Friday, January 06, 2006

Mr. Completely and Jerry the Geek have both made positive comments about Boomershoot 2006.

Thanks guys. 

Jerry, as he points out, provided some memorable tips for Boomershooting back in '99 which I am quite fond of.  I get comments on those hints every once in a while.

I really should go have dinner with Mr. Completely--I was invited two months ago and never got around to it.

Update: Doing a little searching I came up with a bunch more posts.  Some of which I had seen and forgot about in my early morning (I tend to agree with my daughter Kim who says, "Afternoon IS early") haze.  I cut off the list of posts at January 1, 2006.

Joe Huffman  Friday, January 06, 2006 6:23:29 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  | 

Via Michelle Malkin comes this story in the Washington Times:

PARIS -- A gang of more than 20 youths -- thought to be North African immigrants -- terrorized hundreds of train passengers in a rampage of violence, robbery and sexual assault on New Year's Day, French officials said yesterday.
    The five-hour-long criminal frenzy was "totally unacceptable," French President Jacques Chirac told reporters. "Those guilty will be found and punished, as they deserve."
    The gang of between 20 and 30 youths boarded the train, heading from Nice on the French Riviera to Lyon, in eastern France, early on Jan. 1, as it carried 600 passengers home from New Year's Eve partying overnight.
    Once inside, they went wild, forcing passengers to hand over mobile phones and wallets, and slashing seats and breaking windows.
    A 20-year-old woman cornered by several of the marauders was sexually molested.
    "It was a real scene of pillage on the train," said the regional state prosecutor, Dominique Luigi, adding that the passengers were in a state of "panic."

I'm reminded of Hamilton's quote about a target rich environment--both on that train and any place anti-gun French politicians congregate.

Joe Huffman  Friday, January 06, 2006 5:57:50 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

The Seattle Times just announced their web statistics for the stories of 2005.  One story in 2005 was probably the most popular story EVER.  Danny Westneat explains:

By tallying clicks on our Web site, we now chart the most read stories in the online edition of The Seattle Times. Software then sorts the tens of thousands of stories for 2005 and ranks them. Not by importance, impact or poetic lyricism, but by which stories compelled the most people to put finger to mouse, click, open and, presumably, read.

Which brings me back to sex with horses. The story last summer about the man who died from a perforated colon while having sex with a horse in Enumclaw was by far the year's most read article.

What's more, four more of the year's 20 most clicked-upon local news stories were about the same horse-sex incident. We don't publish our Web-traffic numbers, but take it from me — the total readership on these stories was huge.

So much so, a case can be made that the articles on horse sex are the most widely read material this paper has published in its 109-year history.

Even though sex is one of my hobbies I didn't have an interest in this story.  It wasn't until today that I actually read the story.  I'd heard about it of course but it was one of those stories that made me uncomfortable.  The mental images were disturbing for me and I didn't want to know any more details.  I categorized it as a Darwin Award incident and forgot about it.  The rest of you that made this story so popular; I think you need to get your own sex life--this vicarious stuff is more than just a little weird.

Sex
Joe Huffman  Friday, January 06, 2006 5:30:53 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

In some areas of the country showing someone your middle finger is the universal hand signal for "shoot me".  If you are carrying a gun and give such a hand signal you likely to be held at fault if the shooting does start. If you choose to carry, you will be held to a higher standard of behavior than those that don't.

Greg Hamilton
Self Defense Instructor
Nov. 19, 1995

Joe Huffman  Friday, January 06, 2006 5:12:39 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Thursday, January 05, 2006

Okay, I just remembered another case where guns and sex mixed fairly well.  It's this joke:

Back in the good ole days in Texas, when stagecoaches and the like was popular, there were three people in a stagecoach one day:  a true red-blooded born-and-raised Texas gentleman, a tenderfoot city-slicker from back East, and a beautiful and well-endowed Texas lady.  The city- slicker kept eyeing the lady, and finally he leaned forward and said, "Lady, I'll give you $10 for a blow job."  The Texas gentleman looked appalled, pulled out his pistol, and killed the city-slicker on the spot.  The lady gasped and said, "Thank you, suh, for defendin' mah honor!"  Whereupon the Texan holstered his gun and said, "Your honor, hell!!  No tenderfoot is gonna raise the price of women in Texas!!"

Sex
Joe Huffman  Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:19:16 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

There is a sex toy store in Seattle that has a clever name, "Toys in Babeland".  They have an online presence too.  I had heard people talk about the store and figured it must be something pretty special.  I have visited a couple times now, the most recent must have been a couple years or so ago.  Barb and I were disappointed.  It had a very poor selection.  Their online store is much better and I subscribe to their email list which is kind of cool.  I just got a mailing from them today, visited their website, and thought I would share a few things:

It's extremely rare that I find occasion to legitimately mix sex with guns.  I don't care to see scantily clad or naked women (or men) with guns as some people do.  Guns and sex are just two completely different aspects of my life and I don't generally see activities with one as being connected in any way to the other.  However, this is one occasion where I can see the benefit of a connection between the two.  You see, an added benefit of getting the Pocket Rocket name out there as a vibrator is that it makes it all the easier to make fun of the anti-gun governor of Illinois Rod Blagojevich who refers to small handguns as "pocket rockets".

Joe Huffman  Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:06:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 

I've never been to a Hooters but I think it's time I visited.  This is why:

Jason had a visit from...The Hooter's girls (four) who delivered a calendar filled with pictures of girls and their bikinis. The calendar was signed by many of the models. Jason was impressed that the months were not in order. I was impressed that he noticed the months were not in order.

Jason is our nephew who was in Iraq and is now recuperating at Walter Reed.

Thanks Hooters girls for supporting our troops.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:48:52 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

One of the hazards of being a scientist is allowing your personal biases enter into your work.  It is exceedingly easy for people to believe what they want to believe.  This can take many forms.  It can be rejecting data that does not fit your conclusion.  It can be using subjective measurements of your data (particularly easy when assessing mental conditions--"Are you happy today?").  One of the most common is forgetting/overlooking that correlation does not mean causation.  Just because birds fly north (in the northern hemisphere) before summer does not mean birds flying north caused summer weather.  Just because a most people die in hospitals does not mean hospitals cause most deaths.  And just because guns are present in "unstable" countries or cities does not mean guns caused the instability.  This is the mistake "expert" Wendy Cukier makes here:

Scholars fight arms flow, violent culture
Toronto has its work cut out, halting the gun run from the U.S., which owns one-third of the world's 700 million guns
Jan. 3, 2006. 05:42 PM
OLIVIA WARD
STAFF REPORTER

Canada needs tough gun control laws, says a Toronto expert, but lawmakers are up against a global arms "epidemic" that has circulated millions of weapons around the world, destabilizing countries and undermining cities.

And, says Wendy Cukier, professor of justice studies at Ryerson University, the latest Toronto police figures — obtained through a Freedom of Information request — show that 52 per cent of handguns seized as "potential crime weapons" in 2004 came from the United States.

"The majority of those guns come from over the border," she says. "And the ones that are reported as legally registered in Canada may also be manufactured in the U.S."

Now, it's possible that Cukier view of a "stable" city or country is a iron fisted police state but I'll give her the benefit of the doubt on that.  In areas of high crime or oppressive governments the people act in their own self interest and obtain weapons to defend themselves.  The guns didn't cause the crime rate or the oppressive government.

Cukier became involved in the ant-gun movement after several women were killed by a woman-hating Muslim extremist using a rifle in Montreal 1989.  I suspect it was psychologically difficult for her to lay the blame where it really belonged--on a minority extremist.  It was far more politically correct to blame the availability of the rifle.  Once she took that step and pursued that path for several years it was even more difficult to back down from that position.  She would have to admit she was wrong for all those years.  That is an extremely difficult thing to do.  This has been known and studied for decades.  From this research we also know what comes when irrefutable proof for the error occurs--more proselytizing of her mistaken belief.  It is psychologically easier for her to find more converts to her belief system, hence giving her psychological support, than it is to admit she was wrong.  Read When Prophecy Fails--Cukier could be a case study.  And given her first hand experience with it perhaps that should be the field where she is considered a scholar and an expert.  She's not an expert on guns or cause and effect.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, January 05, 2006 11:02:11 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

There is no "scourge of illegal guns" in New York City.

Being a police officer is inherently dangerous, and it is wrong to pretend that infringing on the constitutional rights of citizens will eliminate all the dangers associated with the job.

This is nothing more than a disgraceful attempt by Bloomberg to use the tragic deaths of two police officers to advance his irrational political agenda.

If he really wants to help the city, he can start by ending the scourge of eminent-domain abuse.


James Harlacher
Brooklyn
New York Post January 4, 2006

Joe Huffman  Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:55:34 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Wednesday, January 04, 2006

I placed a some ads for Boomershoot 2006 on a few blogs.  With the event already almost half full I expect it will fill up by sometime in March.  Sign up soon if you want to participate.  Here is the list of blogs I'm advertising on in no particular order:

http://www.saysuncle.com/
http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/
http://gullyborg.typepad.com/
http://www.claytoncramer.com/gundefenseblog/blogger.html
http://countertop-chronicles.blogspot.com/

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:25:34 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

I received a request for a license for Modern Ballistics to be used on a computer in the U.K. that wasn't connected to the Internet.  Because the license mechanism includes information such as the processor type and the number of processors I can't just generate a license and send it to someone.  Since the guy is a private citizen and living in the beginnings of a police state I gave him a version of the program that doesn't require a connection to the net.  Furthermore I pointed him to this post about giving free entry to Boomershoot 2006 to British subjects which lead him to my Jews In The Attic Test.  He responded with:

Joe, Thank you for that. Love the Boomershoot. I'll start applying the Jews in the Attic test. Might have some effect on those over here who can't see the danger of more government controls.

Like I have said before, it's better to stop this sort of danger to humanity in someone else's country before it reaches ours.  I wish him and his fellow subjects all the luck in the world and if there is anything I can do to help them in their fight I'm honored to provide the assistance.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:03:50 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

Former Washington D.C. mayor Marion Barry was robbed at gun point in his home--where guns are banned.  Alan Gottlieb has the appropriate response in this same article, but Barry is insane.  How can he push for tougher gun control laws when guns are already completely banned?

"It's time, to tell anti-gun city leaders like Barry that 'we've tried it your way, and it was a disaster; now let's try it a different way.' It is time for citizens in Washington, D.C. to once again be secure in their homes and businesses, and the only way to accomplish that is to make it possible for them to fight back," Gottlieb said.

"If the gun ban had worked, Marion Barry would still have his wallet," Gottlieb concluded.

Barry has vowed not to move from his home in Southeast Washington's Ward Eight, which he represents in the city council. Instead, he said he'll push for tougher gun control laws, the Associated Press reports.

Barry should read When Prophecy Fails--it describes his mental difficulties.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:49:24 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

If it weren't for the obvious and justified distress these people are in I would just roll my eyes at their insanity:

SOUTH PORTLAND, Me. - Kelly DeCambra made her way through a seven-inches-an-hour snowstorm to a dingy Maine State Police garage where, among the brake parts, transmissions and a flat-bed tow truck, she hoped to find a fragment of solace.

It would come in the form of a Ruger .44 Magnum Super Blackhawk revolver, caked with blood and the memory of Ms. DeCambra's son, 21-year-old Lionel St. Hilaire, who was shot to death with it last year.

The mother had come to watch the gun that was used to kill her son be sawed into pieces in an acrid plume of white-hot sparks.

Ms. DeCambra's act of witness was made possible by a law Maine enacted in 2001 that requires handguns used in homicides to be destroyed when they are no longer needed for evidence. Before that, guns were often sold or auctioned by police departments to raise money for other equipment.

...

Maine's law came about because of Debbie O'Brien, a Kennebunk woman whose 20-year-old son, Devin, was shot to death in 1996. When she learned that the state police would probably sell the gun used to kill her son, Ms. O'Brien said her reaction was, "Oh, my God, the police are here to help you and the next thing you know they're turning around and selling a gun, making money off my dead son."

Ms. O'Brien lobbied for the proposed law, saying that she told the state police, "Look, if you need money, let's do bake sales."

"You're in hell," she said. "You're just struggling to have a life, and then I realized that would include the gun."

William Harwood, a gun control advocate in Maine, and Robert M. Schwartz, executive director of the Maine Chiefs of Police Association, said the original proposal was for all crime guns to be destroyed. But because of the state's strong hunting lobby, they said, the final law included only handguns used in homicides.

"To be candid," Mr. Harwood said, "the legislation had as much symbolic importance as it does deterrence."

But the symbolism is powerful, said Ms. O'Brien, who watched the .22-caliber handgun used to kill her son be cut up six years after his death.

"It was just a very important day for my husband and I," she said. "This was a weapon that changed our lives."

Yes, their thinking is distorted by the grief they are experiencing but to think that a gun would go to Hell because it was used in a homicide (note, not necessarily a murder) assumes not only that there is a hell, but the gun has a soul, and it was the active agent in the homicide.  You don't hear about people wanting cars, baseball bats, and kitchen knives used in homicides being destroyed where one would assume there is a similar amount of grief.  I think I see why this is important to them.  As Harwood, above says, this is about symbolism.  It's about the demonization of firearms.  It's about attributing motives and evil to a piece of metal as does O'Brien when she says, "This is a weapon that changed our lives."  These people need grief counseling not laws that take money away from the police.

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:35:50 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  | 

You're in hell. You're just struggling to have a life, and then I realized that would include the gun.

Debbie O'Brien
Seeing Crime Guns Destroyed Gives Solace to Victims' Families
January 4, 2006
New York Times
[Odd, isn't it, that this seems appropriate to  some people?  Would cars involved in fatalities invoke a similar reaction?--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:05:38 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Tuesday, January 03, 2006

PSR believes that the only way to lower the number of unnecessary gun deaths is to get guns out of the home. Due to the combination of a fear of violent crime and the mistaken impression that guns offer a measure of security, more and more people choose to own guns. In order to stop the perpetuation of the myth that guns in the home offer protection, PSR is waging a campaign to educate the public about the true dangers caused by guns in the home.

 http://www.psr.org/home.htm (as of 11/13/98)

Physicians for Social Responsibility
1101 14th Street Northwest, Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 898-0150 Fax: (202) 898-0172
mailto:psrnatl@psr.org
[For those people that claim, "No one is trying to take your guns away."--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:39:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Monday, January 02, 2006

9-1-1 ain't 1911.

Ken Grubb
December 29, 2005 10:09 AM
WA-CCW email list
[1911 is a model of pistol particularly well suited to self-defense.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Monday, January 02, 2006 3:11:23 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Sunday, January 01, 2006

Dale put up a picture of a pretty woman wearing a "Celebrate Diversity" t-shirt on his blog and the moonbats started barking at it.  Amazing.

Joe Huffman  Sunday, January 01, 2006 2:25:49 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  | 

Our friend the Count Randaccio-Lodi informs us that this business of "politically correct" communication has begun to affect the Italian language too. The Italian word for such talk is sinistrese, indicating its origin on the political left.

"Certain words are replaced by others giving a bad thing a nice sounding appearance (like gay for sodomite or progressive for communist). Trouble is that this game never ends since sooner or later the meaning catches up with the sound and a new word must be issued."

I know this curious affliction still afflicts the English-speaking world, despite its obvious foolishness, but I had not thought it had gone abroad just yet. We do not hear of it in German or French, but I suppose the time will come. 
   
Jeff Cooper
From Jeff Cooper's Commentaries
Vol. 4, No. 16
December 1996
[This is not something that originated in the U.S.  It's possible it has been around since humans had words.  I do know that I guy I know who came from Russia in the mid-'90s talked about his grandfather living under Stalin and they used the exact same phrase, "political correct speech", during that time.  I really don't have problem with it general as long as it doesn't end up being a crime of some sort, which it has in this country, to use the derogatory version.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Sunday, January 01, 2006 2:06:35 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
 Saturday, December 31, 2005

You would probably guess Georgia, Mississippi, or West Virginia, but this is from Utah:

SALT LAKE CITY The Utah Court of Appeals is upholding a judge's refusal to dismiss a sexual abuse allegation against a 13-year-old Ogden girl who became pregnant by her 12-year-old boyfriend.

The appeals court on Friday ruled that the law's "rigorous protections'' for younger minors include protecting them from each other.

The decision leaves the teens in the position of each being both a victim and a perpetrator in the same offense.

"The Legislature certainly may act to protect the health and safety of children, and may more vigorously protect those of more tender years,'' Judge Gregory Orme wrote for a three-member panel of the court, which made its decision "with some reluctance.''

The girl's Ogden attorneys, Randall Richards and Dee Smith, are considering an appeal to the Utah Supreme Court.

Richards pointed out that Utah law says minors under age 14 do not have the ability to consent to sexual activity.

"It's a paradox,'' he said. "How can they be old enough to commit an offense if they're not old enough to consent to it?''

...

Juveniles who are 14 or 15 and have sex with peers can be charged with unlawful conduct with a minor but the law provides for mitigation when the age difference is less than four years, making the offense a misdemeanor.

Sex
Joe Huffman  Saturday, December 31, 2005 6:17:48 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

What men call social virtues, good fellowship, is commonly but the virtue of pigs in a litter, which lie close together to keep each other warm.

Henry David Thoreau
(1817-62), U.S. philosopher, author, naturalist.
Journal entry, 23 Oct. 1852.

Joe Huffman  Saturday, December 31, 2005 3:04:21 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Friday, December 30, 2005

From CBC News on the Canadian gun registry program:
1995
Bill C-68, the strictest gun control legislation in Canadian history, receives Senate approval. It calls for harsher penalties for crimes involving the use of guns, creates the Firearms Act and also requires gun owners to be licensed and registered. At the time, the government says the registry would cost about $119 million, but the revenue generated by registration fees would mean taxpayers would only be on the hook for $2 million.

...

Feb. 13, 2004
Documents obtained by Zone Libre of CBC's French news service suggest that the gun registry has cost $2 billion so far.

May 20, 2004
The Liberal government, just days before an expected election call, eliminates fees for registering and transferring firearms. Ottawa will also limit its spending on the gun registry to $25 million a year, spending which has averaged $33 million a year and reached as high as $48 million. Licensing of gun owners and firearms will continue.

June 2005
In the 2004 Report of the Commissioner of Firearms on the administration of the Firearms Act, the Canada Firearms Centre estimates that the cost of running the registry for the year ending Dec. 31, 2004 was less than $100 million. The report says costs are continuing their downward trend and should fall to approximately $85 million beginning in fiscal 2005-2006.

You don't need an accounting or psychology degree to figure out these anti-gun people have mental problems.  Estimated to cost $2 million and it then comes in at 1000 times more at $2 BILLION.  The Liberal government says spending on the gun registry has never been more than $48 million per year.  This is AFTER it has been revealed in the previous nine years they have spent $2 billion--meaning that on the average they have spent over $222 million per year.

With that $2 billion they could have funded 1000 more cops or better yet it could have purchased guns and training for 2 million at risk people--such as the 14 women who were killed in Montreal in 1989 when they didn't have gun to defend themselves with and woman hating Muslim extremist Gamil Gharbi started shooting them.  It was that incident that initiated the push for the gun registry.  Instead of taking the appropriate, time proven, path of providing a means for people to defend themselves they let their bigotry and mental disorders cloud their thinking.  At last report the gun registry, at a cost of $2 billion, has only been credited with solving one crime.  So what do the Liberals conclude is the correct answer?  Why of course!  It's more gun control.  There is no need to have them answer Just One Question.  All you need is a body temperature I.Q. to come to the correct conclusion on these mental defects called Liberals.
Joe Huffman  Friday, December 30, 2005 9:46:06 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

"We're from the government & we're here to help you". If you ever hear those words I hope you've already started your draw.

Publicola
http://publicola.mu.nu/archives/2005/12/10/another_case_of_government_internment_camps.html
[While succinct and insightful in the literal sense I must disagree.  If they are at your door when you start your draw you started far too late.  See Why Boomershoot for a more practical approach.  At an absolute minimum you should engage from a block away.  Preferable would be a different neighborhood, city, or state.  And if possible a different country--which is part of why I support the war against the Islamic extremists.--Joe]

Joe Huffman  Friday, December 30, 2005 5:53:20 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Thursday, December 29, 2005

Tell me again why we didn't open the ANWR for more oil production.  Here is a important clue as to why we should:

PICTURE the families shivering in apartments without heating, factories grinding to a halt, frozen water pipes bursting in the depths of winter. Welcome to the new Cold War.

At 10am on Sunday, Russia is threatening to unleash the most powerful weapon in its post-Soviet arsenal: unless Ukraine agrees to a fourfold increase in the price it pays for gas, Russia will simply turn off the tap.

Nor is it just Ukraine under threat — the EU imports about half of its gas from Russia and 80 per cent of that comes through Ukrainian pipelines.

So when President Putin met Ivan Plachkov, the Ukrainian Energy Minister, in Moscow yesterday, there was more at stake than relations between the neighbouring states. Analysts fear the dispute could provide a foretaste of how Russia will use its massive oil and gas reserves as a foreign policy tool in future disputes with the West.

“Energy co-operation has replaced military might as the mainstay of Russia’s international credibility,” Chris Weafer, chief strategist at Alfa Bank in Moscow, said. “It is using its importance as an energy partner to pursue its geopolitical and foreign policy agenda.”

Joe Huffman  Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:32:17 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

Radio Frequency ID--the chips they put in pets for identifcation (and some people want to put them in people) are everywhere.  They used for inventory control, shoplifting detection, and ID cards.  Here is how to make your own wallet that will block the remote reading of the devices in your pocket.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:26:17 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

They should have taken care of this guy decades ago.  Apparently he was overlooked.  I'm of the opinion they should give serious consideration to correcting the oversight.  In any case that he is outraged is not something anyone should loose any sleep over:

The Palestinian mastermind of the Munich Olympics terrorist attack, which killed 11 Israeli athletes, says he is outraged at not being consulted for the Steven Spielberg thriller Munich. 

He also accused the director of pandering to the Jewish state and said the new film about the incident would not deliver reconciliation.

Mohammed Daoud planned the Munich attack on behalf of PLO splinter group Black September, but did not take part in, and does not feature in, the film.

...

"We did not target Israeli civilians," he said.

"Some of them [the athletes] had taken part in wars and killed many Palestinians. Whether a pianist or an athlete, any Israeli is a soldier."

They use the same sort of logic when they kill Israeli children--they would have grown up to be Israeli soldiers.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:01:15 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

From Alberta Canada:

RCMP in Alberta have admitted they made a mistake in failing to respond to a 911 call made by a woman who was later found murdered in her home.

Brenda Moreside, 44, was found stabbed to death last February in her home in High Prairie, Alta., nearly 300 kilometres northwest of Edmonton.

The night she was killed, she called 911, complaining that her common-law husband was drunk and trying to break into her house.

She was told by police that they couldn't come because the man was breaking into his own residence and damaging his own property. Moreside was found dead in the doorway of her home 12 days later.

"The lack of attendance in this particular case was clearly an error," Supt. Marty Cheliak told a news conference in Edmonton Thursday.

Technically, she could have had a gun.  The problem is that the Canadian government has made it difficult, complicated, and time consuming.  "Just dial 911! It's the government's job to take care of your needs."  It is possible that there was a gun in the house and he knew she didn't have a clue as to how to use it.  Which is the reason my kids all took the NRA Personal Protection class.  If you really need to use a gun you need to use it NOW! So, the husband knew it was very unlikely she had a gun or that she didn't know how to use any gun that might have been present.

In any case this Neanderthal knew he could break in and kill her without concern of having his attitude forcibly adjusted by small pieces of metal traversing his brain at Mach 2.5--which reminds me of a Greg Hamilton quote.

Joe Huffman  Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:45:33 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |