Friday, March 10, 2006

That’s kind of like the ACLU giving people who believe in freedom of speech a D in the First Amendment.

Linn Armstrong
A National Rifle Association handgun instructor
Grand Valley Colorado
March 10, 2006
After the Brady Bunch gave Colorado a 'D' grade on "gun safety".

Joe Huffman  Friday, March 10, 2006 8:51:21 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Thursday, March 09, 2006

I got a call from a recruiter for one of the jobs I interviewed for this week.  She said both groups want me.  The company policy is that the two groups won't compete for me.  I have to choose which job I want and then that group will make me an offer.  "Most people would kill to be in your position" she said. 

One of my fellow contractor co-workers is all bubbly and just gushing over the situation vicariously.  She can't figure out why I'm not jumping up and down in excitement.  I'm not entirely sure why I'm not.  It's not really my personality type.  Although there have been events which got me pretty excited when my goals were realized (the audio of one is here the background is here).  And other thing is that I have to make a choice and disappoint someone.  Maybe it's not that big of a deal in the big scheme of things but it's important to me.  I told both groups I wanted the job, which is true, but I have to tell one of them that I want another group more than them.  I'm "rejecting someone".  That's not pleasant for me even though I know "the company" is not the same as a person and holds zero compassion toward individuals in the cases where the situation is reversed.  It's not really rational but it's the way it is.  Barb and I have talked about similar things before.  As we learned again with the bigots at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory we have too often given our employers more loyalty and more of ourselves than they deserve.  I expect this will happen, at least to a certain extent again here.  I'm hoping to stay here until I retire but I had similar plans at PNNL before I found out the depth of their bigotry extended to them being willing to commit felonies against me.  I have friends at this company and it will be easy to settle in and be at ease but I'll try not to give so much of myself that it will not be so incredibly painful if I have to move on for some reason.

Another issue is that I probably don't have the doubts some people do about whether they are "good enough".  I was pretty sure I had what it took.  I just needed a chance where people could overlook my age and my history with PNNL.  I'm climbing back up the ladder and getting in a position to deal with the bigots.  I have the drive, the smarts, and strength of will to deal with almost any obstacle put in my path.  Reaching this goal isn't a surprise to me.

So to sum up my late night ramblings I think the bottom line is that even though I'm not bubbling with happiness I'm content.  I wouldn't kill to be here because I knew wouldn't be necessary for me.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:58:19 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  | 

Be wary of strong drink.  It can make you shoot at tax collectors--and miss.

Lazarus Long
A character in Robert Henlien's book Time Enough for Love

Joe Huffman  Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:30:30 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Yesterday I arrived at 8:45 and left at 17:40.  Nearly nine hours interviewing for a new job.  I'm not sure how many people I talked to.  In my mind they merged into a blur of coding tests on the white-board.  "Write your own version of malloc() and free()."  "Implement a function that converts a ASCII string into a floating point number."  "Reverse the order of the words in a string.  Do it in place--without allocating more memory."  "Find the first unique character in a string."  "Write the test cases for your code."  "What is the big O of your solution?  Can you do it better?"  Those are just the ones I remember.  My right arm went weak from writing on the white-board for so many hours.  I remember the easiest question though.  "What gets you up in the morning?"  "My wife", I answered.

Update: I've been getting calls and email asking how it went.  It went well.  Only the smallest of glitches.  The 8.5 hours of interviews with eight different people today in a different group was generally easier except for one technical question that I severely crashed and burned on. 

And the toughest question yesterday?  "Show me a cure for spam email.  You have 45 minutes."

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:57:27 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 

Reno tells us that the weapon is totally safe, the finger was off the trigger.

I now know I'll never need a trigger lock if I just keep my finger off the trigger.

"Lee Enfield"
Regarding the raid the took Elian from his relatives and back in the hands of his Cuban father.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:46:34 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Tuesday, March 07, 2006

The Liberals are the flying saucers of politics. No one can make head nor tail of them and they never are seen twice in the same place.

John G. Diefenbaker

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, March 07, 2006 7:38:14 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Monday, March 06, 2006

They are pulling the plug on the gun and gun owner registry in Canada and the nationwide long gun registry (handguns have all been confiscated--except those owned by the criminals) in the UK can't get off the ground after ten years.  Details are here:

Dunblane gun crackdown 'a failure'

ALMOST a decade after the Dunblane massacre, ministers have been accused of an "abject failure" to crack down on the number of firearms in circulation. Tories have joined Labour MPs, gun-control campaigners and peers in condemning the government over the National Firearms Register, which was promised after Dunblane but will not be delivered for at least another year.

The need to establish a searchable, nationwide computer system to track those who hold firearms licences was established after Thomas Hamilton's murderous attack on Dunblane Primary School on March 13, 1996.

Several investigations, including the inquiry led by Lord Cullen, found disparities in the records of legally held firearms maintained by police forces across the country. Hamilton had legal certificates allowing him to own the guns.

Legislation paving the way for the register of certificates was rushed through Parliament during Tony Blair's first days in office in 1997, but the project has since become bogged down by a succession of technical problems.

The Home Office and police chiefs have since reversed the plan for a standalone firearms register, opting instead to link it to the Police National Computer. That will not happen until March 2007 at the earliest.

More details are here:

Pilots highlighted "data quality issues" which have yet to be ironed out, much to the anger of campaigners such as Dr Mick North, father of five-year-old victim Sophie.

Chief Constable Bernard Hogan-Howe told the Jonathan Dimbleby programme that there had been "great progress" in gun control but admitted that 10 years was "too long" for the register.

He said: "I understand that they've had two pilots and we're told that there are IT problems to actually resolving it, but I'm with Dr North in the sense that 10 years on, this is too long.

"We want it, there's certainly no resistance from the police service to have it and clearly what we do need is a register of all the people with a licence and we certainly need a register of those people who have applied for a licence and had it refused because the danger is they apply to one force, fail, and then re-apply to another."

The establishment of a searchable database of everyone who holds a firearms certificate, or who has ever applied for one, was one of the central demands of the campaign for greater gun control that followed the Dunblane massacre in 1996.

It was promised by Prime Minister Tony Blair to members of the Snowdrop Campaign, set up by victims' families to call for tighter gun controls.

About £5.5 million has so far been spent on setting up the register, which will be piloted once again in May.

"Great progress" in gun control?  They make that claim when the number of crimes committed with guns has skyrocketed?  Oh yeah, I forgot that's not how they measure progress.  They measure progress by how few people can legally own firearms, not how often guns are used criminally.  These people have mental problems.

Joe Huffman  Monday, March 06, 2006 8:43:25 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 

This delay is yet another example of Home Office inability to operate computer systems, and if they cannot get a relatively simple system for a firearms register like this to work so many years after such an awful disaster, what hope is there for the vast system needed to make identity cards work?

Alistair Carmichael
Orkney and Shetland MP
March 5, 2006
Dunblane gun crackdown 'a failure'
News.Scotsman.com
[There is no hope of a system of national identity cards working.  If you have doubts read this.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Monday, March 06, 2006 8:27:09 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Sunday, March 05, 2006

I should sooner live in a society governed by the first two thousand names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society governed by the two thousand faculty members of Harvard University.

William F. Buckley, Jr.
Literature
Rumbles

Joe Huffman  Sunday, March 05, 2006 4:30:11 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Saturday, March 04, 2006

We were recently treated to a bizarre exchange between a hapless Englishman and some BATchick in some front office in Washington. Our English friend was inquiring about bringing his arms into the United States, and was told that he could not import a Peacemaker (Colt Single-action Army) because it had no "legitimate sporting purpose!" Now, apart from the fact that "legitimate sporting purpose" is a blatantly unconstitutional interpretation of the Second Amendment, it is apparent that these poor souls who are confined to the District of Columbia cannot keep up with the times. Clearly the girl involved had not heard of the proliferation of "Cowboy Action Shooting." I stuck my oar in to tell her that this sort of bureaucratic behavior gives ignorance a bad name. I guess I can expect the black helicopters any night now.

 

Jeff Cooper
From Jeff Cooper's Commentaries
Vol. 5, No. 5
April 1997

Joe Huffman  Saturday, March 04, 2006 8:38:44 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Friday, March 03, 2006

I'm all for religious tolerance as long as they are also tolerant of others.  I'm intolerant of intolerance.  The Supreme Court of Canada just made an important ruling with an 8-0 victory for freedom and tolerance.  I think it's time for some Canadian gun owners to start a new religion to "push the envelope" just a little bit more for the cause of freedom.  Here are the details on the ruling:

For nearly five years, Gurbaj Singh has argued that he has a legal right under religious freedom to wear a ceremonial dagger to school.

The Supreme Court of Canada now agrees with him.

In a unanimous 8-0 decision yesterday, the top court sided with Singh, now 17, that a Montreal school board went too far in banning his wearing of a Sikh kirpan, stating that it is an infringement on religious freedom that "cannot be justified" under the Charter of Rights.

Joe Huffman  Friday, March 03, 2006 11:43:13 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

The Illinois State Rifle Association walloped the Brady Bunch, etc. yesterday in a news release:

The very foundations of the gun control movement were rocked today by the results of a survey taken by the National Association of Chiefs of Police (NACOP). In a nutshell, the survey shows that the nation's top law enforcement officers believe that average citizens can be trusted to responsibly own firearms; that criminals ignore gun control laws; and that concealed carry laws reduce crime.

These revelations come as a stark contrast to gun control movement propaganda that asserts that police officials feel that our streets would be safer if law-abiding citizens were disarmed.

Specifically, the survey revealed that 93 percent of chiefs and sheriffs felt that citizens should be able to purchase firearms for sport and self defense; 73 percent opposed so-called "one gun a month" laws; 96 percent believed that criminals ignore gun control laws and; 63 percent supported laws that allow citizens to carry defensive firearms as a means to control crime.

The complete survey can be found here.

Keep the pressure up.  We need to politically exterminate these bigots.

Joe Huffman  Friday, March 03, 2006 8:33:40 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

For them, a gun is a symbol of power and potency... The gun has replaced the spear as a phallic symbol.

Peter Mwaura
Nairobi
The Nation
Owning a Gun Sign of Power And Success
February 25, 2006
[I get rather annoyed at people that believe they can read the minds of others and invariably fail.  This guy is no exception.  In all likelihood it is Mwaura that has the mental problems.  Thanks to Jeff for the pointer.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Friday, March 03, 2006 8:23:55 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Thursday, March 02, 2006

By the time of the nation's tricentennial, there will be more government workers in the United States than there are workers.

Norman R. Augustine
From: "Defense Systems Management Review"

Joe Huffman  Thursday, March 02, 2006 8:02:29 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
 Wednesday, March 01, 2006

I have tears coming down my cheeks from laughing.  This is so funny to me.  A bunch of kids doing something dangerous--following the law.

People with Asperger get annoyed, angry even, with people who don't follow the rules.  To have other people get angry because someone else is following the law and inconveniencing the law breakers is just so sweet.

Thanks to Sean who sent it to me with the subject line "More hope for today's youth."

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:01:54 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 

Long story made short: There is a new version of Modern Ballistics available here.

Long story made long:  As many of you know I wrote the exterior ballistics program Modern Ballistics.  I had the free demo require a license to be updated once a month by contacting server which kept track of how many computers were using the demo.  The user interface to the server had a limit of 100 computers using any copy of the software at a time.  It turned out that more than 100 people were using the demo in a month and new users couldn't test out the software.  This happened just as I moved everything to a new computer and was in the middle of converting my code to use a new compiler.  I had deleted the old compiler off the old computer and I had no way to fix the problem people were having.  Last night (early this morning actually) I got the new build of the program tested.  To get things out quicker I just made the demo not require connecting to the server at all.  Then I had to update the installation process and test it.  Then I had to update the website.  I finished up about 0200 this morning.  Download the latest version here.

Let me know if you run into any bugs. The testing was rather "thin".  In particular I am concerned about it working on various operating systems.  I only tested it on Windows XP and XP-x64.  I have a Win98 and Win95 available at home but I'm not home now.  Send an email to bugs@modernballistics.com if you notice something broken.  Thanks.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, March 01, 2006 8:49:33 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 

I'm not praticularily surprised to see the average barking moonbat saying guns used in a murder are going to hell.  But when the leader of a nation says "they're evil" you have to wonder what kind of insanity has taken hold of an entire nation.  The story is here:

PRIME Minister John Howard tightened gun laws after the Port Arthur massacre because he did not want Australia going down the same path as the US, he said today.

Mr Howard, on the eve of his 10th anniversary in office, said today the nation's grief over the 1996 Port Arthur massacre had been a great opportunity to tighten Australia's gun laws.

"I would call that very definitely an extraordinary outpouring of amazement and grief in this country and I knew out of that there was an opportunity to grab the moment and think about a fundamental change to gun laws in this country," he told the Nine Network.

Mr Howard said he did not want Australia to adopt the American stance on guns.

"I did not want Australia to go down the American path," he said.

"There are some things about America I admire and there are some things I don't.

"And one of the things I don't admire about America is their ... slavish love of guns. They're evil."

And you, mister Prime Minister, are irrational.  Answer Just One Question.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:40:58 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

And one of the things I don't admire about America is their ... slavish love of guns. They're evil.

John Howard
Prime Minister of Australia
March 01, 2006
The Australian

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:12:07 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
 Tuesday, February 28, 2006

A free press can of course be good or bad, but, most certainly, without freedom it will never be anything but bad.... Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better, whereas enslavement is a certainty of the worse.

Albert Camus

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, February 28, 2006 11:49:46 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |