are also liars.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Monday, June 09, 2008 2:11:54 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Sunday, June 08, 2008

Amici have no fears that upholding the rights of law-abiding citizens to possess handguns and other functional defensive firearms in their homes will endanger law enforcement officers. Police in the District are killed at a rate about six times higher than the national rate, a statistic that hardly suggests that the District’s ban on law-abiding citizens protecting their homes has helped protect the police.

David B. Kopel
D.C. v. Heller
Brief of The International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), The International Association of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors (IALEFI), Maryland State Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police, Southern States Police Benevolent Association, 29 Elected California District Attorneys, San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association, Long Beach Police Officers Association, Texas Police Chiefs Association, Texas Municipal Police Association, New York State Association of Auxiliary Police, Mendocino County, Calif., Sheriff Thomas D. Allman, Oregon State Rep. Andy Olson, National Police Defense Foundation, Law Enforcement Alliance of America, and The Independence Institute as amici curiae in support of respondent.
[Kopel rocks with the numbers in this brief. This is an excellent source for exploding many of the fallacies used by the anti-gun bigots against us.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Sunday, June 08, 2008 1:00:32 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Saturday, June 07, 2008

A critical step in interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of the privileges and immunities of national citizens and of life, liberty, and property is to understand the evils its Framers sought to remedy. Among the many evils those Framers sought to cure, the systematic violation of the freedmen’s constitutional right to keep and bear arms was prominent.

The evidence of such concern is extensive. While Congress was drafting and considering the proposed Fourteenth Amendment and two pieces of interim legislation -- the Freedmen’s Bureau Bill and the Civil Rights Bill -- it received considerable testimony and evidence regarding the disarming of freedmen by state and local governments and militias.

Steven M. Simpson
February 11, 2008
D.C. versus Heller
Brief for the Institute for Justice as Amicus Curiae in support of respondent.
[There is some really good stuff in this brief explaining the 14th Amendment was initiated because the right to keep and bear arms was being infringed upon by the states. This is setting the stage for applying the 2nd Amendment to the states and cities.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Saturday, June 07, 2008 11:59:11 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Friday, June 06, 2008

The Second Amendment’s historical self-defense purpose should be used to define the scope of its protections. In our view, the Second Amendment protects the right to own firearms of a kind that are commonly used for self-defense by law-abiding individuals. We do not doubt that the government can outlaw private ownership of unusually destructive or exotic weapons. But private ownership of all handguns cannot be prohibited because handguns are the kind of weapon best suited for and most commonly owned for the purpose of self-defense.

Richard K. Willard
D.C. versus Heller
Brief Amicus Curiae Of The Heartland Institute in support of respondent.

Joe Huffman  Friday, June 06, 2008 7:38:57 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Thursday, June 05, 2008

Son James sent me this link--British government vows tougher knife laws. My response was, "Its not Great Britain. Its not mediocre Britain. Its pathetic Britain."

A small sample of the pathetically stupid:

Until now, warnings were given to most of those under the age of 18 found with knives. With the change, anyone 16 or over who carries a knife with a blade longer than 3 inches (7.6 centimeters) will be prosecuted. Those convicted face a penalty of up to four years in prison.

"Young people need to understand that carrying knives doesn't protect you, it does the opposite — it increases the danger for all of us, destroys young lives and ruins families," Brown said.

And a sample of the police state being implemented:

London's new mayor, Boris Johnson, has also vowed to crack down on knife crime. His proposals include airport-style metal-detecting arches at train and subway stations. London police recently began an aggressive new program to search anyone they wish for knives without having to justify their suspicions beforehand.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, June 05, 2008 10:57:31 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Nor may the government justify a ban on a particular firearm simply by claiming to allow the possession of others. While it is a dubious proposition that Petitioners allow individuals any firearms for private home use, the government’s compliance with the Constitution by allowing rifles would not permit the government to violate the Constitution by banning handguns--any more than the government could prohibit books because it permits newspapers and considers them an "adequate substitute."

Alan Gura
Robert A. Levy
Clark M. Neily III
February 24, 2008
RESPONDENT’S BRIEF
On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia Circuit

Joe Huffman  Thursday, June 05, 2008 10:18:26 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, June 04, 2008

It appears the Brady Bunch stopped by for a visit. They just saw the one post. It was such a mildly worded post though. There are other posts I wish the Brady Campaign people had read instead.

Even if they don't recognize it at first having their bigotry repeatedly pointed out will have an effect on their morale and dedication to their evil cause.

Domain Name   sct.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address   65.242.56.# (HANDGUN CONTROL)
ISP   Verizon Business
Location  
Continent  :  North America
Country  :  United States  (Facts)
State  :  District of Columbia
City  :  Washington
Lat/Long  :  38.9042, -77.032 (Map)
Distance  :  2,071 miles
Language   English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14
Javascript   version 1.5
Monitor  
Resolution  :  1024 x 768
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Jun 3 2008 12:33:57 pm
Last Page View   Jun 3 2008 12:33:57 pm
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL http://blogsearch.go...22&btnG=Search Blogs
Search Engine blogsearch.google.com
Search Words "brady campaign"
Visit Entry Page   http://blog.joehuffm...bleRestrictions.aspx
Visit Exit Page   http://blog.joehuffm...bleRestrictions.aspx
Out Click    
Time Zone   UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time   Jun 3 2008 3:33:57 pm
Visit Number   315,333

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:26:52 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

I was invited to speak at the Boeing Rifle and Pistol Club tonight. This will be something like the fifth time. Tonight I will be talking about the NRA Convention and the Second Amendment Blogger Bash.

My notes for the presentation:

  • Huge, fancy, gun show
  • Nearly 70K people
  • Media credentials for bloggers
  • Second Amendment blogger bash
    • Bitch girls
    • Snowflakes in Hell
    • Say Uncle
    • Michael Bane
    • Smallest Minority
    • Books, Bikes, Boomsticks (broomsticks)
    • Squeaky Wheel Seeks Grease
    • Call me Ahab
    • Sharp as a Marble
    • Third Power (Days of our Trailer)
    • Traction Control 
    • The Ten Ring (Denise and Bill)
    • 40 in all
  • Sessions
    • Legal
    • Activists
      • Its not the critic that counts
      • In their own words
      • They don't fear me they fear you--Chris Cox
      • You have the final say--Wayne LaPierre
  • Blogger activities
    • Happy hour with Bane
    • Todd Jarrett
    • Publisher of Soldier of Fortune
    • Eyeblast.TV
    • Talk until dawn
  • Celebrities
    • McCain
    • Mitt Romney
    • David Hardy
    • Ollie North
    • Ted Nugent
    • Cam Edwards
    • Glenn Beck
      • It comes down to Larry, Moe, Curly?
      • The Democrats sold their soul to Karl Marx.
      • We like lawyers, crooks and crack dealers better than Washington.
      • Before I pay over 10 for a gallon of gas I will drill through a polar bears head.  ----- I would feel bad but I would do it.
Joe Huffman  Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:11:46 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Madison’s very organization shows the right to arms was seen as an individual right and not as militia-related. Madison’s draft did not take the format with which we are today familiar, that of a numbered list of amendments following the Constitution. Rather, his draft designated where, within the Constitution, each provision was to be inserted.

For example, his provisions relating to the House of Representatives were to be inserted in Article I, Section 2. An unsuccessful proposal to forbid States to infringe the rights of conscience was to be inserted in Article I, Section 10, alongside its other "Restrictions Upon Powers of States." Provisions relating to jury trial, grand juries, and appeals were to be placed in Article III.

Thus, if Madison had seen the future Second Amendment as militia-related, he would have designated its place next to the Militia Clauses in Article I, Section 8.

Instead Madison grouped it with freedom of speech, press, assembly and other individual rights, and designated their place in Article I, Section 9, right after "No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed." Madison’s arrangement is compelling evidence that he did not view the right to arms as a guarantee relating to States and militias; its militia reference was explanation, not an operative part of its guarantee.

David T. Hardy
Brief of amicus curiae, Academics for the Second Amendment
[Sometime this month the Supreme Court will settle "the question". We know the correct answer. We've known it all along. We just had trouble convincing those bigots who didn't want to confront reality. Nearly everyone expects the court to deliver us an easily wielded "clue by four" on at least this one point. I just hope we have the wisdom to use it correctly and not snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:04:34 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Tuesday, June 03, 2008

I wrote this as a comment on thehighroad.org but figured it should have its own post.  Someone started a thread about NDs at gun shows (smells like an anti to me, akin to the standard MSM interview wherein the conservative guest is asked, "What's the dumbest thing you've ever done?")  Here's my response:

I used to exhibit at gun shows. I always felt as safe at a gun show as anywhere else.  Much safer than some places I've been.  NDs at shows were always something you heard about, but never witnessed, kind of like Sasquatch and space aliens.

If you ever find yourself afraid for your life, running into a gun show would be a good choice if available.

If you're worried about safety, don't drive to a gun show though-- you're vastly more likely to be injured or killed during the drive to and from the gun show than while you're there.  I suspect this would be true even if 3/4 of the people at the gun show were drunk and all the people on the roads that day were sober.

On that note; I go to my kid's school football games (you know where this is going, right?) and at each and every game there is an ambulance, complete with paramedic crew, on location all during the game.

Ever seen an ambulance and crew on standby at a gun show? How about at a shooting match, where people are, you know, actually loading and firing guns?

Me neither.

Do NDs happen? Yes. Very, very rarely. Usually, they result in no injuries or serious property damage. Do people get killed falling down in their own homes?  Yes, and it is a more common occurrence.

Carry on.
When I was taking my NRA instructor courses last fall, a couple of the teachers gave several accounts of antis going to gun shows or gun classes and leaving loaded cartridges in places they don't belong, trying to create an incident.  I have no doubt that this can happen-- it could be seen as a variation on Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy, or whatever you call it when someone starts a building on fire and then hangs around to watch the spectacle.  It also demonstrates that other people's safety is often the last thing on the mind of the anti gun bigot.
Lyle at UltiMAK  Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:27:36 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

The view that the right of armed self defense was a first law of nature both preceded enactment of the Constitution, and continued to prevail in the decades following its enactment. Shortly before the Revolutionary war commenced, Blackstone confirmed that every Englishman had the right of "arms for their defence," which stemmed from "the natural right of resistance and self-preservation, when the sanctions of society and laws are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression."

Michael B. Minton
Brief of Pink Pistols and gays and lesbians for individual liberty as amici curiae in support of respondent.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, June 03, 2008 7:04:15 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, June 02, 2008

I posted the other day about knife rights and mentioned that knives with blades longer than three inches were illegal in Atlanta.

Thanks to an email from Azreel I received these links: Yesterday Joshua was arrested in Atlanta for having a knife with a blade too long. The concealed pistol (with a permit) wasn't a problem. He could be trusted with that, but a knife? Nope. It's off to spend some quality time with the police for five or six hours. It turned out okay. After spending hundreds of dollars on an attorney the charges were dismissed today.

Joe Huffman  Monday, June 02, 2008 10:02:01 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

In addition to the postcard from Dave Barry I also received some other stuff today that thrilled me almost as much.

I received a couple of patches from Thirdpower. I'm going to put one on my Boomershoot coat and the other one on my cork board at work.

I received the explosives handler form Squeaky filled out a few days ago. It sure looks like we are going to have another gun nut playing with explosives next April. Cool!

Joe Huffman  Monday, June 02, 2008 9:38:14 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

Background material is here.

I returned to the Seattle area tonight and found the following postcard in my mail:

Dear Joe --

Many thanks for the toilet pieces. (I never thought I would write those words.)

Best,
Dave Barry

I wonder if I could auction off the remaining pieces on eBay...

I would have given a piece or two to Sue today if I had thought about. We were right there...

Joe Huffman  Monday, June 02, 2008 9:26:51 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Sue showed up at my house right on time and we drove to Kendrick and had an early lunch. I think we spent more time in the restaurant that we did actually on site. But we did do some work at the restaurant where we had a nice table to look at paperwork.

We parked at the road and walked in rather than drive the government car across the hay field. I opened the place up, showed her around. She took some pictures, I explained some nuances in my record keeping to her. She said it all looked fine and we drove back to Moscow. She said she was happy to finally be able to visit the Taj Mahal it was nice to see how much I had improved things since the last time she visited (about six years ago I think).

We spent more time talking about kids, spouses, grade school teachers, people at work, her ex-husband, my old job at PNNL, and books than we did about ATF and Boomershoot stuff. She said she wants to attend Boomershoot sometime. She asked if we blew up anything interesting recently, like pumpkins maybe? She already knew about the pumpkins. It's actually in my file. They think it's fine and kind of a fun thing to talk about. I told her about blowing up the toilet this year and we did a laptop computer once. She asked how far the pieces of the toilet went. I told her we found pieces a 100 yards away but that we were a minimum of 375 yards away.

She told me that my file had a few notes in it about "concerned calls" from the ATF in the Seattle office. Apparently someone will hear about Boomershoot and the Seattle people will contact the Spokane ATF office to "check up on things". The Spokane people will have to tell them that I'm one of the good guys with a license and everything is in order and they aren't worried about me. That hasn't happened for a while and she thinks maybe they have the Seattle people educated now.

She told stories of explosive magazines built high into the side of mountains where when the snow melts in the spring things get very wet (not acceptable as per ATF regulations). And having to open up box after box of blasting caps to verify the contents because they had so many partial boxes. Another story that was interesting was about confiscating cigarettes that had not had the tax paid on them--a barn stacked FULL of them. It took two semi-trucks to haul them all away and the ATF people had to inventory and put evidence tags on everything. A real pain. My take on that is that someone was being so stupid they deserved to get caught. If you are going to get involved in the black market for a product you want to keep the minimum quantity of product on hand at any one time. There were all kinds of clues in the story that made it clear these people were just stupid. They made a LOT of money but were too stupid to hold on to it.

The only thing that was a downer was that she confirmed what I already suspected about the renewal. They don't have a special form for renewal like the Orange Book section 555.46 says. I have to fill out the original application complete with fingerprints and picture just like an original application. The only thing that is different is that I pay the $100 renewal fee instead of the $200 original application fee. She started to sort of apologize for it saying she it didn't make a lot of sense but I cut her off and said something like, "It doesn't have to make sense. It just the way it is and I have to do it. I understand and I'll comply. I'm just a little annoyed because I'm pretty sure my fingerprints haven't changed recently."

All in all it was a very pleasant drive and an enjoyable time talking. Assuming I don't goof off too long and get the renewal form back in time there will be Boomershoot 2009.

Joe Huffman  Monday, June 02, 2008 2:48:12 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

While the AAP Brief purports to defend the interests of children, in fact the gun is the best protector for the weak and vulnerable in society, as it removes any advantage held by a stronger aggressor. Victims who resist crime with a gun are only half as likely to be injured as those who put up no defense, and one fourth as likely to be injured as those resisting by other means. For centuries, the gun has been a family’s best defense against criminal attack, and the Second Amendment enshrines that essential safeguard in the Constitution. It is worth observing that "about half of all American homes contain a gun" and thus "burglars tend to avoid all occupied American homes."

Andrew L. Schlafly
February 7, 2008
Brief for amicus curiae association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc. in support of Respondent.
http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/documents/07-290bsacAAPS.pdf

Joe Huffman  Monday, June 02, 2008 7:08:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Sunday, June 01, 2008

I"ve been saying they think of us as "gun n***ers". More evidence via Ry at the Seattle Times from Times deputy business editor Rami Grunbaum:

Pawn X-Change, which expects revenues of $38 million this year, seeks to separate itself from the stereotype of the dingy and disreputable pawnshop. Power tools, guitars, TV and electronics — but no firearms — are carefully arrayed around a well-lit store staffed by cordial employees wearing company shirts.

What if the article, making the point about avoiding the dingy and disreputable sterotypes, said none of the pawnshop employees were Jews? Think about that Mr. Grunbaum.

Treat them as the bigots they are.

Joe Huffman  Sunday, June 01, 2008 5:14:45 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  |