Thursday, October 05, 2006

Malkin's video on Islamic extremists has been banned and they won't tell her specifically why. So she made another video asking them why. I love the sarcasm at the end:

Joe Huffman  Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:37:58 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

The Liberal party has no direction. The real challenge for the next leader will obviously be to unite the party and give them some direction other than just to run with whatever the issue of the week is that they think they can make a cheap point out of.

Stephen Harper
Prime Minister of Canada
September 16, 2006
$1-billion didn't prevent tragedy
[As near as I can tell the same applies to the Democrats in our country.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:03:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Phil at Random Nuclear Strikes asks Ken Schram, Seattle liberal talk show host, Just One Question.

He probably won't get an answer, but it might make a few gears grind for a minute or two.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:54:50 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Via David and the Idaho Statesman:

Helen Chenoweth-Hage, an outspoken conservative who served three terms as Idaho’s 1st Congressional District representative, died Monday after being thrown from a vehicle that overturned on an isolated central Nevada highway.

She was traveling toward Tonopah, Nev., at 11:40 a.m. PDT on State Route 376 when the Jeep drifted off the right side of the road, swerved to the left and flipped after the driver overcorrected in steering to the right, Nevada Highway Patrol Trooper Rocky Gonzalez said.

State Route 376 is the main route between Tonopah and her ranch in Monitor Valley. The crash occurred about 40 miles from her ranch. Tonopah is halfway between Reno and Las Vegas.

The other occupants — daughter-in-law Yelena Hage, 24, and 5-month-old grandson, Bryan Hage — also were ejected but were not seriously injured. Nye County Sheriff Tony DeMeo said it’s still unclear who was driving.

Gonzalez said Chenoweth-Hage, 68, was holding the baby and wasn’t wearing a seatbelt.

...

A Republican, Chenoweth-Hage was elected to Congress from Idaho in 1994, serving three terms before stepping down.

She first ran for Congress against incumbent Democrat Larry LaRocco, gaining national attention during fundraisers when she held endangered-salmon bakes, serving canned salmon and ridiculing the listing of Idaho salmon as an endangered species.

During her congressional career, Chenoweth-Hage was a victim of a “salmon pie” attack while at a field hearing on forest health in Missoula, Mont. Randall Mark of Moscow hit her in the head with a “pie” made of rotten canned salmon, forcing the meeting to adjourn for an hour while she cleaned salmon flakes from her hair and jacket.

After the attack, the congresswoman joked, “I would like to say that I find it amusing that they used salmon. I guess salmon must not be endangered anymore.”

Chenoweth-Hage, a colorful lawmaker, said salmon aren’t endangered but that white males are. She also said the Endangered Species Act was unconstitutional, complained about black government helicopters harassing ranchers, said minorities didn’t like northern Idaho because it is too cold and called for disarming federal resource enforcement agents.

The outspoken advocate of smaller government self-imposed a three-term limit and chose not to run in 2000.

She lived in Orofino at the same time Barb and I were going to High School there. Barb's sister Nancy used to babysit for her and her ex-husband Nick Chenoweth. There are stories I could tell, but won't, about her private life.

She did a good job as our Representative in Congress. I'm sorry to hear she is gone.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, October 04, 2006 1:23:51 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

I sometimes give my wife and her family a bad time about their "different" sense of humor. Here we have Barb's sister Nancy caught in the act, by both Xenia and I, of pushing over an old building in the park last Saturday:

Probably more characteristic of their "different" sense of humor is as it applies to outhouses. I'll explain some other time.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, October 04, 2006 6:20:01 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

For some reason this quote came to mind when I read the article:

Man, n.: An animal so lost in rapturous contemplation of what he thinks he is as to overlook what he indubitably ought to be.  His chief occupation is extermination of other animals and his own species, which, however, multiplies with such insistent rapidity as to infest the whole habitable earth and Canada.

Ambrose Bierce
The Devil's Dictionary

It's politicians that infest the whole habitable earth, even Canada, but some of them 'get it'--even in Canada:

For the past decade, the previous Liberal government has put all of its eggs in one basket when it comes to preventing gun crime. It invested over $1 billion into a gun registry that never functioned properly and was never proven to have prevented a single crime.

While federal gun registry officials were out chasing down farmers for not registering their .22s, relatively little was being done to attack criminal gun use. The Montreal tragedy, sadly, was the ultimate proof of the gun registry's failure. The preliminary police investigation revealed Kimveer Gill appears to have properly registered all his guns and complied with every other firearm regulation.

The $1 billion wasted on the registry could have been put to much better use in putting more police on the streets, providing better equipment for forensics labs and helping schools and social workers to identify and deal with troubled youths before they become violent.

The Liberal opposition, blind as always to facts, continues to chant that we must keep the registry to prevent future crimes, even though it has failed so abysmally to prevent past ones. The new Conservative government will not repeat the Liberals' mistakes.

...

Shamefully, the Liberals, NDP and the Bloc continue to exploit the grief of families by trying to twist the Montreal tragedy to their own political advantage. The Conservative government is not interested in such rhetoric. We are interested only in doing the right things by taking practical steps to clamp down on gun crime and violent criminals.

Tom Lukiwski
Lukiwski is Conservative MP for Regina Lumsden Lake Centre.
Ottawa

They have a long way to go to undo all the harm done by the restrictions on firearms. An entire nation needs to be educated on self-defense and how to use handguns. Had that $1 Billion (some say $2 Billion) been spent on teaching people to use and carry a handgun the Montreal tragedy would have been stopped much sooner. Think of it this way; when some criminal starts shooting innocent people what is the current response? It's to call the police who, quite correctly, arrive as fast as is practical with their own guns to stop the shooter.

Got that? Good guys with guns stop bad guys with guns from hurting innocent people. Everyone knows that. When the good guys don't have guns they are easily slaughtered by the bad guys with guns.

Therefore the way to reduce the number of innocent people from getting hurt or killed is to make sure there are good guys with guns close by. Therefore we need more good guys to carry guns with them and reduce the time from when a bad guy does something bad until he is stopped by a good guy with a gun. In this country we, by constitutional design, have the ultimate solution--The Right to Keep and Bear Arms. This solution also protects us from when the police, and the government in general, becomes infested with bad guys.

Unfortunately because of the infestation of politicians we have suffered with for the past 70+ years (I'm thinking of NFA '34, but really it's been longer than that) we have a lot of work to do before we restore things to their proper order. At least we are headed in the proper direction on this important issue.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, October 04, 2006 5:41:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

As I obliquely reported the other day my cell phone turned into a pumpkin at midnight on Saturday. It wasn't until lunch time yesterday that I was finally able to get it fixed. It's quite the Cinderella now. Very pretty and nice. I'd like to say more but there are those pesky NDAs...

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:32:34 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

They say $32K was too much for playing around on second base. But they don't say what they think a fair price would be.

I think they should just let the open market decide.

Both links are via Raymond.

Sex
Joe Huffman  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:18:08 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Your claim that "they're only for killing people" is imprecise. A gas chamber or electric chair is designed for killing people, and these devices obviously serve different functions than guns. To be precise, a high-capacity, military-type rifle or handgun is designed for conflict. When I need to protect myself and my freedom, I want the most reliable, most durable, highest-capacity weapon possible. The only thing hunting and target shooting have to do with freedom is that they're good practice.

John Ross
http://www.john-ross.net/mistakes.htm
September 14, 2005

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:05:03 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Just stay away. There's no one here but racist, sexist, red-necked, gun-toting, explosives-loving, knuckle-dragging, Neanderthals anyway so you wouldn't like it.

On Sunday Barb and I replaced a Geocache that turned up missing. Things went much better this time than the last time we tried to visit this location. We took some pictures while we were out:

This is what I want you to think of when you think of Idaho:

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 10:59:48 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

I think the law is silly, but I am inclined to agree that the State of Texas probably is within it's enumerated powers to pass and enforce such a silly law:

The Supreme Court refused Monday to consider whether a Texas law making it a crime to promote sex toys shaped like sexual organs is unconstitutional.

An adult bookstore employee in El Paso, Texas, sued the state after his arrest for showing two undercover officers a device shaped like a penis and telling the female officer the device would arouse and gratify her.

The employee, Ignacio Sergio Acosta, says a Texas law outlawing the manufacture, marketing or dissemination of an “obscene device” including those shaped like sex organs is unconstitutional because it prevents individuals from using such devices, violating their right to sexual privacy.

I would be inclined to ridicule every man involved in this from the legislators that voted for it, the police enforcing the law, to the prosecutors presenting the case. It would go something like this, "So, are you afraid your wife won't be interested in you anymore once she gets one of these? Perhaps you should get some lessons on how to be a better lover rather than trying to prevent her from getting a little satisfaction."

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 10:09:26 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Pretty much what I expected. I thought that particular explosive needed some more processing after being mixed and perhaps it does but they just aren't telling us. Also, I would have used something other than a hypodermic needle but other than that there are no surprises here for me:

Scientists tested the ingredients linked to the London plot in the Rio Grande Valley south of Albuquerque, where the canyons and mountains form a perfect explosives testing range. Based on the materials found in Britain, investigators developed a specific theory of the bomb plot, two officials who have been briefed on the inquiry said.

With the seal on a sports drink called Lucozade intact, the plotters apparently intended to remove the drink with a hypodermic needle and replace it with highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide, a syrupy liquid once used as rocket fuel. Another bottle would be filled with a common household substance, which The New York Times agreed not to disclose at the request of Homeland Security officials. After the two were mixed, a detonator hidden in a hollowed-out AA battery would be used to set off the bomb, according to this theory.

What they don't come right out and say is that they can't protect us from bombs being brought or made on-board. As long as I am allowed to walk on-board without body cavity searches, remain conscious, unrestrained, and unobserved for at least a short time there will be a way for me to detonate an explosive on-board. Get used to it and stop spending so much money on useless "security".

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:55:56 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

I don't think some people believe me when I tell them the hoplophobes frequently appear to believe that guns have free will. Here is more evidence of the truth of my claim:

No one will rise up to defend a man who walks into an Amish school, lines young girls up against a blackboard, ties up their feet, and then kills them before killing himself. But a surprising number of people will inevitably rise up to defend his guns, to call the man guilty but his weapons innocent.

...

There are no simple solutions to this conflict. It is neither possible nor tolerable to secure every school or guard every child. Nor is it possible or politically tolerable to keep tabs on every gun. But in these killings we see an open society threatened by the ubiquity of its weapons, in which one kind of freedom is allowed to trump all others. Most gun owners are respectable, law-abiding citizens. But that is no reason to acquit the guns.

Call the weapons innocent? "Acquit the guns"? Someone should commit these lunatics. They have mental problems.

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:42:08 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greater dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.

Justice Louis Brandeis
1928
Olmstead v. US 277 US 479

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:06:44 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

This is, word for word and in its entirety, the text on a poster that has been displayed in a public school in our area for years:

Violence is Any;
Word
Look
Sign
Act
 that inflicts or threatens to inflict physical or emotional injury or discomfort upon another person's body, feelings, or possessions.

Can anyone make sense of that statement?  Adopting it as policy would be quite another matter:  "Ms. Dimbulb, Johnny gave my pencil a dirty look..."

Send the kid in for anger management counseling.  That'll get him to respect you, I'm sure.

I would point out that approximately 100% of a public school's budget comes as a result of threatening tax payers with acts of violence, but saying that might inflict emotional discomfort and thereby constitute an act of violence.

Lyle at UltiMAK  Tuesday, October 03, 2006 5:44:07 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
 Monday, October 02, 2006

Someone gets up one day and says, 'I'm gonna kill all the girls.' How do you legislate against that?

Katie True
Pennsylvania House Representative from Lancaster County
October 2, 2006
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Analysis: Gun control forces will be emboldened, face tall task
[The "tall task" is to train and arm the adults in the schools. The only solution which could improve the odds.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Monday, October 02, 2006 10:52:36 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
 Sunday, October 01, 2006

DOS probably got your dog pregnant and left the milk out a couple times in college. Perhaps Windows 3.11 never paid you back for that $100 it was totally going to spend to get his car fixed but you later found out he spent on whiskey and hookers. Exchange server - I heard what it did, it was in all the papers.

Ry Jones

I understand you hate Microsoft
October 1, 2006
[Read the post. How apropos. As I told Barb this morning, "My phone turned into a pumpkin at midnight."--Joe]
Joe Huffman  Sunday, October 01, 2006 9:44:06 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Saturday, September 30, 2006

Xenia's boyfriend just came home on leave from his army training. Xenia has been anxiously awaiting his return after not seen him for months.

After saying, "Hi." The first thing I asked him if he brought any hand grenades back for me. Alas, he says access is restricted. <heavy sigh>

Joe Huffman  Saturday, September 30, 2006 10:09:23 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

My nephew, Scott Amos, became an Eagle Scout today. We just got back from the ceremony. His name was engraved on a plaque that is kept in the local church. His was the 13th name on the plaque. The first one had the date of 1983. There have been just 13 Eagle Scouts in the town of Potlatch Idaho in the last 23 years.

I was surprised at how big a deal it was. The mayor was there, a city councilman, and our State Representative, Shirley Ringo. He got letters of congratulation from our U.S. Representative Butch Otter, our U.S. Senator Larry Craig, our Governor Jim Risch, Vice President Dick Cheney, and President George Bush.

Congratulations to Scott for acceptance into such an elite group.

Xenia took lots of pictures and I expect I'll be getting one to put up with this post later today.

Joe Huffman  Saturday, September 30, 2006 3:27:29 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

I don't help people make bombs (exception given to the U.S. Military should they ask but that is exceedingly unlikely). And I don't help idiots make explosives.

A case in point:

From: Andrewball20@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 5:48 AM
To: blog@joehuffman.org
Subject: Comments on: The View From North Central Idaho

i want 2 get some hydrogen peroxide beacause can u send me some and how much will it cost i live in england by the way.

Hydrogen peroxide is used for many things. But if someone doesn't know where to get it then almost for certain they want it for making explosives. Otherwise they would go to a retailer that specializes in that particular legitimate use and ask for the substance that performed the function they wanted accomplished. For example you would get acetone for removing paint at the paint store and ask for "paint remover". Or you would get acetone from the cosmetic department of the drug store by asking for fingernail polish remover.

And why else would he find me (actually boomershoot.org/general/bombhelp.htm and then to blog.joehuffman.org) via this google query:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=how+to+make+a+bomb
My response to this idiot:

From: Joe Huffman
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 6:42 AM
To: 'Andrewball20@aol.com'
Subject: RE: Comments on: The View From North Central Idaho

 
In particular this link should be of use to you: http://nobombs.net/brucel/explosivegraphics.html
 
And as near as I can tell you don't live in England. You probably sent this message from NYC and certainly from within the U.S.
 
And furthermore if you can't figure out how to get hydrogen peroxide on your own you are far too stupid to know how to build explosives without hurting some innocent person. I wouldn't worry about you getting a Darwin Award but hurting innocent people I do worry about.
 
-joe-

I may be wrong about him being from NYC. His email appears to have come from a dialup in NYC. His browsing appears to come in from the U.K.

Joe Huffman  Saturday, September 30, 2006 6:29:26 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Giving a friend or neighbor a firearm doesn’t help them– it puts them in danger. And re-releasing a firearm into the community instead of destroying it is, as Shaw rightly realizes, asking for trouble.

'Mike' at GunGuys.com
September 29, 2006
Gun Owner Can’t Get Rid of an Unwanted Gun
[One could surmise from this nut case that the gun, a bolt action .22 rifle, was caught in a trap while on the prowl for a victim. He uses language that would be more appropriate for a live rattlesnake than an inanimate object made of metal and wood. Either 'Mike' has mental problems or he is actually on our side and is mocking the anti-gun bigots.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Saturday, September 30, 2006 4:49:04 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Friday, September 29, 2006

From Sean and Wendell.

Sean says, "In the spirit of Boomershoot Adventures..."

Skeet shooting has been replaced.

I'm amazed by his excellent aim shooting the shotgun from the hip and what appears to be without sights with the machine gun.

Now if those cars had been filled with Boomerite...

I've had several requests to blow up cars but people always lost interest when I told them they would have to help clean up the mess.

Joe Huffman  Friday, September 29, 2006 4:43:40 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

I'm working on the web page(s) for reserving a Boomershoot 2007 shooting position. You can see it here. For test purposes only at this time. Let me know what you think.

The pictures were taken March of 2006 on a rather "gray" day. During the actual event the grass is green even if it's snowing, you have 40 MPH winds, and the forecast is looking up because they are only predicting 20 MPH winds and rain.

Actually, some times it's beautiful (from Ry, click on the picture for the video):

Now, isn't that beautiful? One of my favorite quotes says it so well:

I don't know why everyone does not share my delight with explosives. If they don't, it has to be some abhorrent character defect.

Ragnar Benson
From: Ragnar's Guide to Home and Recreational Use of High Explosives
Page 110, Copyright 1988.

Joe Huffman  Friday, September 29, 2006 8:25:57 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  | 

The time is overdue for a reassessment of such laws. All they have done is create target-rich, no-risk environments for monsters who have no fear of encountering an armed teacher or administrator, or a legally-armed private citizen who might happen to be in the building.

This sort of thing didn't happen before the advent of gun-free school zone laws. You never saw such an outrage in the days when high schools typically had rifle teams, and -- particularly in the West -- where it was common in the fall to find both teachers and students with hunting rifles or shotguns locked in their cars.

Alan Gottlieb
Chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
CO. ATTACK PROVES FALLACY OF ‘GUN FREE SCHOOL ZONE’ LAWS, SAYS CCRKBA
September 28, 2006

Joe Huffman  Friday, September 29, 2006 7:14:34 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
 Thursday, September 28, 2006

Actually it is a Discovery Channel piece that I was pointed to by the anti gun bigot at "Freedom State Alliance". This time I actually mostly agree with him when he says:

This shocking video might be the best demonstration of the lethality and power of the .50-caliber sniper rifle – YOU SIMPLY MUST WATCH IT.

Drop the words "shocking" and "YOU SIMPLY MUST" and we've come to agreement.

There is some false/misleading information in the video however. Bolt action rifles don't take 15 to 20 seconds to cycle. And the AK round is seldom referred to as "308".

Joe Huffman  Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:13:52 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  | 

Liberal gun-grabbing legislation is going to go down here... . And I'm going to continue to stand with some of my colleagues and reference those hundreds of thousands of Second Amendment supporters that want the gun-grabbing legislation to go down.

Daryl Metcalfe
Pennsylvania State Representative 
September 27, 2006
Mostly, a miss on gun control
The Philadelphia Enquirer September 28, 2006
[This particular gun grabbing special event attracted a lot of attention outside the state as well as inside. It's good to see the anti-gun bigots stopped.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:30:31 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Wednesday, September 27, 2006

The Utah Supreme court:

In the decision, the court ruled a University of Utah policy prohibiting students, faculty and staff from carrying weapons on campus violated Utah's Uniform Firearms Act. The law, enacted in 2004, prevents any state entity from creating a rule which in "any way inhibits or restricts the possession or use of firearms on either public or private property," according to the ruling.

So what are the schools doing?

Paul Murphy, spokesperson for the attorney general's office, said the policies at both Weber State and USU raise legal concerns in light of the court's recent ruling.

"Right now, the law is very clear that only the legislature can make laws concerning firearms," Murphy said. "And if they [state schools] are out of sync with that, they will have to make changes."

So far, however, USU and Weber State have no plans to permanently change their gun policies.

"I haven't heard anything on our campus about making a change to this policy [prohibiting firearms]," said Travis Hampshire, a human resources generalist at Weber State. "I imagine if this was brought up to the president, they would look into it."

"Look into it"? Yeah, right. They are going to do their best to ignore it and if necessary fight it every inch of the way. It's just like 50 years ago with signs that said "no colored people allowed". These bigots are defying the law, denying people their inalienable rights, and should be prosecuted, fined, and jailed under 18 USC 242.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, September 27, 2006 7:31:40 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

When the Intel 386 came out tech pundits joked about the computers could then wait faster for the next keystroke while running your word processing program. But Bill Gates told the world that no matter how fast the computers were that Microsoft would be able to write software that would bring them to their knees. He wasn't joking but I'm pretty sure it didn't come out quite like he intended it.

The 386 ran at something like 15 to 25 MHz and required a separate math co-processor in order to compute the sum of two floating point numbers in anything less than dozens of clock cycles. Trig functions, square roots, or logarithms were hundreds of clock cycles without the co-processor.

Now Intel has announced quad-core processors with more cores on the way:

Intel will deliver the company's first quad-core processors for high-performance PCs and servers in November, getting the jump on rival AMD in providing the next generation of chips designed to deliver the power needed to handle high-definition video, cutting-edge games, and math-intensive number-crunching.

...

Intel officials already have indicated that chips with dozens of cores might be possible by the end of this decade. The company hinted that, 10 years down the line, chips with hundreds of cores might be possible.

Mark Margevicius, a research director at Gartner, said that the move from single- to dual-core processors broke the barrier to such developments. "We're now in a multicore world," he said in a recent interview. "There's no looking back."

One of these quad-core processors can do more hard core (pardon the pun) math computing in a second than my first 386 could in five hours. Now I just have to write applications than can put that processing power to useful work.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, September 27, 2006 7:14:40 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

A mere 70 some years after many Jews no doubt told each other, "Careful not to piss off the Nazis.  It might antagonize them" we see the German government ceding to the Jihadis' wishes.  No doubt this will be a big help in bringing "Peace In Our Time".

Mozart's Idomeneo, re di Creta (K. 366) was written in 1780, and premiered in Munich in 1781.  225 years later, it has become politically incorrect-- apparently banned in Germany until further notice.  My! How we have progressed.

LONDON (Reuters)
Berlin security officials had warned that staging the opera "Idomeneo" would pose an "incalculable security risk."

The controversy centered on a scene in which King Idomeneo is shown on stage with the severed heads of Buddha, Jesus, Mohammad and the sea god Poseidon.

This Mozart was an unusual fellow.  Here's a background of the offending opera.  You can see it performed for yourself, or arrange a community showing.

On a slightly interesting side note;  Mozart died in December of 1791-- the same month in which our United States Bill of Rights was ratified.  Both, it seems, are unpopular today among idiots.

Lyle at UltiMAK  Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:05:36 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

Action is greater than writing. A good man is a nobler object of contemplation than a great author. There are but two things worth living for: to do what is worthy of being written; and to write what is worthy of being read.

Ross Perot
[I was thinking of Jeff Cooper when I selected this quote. He did both.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, September 26, 2006 11:27:44 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Tuesday, September 26, 2006

At first glance at the newspaper version I was only surprised by one statistic; "one in five men had homosexual experiences". That seems a little bit high but it would depend on the exact question asked. Other bits of information include:

"Materials in our archive range from holiday makers enjoying themselves on the beach at Blackpool to the experiences of the Second World War when many people, fearing they may not survive the war, were more sexually active," she said.

Despite the taboos of the time, the 1949 sex survey, originally meant for national newspapers but never published due to its content, found one in five men had homosexual experiences and a quarter admitted to having sex with prostitutes. One in five women confessed to extra-marital affairs.

Alan Crosby, a historian at Liverpool University, said the archives also show how attitudes to sex crimes have changed.

"Sexual offences in the past were recognized as serious crimes, just as they are today," he said, but the punishment system was very different.

Documents detail how a man convicted of a sex crime in northern English town in 1630 was punished by being paraded through the streets and humiliated in front of fellow citizens.

Sex
Joe Huffman  Tuesday, September 26, 2006 8:15:41 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |